White Privilege

The answer to the question.... The judge in Rittenhouse case is a Democrat. Judge in Simpkins case? A Republican.

No - we aren't. We are questioning why a black kid can do that and have a slap on the wrist bail/bond - but a white kid who was carrying and such - got much higher.

The firearm poopenhouse (speaking in your terms) was legally purchased - the firearm the black kid has was illegally obtained.

Ask the judges in each instance.

Question authority??? That sounds awfully republican of you...

The answer to the question.... The judge in Rittenhouse case is a Democrat. Judge in Simpkins case? A Republican.

I'm sorry you lack the intellectual capacity to understand the idea of self-defense.

I'm sorry that you think traveling several miles from your home, deliberately obtaining a gun, and standing around a local car dealership that you have no connection to or interest in with a bunch of other armed men, then staying around for protests is self-defense.

Because that's not self-defense. He put himself in that situation. He stayed there until he killed people. THEN he walked out, got in a car, and fled the scene.

I got it. You're dreadfully hurt that a child-rapist and a woman-beater were killed. I guess you just identify with that kind of people.

"traveling several miles from your home, deliberately obtaining a gun,"

So you admit that "crossing state lines with a gun" was false?

Both were kids though

curious how you glom onto 'Distance' and ignore that 'Your boy' Illegally acquired and brought a Gun to School (Premeditation BTW) before he knew there would be 'problems' and he had extricated himself from those Problems, and yet returned to get Revenge...

I cited '8 Miles' because everyone keeps bringing up "Illinois Resident" and Crossed State Lines" like the trip was a major undertaking (My personal commute to work each Day is ~10 Miles... but for me both sites just happen to be in the same county...but I go 5 miles in the other direction and I could cross two county lines because a 'trick' of geography/cartography)

would/could he have rendered aid, perhaps... but if he's twice? attacked while Leaving already what reason does he have to not assume someone else will do so again?

He fired the gun with intention of killing people and like most limp wristed Democrats - was a poor shot. Doesn't make the intent any different.

Attempted murder is just as bad as murder.

"Several".. 2?
and did he know he'd killed them, or did he simply assume they had been rendered as no longer a threat and continue to leave as he was doing before they 'introduced themselves'... and unless you're counting Attending the Protest as the instigating event (several steps removed from 1-1 contact) Those altercations were initiated by the decedents attempting to separate him from his gun (whether owned or Loaned, in that moment, HIS Property)

"Simpkins got his ass kicked at school. He started it? doesn't matter."
- how does it not Matter... if he initiated the altercation that 'could' imply that he was looking for an excuse to shoot someone that day

"He got his ass kicked at school. He goes to his bag, which isn't that far away. Gets the gun."
- He Brought a Gun (which he had no right to possess) to School, (where he had reason to possess it, Gun Free Zone and all... or do those only apply to some people?) having no reason to assume he'll 'get his ass kicked' that day.

He defended himself.

Then he offered to turn himself into the police.

Then he declined.

You are lying filth.

So when you were 17 - you made all of the best decisions after making a mistake? He wasn't expecting to shoot anyone. He got caught in a situation where someone pulled a gun on him - and then didn't know what to do after he fired.

When going through an extremely emotional situation - the body produces chemicals that kick in. Fight or flight. After the fight instinct chemicals wears off - the flight chemicals kick in. It's the natural course of the chemicals unleashed on the frontal lobe.

One went somewhere with a gun carrying around - was attacked and defended himself. The other went somewhere with a gun and then attacked other people. Seems your the one making it about race here, not me.

Yeah but the other dude was trying to kill people and obviously a bad shot. Attempted murder gets you pretty much the same consequences with exception to death penalty being on the table.

You're wrong. Period.

So attempting to murder kids is better than self defending against an assailant...? Yeah didn't think so whack job.

Bail isn't set based on your defense, but with what you're charged with and your ability or inability to make a court appearance.

No, he didn't murder people.

Words mean things, dim bulb. Lawful killing is not murder. Kyle Rittenhouse murdered no one.

He immediately attempted to surrender himself to the police.

Self defense is not murder.

He left the state because he lives in another state.

"On August 26, 2020, Rittenhouse ***turned himself in*** on charges of first-degree intentional homicide in his home state of Illinois. He was labeled a "fugitive from justice" in the criminal complaint, ****which alleged*** that he "fled the state of Wisconsin with intent to avoid prosecution for that offense."

His trial is next month, which is where this will be tried- not in the feeble mind of a liberal troll.

But you seem a little incensed over this justified use of self defense. This is really what you liberals are hoping for- wild west shoot-ups in the street. We have seen how you desperately cling to the political narrative that January 6th was a real "insurrection", and tantamount to the destruction of the Republic. (Sorry, "Democracy" for you liberals)

Save your feigned outrage- you enjoy murdering unborn children as a hobby.

Was it murder on self defense (Rittenhouse case) but what I care the most to know from you which you dodged, you are okay excussing a kid taking a gun to school and shooting other kids! Really, so you are okay with kids taking guns to school and shooting other kids! You are a terrorist.

Rittenhouse was not a wee little lamb caught up in something.
He wasn't defending his property. He wasn't attacked out of no where and feared for his life.

He traveled to that location. Decided he was going to help protect a car dealership. That he had no interest or connection to. He got a gun. He stayed there.

And then when he'd killed people, he walked out.

So, it's clear he could have left at any time. Any time.

But he decided to stay there and be part of the problem.

Do you have any anger, any problem at all, with the people who were rioting and burning the town down that night? Or just with the decent human being trying to stop them?

Oh so because you don't approve of the protests, it's okay to murder the protesters?

If you had a gun and angry crowd was chasing you and one of them TRIED TO GRAB YOUR GUN FROM YOU, what would you do?

Does your retarded ass understand what self-defense means? Kyle had every right to be there. That vicious, insane mob did not own that town.

I notice you failed to answer the question.

Oh. Yeah. I did. But with another question. You should spend some time in thought on that.

Your response failed to address my question. The inferences that failure leads me to are nasty.

No, it illustrates the WhatAboutIsm of your question and its sheer inanity.

You can excuse his crimes all you like, but that doesn't change the scale of what happened. He killed people. Fled the scene.

That's why his bail is higher. He did more. And it was worse.

Your racist desire to see a black kid be punished more doesn't change facts.

Oh good you still dodging that you are pro behavior of a black kid going to a school armed and shooting other kids... becasue, you know, that is what black kids do, so it is okay. You are a racist, delusional and a terrorist and I am done wasting my time with you.

Gosh. If only you had written what I wrote. Repeatedly wrote.

But you went with your assumptions.

"Facts: Rittenhouse crossed state lines with his gun."

No, he didn't. Stop lying.

"Rittenhouse killed several people." Who were trying to kill him. It's called self-defense.

"Rittenhouse IMMEDIATELY fled the scene and re-crossed state lines."

Offered to turn himself in, was declined. Stop lying, you filth.

Holding your hands up as you walk past the cops is not offering to turn yourself in.

Walking past the cops and getting into a car and going home is not turning yourself in.

Do you think it's reasonable to believe that Rittenhouse walked up to the cops and said, "hey, I shot several people. I am pretty sure I blew one guys arm off. And I think the other two are dead."

And the cops are like "no big, bro. It happens. Go on home."

That sounds like reasonable events to you that could happen?

One was politically aligned with Democrats and one wasn't. Plain and simple.

That is not what the difference is. Rittenhouse was defending himself. Simpkins actively sought out people to kill.

Rittenhouse is white... We get it. Whitey bad to you lmao.

Just as well as taxing the rich more does right? If you tax the Rich too much, they take their ball and go home. They move their operations elsewhere. That or they increase the prices of their goods and services - which makes it harder for the poor to get by.

He was protecting himself from another person with a gun. Literally the dude kneeling on the ground photo was a guy he shot. Watch the videos in slow mo and you will see he was protecting himself from an armed assailant

He deliberately went to that city. He went there with the intent to "protect a local business" that he had no connection to.

He got a gun.

He put himself in that situation. He stayed there. Can you claim self-defense when you caused the problem?

Why aren't you at all upset about the mob that was rioting and burning the town? Why is that not a problem to you? You know they were trying to set a gas station ablaze. Kyle stopped that. That's what you really have a problem with, isn't it? He got in the way of their fun.

Name one person the BLM rioters killed last year. I'd bet without looking it up, you can't name one because YOU DON'T GIVE A SHIT.

So did he or did he not use the gun - because someone else pulled theirs first?

Also - let's take what you said and apply it to the border problem.

The illegal immigrants deliberately went to the border. They went there with the intention to circumvent immigration laws - to get in a country they had no connection to.

A lot of them have COVID-19.

They put themselves in that situation. They stayed there. Can they proclaim "asylum!", even though they caused the problem?

Attempted murder is just as bad as murder

There’s no such thing as ‘illegally posting a gun in America’ The 2nd Amendment ensures that the citizens and all militias have unlimited access to firearms. Any and all laws restricting access to firearms for any reason is against the constitution and any/all politicians, lawmakers etc. that make or aid in the implementing of these illegal restrictions are traitors to the country.

Good thing he wasn't.

Well, no meme is perfe . . . never mind.

You're describing a whole lotta Dems there ;)

Well that's obvious

ROFLMAO!!!!

"people with domestic violence convictions,"

Like the shithead Huber, whom Kyle kindly put out of our misery?

I find it grimly amusing that in this case, you are siding with a child-rapist, a domestic abuser, and a burglar, and still you like to pretend you're on the good side.

Still confused about Who God is, I see. Not surprising- it is the evil of your heart that's the problem. That you see God in that manner is a reflection of YOUR heart, not Who God truly is. Based on the wisdom of God, I know you to be, at your core, unmerciful, sinful, and crooked.

Psalm 18
With the merciful You show Yourself merciful;
With the blameless man You show Yourself blameless;
With the purified You show Yourself pure;
And with the crooked You make Yourself seem tortuous.

For You save a humble people,
but the haughty eyes You bring down.

"That's Christianspeak for "I'm gonna make excuses for why you don't believe the bullshit I do."

Or, it's the simple, straightforward truth. Which of course is precisely what it is.

"And yet I can provide Bible verses to support every single thing I'm pointing out"

Ah yes, a legend in your own mind.

"You actually don't know that, because you're not a mind reader."

Clearly, I do know that, especially given the help of the One Who knows us better than we know ourselves. I find this to be one of the convincing proofs of the divine authorship of the Scriptures- their ability to describe human nature to a tee. Blasphemers, like yourself, follow the script found therein exactly as written- you would have thought after all those centuries of "evolution" you would have moved beyond this, but you simply cannot escape the reality of it.

Sad, angry little Octardia . . . what a terrible melody you sing in life.

Like I said- a legend in your own mind.

"Then prove it with facts"
I have proven it over and over and over, as have millions upon millions of others. There are plenty of facts out there, not the least of which is creation itself. You besmirch faith, yet it is a blind faith that allows you to believe we got here without God.

"I'm sorry, I was under the impression that you had actually read the Bible. Clearly you haven't, because you don't know what it says."

Oh, I know it very, very well, your futile attempts to twist it notwithstanding.

"There's a very simple way you can prove that."
You have a lot in common with one of the characters seen in the Bible:

Matthew 4:7
Jesus said to [Satan], “Again it is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.’”

Your perception that God is some sort of cosmic genie, who must dance to your tune in order to prove Himself is sad. You are like a snotty little child:

Luke 7:31-32
“To what then shall I compare the people of this generation, and what are they like?
They are like children sitting in the marketplace and calling to one another,

“‘We played the flute for you, and you did not dance;
we sang a dirge, and you did not weep.’

I, and most certainly not God, are here to dance to your tune. You are a fool, in the biblical sense, after all.

"like saying that all humans are evil and wicked."
You err, because you do not know the Scriptures. Sin is rebellion towards God, regardless of how minor it is. You fail to begin to comprehend the holiness of God, therefore you do not comprehend the seriousness of your crimes against Him.

James 2:10
For whoever keeps the whole Law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it.

"The Bible was written by humans" who were carried along by God, Who ensured that what He wanted to have written down, was. While you think yourself superior to those who believe it to be God's Word, you are obviously anything but. I am convinced of it, after laying aside my hatred of it. You are hardly the only one in this conversation who has had these same thoughts.

"That's extremely easy to predict because it happens all the time."
Things are considerably different today than they were 2000 years ago. And why does it happen "all the time"? What is the point of modern, "advanced" man mocking something he or she doesn't believe exists? Why the continued pettiness? Your excuses are thin.

[image deleted] At no point in the 2nd Amendment does it specify that there are any restrictions on who can own firearms. It DOES however state that ‘militias’ are the intended people’s mentioned in the document.

However don’t conflate ‘military or law enforcement’ as ‘militia’
Military = Govornment
Militia = Citizen organisation

The 2nd Amendment could have been clearer but it was written in the 18th century. That doesn’t make the document any less valid as rights don’t have expiration dates.

As I’ve made it clear beforehand Kyle Rittenhouse committed no crime whatsoever and acted in self defence when he had absolutely no other choice. He’s an American patriot and I wish him and his family all the best.

"Do you think a man with a history of beating up his wife should be allowed to own a gun?"

No, clearly shitbag Anthony Huber, killed in self-defense by Kyle, should not be allowed to own a gun. Fortunately, that case is no longer an issue.

It certainly helped me understand what a context numb, content immune, totally clueless dumb ass shitlib you are, that for sure. I suppose English isn't your first language and you're one of those filthy brown people here illegally.

SMH LOL!!!!

He purchased it as a minor but at the time of the crime, he was legal.

"Prosecutors announced Kyle Rittenhouse, the teen facing charges in Wisconsin in the shooting deaths of two men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, will not face gun charges in his home state of Illinois."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/kyle-rittenhouse-cleared-of-gun-charges-in-illinois-gun-never-left-the-state-of-wisconsin/ar-BB1a1q3G

Soooo what you're saying is the black kid had an illegal firearm - but the white kid was legal?