Imgflip Logo Icon
AdamSmithsInvisibleHand (773934)
Joined 2022-05-21
706 Featured Images
1488 Creations
5338 Comments
24 Followers

Latest Submissions See All

Latest Comments

It's only acceptable if a Democrat does it. Right??? Republicans are not allowed to accomplish what Dems fail to do. in politics
0 ups, 3h
Except for the fact that we are NOT isolating ourselves. Why does the left always call it isolationist to actually try to make America better? That's idiotic. We still export goods and services, we'll just have more goods to export.

We haven't shut off any foreign travel. We're not doing anything to isolate ourselves. So why does the left scream isolationist. Trump actually means it when he says let's Make America Great Again. Just like when Reagan said, lets Make America Great. What is wrong with putting people to work? What is wrong with getting raises? What is wrong with making the economy sound? What is wrong with helping ourselves for a change?

We are NOT citizens of the world. We do not want the New World Order. We do not want The Great Reset. We do not want the left's Global One World Fascist Government.
It's only acceptable if a Democrat does it. Right??? Republicans are not allowed to accomplish what Dems fail to do. in politics
0 ups, 3h
Do you know what happens to countries that impose unreasonable counter-tariffs? We just increase our tariffs. In fact that is exactly what Trump said he would do and those nations backed down.

Do you actually think the world would be better off without us? Think about that for a minute. Let that sink in. What happens to you without the United States? What happens to freedom without the United States? Do you think your life will be better or worse without the United States? If better then why are you still living here? Move. Go find that utopia you think is out there.

Do you think so little of our country to think the world could do fine without us? Is the world at the pinnacle of technological advancement to where they can no longer advance? So you think we've learned all we need to learn, we've cured every illness, we have invented every tool to benefit mankind?

95% of all of the major life changing advancements in the world today came from the United States.

Why the United States? Because of freedom. The left has killed a lot of freedoms over the years and has put a severe stranglehold on innovation these days, but we are still the freest country in the world. Before Steve Jobs died, he referred to when he started Apple compared to all of the regulations that the government imposed on business towards the end of his life. He said if he had to build Apple before he died, he couldn't do it. There's just too much red tape in the way now.

Regardless we still have some freedom comes innovation, more than any other nation. The free market rewards innovation. Socialism punishes innovation.

Now all of that innovation is being sent, mostly, to China to be built because Chinese slave labor is less expensive than paying Americans to build it. We still innovate but because it is impossible to turn that innovation into an affordable product, we send it to China do be made. Because of that we have made China technologically our equals at the expense of the United States. Had we not done that China would still be 100 years or more behind us.

"isolating ourselves and pissing off pretty much every single other country in the world while doing so does not sound like a good idea for the future."
It's only acceptable if a Democrat does it. Right??? Republicans are not allowed to accomplish what Dems fail to do. in politics
0 ups, 4h
"so they would understand what I the point I am trying to make" What part of that lead you to think that I am the point?

The original point I was trying to make is we need Greenland to protect us from Russia and China. I just reworded my original point into "newspeak" so libs could better understand it. But I guess I was wrong. You got hung up on the minutia. Oh yeah. Of course you would. Libs are always scrutinizing over every word a conservative writes, looking for ways to turn it into a racist statement. Here, let me save you the time and the headache. There was nothing racist in what I said.
politics in politics
1 up, 15h
The fact remains, she hit him with her car. From the officer's perspective, he was responding to an assault with a deadly weapon (her car) with the appropriate action.

It would have been just as appropriate if he was just a citizen and not law enforcement.

Let me put this in leftist "newspeak" so you'll understand it better.

A white supremacist hit a black man with her car while he was peacefully protesting against white supremacy. He was armed because he feared the white supremacists might try to kill him and that fear was stronger than his absolute disdain of the 2nd Amendment.

He perceived the actions of this white supremacist as racist and potentially deadly, so he fired back in self defense and killed the white supremacist as she hit him with her car. He ended up in the hospital with internal bleeding.

Now do you understand the situation better?