What Shirley "uncovered" was already known about. That's why there had already been arrests. There had already been grand jury indictments.

In fact, the first investigations launched waaay back during 2019 and 2020. You can read more about it here: https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/06/timeline-of-fraud-investigations-that-shaped-walz-tenure

The ringleader had already been to trial. She was sentenced not long after Shirley "uncovered the fraud." Shirely didn't uncover anything. You just learned about it because the right wing machine decided to amplify in an attempt to bolster their chances against Walz in this most recent election.

The America you "remember" would have reported the fraud. Yes. The journalists back then wouldn't have put Somali in front of everything, especially because the ringleader is a white woman. Because the news you watched back in the day wasn't out to control you, to tell you who to be afraid of, and more importantly, tell you who to vote for.

Oh, and I don't live in my mother's house. I have my own. In Frisco, TX.

Weird thing to say as the descendant of immigrants in a nation of immigrants.

Unless you're a racist and then it's not so weird at all.

Oh, do you mean the guy who had a Youtube Prank channel that would disrupt other people's weddings because it was "a prank" then disappeared for 2 years then came back to produce political content? Like the ones where he paid Day Laborers he recruited at a Home Depot to hold Pro Immigration signs in front of the White House?

that guy?

The guy who actively praised the unConstitutional actions of the Trump adminstration when they deported people without a fair trial (you know, the one demanded by the Constitution where they have to be proven guilty).

That guy?

Are you sure you want to be getting your "facts" from that guy?

Did you hear that from Trump? Because most people heard that from Trump in one of his press conferences.

He's a well documented liar. Why do you choose to believe him about anything?

Welfare, huh?

What kind? Because it's not an umbrella program that gives a household every service.

Are 81% of them households with children? Because children under the age of 17 get free health insurance through the state. Yeah, MNSure covers every kid in the state.

Are those households ones with kids?

Because that would be considered a welfare program.

If they have kids, then those kids go to school. And every kid in Minnesota gets free breakfast and lunch.

That's a welfare program.