Trying to minimize double mastectomies on 13- to 17-year-old girls as "no big deal" because it’s "only top surgery" is absurd. Slicing off healthy body tissue, severing nerves, and causing permanent loss of lactation on a child is irreversible surgical harm, no matter how you try to package it.
And saying "well, bottom surgery isn't legal for teens in those states"-big deal. Something being legal doesn't make it morally right. I don't give a shit what's legal or not; history is full of horrific things that were completely legal under the law.
Besides, in blue "sanctuary" states, there are zero statutory laws explicitly prohibiting these procedures on minors with parental consent. But legal or not, putting kids on puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and cutting off healthy breasts leaves real young adults living with permanent physical scarring, bone density loss, and infertility before they're even old enough to vote.
Biological sex is an immutable, created reality (Genesis 1:27). Pointing out the actual physical damage being inflicted on confused kids isn't "psychosis"- it's standing up for basic human ethics and protecting children who aren't old enough to give informed consent for lifetime body alterations.
If these are "pathetic lies" a smart progressive fellow like yourself should be more than capable of making quick work of demonstrating that with a valid sound syllogistic argument. Until you do, you're just blowing objectively meaningless hot air.
If pediatric mutilation procedures and irreversible harms are "not a reality," I challenge you to Google these names and read their actual medical records and sworn court filings:
1. Chloe Cole – Double mastectomy at 15 after starting cross-sex hormones at 13; detransitioned at 16 with severe skin graft complications and permanent scarring.
2. Luka Hein – Double mastectomy at 16 after just two clinic visits while struggling with severe underlying mental health issues; now suffers chronic pain and lost fertility.
3. Prisha Mosley – Blockers/testosterone at 16, double mastectomy at 17, despite severe psychiatric conditions like borderline personality disorder; left with permanent physical trauma.
4. Keira Bell – Put on blockers at 16 and double mastectomy at 20 via the UK's NHS Tavistock clinic; successfully sued after realization that doctors ignored her underlying depression.
5. Soren Aldaco – Double mastectomy at 17 alongside heavy hormone regimes while dealing with autism; suffered severe nerve damage and surgical complications.
6. Layla Jane – Puberty blockers at 12 and double mastectomy at 13; detransitioned after realizing her distress stemmed from underlying trauma.
7. Isabella Ayala – Fast-tracked onto cross-sex hormones as a minor after struggling with depression; detransitioned after realizing doctors affirmed distress instead of treating psychiatric issues.
8. Camille Kiefel – Double mastectomy approved after brief consultations that completely ignored severe mental health trauma before surgically removing healthy tissue.
9. Cristina Hineman – Fast-tracked to hormones and double mastectomy as a teen despite severe depression and anxiety; now speaks out against medical providers who rushed her.
10. Lucci Johnston – Fast-tracked into medical transition as an adolescent struggling with social isolation, resulting in permanent modifications before reaching adult maturity.
These are real young adults fast-tracked into double mastectomies and cross-sex hormones as children-often while struggling with autism, depression, or past trauma that doctors ignored.
Biological sex is an immutable, created reality (Genesis 1:27). Minimizing bodily destruction and permanent medicalization as "fear-mongering" insults vulnerable youth who were permanently harmed before they were old enough to drive, vote, or sign a contract. Safeguarding children from permanent harm is a basic moral duty.
Calling documented facts "lies" doesn't change the reality. Vanderbilt University Medical Center stopped its pediatric transgender surgery mutilation program precisely because of public exposure and legislative intervention over procedures performed on minors.
Minimizing irreversible harm by calling it a "tiny handful" is a moral failure. Society restricts minors from driving, voting, buying alcohol, or getting tattoos because children lack the developmental maturity to weigh lifelong consequences. Subjecting youth to permanent sterilization, surgical alterations, and body-altering chemicals before they reach adulthood causes immense, non-quantifiable harm to human flourishing.
Biological sex is an immutable, created reality (Genesis 1:27). Protecting children from permanent medical harm isn't "fear-mongering"-it is the fundamental duty of any civilized society that values the protection of its most vulnerable. Your objectives are baseless and without warrant.
