What in the everloving HECK, Colorado???!!!

look around! read these comments! do you REALLY think people want it changed?

so you think nothing is ever worth fighting against? that the government should be able to do whatever they want with you?

Yes, i'm making a mountain over a molehill, but your comment did seem to suggest it...

No, you make a good point and you are expressing an objective opinion. That is admirable.

You're not making a mountain out of a molehill, imo. Here's my comment to a previous post by thesis, which explains why I say that:

"If there's no point in making the change, even the libtards running the show there would not have done it. Trust that this is just the first step. They'll change the name again, and again. As many times as it takes to remove the stigma. Then they'll water down the laws. Before you know it, being a sex offender there will be like getting a fixit ticket."

If it's so minor that it's not worth doing, then that is the very reason to complain about it when it's done.

Get it, thesis? At least for me, the complaint is why do it if it doesn't need to be done? All I can say, based on years of watching the libtards here in Taxifornia operate, is that they rarely do things for no reason. They have a huuuuuge agenda, and this is part of it. It may be a tiny part of it, but it's still a part of it.

So if it doesn't need to be done, then hell yeah, I would fight against doing it, because I know the character of those who are trying to do it. And rarely does anything good come from them.

Cause everything is worth complaining about, and very little is worth doing. First world problems.

You mean like entertaining the feelings of a sex offender over being called a sex offender?

Yeah, first world problems indeed. Third world countries deal with this problem using bullets (if not clubs), so it could definitely be worse for the sex offenders.

As usual thesis, you miss the obvious. If there's no point in making the change, even the libtards running the show there would not have done it. Trust that this is just the first step. They'll change the name again, and again. As many times as it takes to remove the stigma. Then they'll water down the laws. Before you know it, being a sex offender there will be like getting a fixit ticket.

Call them whatever you like, antithesis, but I’m still gonna call the sick f**ks ‘sex offenders’

Ok. So you can't work in the Colorado office in question.

And nobody's noticed nor cared.

F**k Colorado!

And that is why they didn't ask you what you think

No they didn’t ask because i don’t live in Colorado, so nothing I say should affect what they put into their state’s law, no matter how stupid it may be.

No point in changing the term. The only thing it actually does is spend more time and energy on a person who doesn't deserve it.

Because they are giving a sexual dog more money than he should be spent on. Imagine you being raped, whether male or female, and having your rapist exonerated!

We have differing opinions.

I don't agree.

That is a fundamental statement. We disagree on the fundamental statement. You saying I can't doesn't make you right.

It's worth both.

Yeah, I'm going to have to agree, that's more dumb.

Bureaucracy is full of unnessary redundancies. It works best with fewer of them.

You want to cut the offices for people who go after sex offenders?

See, THAT'S doing the sex offenders a huge favor.

Please tell me where I said that. The topic is unnecessary bureaucracy not bureaucratic offices. Nice try. Argue better.

Now now, they’re called adults who commit sexual offenses. Stay consistent.

My argument is only that the change in term is unnecessary. I’m sorry if I wasn’t clear unless you’re being intentionally obtuse and trolling.

And here I thought you were very reasonable in your arguments. I guess you’re no different than everyone else here who can’t resist the urge to troll when presented with differing opinions.

As unnecessary as it appears to you, it's how they've decided their job should be done. People are allowed to make small decisions on how they do their job. And it benefits the offenders exactly not at all.

So calm the heck down.

And people are allowed to have opinions of others.

You calm the heck down.

That's as asinine as calling women "birthing people."

Sit down.

Still their decision to make and affects your life not one bit.

what does the change actually CHANGE, dumbass?

Well, that's my point - not very much. You're clutching your pearls over a minor discretion about a standard operating procedure in policy documentation.

Now you’re just wasting your breath

Then why change it?(and btw I meant with the new name you’re wasting you’re breath)

But that's the thing though - it's not a waste of breath because more than anything else, they're discussing a phrase that is going on their documents. Written. Not spoken.

And whether you like it or not, they've decided they want to change it, which means it's now your turn to realize it's too small to react to.

Two words vs five words. Waste of breath

Again, this is going on policy documents. Not spoken.

As if the terminology on "policy documents" never makes it into speech. smh...

And again, its still pointless, who cares about some pedo’s feelings?

You think calling them "adults who committed sexual offenses" is caring about their feelings?

It's watered down. That is what people are upset about.

Watering down how sick crimes are described does society no good, and those who live in the society no good. In this case, it only helps those who have committed the crimes.

Which sort of pisses off people who live their life without committing those crimes, don't you know?

I know it's a complete tangent, but it's similar to the acceptance of illegal immigrants, and how those who came to this country legally feel about it. Why should those people, who essentially violated the law (in a practical sense, think of it as cutting in line) get better treatment than those who followed the law? Here in Taxifornia, there was a big story on local TV about the difficulties "undocumented" students face in getting student aid. Cry me an effing river.

That’s where I’m coming from here dude

They changed it because of negative impact on the pedos, you wanna tell me this means something different?

Tell you what, get a friend to call you someone who committed sexual offenses and let me know how positive that impact was.

My point is it’s having a negative effect on them so to make the people who raped kids feel better about themselves

Get a friend to call you someone who raped kids instead of a kid rapist and let me know how much better you feel about yourself.

You’re probably one of the guys who agrees with SSTTUUTTAA

Who's that?

The ultimate libtard

Just, read fat Elvis’ comment about why people are against it, I don’t feel like arguing

I blocked him a long time ago. There's NO point in reading anything he says - he's a deliberate time waster.