"Your entire belief is that Islam is inherently violent."
True, because it is. All you have to do is look at history.
"But you did not give me any quran quotes to prove that."
I already told you that I wasn't going to do your homework for you. There are tons of websites dedicated to this. The entire Quran is probably somewhere online. There several books written on the subject.
"You appear to have a bias: If a christian commits a crime, they are a fake "christian."
But when a muslim commits a crime, they are a "real muslim" simply because they scream 'abu bakr?'"
It is not a false bias, it is based on centuries of Islamic violence against everyone they come in contact with
"You're excusing christianity while harshly reprimanding islam."
I will not excuse any church, group or individual who calls themselves, Christian, and does things in direct opposition to what Jesus taught.
I also will not excuse Islam when the Quran and the Hadiths command Muslims to commit all sorts of heinous crimes in the name of Allah.
"Why are christians excusable but muslims are not?"
You're stuck thinking that Christianity teaches violence, it does not. Islam does teach violence. No one is perfect. There are Christians who do bad things and there are Muslims who do good things. Both are contracting their scripture.
"In the US, the vast majority of terrorist attacks are by those claiming christian beliefs, not islamic beliefs."
That is a flat out lie.
"Like I said, give me any quran quotes to prove that muslims are inherently violent. Many of the so called "violent" islamic quotes were made during times of war, where muslims where hunted simply for their monotheism by their other arabic neighbors.
Do your own homework. Look at what Muslims have done from the beginning until now. They have a long history of terrorism. Christians have the dark ages and a little bit of the renaissance. After that all of those Christian churches were found out and they had to make huge changes. They had to begin to acting like they always should have before evil people infiltrated the church for power and control.
If you are going to ask me to do your own homework then I want you to tell me where in the Bible it says to murder people who do not convert.
Show me were pedophilia is allowed. Show me were raping the infidel is not a sin. Where treating women worse than dogs is taught. Show me where the woman must be punish when come creep rapes her
"According to your logic that it's just coincidental many of the genocides were done by fake Christians, it's also true that its coincidental many of the genocides were done by Muslims who were not true believers."
That is not what I am saying. No genocides were committed by any Christians. Technically speaking a Christian is only a Christian when he or she is actively trying to live a Christ-like life. If they are not actively seeking that, and doing things which are in opposition to what Christ taught, then they have no claim to be a Christian. A Christian is a Christian because they have taken on the name of Christ as their Savior. Doing so comes with a change of lifestyle. You simply cannot take on His name and then be as evil as you want to be.
That aside, I would say that most of anything bad that was done by a "Christian" was not because they were fake but because they did not understand that what they were doing was wrong. Some may have even been very devout in their Christianity.
They let influence from outside of the Bible direct them do to wrong.
This situation could exist in any other religion. Even in Islam. However, in Islam, the Quran teaches Muslims to commit genocide. So it is not a fake Muslim committing genocide, it is one who is obeying Allah. This is why so many Islamacists yell "Allu Akbar" (god is great) just prior to their criminal behavior.
If a Christian ever said "Jesus is great" just before committing murder they would have blasphemed Jesus' name.
Christians did NOT conquer Spain, England and France. Conquer means by violent means. Rome (before Jesus was born) conquered Spain, England, France and most of the rest of Europe, Israel and including what is now Turkey. Then much later the Roman Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity and by default the Roman empire became Christian. To do this they made many concessions. Instead of god, they created saints for the people to pray to. They took pagan holidays, made them Christian. One they even kept the name, Easter. Named for the goddess spring, Ishtar. They made that about the Crucifixion of Jesus. That is why it is a floating holiday rather than a specific day.
Islam was sending armies all over Europe from the beginning trying to conquer as many places as the could. They had a few footholds but were soon driven out. When they took Spain that was the strongest foothold they ever had in Europe. It took 800 years to kick them out.
So, like everything the left gets their panties in a bind over, I had to look this up. Here is the fact. X's AI, not Grok (but probably including Grok) is opposing the Minnesota bill because the bill goes too far. The bill would prevent X AI from producing nude, partially nude, swimsuit or medical images OF ADULTS. Elon Musk, himself, is actively opposing any type of child nudity and neither Grok or X AI produces child nudty.
Twice Musk sent e-mails that he was interested in visiting Epstein's Island. Both trips fell through. It is true that not everyone who visited the Island went there to participate in child sex. Some did not even know that this was even happening on the Island.
I have no idea if Musk new about the child sex slavery ring or not. So, that being said, it is very troubling. However, Musk never went, so, at least, he's got that going for him.
BUT I will not try to defend him if he wanted to go to Epstein Island with the intent of participating in child sex. I have no way of know if that was his intention or not, so I will give him the benefit of the doubt until any type of proof comes out. If it is found out that he is a pedophile because of some other case then we can pretty much assume that was his intention for going to the Island. However, the first time he emailed Epstein, he wanted to take his then girlfriend with him.
