"Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right"

The constitution is liberalism in its purest form, but what is understood today as liberal is what threatens the constitution of the United States, which is one of the greatest sources of liberty.

Up voted.

Leftists call themselves liberal. They are not.

Conservatives strive to protect the liberties enshrined in the Constitution. They are the true liberals, the defenders of liberty and freedom.

I think the same. The term liberal is distorted.

“Leftists call themselves liberal. They are not.“

They are communists.

"Leftists call themselves liberal. They are not"

They sure as hell aren't conservatives

"Conservatives strive to protect the liberties enshrined in the Constitution. They are the true liberals, the defenders of liberty and freedom."

Like which ones?

I mean yeah, this isn't news. They say so themselves that they don't care about the constitution lol.

Who said that?

Liberals really hate freedom. That is why they connived to include language in other cases that had nothing to do with the case so that it could be used as a "precedent" in Roe v Wade.

What libs want is to be able to control the Supreme Court, an unelected branch of the government, so that they can create laws completely outside of the will of the people.

They do not believe the people should have a vote on something like killing babies. They do not believe in the democracy. They accuse the Jan 6th rioters of trying to destroy democracy but rigging elections and ignoring the constitution is what is really killing democracy.

Do feel 'pro-choice' isn't really a 'choice' but another way for government to get what they want without coming off like Hitler. Why have government kill off whole sections of the population when it's easier to let the citizens do it themselves under the Right of Choice?
They also show their true colors about 'choice'. The latest example is Jane's Revenge. If Pro-Infanticide believes in Choice then why do they hate women that choose to have the baby?

Definitely. Planned Parenthood was started by a eugenicist who wanted to eliminate the black race. Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood for this purpose. She also that poverty was genetic, and she wanted to eliminate the poor. Sanger and Hitler shared the same world view and from what I understand, Hitler learned some of his tactics from Sanger.

Abortion was spun to the self-centered left as a contraceptive and that is how they have looked at it ever since. Those behind it all still want to eliminate blacks and the poor and any other excess population. They called it "choice" even though the baby has no choice.

"If Pro-Infanticide believes in Choice then why do they hate women that choose to have the baby?"

Exactly. I've heard of so many liberal Nazi women going up to pregnant women and demanding they abort their baby. That is evil and it is none of their business.

"I've heard of so many liberal Nazi women going up to pregnant women and demanding they abort their baby."

Go on... Where did you hear that?

Does it matter? If I tell you you will deny it anyway.

I personally know many liberal women. I do not know a single one who would be so ridiculous as to do that. I mean really.... demanding that someone else have an abortion...... That is not pro-choice. I don't know what that is. I've never seen it. So I would assume you "heard of" it on social media but I could be wrong.

Notice how they provided zero examples of that actually happening?

I never said it was an epidemic. There are just a few whackos who have done this.

"I've heard of so many"

"There are just a few whackos"

So many could be 5. This is not normal behavior for someone to do this so when I said "so many" I never meant it was every single one of you or even a majority. But if I have heard of this more than once then that is far too many times. Don't get stressed out over that.

I hear a lot of talk about what you (allegedly) heard... One thing I have still not heard is where you heard it!

Lol

Various sources. That's the best I can tell you. I haven't heard of it happening recently. I think a few times it was callers who called into the Rush Limbaugh show saying it happened to them. I think other times it was other conservative talk radio shows.

It was the people themselves that got verbally accosted who said they were told that they should abort their babies. Like I said it has been a long time, but I think I remember someone I have met also got verbally accosted.

The Generalplan Ost doesn't seem to have been quite effectual as of yet.
Any ETA on when this reversing of the racists' feared Replacement Theory trend shall take effect?

Liberals and Democrats in 2022 are communists, flat out devotees of Marxism/Leninism. They don’t want what they have in Scandinavia like they say, they want what they have in Cuba, Venezuela, China, the former Soviet Union. Liberals only continue to use the word “liberal” because it sounds less threatening than “communist.” Liberalization is actually what happened to former communist countries when they fell. So no, people in America who claim to be “liberals” are really anything but. If “liberals” really cared about the constitution, they would respect the right to bear arms, they wouldn’t push open borders, they wouldn’t allow foreign invasions, they wouldn’t try to limit free speech with political correctness BS, they wouldn’t try to shut down those who disagree with them, they wouldn’t try to limit the right to freedom of religion.

"Liberals and Democrats in 2022 are communists, flat out devotees of Marxism/Leninism"

No they aren't

"Liberals only continue to use the word “liberal” because it sounds less threatening than “communist.”"

It's actually because they are liberals. I could just as easily say that conservatives only continue to use the word conservative because it sounds less threatening than "authoritarian fascist"

"So no, people in America who claim to be “liberals” are really anything but"

No, they are liberals

"they wouldn’t try to limit the right to freedom of religion"

No one is taking away your freedom of religion. You're still entitled to your cult activities.

I never asked for your opinion. I don’t want to talk to you or have anything to do with someone like you. Reply with whatever you want. I will not speak to you again.

Be Felicia :)

How about you watch the language?

And when did I say I'm a Stalinist? Oh, that's right. You're one of those people who thinks anyone who doesn't agree with you is a communist 😂

Communists stole the word liberal to hide their tyranny behind. Thomas Jefferson was a liberal, a real liberal and Jefferson is opposite of today's liberals. Liberal come from the same root as liberty and today's liberals hate liberty. They prefer rule by Supreme Court justices and Democrat president's executive orders.

I think todays liberals are closer to fascists. They want all of the controls of Marxism, but they know they need the help of big businesses, so they are willing to compromise with them. They still want the government to control the means of production, they just are willing to let corporate CEO's, who finance them, keep their jobs. That better describes fascism, not socialism or communism.

"Communists stole the word liberal to hide their tyranny behind"

Well if that's what they tried then they completely failed, because liberal does not mean communist by any stretch of the definition

"Thomas Jefferson was a liberal, a real liberal and Jefferson is opposite of today's liberals"

Well in one sense you're right, because liberals today don't support owning slaves

"Liberal come from the same root as liberty and today's liberals hate liberty"

No they don't. I'm a liberal and I support liberty for everybody.

"I think todays liberals are closer to fascists"

Despite the fact that liberals are on the left side of the political spectrum and fascism is on the right side.

Upvote!

The only guns, leftists love, are ones that FBI stages up for a FBI patsy, to be used politically to target law-abiding Americans.

And the .. "My own body" hypocrisy... there's two in there, peaches, there's two bodies, not just your "own".

It's the person who's pregnant who decides if that pregnancy continues or not. It's not anyone else's choice and it's not anyone else's business

Including the baby and it is the baby who is the severely affected. The murde... uh woman gets off very easy.

Sorry, a fetus doesn't have a say in the matter

So, if a human is incapable of speaking for themselves, we have the right to murder them just because they are in inconvenience? They should have executed Hellen Keller rather than try to teach her to communicate. I mean, who really has the time to put up with all of that nonsense anyway. In fact, we should just off everyone who inconveniences anyone for any reason.

You are just plain cruel.

This is exactly correct.

And also the root of the problem, and why overturning RvW doesn't amount to a hill of beans where the *real* issue is concerned. The fact that SCOTUS turned the issue back to the states, is basically a modern day Missouri Compromise. It's a cop-out. Passing the buck, nothing more. They did not grant personhood under the 14th Amendment, and until that is done the slaughter will continue.

You see, when they look at an "unborn" child, they don't see a human being there (in very much the same way Jefferson Davis didn't see a human being when he looked at a black man). And because they don't see a human being, why in the world would they imagine that they have any civil rights at all?

The fact that we *do* see a human being there, confuses, frustrates, and infuriates them. They cannot wrap their heads around the concept. To them, granting civil rights to the unborn makes about as much rational sense as granting it to blacks did to Jefferson Davis and his political contemporaries.

It's extraordinarily difficult to argue with that level of denial. At some point, you have to forget about trying to convince people who cannot and will not be convinced, and just do the right thing. And if we end up fighting another civil war over it, then so be it.

Granting person was something they could have done because their job is to uphold the constitution. Perhaps their reasoning is that the 14th should have already done that. It reaffirms the Declaration of Independences right to life and liberty.

What the Court did was a lot more important than you give credit for. It was a massive slap in the face to all of the activist liberal justices who have been unconstitutionally legislating from the bench.

At least for a few years, maybe. The Dems are already talking about packing the court. They started talking about that after Alito's draft ruling was leaked by some stupid Democrat who put their feelings above the law. Dems only care about their agenda and never how adversely it affects anyone. They always crap all over the country and then tell us they are doing the right thing.

The next thing the courts should do is apply the 14th amendment to any State's legislation that permits abortion. Because that is their job. Maybe they will. Like always they need a court case that is about this very thing before they can rule on it. So maybe they are waiting for people in a State's to bring a lawsuit against the state for not upholding the 14th amendment.