I wanted to remind you of the now reality that capitalism has caused this great nation that should have had intervention sooner regarding the government. That is the ownership of land and resources. Thanks to capitalism anyone can own land and it's resources if they have the rights, and because that means anyone, it becomes a national security threat when foreign governments and entities are purchasing up America's land, water and minerals. Because capitalism allows them to. This is why even people within the government is corrupted by the purchasing power and ownership of capitalism. In the big picture of it all it's pretty ugly, but if your given the slice of the dream, and can afford to participate and be happy, it's not all that bad. Could it be worse or get worse, of course it can.
Lokiare... If the money printer is controlled by the federal reserve which is its own thing, appointed officials by the government to operate upon fiscal policy, which is controlled by the government that operates in a capitalist society, where once again business owners , individuals, and corporations can own goods and provide services that set the prices up in a economy that runs inside the bounds of capitalism, yet is tied to pay governmental requirements and file papers and operate with licenses, the government makes up a huge part of capitalism because it collects taxes and requires licenses and prints the legal tender... Now if you can get Business to accept trade, like in beads, or rocks for a good or service, and then that business turns around and pays the government with a glass bead, then that's more of the view you have on capitalism, but generally speaking, it is the ability to own a business, operate a business and set a price for goods and services with little government interference... But look at enron... That is where capitalism as a entity failed and the government stepped in. Capitalism needs a government or there would be astronomical amounts of fraud, the problem is that a government can also commit fraud as we all know. Anyone can.
In the event of local government it's like this, having a town mayor for 40 years because nobody wants to run.... Or having a district win a seat because it only had one candidate on the ballot. I really think it's an accountability issue. We obviously have a lot of alcoholics, and possibly individuals using uppers, downers, and anything they could be prescribed holding many different governmental positions. If a individual makes it on the ballot, that individual should pass tests to make it on the ballot, or have a disclosure on the ballot for failing drug, background, or citizens testing. Just my personal opinion ... Maybe voters would be informed better.
Just like gangs sell drugs, and illegal goods, the new crime is in fraudulent Enterprise . Stealing identity, defrauding programs, robbing atms. It's almost like gang activities. But because our government failed to stop it and protect the us citizens from fraud, this is what we have.
