2. the concept is not backed up with verifiable sources.
3. the concept in context of reality seems a bit meaningless.
4. at the end of the day, you're another anon on the internet on a meme website in a stream which notoriously has spread misinformation around covid.
Someone "they" (?) China(?) Our own military or military complex (?) forced (?) threatened(?) paid millions/billions/trillions $$ (?) To make the news(?) The CDC(?) Coroners(?) the NIH (?) the WHO(?) produce fake data(?) fake articles(?) somewhere (?) to the public (which apparently cannot be found online anymore) lying about millions of people in America dying in 2020... to test a strategy... to see if citizens could be scared enough to vote someone (trump ).. out of office....... apparently completely ignoring the fact that the guy they would be testing the strategy on (trump), is a wildcard that would make the results of the alleged test run a bit meaningless. I mean it's unclear if that would've worked on anyone besides trump.
If trump had not retweeted Qanon, and had not downplayed covid in public while acknowledging its danger in private, maybe made some MAGA N95 masks and worn them.... it seems possible he would've been re-elected regardless of the number of covid deaths.
"...Thinking that only between 1 and 2 mllion people are in the "deadly covid frame" after the unending lists of comorbidities that if a person had, made covid a death sentence , from some of the sources you listed, is such a ridiculous notion... "
Which source said a list of comorbities is a death sentence? Pretty sure even the most high risk- elderly, Hispanic, males is still not necessarily a death sentence.
If a notion seems ridiculous to you, maybe your interpretation of it is incorrect?
"In 2020 Americans over 65 reached 55 Million "..
And although many died, it clearly was not a death sentence for all of them. What is your point?