Imgflip Logo Icon

Change My Mind

Change My Mind Meme | LEAKING THE DRAFT OF 
THE SUPREME COURT
DECISION IS A MORE SERIOUS 
BREACH THAN JAN 6 | image tagged in memes,change my mind | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,605 views 91 upvotes Made by CallMeLuvie 2 years ago in politics
Change My Mind memeCaption this Meme
36 Comments
13 ups, 2y
Donald Trump | Time to impeach a liberal Justice in 2023 | image tagged in donald trump | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
12 ups, 2y,
1 reply
It wasn't leaked, it was planned. Had to give the printers and the rent-a-mob proper lead times.
7 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Pete Buttigieg in hospital bed with baby | EXCEPT THIS TIME AROUND FOR THE RE-HASHED ABORTION DEBATE SINCE "MEN" CAN HAVE BABIES NOW, MEN GET TO THROW IN THEIR OPINION NOW. SUCK IT, L | image tagged in pete buttigieg in hospital bed with baby | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Not to mention Roe was set by a bunch of men and therefore it should be negated with the argument that men don’t have an opinion on abortion
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Cool then let all the women in the country vote on it.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Sorry, but sadly women don’t exist anymore and as a result they can’t.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
OK- those with uteri
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Sorry, but as someone with testicles that identify as a uterus I find that quite offensive.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Sorry snowflake
1 up, 2y
Oh, man! I’m gonna call Mark Zuckerburg on you!
9 ups, 2y,
1 reply
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
3 ups, 2y
8 ups, 2y
Yep. Courts are really anal about things like this, sealed records, and whatnot.
7 ups, 2y
all offense and gnashing teeth.

we should demand all "insurrectionist muppets" and the newly birthed "leaked SCOTUS muppets" fight to death in a cage match.
with weapons.
and have it televised
pay per view.

i'd watch it..
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
0 ups, 2y
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
I don’t think I’m understanding things here; wasn’t overturning Roe v. Wade a bad thing? RBG has to spinning in her grave right now
5 ups, 2y,
2 replies
"I don’t think I’m understanding things here; wasn’t overturning Roe v. Wade a bad thing?"

How a person feels about a ruling that would overturn Roe v. Wade to be either bad or good depends on your feelings about abortion in combination with your political views.

But that's not the issue. It's the leak that's the issue.

As for poor 'Notorious RBG', she's probably been spinning ever since it was Trump who got to name her replacement to the SCOTUS.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Still don't think I'm understanding this. If it was a draft, a similar thing would have been published in the near future anyway?
7 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Being a draft, it is still subject to changes. It was leaked in order to rile up the base, and perhaps the arsonists, in order to attempt to sway the final product. If Roberts allows any of their criminal antics to sway the final version, then the Supreme Court is dead as the Third Branch of our Republic.
4 ups, 2y
Oh I see I see. Use "publuc opinion" (if you even call arson and riots that) to try to sway the votes and the final opinion. Truly disgusting and immoral then.... on top of the breach of protocol.
0 ups, 2y
My opinion against abortion aren’t gonna change a woman’s mind if she decides to get an abortion so why bother asking for my opinion anyway?
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y
There's the abortion side of the argument and there's the Constitutional side. Roe v Wade was an unconstitutional ruling by the Court and should have been overturned decades ago.

Simply put the Supreme Court does not have the authority or right to make law. The Constitution is very clear on that. Only those who represent the people are allowed to make law. It is the job of Legislative Branch. Not the Judicial and not the Executive Branches.

In addition SCOTUS in Roe v Wade claimed they found a right to privacy (that doesn't exist in the Constitution) and then after twisting that out they twisted it even harder to say that the right to privacy allows women to murder their unborn children. If that's the case then all murder is a privacy issue. It would mean you can take any human life as long and you do it privately.

Not to mention it completely ignores the 3 basic and fundamental inalienable rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, that of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Also reiterated in Section I of the 14th Amendment as Life, Liberty and Property.

There is no right to take human life under any circumstances. There never has been.

But this is what happens when you put leftist judges on the Supreme Court, who although they had to study constitutional law, they despise the constitution and usurp authority that they do not have.

Overturning Roe is a good thing, not a bad thing.
2 ups, 2y
the Left's goal is to have lawmakers with lifetime appointments, so by trying to scare traditional Democrat voters into thinking the eventual move to pack the court will seem "justified".
0 ups, 2y
“Russia, if you’re listening….”
1 up, 2y
And both were done by conservatives.

Also, the Supreme Court thinks it has a right to privacy but you don't.

Let that sink in.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
People exposing any court record that has not been released through the normal channels has committed a crime. Courts are pretty secretive about documents - when they find the law clerk who leaked it - expect them to be disbarred for starters, and criminal charges filed.

It doesn't matter what was in the document, the fact that it was released against the will of the court is a violation.

The court has a responsibility to handle cases brought before it. That particular draft is from February, and contains ONLY the opinions of the conservative justices - it's possible that it has been replaced, or has been discarded entirely in favor of a newer draft with different conclusions. That it's 3 months old and incomplete should give you an idea that something isn't right.
0 ups, 2y
As the Whistleblower protection act covers all federal employees and the Supreme Court exists as a federal entity, I’m not entirely sure there is any validity to stating that this is a crime even from the perspective of the Chief Justice.

It seems reasonable that since the Supreme Court is prepared to violate the public trust in a decision that will effect hundreds of millions of US citizens, that despite the unprecedented nature of the leak it could be argued to be justified.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
What about Snowden? Assange? Wikileaks?

Careful…..emails. Remember the emails.
0 ups, 2y
What about them?
1 up, 2y
It's not hard to be more serious than police holding the doors open for people to enter the capitol building...
Change My Mind memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
LEAKING THE DRAFT OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IS A MORE SERIOUS BREACH THAN JAN 6