Jim Halpert Explains

Ok now that's just messed up

How so?

There is a way. What you need to do is first start a movement. What you need are "Useful idiots" who have no idea what they are fighting for. Despite popular belief you can find these people anywhere on the political or religious spectrum. To get them on your side you must appeal to their interests by advocating for something they agree with. Then the next step is to radicalize them. You must exaggerate harm caused by the enemy or just make things up. If anyone calls you out on this you must devalue their opinion right away and get people in your group against this person. If it's an outsider you must claim that it's a simple lie put out by the oppressors and then pretend to debunk it with convincing but false information that someone uninformed about the subject would believe. If it's in the group you must frame them as a traitor. But you mustn't frame them as a traitor just for disagreeing with you, you aren't powerful enough yet. You must use other things that would turn people against them, true or not. Then you could take a page out of Stalin's book by miscommunicating with them on purpose about things important to the group with them to cause drama. Then once people start listening to them you can use the artificial drama you have created against them to convince everyone that their accusations against you are them trying to make the group collapse by secretly indoctrinating everyone with enemy propaganda to hide the truth and use the drama as an excuse to show they can't be trusted. Be careful not to act like you've been investigating for a long time, pretend to be simply a concerned member who has just noticed a pattern. If the plan works the member will likely be shunned or at least a lot less trusted. Next part is the taking over of the government. I don't want to get assassinated by the CIA so I won't tell you how to do that but I recommend taking inspiration from the Russian Revolution or the Cuban Revolution. Now you are in the parliament of a new republic. If you are not already the leader you must use the previous method I mentioned to eliminate anyone in your way. Make sure you're not always the one making accusations. Instead you should spread rumors to cause drama and then sit back and watch it unfold. Always put on the mask of concerned member rather than detective. You could even use anonymous ways of spreading rumors to make it harder to trace it back to you. Anyway I'm out of room so let me know if you want part 2.

Yo, i want a part a part 2, so evil yet smart. (This shit also sounds so fimilar...)
And ins't that the classic Demoralization - Destabilization - Crisis - Normalization stage thing?

It is quite familiar because it's heavily based off of Stalin's method of taking power. It's still highly effective to this day. (Also a note to mods: I'm not encouraging violence, nor do I endorse doing this.) So if you followed the previous steps you should eventually become the leader. What you must now begin is censorship. Censor all of the propaganda against your regime and frame people as traitors. Set up a secret police department to spy on all your people. You should also encourage people to report their neighbors for a high reward. But to keep the nation from going poor you must secretly increase the person's taxes after they've gotten their reward to secretly take it all back. If they speak out, arrest them. Something useful to implement to purge a population is hatred. Stage multiple terrorist attacks and fake evidence against one minority group of your choice. This should drive the population to grow hate towards this group. Anyone who resists the hatred you must frame as a spy for the group and arrest them. Then you can begin eliminating this group. To keep your image clean you should make yourself look like a hero and arrest anyone who says otherwise. Eventually if done right people will look at you as a God. This is called a "personality cult" and is a trick Stalin used. Depicting yourself as a fatherly or motherly figure is a great way to win support. Even small things like leaving your bedroom light on all night even when you're not home can gain support. This was an old trick Stalin used to make it look like he was working hard all night improving the country. You could also send "humanitarian aid" to 3rd world countries but secretly poison the goods you give the 3rd world nations. The donating will make you look like a selfless hero. If anyone notices all the dying frame it on diseases in the region as well as arresting the accusers. You could also come up with your own methods of population control during your reign. And that is how to solve overpopulation. Let me know if you wanna know how to solve world hunger next :)

Theirs is, you can move to Canada and request assistance ending your life. Problem solved

The constitution does not mention pregnancy, or abortion, because the Constitution does not mention women.

But women are the only people who can actually bare arms into the world.

I am a male. I have held a gun in my life.

Yet several states allow killing unborn children no matter how far along the pregnancy is.

Do you understand that killing a human fetus is still killing a human being?

Oh, so how old does a human need to be before killing them is wrong?

Oh, so 16 days after conception? That’s when the brain begins to develop. The human brain continues to develop long after birth.

But the word Abortion hurts anyone who is pro life. It hurts them so bad that it ridicules anyone who is a woman. Even the pro choice license plates hurt them when their pro life license plate is speeding on past, super ironic.

Yeah it's weird how people don't like thinking of babies getting murdered, isn't it?

Depends on what THINK is. Newborn babies don’t “think” when they emerge from the womb. But their brain manages their autonomic nervous system - which manages involuntary body functions - long before birth. So, by your standard, it’s OK to kill newborns because they can’t express thought like you can?

When do you think you were not a clump of nerves anymore? The answer is, you still are.

If a doctor knows a mother is to mentally unstable to parent a child we might not have to see month/ year long reports of Clancy problems.

OK, poindexter, are you only killing the brain when you kill an unborn child?

What is a person at this point?
Could a brain survive without anything else?

Technically no but a machine would function the rest of the body and the brain stem and brain would be dead. The term is brain dead, and it's actually the brain stem that causes the whole ball of wax to work. When the brain stem is severed by disease or accidents, you are brain dead, the body will still continue to operate through life force energy struggle though when someone is removed from life support ... I take it you have never seen a loved one die?

I KNOW HOW DEATH WORKS
BUT IF A BRAIN WERE JUST A BRAIN WOULD THAT BE A PERSON?

That sounds like a medical specimen who once was a person but donated their brain to medical science. So are we making that illegal now?

At what point, the he sage of development you’re in? An animal has a brain but that doesn’t make it a person.
What makes us people, as opposed to plants and animals, is our DNA. Guess what point our DNA develops. Hint: it’s not when we start thinking.

We have different brains than lions, genius.

Figured that out on your own, eh?

That was the point he was making.

Goodness gracious, how many anybodies in your life have you met that actually can think? I'm talking slightly past infancy a lot, like well into adulthood?

Does the notion that an unborn baby - excuse me fetus, I wouldn't want to get that scripted one wrong - not being able to recite Shakespeare at 6 weeks mean that somehow it's not alive sounds like something that took any much thinking to come up with?

What does it matter if it doesn't have a three digit IQ yet, what about those who think they can think who are the ones thinking about killing it? The baby is not thinking that it wants to live or die. It's the people that want to kill it that think they can think they want it to die. It doesn't matter if somehow the fetus is capable of thinking that it doesn't want to live anymore, it's those that are wanting to kill it that are thinking that. And they have fully develop brains. Supposedly. They still haven't reached the level of thinking where they know the unborn baby is alive yet they're using the baby thinking as a criteria for getting killed or not?

Newborn babies can't recite Shakespeare either and I'm against killing them

But you were using thinking as a criteria.

Babies can feel pain
Fetuses (before week 13, when they are aborted) do not.

Fetuses respond to stimuli, including trying to move away when the forceps goes at them or when writhing after being administered some sort of chemical.

Doesn't matter, whether under anesthesia or not, killing them is killing them.

You DO know abortions aren't just surgical, right?

You do know that chemicals are chemicals?

Always read the entire sentence before trying to strawman yourself on it.

Abortion pills are essentially just miscarriage on purpose

That doesn't stop the pain caused.

'Pain' abortions happen BEFORE the baby can feel pain

Some later ones do not.

I wouldnt call 1% a lot

(replying to the red comment) Then it does happen a lot. That info just makes it worse.

As I said, in the last TWENTY YEARS

(replying to other red comment) One death is a tragedy.

So its a tragedy that immigrants get killed by ICE in custody?

(replying to other red comment) yes

So ICE shouldn't be doing this stuff.

(replying to the other other red comment) They should be deporting, it is necessary for safety reasons but there're a lot of cases of them being unnecessarily brutal.

You don't need to put the parentheses in each comment you make.

ok. I just like leaving no room for misunderstanding.

K

I never said a lot. It doesn't need to happen frequently to be a tragedy.

In the last 20 years, there were at most 21 million abortions in the us.
That makes 1% 210,000

What's so wrong with being pro choice hmm?

It's only a 'choice' when the right 'choice' is made, amiright?

6fqsep.jpg (click to show)

I’m pro choice. You can choose to have sex or not. Only exception might be in the case of rape.

What 'choice' you're just telling them to have abortions
That isn't a choice

"Personally, I think abortion should be mandatory"

That's not pro choice, that's pro murder.
You said it should me "mandatory" that everyone should have an abortion.

Hell, that isn't even pro murder... that just pro human extermination!

dude, you celebrated the murder of an innocent man.
I regret nothing I said.

China is forcing abortions like you said. We want the exact opposite of that.

I want abortions to be left between the woman and her doctor, that way the government doest have to force abortions when the population becomes crisis stage, which it already sorta is if you didn't know it falls in healthcare cuts for the elderly who's insurance benefits shrink every year on Medicare, and some private plans who are stipend by the government keep on cutting benefits year to year. We can't even decide how to afford taking care of the elderly population, and now the government wants to force abortion bans in some states who continue to cut Medicaid benefits for families and expecting mothers. But it would piss people off if Medicaid covered non emergency abortions..... What kinda cake do you want because your going to have to eat it to.

Scientists have already determined that its a separate living being very early on. We're still waiting for the pro choice crowd to catch up to science.

You're a clump of cells. I'm a clump of cells. We all are. Location doesn't determine moral worth

bro... is genuinely brainless.

very RARE W.

Look I hate the right but I do NOT accept you either
You're your own square in the political compass