Your math don't math. California is a donor state- meaning it puts more into the federal system than it receives.
So... the math don't math.
And the "likely happening" is you just making shit up. If the state administers the funds, how can a blue city have more power over the direction of those state administered funds than the state?
Do you see how what you're claiming doesn't make any sense when you take a moment to think about it?
Oh, so it's not everywhere. It's not the federal government paying for it. It's one state exercising it's what? State's Rights. Exercising their States Rights to enact a program.
Is that what you're claiming?
Or are you claiming that this program isolated to California is actually a federal program that siphons so much money that we can't have healthcare in every other state in the union?