Demand justice

If only there was some...way...to... I don't know.... Audit votes and complete a forensic analysis of the machines and servers... Argh! If only that existed!
Curses!

Like this is magic and those cursed Dems are so advanced in their thinking that they can't be matched by Repubs.

I read this morning that the company hired to do the Georgia audit also has ties to Dominion

Demand answers!

Demand evidence!

Atlanta, GA, Fulton county balloting counting - security camera evidence of ballot counters working after closing pulling out hidden ballot boxes with no election official supervision, no media coverage and no poll observers.

but if you plug your fingers in your ears deep enough, you can't hear any of the truth

Debunked. Try again, Trumptard.

Democrat: This video evidence isn't video evidence.

Because it isn't.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/12/fact-check-video-from-ga-does-not-show-suitcases-filled-with-ballots-pulled-from-under-a-table-after-poll-workers-dismissed.html

Nope. All people in the video are identified and none of them are republican poll watchers. Also the time stamp puts it after the close. Nice try at fake news though.

https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/12/fact-check-video-from-ga-does-not-show-suitcases-filled-with-ballots-pulled-from-under-a-table-after-poll-workers-dismissed.html

But Georgia's voting system implementation manager — you know, someone who would lose their job if this was actually fraud — said it was all normal procedure and nothing looks odd or bizarre.
Thus, no evidence of voter fraud. 🙄

Didn't read the article.

Maybe you should.

YOU didn't read the article.

Uh, yeah I did. Did you?

LMAO

That's what the justice systems for.

Okay

Prove it!

This stuff has already had its day in court. The "witnesses" weren't even testifying under oath and they still couldn't provide actual proof.

Nope, fake news again. You never testify in court without being under oath. They did testify in state legislature hearings which is not the same.

Yeah, you're not actually required to be truthful, unlike in court.

You actually are, but they didn't put them under oath, which was the legislatures choice.

Unhinged Trumpers are willing to shoot up a pizza joint and go to prison over some BS they saw on Infowars. Do we think they're ok with risking jail by committing perjury for Trump? Mm, yep, sure do!

2hsnp9.jpg (click to show) Upvoted!

all of those lawsuits failed. Trump is going nowhere. Not 1 of the 300+ cases of voter fraud has been confirmed.

Well, he's going to Mar-a-Largo at least until New York extradites him to stand trial on...FRAUD CHARGES! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I love schadenfreude, don't you?

If you believe those numbers, you're batshit insane. No evidence, AND TRUMP HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE LAWSUIT!

Republicans: *Provides mountains of evidence*
Democrats: I" see evidence before me."

Nope, no mountains of evidence. Not even a friggin molehill.

HERE IS THE EVIDENCE

https://hereistheevidence.com/

1,218,281 Ballots Touched By Anomalies
923 Fact Witnesses
31+ Courts Blocked An Evidentiary Hearing

As for "fact checking" by Leadstories.com, for those who never heard of it, here's the Editor in Chief:

Alan Duke | Lead Stories
Editor-in-Chief Alan Duke co-founded Lead Stories after ending a 26-year career with CNN...

Once you know where he's been, you know what kind of "fact checking" he does.

More BS about courts refusing to hear evidence. Trump's lawyers literally admitted that they have no evidence.
And a lot of the witnesses didn't pay attention in orientation and describe ordinary things.
And as for Lead Stories: all it did was quote Republican officials, whose statements appear in several other news sources

1-47 in post election litigation and counting...

Nope 3-4. The rest are not Trump. Why do the left keep spreading this fake news.

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2020/11/16/trump-election-lawsuits-republicans-battleground-states-vote-count/6177538002/
Of course its USA Today so you may want to verify. Some of these weren't lawsuits they were injunctions which are a request for an action by a judge.

Even your source doesn't remotely say 3-4 but go off.

You have to actually read it. the actual lawsuits are very low. The rest are not lawsuits.

They're literally lawsuits, according to your own suit, but again go off. I have no f**king idea where you got the "3 victories" from either. That's a figment of your imagination.

Someone's delusional.

Yeah...and they voted Trump.

Ah yes, Bush and Trump appointed judges, heads of federal agencies like Bill Barr, Chad Wolf, and Chris Krebs, attorney generals and secretary of states including republicans, other election officials, election experts, etc. etc. they're all part of the deep state. Every single one of them is wrong, but Trump is right.

Why don't you just admit you're in a cult? Don't be shy about it.

A judge not ruling in the way you desire isn't proof of judicial corruption, tho.