Good Fellas Hilarious

And, I don't believe any of those charged were charged with insurrection, right? (libtards, please correct me if I'm wrong...)

Like someone else pointed out on the other stream Biden was never charged with ANY of the BS you people accuse of him so maybe you and everyone else with Democrat Derangment should stop lying

btw calling people names does not win you anything it only exposes you have no actual arguments.

We call Trump supporters Trumplicans because you are no longer Republicans.

Don't count on it. The voting hasn't been fixed. It's dems and RINOs from here on out.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Bbbbb... B... But Trump!

Huge Upvote!

yeah

a few nutty people don't represent everyone

and then these ones clearly don't look like they want to overthrow a country

:0)

Probably.
The scary thing about 1984, was it made it clear that, in it's reality, fighting the system was futile. Once it's gotten to that point, it's too late. I think we've gotten to that point.

I agree, 2020 was a precedent. They proved that they could put anyone they wanted into Office while social media labeled anyone that disagreed with it, a terrorist and white supremacist.

Ah yes, the violent insurrection, where evil Trump supporters killed zeros of people... And almost AOC...

And, according to her, they just wanted to "date her'!!!! SMH LOL!!!!

AOC needs the Whoopi mask!

Made by RedBarron1 1 day ago in politics:

imgflip.com/i/60g3kd

Name one insurrection in history (prior to 2020) - where the insurrectionists weren't armed and where everyone made it home in time for dinner.

Not everybody made it home on January 6. And many were armed. Maybe not with firearms, but they had weapons.

1 person didn't make it back. Ashli Babbitt who was killed by a police officer. Armed in modern terms is guns, knives, swords, axes, any vehicles...

Speaking of armed - you can see example of armed rioters in the BLM Protests (against many government entities). Notice how Republicans called both BLM and Jan 6th "riots" and did so fairly. Democrats call an event where everyone was home by supper... An insurrection. They call billions in property damage "mostly peaceful" when done by BLM.

Also, The only people armed with bullets were the Capitol Police.

B... B... But Trump...!

This was one of several people caught there with guns/bullets/ weapons. As for the rest of the people..... they were not arrested (and therefore not searched), did not go through metal detectors, and as you said eventually went home.... You literally have no way to know if they were not armed...

I would also point out that Democrats aren't the only ones who recognize it as an insurrection.

How many government employees got shot again? Oh yeah none. Move on

How many police officers were injured again? Oh yeah.. over 100.

How many officers decided to say f*** this job, it's not worth it, and either quit or retired following Jan 6th? Over 150.

Also if you're going to parrot Trump / repubs and be moving them goalposts, you might want to move them away from the idea that having a gun automatically means you will shoot people. I think that would be generally frowned upon.

So injured and went home to their families cool. Happens to cops in the line of duty every day. your point?

Cops are also shot in the line of duty nearly every day. From 2014-2019 1,467 police officers got shot. And yet you asked that as if it meant something.

Also I mean looking at the definition a "violent uprising against a government".... I mean you don't even need a weapon let alone a gun to be "violent". Furthermore other definitions I've seen don't even necessarily hold violence as an integral part of the definition. So keep moving them goalposts around. Since "unarmed" is out maybe you can try to convince people that they didn't actually want to "stop the steal" despite that being the actual stated name of the "rally".

Wasn't an insurrection. You're dumb if you think it was.

Like so many other endeavors which were financially backed by Trump... it was a failure.

"Insurrection"..or.. "attack on our democracy" ..or.. "terrorist attack" as Ted Cruz put it .... I'm more or less good with any of those.

But Congress doesn't have that kind of success rate. They literally have voted our country into 30 trillion in debt. Trump industries makes money and a few smaller ventures failed.

Trump also has his fair share of debt and I understand it's pretty easy to make money when you start with money and occasionally/allegedly have free labor.... As far as Congress, if Trump could essentially print his own debt with no limit, he probably would.

Over 100 companies with what.. 6 or 7 failing? That's 93-94 percent successful. Can you imagine if Congress was that successful?

Similar to Trump, Congress does whatever they think they can get away with.... sometimes they get caught... sometimes they get shut down.... and they generally don't do any jail time.

If you were a 10th as successful as Trump, you wouldn't even have time to post this nonsense.

I know right.... pretty amazing what can be accomplished by having rich parents who give you money and real estate!

So now you care about police violence since it's a person of value to you. And for the record, no, most of the BLM protests weren't violent. A lot were, but not most of them. (It's like saying 1 million is a lot, but not compared to 10 million. Relativity is always a factor.) While I do agree that the actual intensity of the attack on the capitol was exaggerated, people are moreso upset about the symbolic relevance of it all; it was seen as an attack on democracy and freedom, the very things these supporters were claiming to stand for (but I guess only freedom and democracy for them). People were upset because the decision had already been made; both the general public and the electoral office wanted Biden in office instead. These people went against the idea of democracy by willing to try to force the government to go against what it was founded on just to satisfy themselves, a group that was not in the majority. While it may not have been as violent as it could have been, it's implied that they still were trying to intimidate government officials. I will make it clear that this doesn't represent all Republicans, just how the violent instances of BLM riots don't represent all people who are tired of racial injustice.

6 hours... Verses how many months of looting and violence and fires and.... Move TF on.

Well, I'd first of all like to say you lack maturity, but that's irrelevant.
Anyway, I'd like to mention that this incident came with all intents of potentially turning violent, as did many incidents with the BLM movement. I also would like to add the difference in nature between them; the BLM protests that turned to riots happened as a result of people not diffusing the situation. The attack on the capitol could have easily ended the same way if the cops defending it decided to exercise their power more. Adding fuel to the fire doesn't justify rioting and violence, but I'm trying to say that Jan 6 could have ended the exact same way. The BLM movement was supposed to be a peaceful protest campaign originally, but was tainted by many crazed acts of aggression. Those who rallied together on Jan 6 had deliberately planned this, and went with the intent to intimidate and cause a hostile atmosphere, and could potentially have actually become violent. So maybe both parties should "move TF on."

Only one party is trying to make it seem like the worst day ever and it's the party that covers up for rapists and pedos. Which do you fall into?

First of all, I consider myself an independent party. While many of my ideas align with those of Democrats, I don't consider myself one of them. Second, it's your party (I'm just assuming it's your party, correct me if I'm wrong) that refuses to let go of the incidents surrounding BLM. Both parties have their scandals, it's not just one.

Registered Democrat... Vote independently of party

Pretty much, yeah

The last legitimate insurrection the United States saw was the Civil War. Where a group trying to segregate it's citizens - lost. Prior to that it was Colonies giving the middle finger to England.

Prior to that it was the Colonists taking out the real heirs to the land (Native Americans).

It's good that you admit the seattle riots

1. Had zero relation to Jan 6th and right wingers trying to use it are only excusing themselves from thie own guilt.

2. It's funny how right wingers hate the statues of Traitors being torn down.It's almost like they wanted the South to win

We remember Hitler so nobody turns out like Hitler again

just gonna leave this here:

The Reichstag Fire

The Reichstag fire was an arson attack on the Reichstag building (the German Capitol).
On Monday 27 February 1933, precisely four weeks after Adolf Hitler was elected Chancellor of Germany, the Reichstag was set on fire.

Nazi Party used the fire as a pretext to claim that communists were plotting against the German government; thus warranting mass arrests of political opponents and suspending most civil liberties, including habeas corpus, freedom of expression, freedom of the press, the right of free association and public assembly, and the secrecy of postal services and telephone by decree.
Hitler, after having obtained his emergency powers, announced that it was the start of an insurrection to take over Germany. Nazi Party newspapers then published this fabricated "news".[18]

Van der Lubbe being solely responsible the Nazis sought to make it appear to be insurgents that set the fire.
The responsibility for the Reichstag fire remains a topic of debate and research. Some historians believe, based on archive evidence, that the arson had been planned and ordered by the Nazis as a false flag operation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire

now replace "Reichstag" with "Capitol", "fire" with "breach", "elected Chancellor of Germany" with "President elect Biden", the Nazi Party with the Democrat Party, "brown shirts" with "black block", "SA" with "Feds", "Van der Lubbe" with "Qanon Shaman", "Socialists protesting the election of Hitler" with "Conservatives protesting for election integrity" and "Nazi Party Newspapers pushing the insurretion narrative" with "liberal mainstream media" then tell me more how history doesn't repeat itself.

Holy shit bro your right

next in the totalitarian playbook:
• silencing dissenting voices and public opinion
• making it a crime to question election integrity
• making it a crime to deride government officials and lawmakers
• aboltion of state rights
• aboltion of voters' rights
• Federal takeover of elections
• mandatory mail-in voting
• gun grab
• suspension of home schooling and church schools
• detention camps for non-conformists

update:
• state controlled media

Last I checked the BLM rioters didn't attack THE very symbol of democracy itself, but ok. And don't even dare to mention that the left is fear mongering while assuming that the right isn't. Which party is it that said COVID was a hoax and it was all about control and that vaccines had microchips? Not the left, but be my guest. I've got a while and I love comedy.

Totalitarian power grab playbook on schedule
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/doj-creates-special-unit-to-target-domestic-terrorism/

Historian of fascism offers lessons for democracies on how to resist authoritarianism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwrH_HEZQnc
sort comments by new

No - its about history. When you destroy history - you become doomed to repeat it. Look what happened - tear down statues of ppl who wanted segregation of class.... Now the Democrats segregate based on vaxx. They obviously forgot the history.

But at the same time remember that tearing down statues idolizing people isn't the same as straight-up refusing to teach about it. We teach about the Holocaust, but you don't see Europeans putting up statues of Hitler either. And for the record, it's not "segregation." There are many states where unvaccinated people can still do everything that vaccinated people can. There are many that aren't like that, and if you don't like that, then don't go to those states (we don't want you there anyway). If you're going to compare trying to protect our population as a whole with the best we have (which is far from perfect, I will admit that) by limiting potential carriers' access to certain conveniences and services by private corporations who have the right to refuse service with straight-up throwing people in jail for just wanting the same rights as another group who were discriminated over a factor they literally have zero control over, while also being targets of lynchings and racial violence, you might as well try to convince people that elephants and yams are the same thing. Last time I checked, I don't see any systematic violence against unvaccinated people. Yes, we verbally shit on them, but we don't marginalize them.

The lefties got the Dukes of Hazzard taken off the air and the damned show literally taught people to be inclusive. Move on commie

U good man? Have a virtual hug, you seem to be having a bad day.

Thanks I appreciate it lol

The FBI admitted they had hundreds of agents out there provocateuring. Please do some reading.

And they ADMITTED it too!
This is precious!

Proof?

Crickets,,,

He never has any proof for the crazy stuff he posts.

I know, but I figured referring to SSTTUUTTAA fit atm, hahaha

HEre's some actual fact checking: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/06/25/fact-check-no-evidence-fbi-organized-jan-6-capitol-riot/7753276002/

Of course, it shows the FBI didn't organize the Insurrection.

The notion is beyond ridiculous, and desperate, even for this lot.
Then again, maybe not, because desperately ridiculous is their hallmark.

That's a journal, not exactly the most reliable. Could you provide me with a credible source such as government archives or a scholarly journal?

Or, if that's too hard, use something that ends with ".org" or ".gov".

Good point, can you?

On behalf of Loki, I grant you permish to post fbi.gov's admission that it was all a farce staged by FBI agents posing as MAGAt traitors to make poor Don Don look bad as his own kids implored him to stop them even though yadda yadda,,,

USA Today is a daily newspaper, btw.

A newspaper is journalism, my guy. A factual database isn't allowed to exaggerate because they give black-and-white statistics.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases

A journal contains journalism but not all journalism are journals.

That's what I'm saying, they CAN be the same thing depending on the context...

It's like all German Shepards are dogs but not all dogs are German Shepards.

Yeah, just like how in certain contexts they can be the same thing. Never said they always are, the situations overlap.

Wait, is that why they have journalists working for them?

You said journal, fella, not journalism.

Depending on the context they can be the same thing though?...

Just realizing that you were against the conspiracy theory targeting the FBI- my bad.

Of course, I do highly doubt that the FBI did organize it, but you never know nowadays.

To make it clear: I meant that the insurrection was planned, not staged. I highly doubt the FBI would have gone with it, they're not that stupid. That's the thing, there isn't an official document anywhere about the FBI encouraging the insurrection. There is, however, an overview of the insurrection and how the FBI is investigating. If the FBI really did aid this and they're only pretending to investigate, they would have all the insurrectionists by now.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases

No one said they organized it. Please read.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/setup-fbi-admits-jan-6-deep-state-operation-one-first-inside-capitol-fbi-operative-video/

The Gateway Pundit? That fart right alt shite fake news site?
What next, the adventures of Santa Claus in your St Petersburg?

Check the source. They are legit.

No, they are the Onion for the fArt Right, only minus the humor.

Nope. I'm talking about the court case transcript they cite.

Um, still no.

Stop cramming my notifs with your nonsense.

"Um, still no.

Stop cramming my notifs with your nonsense."

Stop spewing nonsense then.

At the pool you are again?