special kind of stupid

special kind of stupid | IF YOU ARE MARCHING IN SUPPORT OF GIVING UP ONE OF YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS YOU ARE A SPECIAL KIND OF STUPID | image tagged in special kind of stupid | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
21,785 views, 246 upvotes, Made by sweetP 3 months ago special kind of stupid
special kind of stupid memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
15 ups, 4 replies
AND IF YOU THINK THAT IS WHAT THEY'RE MARCHING FOR,... MY QUESTION IS WHO TIES YOUR SHOE LACES? | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
13 ups, 5 replies
Distracted Boyfriend Meme | STRICTER LAWS ON GUN OWNERSHIP AMERICAN PEOPLE GUN OWNERSHIP | image tagged in memes,distracted boyfriend | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Not everyone wants to ban all guns. There definitely is a push to ban the AR-15. But to NRAers that's the same thing, apparently.
reply
12 ups, 2 replies
Two Buttons Meme | PAYING ATTENTION JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS | image tagged in memes,two buttons | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
That's what they're not hearing. It's not a ban or taking away of guns. But you know, selective hearing, propaganda, paranoia, fear, n good ol' fashion na na na na na na I cant hear you, bullshit.
reply
12 ups, 4 replies
Leonardo Dicaprio Cheers Meme | SLIPPERY SLOPE PARANOIA | image tagged in memes,leonardo dicaprio cheers | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
They're terrified that banning the AR-15 will lead to a ban on all guns someday... like whenever that will be...
reply
10 ups, 2 replies
AT LEAST SOME LEFTISTS ARE HONEST ABOUT THEIR INTENTIONS AND DESIRE | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
7 ups, 6 replies
Futurama Fry Meme | IF STRICTER LAWS DON'T STOP GUN VIOLENCE THEN SO BE IT | image tagged in memes,futurama fry | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Guns are a plague. They always have been.
reply
9 ups, 2 replies
i.imgflip.com/27509j.jpg (click to show)
i.imgflip.com/26lqcj.jpg (click to show)
"Then so be it." I bet that was the attitude of citizens in the UK. Now they find themselves helpless and defenseless in the face of criminals with knives and guns. That is not going to happen in the USA.
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
reply
10 ups, 2 replies
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
5 ups
i.imgflip.com/272n1d.jpg (click to show)
Couldn't have said it better.
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
*DISCLAIMER* (this meme was strictly intended as a joke. no fiery responses or attempted roasts will actually be taken seriously.) ;-P
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 2 replies
I know you're joking. But the British take that shit seriously.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Brits don't take shit like you seriously.
0 ups
Lol...while being **ped and acid bombed my a Muslim horde. Unbelieveable that the CELTS have allowed this.
reply
1 up
lol i should have known... after all, i AM on a meme website... ;-P
reply
9 ups, 2 replies
Guns aren’t a plague dummy
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
Got a non-conservative leaning source to back up your claim?
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups
reply
2 ups
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 2 replies
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Saying guns are a plague isn't the same as saying they want to take them away. I think tobacco is a plague of sorts, but I'm not trying to ban cigarettes.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Tobacco bought and paid for America.
Smoke up
reply
0 ups
reply
1 up
Share this with of the "nobody wants to take or ban your guns or repeal the Second Amendment" types:
i.imgflip.com/2777x0.jpg (click to show)
i.imgflip.com/274xqe.jpg (click to show)
Because their are leftists out there who make their true intentions known.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
The founders of this nation who fought and died for it's creation would disagree with you about that. Be careful how you use 'always'
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
How do you know what they would think right now? The world was very different 200 years ago than it is today. They only had muskets, not AR-15s. They didn't have as many people in the military which is why farmboys had to take up arms. They wrote the second amendment for a very different time. They might hate what guns have become. But I stand by my original statement. Guns have *always* been a plague on humanity. And they always will be.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
The strong prey upon the weak. That is human nature. That is never going to change. It doesn't matter if you're King George III, Joseph Stalin, Nikita Khrushchev, Saddam Hussein, or the drug-pushing gang-bangers down the street. This is simply how human beings are wired.

From the beginning of time, the weak have either paid the milk-money, or picked up an equalizer to level the playing field. That's how it works.

You would take away the greatest equalizer ever devised by man to empower the individual with a fighting chance against tyranny. I think that's despicable.
reply
3 ups, 3 replies
Guns have been the tool of tyranny since their inception. This is why we have a military. If you think you and your guns are going to do anything against our military you're batsh*t crazy.
3 ups
Tyranny comes in many forms, and does not necessarily imply "government". You don't think gangs and drug syndicates that rule neighborhoods to the extent that police are hesitant to go there constitutes tyranny?

Having said that, I'd like to point out that armed partisans have held out against large, organized military forces again and again throughout history.

I repeat, guns are not the tools of tyranny, they are the defense against it. If you cannot see the truth of that, then your knowledge of history is faulty.
0 ups
Every weapon has been the tool of tyranny at some point, not just guns. You can't banish all weapons: people will just make their own. A police state would be the closest thing to accomplishing that, but people would still find a way.
0 ups
Fighting the military might be crazy, but what about protecting against criminals? What about muggers and rapists who will almost always choose to attack a person weaker than themselves? Certainly, pepper spray and self-defense training will help, but not much if the criminal powers through them. A gun remains the best tool for self-defense ever created, especially for women.

I am not going to insult your values. I do believe that you want to see less death, less murder, less violence. I sympathize with that. I used to think that a world without guns was desirable but unfeasible, but at the end of the day, I don't think I would like to live in a world where rapists and other thugs never have to worry about being shot. I don't think you want that, either
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
"Having said that, I'd like to point out that armed partisans have held out against large, organized military forces again and again throughout history."

But that was back when armies and civilians had similar weaponry. Today it's not even close to the same. US citizens have small arms. The US military has jets, bombers, rockets, missiles, nukes, etc. If (I'm speaking hypothetically) the US military/government tried to take over, of course armed citizens would fight back as best they could, but it would ultimately be in vain, because the government and military hold all the cards, speaking in terms of weaponry.
0 ups
Well, I don't know if Afghani rebels were as well armed as the Soviet invaders they held off for almost a decade. Granted, they had covert assistance from anti-Communist western powers, but that shouldn't take anything away from their grit and determination in the defense of their homeland.

I would say that far more important than any tank or jet would be the propaganda machine. When someone talks about the citizen militias in West Virginia, Montana or Arizona, most people get a picture in their heads of Libertarian survivalist kooks. While some may qualify as such, I suspect that's more propaganda than reality.
reply
0 ups
Lol...
Gun free Zones is where democrats choose to go and shoot people up. A r e you retarded or just pretending to be?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
MauiOnion dude you need to re-read your meme... lol according to you stricter gun laws wont stop any gun violence... so doing that might make things worse stupid liberal snowflake
reply
0 ups
Nice argument. You shouuld run for president.
reply
1 up
What no one wants to admit about the clickbait they just clicked...
reply
5 ups
Beware the boogyman. F**k, gotta wait 82 secs. Then I'll ask for your gun.
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Can you prove that it won't?
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
9 ups, 2 replies
Nazi Germany, Russia, mexico, china.
Need more proof?
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
Chicago
reply
5 ups
Nope. NRA propaganda that ignores the fact that the cities around Chicago allowed guns to be sold that were brought into Chicago despite the ban.

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20151008/NEWS02/151009827/the-problem-with-using-chicago-to-make-the-case-against-gun-control
reply
1 up
The only place in the USA says the NRA.
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
lol we're hardly third world or communist countries but at the rate Trump is going, we'll get there soon. I'll give you that.
reply
1 up
Really?

One word refutation : Detroit.

56 solid years of Democrat control. There simply is no Republican one can blame. Well, there's no way an honest, smart person can blame any Republican. That's not to say the stupid and insane won't try. Like you for example.
reply
1 up
You can't?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
No, it's about control. They want to tell people what they can and can't own based on lies. If it were about saving lives they would be marching to restrict cell phones, cars, swimming pools, hammers, trucks, etc. All of which kill more people than semi-auto rifles do. A major portion of the sporting rifles out there are semi-auto. They want to restrict access to one particular type based on cosmetic enhancements. Once they get the wording "semi-automatic" in the laws then that opens the door to restricting or taking away many, many other rifles.
reply
2 ups
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups
reply
1 up
[image deleted]
reply
1 up, 1 reply
AR means Armalite rifle. It isnt even close to a military assult rifle. Its the same small game round used on ranches for varmints and hog control. River Ranch rifle is one example of probably 50 differing but similar rifles that fire the same caliber. The NRA is only a 2A defending organization.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
reply
0 ups
MauiOnion bullshit more pistols and shotguns were used in mass-shooting since the 80's... liberal lying media is giving loads ands of bullshit... there pushing ther own commie agenda... if they takes AR-15 away do you really think that they will stop there... liberal wont be happy till all guns are gone they when then take other right away you will wish you still had guns... also the AR-15 is a small caliber rifle round there are much bigger caliber rounds for legal guns to buy and a cowboy 9mm repeater rifle can be fired faster then an AR-15

legeal round size and 5.56x.45mm & .223 are the rounds AR-15 uses

https://www.pewpewtactical.com/rifle-caliber-guide/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States

cowboy repeater fired very fast but you dont hear about people b**ching about these

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3iX9xSdyzI
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Source that please
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
Here's a couple sources for you but there are plenty others:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/world/ak-47-mass-shootings.html ...

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/latest-mass-shootings-all-have-ar-15-in-common/ ...

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timeinc.net/time/5160355/ar-15-rifle-florida-parkland-school-shooting
reply
0 ups
The Ak 47 is the bandits gun of choice.https://youtu.be/yxQNYPYFq1c
reply
0 ups
Yeh, those are have truths and some all out lies. Especially the cases where multiple types of guns were used.
The worse mass shootings were with a bolt action rifle. We simply can't trust liberals to give the truth and nothing but the truth. Just a bunch of emotional talking heads.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 5 replies
Because AR-15s is first step. People are ALREADY calling for a ban on ALL semi-auto rifles and pistols. And when they do that and the killings don't stop (which they wont, because shotguns kill you just as dead), they'll call for a ban on the rest of them.

A ban on AR-15 IS a ban on ALL guns. It's called divide and conquer- ever heard of it?
reply
3 ups
Heard they played Woodstock.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
reply
[deleted]
1 up
What are you even trying to say? Are you asking for a rifle duel, where I get an AR and you get a bolt action? Dueling is illegal I'm afraid....
reply
1 up
I'll take you up on it. Let's meet, say, in a football stadium. You can have the on on top and I'll take any one of the ones on the bottom. They are of a larger caliber and are more accurate. I'd hit you LONG before you were able to be effective with the semi-auto. Hell, I might even take the pistol. I hit a jackrabbit once at 75 yards with my Ruger GP100 revolver. I'll admit though, it's unusually accurate for a handgun. I could have my 84 year old Marine Corps Vet Dad challenge you with his .45 Colt 19111. He can still hit a 2 litre bottle of water at 100 yards.
reply
0 ups
Why isn't everyone just satisfied with a little handgun? Why need rifles at all?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
You're only going to force weapon diversification.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Again with the tinfoil hat paranoia. We don't know for sure what will happen because we haven't tried it yet...
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Paranoia? This is a case in fact, not speculation. Nor is it isolated. I don't know what will happen if I jump off a bridge, because I haven't tried it yet...but I don't need a longitudinal study to know the outcome will not be a happy one.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
We haven't implemented comprehensive gun regulation in the US to the extent that people are asking for yet so yes, you're making assumptions and using your crystal ball to try to predict what will happen if we do. Meanwhile your compromised president continues to chip away at our democracy at the behest of a fascist foreign power and you're perfectly ok with that. But God forbid actual citizens of this country try to change our society for the better. All that matters is you get to stroke your gun at night while you cower in fear of an imaginary tyrannical government blind to the fact that you're supporting one. That's you and your half of a brain in action.
reply
1 up
Talk about assumptions...I said none of that. The problem with the experiment that you're suggesting is that, like jumping off a bridge, it is irreversible. My original point in posting the meme about the Austin bomber was that this isn't about guns, it is about violence and the depravity of our society. Gun regs won't change that. That makes gun regs as effective as treating the flu by holding your breath. Address the cause not the symptom. The tone of your reply suggests that you will not be able to hear any of this. Oh well, I tried.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
How about a serious reduction in mass shootings? Can we at least strive for that? Why don't you ask your boy Putin about dividing and conquering?
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
Want to reduce mass shootings? Address the actual underlying societal issues such as increasing alienation and the fact that media coverage drives copycats. Want to ban guns? Then you'll have to ban all, because ANY gun can be used for mass shootings.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
So your half of a brain is psychic then? :))))
reply
[deleted]
1 up
Nope, it's just able to put together basic concepts like that if you have a whole brain, you must have half a brain. You know, basic concepts that would make someone like you get a headache. Stuff like peekaboo or arithmetic.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
MauiOnion do you even know how many actual mass shooting in the US that there have been since the 80's its not like it happen every week... count them there have been 22 mass shoting since the 80's but way more deaths

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States

2.1k
shares
How many Americans die by guns versus other means?

http://www.oregonlive.com/data/2015/10/gun_deaths_other_causes.html
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Yes I know the US has had numerous mass shootings over the years. What's your point?

As far as people dying by other causes that's just another deflection. This is about one person committing an act of violence against innocent people and using guns to do so. We can talk about shark attacks or scooter accidents all day but the gun problem isn't going away in its own.
reply
0 ups
the point im making is people die more from other thing then besides guns... that's the that i'm making... liberal media, liberal government, anti-gun people and misinformed liberals push for banning guns because they have an agenda... they pander to people that are misinformed about guns to gain their votes and keep ther3e corupt butt's in office... and its funny that you think 22 mass shootings in 37 years is alot when that stuff happens over seas also daly in other countries that have stricter gun laws then if they dont have gun...large groups of people use bladed weapons, clubs, vehicle and nerve gas to kill people... so whats next banning all that other stuff and i know nerve gas is already banned but you can make chlorine gas very easy
reply
8 ups, 3 replies
[image deleted]
reply
5 ups, 3 replies
reply
5 ups, 3 replies
If the right to bear arms only applies to a well regulated (eroniously interpreted as government approved) militia, there would have been no need to include it in the bill of rights.
If you want to do away with the second amendment, or even other parts of the constitution, just admit it. Many people feel it is antiquated and obsolete. I may disagree with you, but I can respect your opinion. What I can not respect is people who claim to value the constitution while systematically trying to dismantle it.
reply
5 ups
then you are just erroneously interpreting 'shall not be infringed
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Even the founding fathers at the time found the constitution needed updating.
reply
1 up
This is true. But many claim to "respect" the second amendment while intentionally interpreting it in a way that makes it meaningless. If it only applies to a well regulated (interpreted as government approved by those who push this limitation) militia, then there would have been no reason to include it as all a government has to do to limit (infringe on) the right to bear arms is refuse to approve or acknowledge militias.
If you want to eliminate the 2nd amendment, I disagree, but respect your opinion.
What I don't respect are those who claim to respect it while trying to interpret out of existence with ridiculous interpretations.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Ahh yes, the well regulated militia argument. You really should pull your head out of your posterior and realize that your arguments mean exactly nothing when discussing OUR laws. You don't live here, numbnuts.
reply
0 ups
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 1 reply
You're a troll.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
You're an idiot.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Ad hominems... ad hominems everywhere. These people should run for seats in the Senate.
reply
1 up
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 2 replies
For knowing US federal law? We really live in an Orwell novel where knowing the facts gets you labeled an idiot.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Facts? You don't do anything but butthurt yelping from that inbred noggin.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
I'm inbred for knowing the law? You kids have the weirdest slang.
1 up
More kid slang: "Just because the shoe fits, don't mean you have to wear it"
reply
1 up
Yes, this is an Orwellian universe we're living in.
reply
3 ups
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
It was defined by the Supreme Court of the United States of America, and the decision reaffirmed a citizen's right to own a firearm was protected by the Constitution.

Do try to keep up, and pay attention.
reply
1 up
Defined how? When?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
By all means, say it was defined and then don't provide any definition or source of the definition.

Do try to learn the basics of debate.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
He just provided the US supreme court as his source. At least read before you reply.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Because the Supreme Court has only ruled on one thing ever? Provide the specific ruling or go back to licking windows.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
Heller vs D.C.

Look it the f**k up. Didn't realize I had to spell it out for you, but there you go.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
Get up off your lazy ass and do your own research. You say I am wrong - so prove it. Hint : it's the only ruling dealing with the Second Amendment in the last 50 years. Even a dummy like you could hit that target.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
I wish I could say I was surprised, but your lack of intellectual capacity and depth pretty much guaranteed a juvenile response. You want to wallow in your ignorance and stupidity. Sadly, I will not join you in this endeavor. I am going to stay over here, smart and wealthy, while you indulge in the mire that is stupidity and poverty.

Enjoy it until the end of your days, and may those days be long and cold.
2 ups
Presumptuous, pompous, arrogant, and vindictive rolled up into one bitter package.
All because you assume I have nothing better to do with my time than research the claims you refuse to substantiate. If it isn't worth your precious time to present a valid argument, then quite frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.
1 up
You forgot to add "moron" to your list of qualifications.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
"Presumptuous, pompous, arrogant, and vindictive rolled up into one bitter package. "

You forgot better looking, richer and way more intelligent. Especially the intelligent part, because no matter how you struggle, no matter if you were given all of eternity to train, you will never, ever be more intelligent than me.

Sucks to be you.

What does one call someone so lazy, so absolutely worthless they can't hit a target that is 10 feet away, and all bullseye? You, of course. That of which I spoke was literally the only SCOTUS decision on the subject in the last 50 years, and child's play to discover. Even this simple effort is beyond your grasp, yet you castigate your superiors that can achieve this mundane task.

Really sucks to be you.

So here's a swing of the cluebat : Grow up. Read a book. Move out of your parent's basement. Quit acting like a moron and I guarantee you a world of opportunity and wealth will come your way. On the other hand, I would wager most of my wealth you will not take this advice, live your days in bitterness and anger, and die utterly alone and unwept.

Like looking up a very simple SCOTUS case, the choice is yours to make. I am betting on the cold, dark, bitter, lonely death.

REALLY, really sucks to be you.
1 up
In your astute babbling of 'facts' to back your empty position on the issue, you forgot to say "troll."

Enjoy your trailer park welfare wealth.
reply
0 ups
He only wants you to post the complete information (rather than looking it up) because he knows It's long. Then he'll attempt to criticise it for being "long winded" or "too technical". Give him an abbreviated version, and It's "over-simplified". He will NEVER adress the actual arguement, just the way it is presented. That's how all these trolls work. I know It's hard to ignore them, because you're right, they are idiots, and it hurts to let that stand, but don't feed the trools. Once you idiot proof a comment, they will double down on thier idiocy and eventualky succeed in driving you insane.
reply
6 ups
So you mean to tell me they don't want to do away with our Constitutional right?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Sewmyeyesshut your just a special kinda retarded liberal snowflake
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
That's all you got? Name calling? Typical of your kind.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
you f**king hypocrite... your the one saying that were so dumb that we cant even tie our shoes.... you can go f**k your hypocritical liberal snowflake self
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
First of all it's *you're, second you inbred, half wit, shit stained slow boy, you obviously need help with your laces if you think it's about repealing the second . Nobody is trying to take away your guns, get the jiz outta your eyes and the cocks outta your ears ya f**kin' dummy. If you payed the f**k attention, people are asking for tighter regulations is all. So get your cum dumpster of a head outta your brainwashed right winged conspiracy laden gay frog used up ass and work to help solve the problem rather than be a sister f**kin', daddy felchin' piece of cry baby asshat that's paranoid about your own genocide. B**ch.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
now im inbred, still a half wit and a shit stain... any other names you liberal soy boy/ girl want to cal me... im not the one who enjoys the cock like you liberal beta soy boy/ girl do.

liberal what to ban guns
http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/op-ed/article182420376.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=38&v=Mj4AcjyuV38
https://www.quora.com/Are-there-actually-any-mainstream-Democrats-who-want-
to-ban-all-guns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJmFEv6BHM0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nlhQafsx3o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oePCncK77i0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg0odTmQ2sM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyfkQkchlu4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snc7f1BBuZk

this is a few examples of why democrats are lying to you liberal morons... and again i dont suck c o c k like you do Sewmyeyesshut..because only liberal beta cuck commie soy boy / girl do and i have a clear head unlike your hateful liberal ass... just to let you know my piece of shit dad died when i was in junior high and i never really knew him because he was human garbage kinda like you hypocrite... don't have any sisters and again only beta liberal commie soy boy / girls like have sex with there family... finally you can go f**k yourself with a nasty corroded sewer pipe and ill bet you would like it... nasty liberal commie trash like you are a cancer and are what it killing america
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Ha ha ha ha ha. That was fun. Gettin' all riled up there. I am not liberal nor American, Just sittin back watchin y'all get all f**ked up over this. Innocent people getting all shot up all over America, cops shootin unarmed black men, you guys got some serious issues, but by all means, keep fighting amungst yourselves, let the coroners sort it out.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
wow your stupid... the only innocent people being shot are by black and hispanic gangs, illegals, crazy liberals that shot up places... {and yes a majority of them are liberal look it up yourself lazy ass}... as for cops shooting {unarmed black men yea right} most where later proven to have committed crimes unarmed and armed before hand and had guns {mostly hand illegally bought gun} alot died because they had health problems, pulled fake guns...cellphones and other items out when cop told them to get on the ground,... they ran, fought, or just did stupid things that got them killed and more blacks are killed by other blacks in robberies, drive-by and home invasions more then cops since you arent america you are feed lies by CNN, BBC and other liberal new out there that hate america...question where are you from that is so great that you have no violence in your country... its only the liberals fighting against america because they want to turn it into a socialist 3rd world hell hole that lets everybody in even if there bad guys
reply
0 ups, 3 replies
Bla bla bla. So much hate. Canadian, so I don't watch CNN or BBC or the like. What is a credible news source? And if you say Alex frogs are turning gay Jones or FOX, I'll slap you myself.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
believe what you want dude i don't care... i was just pointing out that canada is better than america.... and how is what put propaganda when its all true and all actually happened... and if your not a liberal {even though you sound like one} then what are you
0 ups
Canada's great, but we do have our issues. That whole national anthem thing, I will still sing it the old way, It was changed back in the 80's aswell when we seceded from England, then changed again. I try not to get all broke up about it. I sit on the middle of the fence, I think everyone should work, but there are those that need help. Drug testing welfare recipients sounds like a great idea, carbon tax is a bullshit cash grab, legalize marry jane, we've lived our entire lives with pipelines, new and improved lines are a good investment, fix the places immigrants are comming from horendous conditions, so they don't need to emigrate. If youre an immigrant and commit murder, back you go. Ya know, middle of the road stuff.
reply
0 ups
the national anthem thing is BS if someone tried to make americas anthem gender neutral id be pissed... yes people that are able to work but there are those who really can and cant get any real meaningful help on it... they would rather help pregnant woman, drug / alcoholic and minorities then they would help someone with real problems... the health care thing in canada ive heard is shit and we almost had the same model..i agree that welfare people should get drug tested and given one chance to streatgeren themselves or be put off of it... green energy is mostly a joke..where not far enough into it for it to really matter and it take twice the resources to make and maintain it... yes weed should be legal, it has to many health benefits in it for it not to be

23 health benefits of marijuana
http://www.businessinsider.com/health-benefits-of-medical-marijuana-2014-4

fossil fuel powers most of our world and these green peacers don't understand that like said before green energy isn't viable as of now... and its cheap get and make compared to other sources...as for immigrants i agree im not against people coming here legally but the illegals and refugees are a huge problem... those countries that they come from dont want the make things better they want there people stupid so they can use them... some muslim groups have said that there goal is to breed out white people so they can take over and its worth they have a dozen or so children apiece and we don't have kids because we cant afford it or other reasons... if you dont belive me then look it up yourself... i've got no problem with canada you seem like a great country... it's just your PC SJW leader is f**king your country up... as for us...trumps not as bad as media makes him out to be... sure hes an asshole and tells you like it is but neither of those are crimes like the liberal in america think they are... don't judge someone off hand... if you had been as rude as you where i wouldn't have acted in kinda... i can have a civil discussion with others if they are civil with me
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
again you are a hypocrite saying i have hate when you spew it much more then me for one you have the liberal cuck trudeau... who enacted laws such as jailing people for misgendering when there are so called infinite genders, getting rid of boarders to let everyone in, Changing ‘O Canada’ and other laws

https://www.dailysignal.com/2017/06/19/canadians-face-hate-crimes-using-wrong-gender-pronouns/

http://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/corbella-trudeau-has-erased-our-border-with-one-simple-tweet

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/10/01/changing-o-canada-sparks-fierce-reaction-from-canadians.html

massive crimes happening

muslims attacking canadians
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AP9NiUQi74
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYDhX3Z4H7s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGUqf2ddnpU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtMirHISnxc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rBezl64SNo
and many more

gun violence in canada
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqVaYMkU1rA

worst canadian cities
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLXrNH4lXZc

so quit action like your shit dont stink also
0 ups
Like I said, I'm no Liberal. And have lived in two of the most violent cities in Canada, and the rest of that shit you got spewing out of your reference material is propaganda dummy. We know what we got here and how we do appreciate most of it, like healthcare, strict gun laws, and all around good people for the most part.
reply
10 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 1 reply
No, Travis Scott's girlfriend, I will not join you in banning guns.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
6 ups
reply
10 ups, 2 replies
The other special kind of stupid
reply
10 ups
The other other special kind of stupid
reply
5 ups
https://patrioticmillionaires.org/about/
reply
8 ups
reply
[deleted]
7 ups, 2 replies
Because if they did this with an armed population, like we have, you'd be looking at an armed revolution real quick. This is why dictators like Hitler, Mao, and Joseph Stalin wanted a disarmed populace because they can't fight back. And if Trump ever does get as bad as Hitler, as many liberals think he will, that's what will allow people to hopefully deal with him. Kinda hard to fight back with sling shots and water balloons.
reply
3 ups
i.imgflip.com/272x4e.jpg (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 3 replies
They have missiles, tanks and aircraft. Your AR15s may as well be water balloons.
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 1 reply
The problem is that our military tends to have a very hard time dealing with armed insurgent groups that engage in guerrilla type warfare[ISIS, the Vietcong, Iraqi insurgent groups etc.]. And many times throughout history, revolutionary groups that hold out long enough draw the attention not just of defectors[which bring with them military goodies], but foreign countries that oppose the enemy of the revolutionary group, examples being France during the Revolutionary War, and our country coming to the aid of the Mujahideen during the Soviet War in Afghanistan. It all starts somewhere, maybe lay off the MSNBC and read a history book.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
I know history. None of it pertains to us no, here. I also don't care for MSNBC.

You're examples are either wholly antiquated or in 3rd world foreign countries where we were the outsider.

The government not only could annihilate the population with weaponry in this country, they could effectively shut down the entire energy grid, food supply, healthcare systems etc. Your AR15s will be meaningless. Maybe helpful for survival, but not to beat the armed services poised against you.

Lay off the Breitbart, Alex Jones or whatever right wing kookfest you call information...and think for yourself.
reply
[deleted]
0 ups
Actually I'm a centrist who doesn't want to see history repeated. MSNBC, CNN, Fox News, all garbage media.
reply
1 up, 2 replies
reply
1 up, 2 replies
The South didn't fight a guerilla war... They fought conventionally using Napoleonic tactics but don't let facts get in the way of your stupid
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 4 replies
You realize the confederacy had its own constitution? And fighting conventionally using multiple standing armies, not militias. But again, facts vs. stupid. Considering just how ignorant you seem to be on the issue, I'll also point out that the north lost more lives than the South during the civil war and were generally winning for the first two years until northern industry and manpower started playing a major role. But keep to your inaccurate steamroll narrative, you are doing wonders for your credibility
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You're not even aware of what the topic is, as displayed by you continuing to verify my point, and I'm kinda bored. So go read some more Alex Jones on YouTube and have a nice day, mkay?

later, toots.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You're really not paying attention to what you yourself are saying. Slant it all you want, but your lies don't revoke truth.
That's just not how reality works. History hasn't changed to suit your bogus propaganda.
Credibility is irrelevent.

[Tapped the wrong thing, original got deleted, added a meme while I was it]
reply
1 up
A reminder in parting what you were arguing about, since you seem to have trouble reading even simple things and understanding them.
reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Who said anything about guerilla warfare, except you?
Oh, and some other people above earlier who aren't me, genius?

Lay off the moonshine & meth, inbreeding has done you bad enough as is.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You responded to a conversation about guerilla warfare and insurrection with some half witted post about the South (I am from Colorado by the way so your prejudiced crack about moonshine did nothing but expose you for the sack of shit you are) and you are going to pretend nothing that took place before your reply is relevant. Funny. Maybe your problem is too many meds?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Again, your comprehension skills are lacking.

Lay off the moonshine and meth, and learn to read.

ta ta?
0 ups
Hurr durr
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Triggered much, snowflake?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Deplorapool
Hey retard, we are talking about 21st century insurrection and asymetric warfare. You know, relevant stuff. Try to keep up.
[deleted]
0 ups
Sure thing. Glad we're back on subject. So we agree that no, the US can't defeat a homegrown insurrection on their own soil because doing so would necessitate the very infrastructure and population they govern. Glad I could teach even a retard something. I feel good. :)
reply
1 up
They won't send those to take what you have. They will send men with guns. Missiles tanks and aircraft are expensive.
reply
1 up
If they are so ineffective why do these window-lickers want to ban them?
reply
5 ups
Viewed and upvoted.

Guns aren't the problem. People are.

This topic requires more thought from SOME people.

Because... criminals don't follow laws. Do they?

A true WTF where they thinking moment...

imgflip.com/i/26k0p4
reply
7 ups, 3 replies
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
I've never assaulted weapons in my life. In fact, I don't think I've ever threatened one, either.
reply
5 ups
LOL! XD
reply
1 up
Those "some" would be profoundly stupid, but you are right... they could. They just wouldn't get very far with their arguments.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Define assault weapon
reply
4 ups, 3 replies
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You can do the same thing with handguns ya know.
reply
3 ups, 4 replies
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
The guy could have killed a lot more by flying his private plane into the crowd.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
reply
5 ups
ROFLMAO!!

YOU - of all people - chastising someone for staying on-topic when the straw man argument is the only rhetorical device you seem to know how to use. It's hilarious and shows your complete lack of intellectual depth.

It's almost like you cannonball into the deep end of the stupid pool to begin each day.
reply
1 up
No. No guns need to be banned. Ever.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Why are the majority of mass shootings committed with a handgun then
reply
3 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
You’re not making any arguments lmao
reply
1 up, 1 reply
TELL HIM!
reply
0 ups
*knapsack for the constipated snowflake who wants to go grammar nazi!
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
But you can do this with a pressure cooker or a fertilizer bomb.
reply
3 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Profoundly dumb comment is profoundly dumb.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
WAY more kids were killed with handguns than rifles, dipshit. And FYI, the Florida shooter only had 10 found magazines, showing your "common sense high capacity ban" is as retarded as you are.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Irrelevant. YOU claimed it couldn't be done with a handgun, and I just showed you a clip that could be used to do it. You made a statement from a position of extreme stupidity, so now it's time to man up and admit the dumb.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
It's painfully obvious you suffer from diarrhea of the mouth. You are profoundly dumb, but are in capable of admitting this simple fact.

So no - until such time as you can summon enough mental wattage to admit your inability to back up even the most simple statements YOU made, I will not answer any of your "questions".
reply
1 up
reply
0 ups
So you dont know
reply
4 ups
reply
[deleted]
4 ups
Agreed!
reply
4 ups
reply
[deleted]
4 ups
reply
3 ups
reply
4 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Reasonable gun control doesn't mean giving your up right to bear arms.
i.imgflip.com/250axe.jpg (click to show)
reply
2 ups
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups
i.imgflip.com/26w46j.jpg (click to show)
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups
Said the idiot.

If the Constitution is not relevant today, then I guess we can just go ahead and make abortion illegal. Right?

Oh? You mean you didn't THINK about that statement before you made it? I am shocked... SHOCKED! So shocked I think I will have a heart attack and die.

That's called sarcasm, son. Ask your mommy to help you look it up. It's for damn sure you don't have enough brains to do so for yourself, what with stepping on the rhetorical rakes all the time.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Everyone needs to realise that if you agree or disagree with gun control you are not imeediately SJW or Alt-Right, you just have a view point on the world. There's no point in tryna bag all the other side as a certain extreme group because you'd have to do it to your side as well.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up
reply
2 ups
DID YOU JUST ASSUME THAT YOUR OPINIONS MATTER TO THE BEAREUCRATIC GOVERNMENT?!
I'M SO TRIGGERED!
ONKLY MINE DO BECAUSE IF THEY DON'T, I WILL SHANKT HEM!
reply
1 up
What is the origin of this meme template cause I feel like I've seen it before.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/274m1g.jpg (click to show)
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
The real irony here is they will all be voting very soon. That will tell the tale.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
I read this earlier:
i.imgflip.com/274shs.jpg (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Hey, I'm in my 40's. Back then, I had no idea of Lenon or Marx or Stalin. I do remember Reagan get shot. What's yor point. The world evolves. Jump on or learn to swim.
reply
7 ups, 3 replies
The world does change but the evil in the hearts of men doesn't.
Have you made yourself aware of the evil those men did when they came to power?
The ignorance of youth is not an excuse to set idly by and allow these young people to steer the nation down a road towards less liberty. Less individual liberty and more reliance on the State is was led to the atrocities in communists countries and I don't want America taken down that path by ignorant young people. That is the point.
reply
5 ups
Learn from history, or die repeating it!
reply
5 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
DeVos heading the DOE and constant cuts to education. Take the blame or the credit of the outcome.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
I'm not saying Trump's admin. is innocent but the problem was in place long before they came about.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Defunding public education has been a GOP initiative for decades
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
Because when the donkeyparty is in charge our schools rank so much higher, right? The problem isn't the funding it is the curriculum and the lack of interest from students. But no, just blame republicans for everything like the partisan tool you are
reply
0 ups
Look at school performances in red vs blue states. It's not partisan. It's facts.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
Here is some data for you to digest. Have a nice day. http://politicsthatwork.com/blog/blue-states-outperforming-red-states.php
0 ups
www.bbc.com/news/amp/business-40511185 here is some for you. Maybe instead of focusing so much on red vs blue you ought to consider our country vs. foreign nations. Even your vaunted blue states fare poorly compared to overseas, despite the funding. Again, partisan politics isn't getting you anywhere
0 ups
The only way to fix our education is to revamp it completely. The only people who think throwing money at problems will make them go away are the people who either don't have or can't keep it. Stupid spending is still stupid
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
reply
9 ups, 2 replies
reply
2 ups
Cascade events....if/then.....it's not hard.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Stop lying - https://patrioticmillionaires.org/2018/03/22/dear-nra-members/
reply
2 ups
I thought FBI check failed in this 18 yr old
reply
0 ups
WRONG.

If the powers that be in Florida were not so damn worried about keeping the Federal money flowing to that school district, he WOULD NOT have been able to buy the gun. The failures of GOVERNMENT in every school shooting are legion.

Let's take away the guns from law-abiding people instead.

It's hilarious you cannot see your own profound stupidity in thinking that disarming the honest and decent people will result in no harm to you when criminals run riot WITH THE GUNS.
reply
0 ups
We're not enforcing the ones we have! Right here in liberal Philadelphia juveniles with gun charges are being nolle prossed! The FBI dropped the ball on Parkland. Oh boy, new regs to ignore.
reply
1 up
The kids marching don't really care, they just wanna skip school and feel special.
reply
2 ups
Why don't we just pass more laws against murdering people? I'm sure the criminals will obey new laws, right? Just like they obey the "Gun Free Zone" laws.
reply
1 up
Great minds think alike!

imgflip.com/i/27bpfn
reply
0 ups
In the last century armed governments killed 200 million of their unarmed subjects. Why would anyone want to take that chance again?
reply
0 ups
give me your freedom of speech and i will give you the gun i don't have
reply
[deleted]
0 ups
Evolution will take care of it
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups
Taking away Guns from Law Abiding Citizens is like cutting off you dick so Trump and Clinton can't cheat on their wives.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Nice argument. You should be a lawmaker.
reply
1 up
We need a lot less law makers and, a lot more lawmaintainers. Most laws should come with an automatic expiration date. Electing lawmakers ad nauseam has only given us laws ad nauseam. No one even knows how many laws are actually on the books. If we had automatic law expiration dates and lawmaintainers, we would only keep the laws that actually matter and, liberal idiots of any party wouldn't have much time on their hands to give us new stupid and crooked laws. Perfect laws, laws that don't expire, should require unanimous approval within and of both houses of congress and the office of the POTUS. Obviously, the constitution would be above such a maintenance system. There could even be a type based tier system for law expiration, 13 max, 9, 5 and, specific terms for less (non-co-incidence with elections is likely prudent). Our government is currently something akin to a cancer crossbred with a defective and self-destructive autoimmune response.
Flip Settings
special kind of stupid memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
IF YOU ARE MARCHING IN SUPPORT OF GIVING UP ONE OF YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS; YOU ARE A SPECIAL KIND OF STUPID
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back