I can think what? I expressed multiple points, not that you'd realize it.
Not saying what isn't true? I expressed multiple points, not that you'd realize it.
And you can pretend to laugh at the concept of a lib bubble, but I know they exist. I guarantee you that they exist. It's 100% that they exist. How do I know? Because I live in one! But as a lib, you could be living deep in the heart of one and not realize it. It takes some self awareness, cheesy, which is why I'm skeptical of your objectivity on that point.
If you're asking me if dumocrat support for the Nazi Platner came before they knew about the Nazi tattoo, then I'd say it doesn't matter. I know you didn't follow that, so please allow me to explain. If the dumocrats support him after they know about him having a Nazi tattoo near his heart (and with tattoos, location matters), which they do, then they'd have supported him before, regardless. Dumocrats are consistent in that way.
At least you're fully willing to admit that facts in support of a viewpoint are irrelevant to you and by extension probably a lot of dumocrats. I always knew it, but to see you put it in writing is mildly satisfying.
I only bring up demorrhoids and Taxifornia when they are relevant to the conversation. The fact that how I brought them up in this case flew right over your head, is not surprising in the least. You are a consistent fellow, that's for certain.
Consistency aside, as I said, you're clearly not a serious person. Not on this issue, nor anything else I've seen you attempt to discuss here on the mighty imgflip. If you were, you'd have something of substance to say, instead of resorting to your usual gibbering about me.
If I thought you actually cared about hypocrisy... well, I haven't seen evidence that you do. But see a chance to throw perceived hypocrisy at a conservative? The left is all over it. Hypocrisy much?
What logic are you attempting to use? While the two examples are superficially similar, that's where it ends, imo. Because if you're saying it's the same thing for a non-Muslim woman to wear a hijab while living in a Muslim country, as it is for a non-Muslim woman to wear a hijab while speaking at a political rally in her own country, then your argument is fairly weak, imo. The two things are not the same
So, as much as you would clearly like them to be, so you can justify throwing your opinion in vBackman's face that you believe her to be a hypocrite, they're just not the same. Besides, vBackman is a lot of wonderful things and maybe some bad that I don't know about, but I seriously doubt that she's a hypocrite. I've seen zero evidence of that.
As per usual, you are wrong. Not just wrong, but wrong in a way that shows how ill-informed (which is the dictionary definition of ignorance) you truly are about my views and about Muslim govts around the world.
For you to utterly dismiss the FACT that Islam fundamentally believes homosexuality is a sin, which absolutely has resulted in Muslim govts killing gays, lesbians, etc., or nearly as bad turning a blind eye when it happens, and to do so by way of some glib, ignorant comment about the IDF, just shows that you're not a serious person. And that doesn't even cover how disrespectful your comment is to homosexuals, but to Jews and Israel as well. But the left is so firmly antisemitic now. So I understand your motive, but not your tactic.
I know you won't care to remember, because you have proven that you not only have TDS, but FADS (Fat Elvis Derangement Syndrome... yes modda, your affliction with lying about me goes way back to when I used Fat Elvis for my login) So, I'll simplify my position for you. I support equal rights for everyone, period. Sexual orientation is irrelevant. And on this issue, not that facts matter to you, I walked the walk by voting against prop 8 here in Taxifornia. So I'm not like the grifters, hypocrites, and lying libtards on the left who have to shove everyone into some twisted ideological box before they can figure out what their view is... this time.
If you want to know where I stand on any issue, just pretend, if even for a moment, that you can look at the issue through the lens of freedom. I know, hard for a leftist to do.
When it comes to socialists, dumocrats and and their insane spending, I always think that if waste, fraud, and abuse weren't baked into govt spending, maybe we would have enough money to spend on some of their pie in the sky ideas. Maybe.
But they never want fiscal responsibility, because they're too dumb to realize there's plenty of money for govt if it was spent responsibly. They're just too dumb to pick up on the fact that we are taxed so insanely and heavily, that we the people can't fund them any more. They need to realize that fiscal responsibility is the best way for them to actually have *more* money to spend.
Also, they seem to think that once they start sucking all the money from those who actually earn it, that it's a never ending tap. As a group, along with their buds the dumocrats, they lack the ability to look a few years down the road to when all the high earners have left for saner states. Hell, Mamdani is already out of money.
