I just jumped on to ChatGPT, not Grok and had a conversation about your CBS New image. What I found out is that CBS got their information from ICE. I also found out that ICE does not always and sometimes cannot obtain criminal records from foreign countries.
So what CBS did was to say "most" have no criminal record. They do not know that. Not even ChatGPT could accumulate enough data to give me a clear count of all of those who were criminals.
CBS just assumed the rest. The took what the count of who they could get records on and then just assumed the rest were innocent.
But they all had one thing in common, they all violated our immigration laws. Our laws are the most lenient in the world. There are several countries where entering illegally is a capital offense. Some come with serious prison time. The rest will fine you heavily.
There is a reason for that and it is not about racism, it is not about hate or anything else the left preaches when they so dearly want to keep all Democrat voter...oops I mean "illegal aliens" in the US.
It is about the economy. Ya know that word that baffles every single leftist, including Robert Reich. Allowing people to enter this country under the pretense of who will pick our crops is not a valid economic reason. It is a very racist view of who illegal immigrants are. Yes, there was a time when a lot of them came here to pick our crops but that changed 40 years ago.
My wife's mother was born in Mexico. She immigrated legally and became a citizen. One of her brothers decided to come to America but he came here illegally. My wife tells me that he came here thinking that if he just put his hand out that people would put money in it. He is legal now, he became legal in the Reagan amnesty. He tells me he loves America a lot and he learned that in order for someone to just put money in your hand you have to earn that money
Since Biden, the world now thinks like my tio because now it is true. If they just put their hand out Biden will put money in it, plus a cellphone and house keys.
And who pays for all of that? We do. What happens when we have less money to spend? The economy plummets and life gets harder for everyone.
And THAT is why every country in the world has immigration laws. Just like the expression that came out of the Bill Clinton presidential campaign, "Its about the economy, stupid". It was just too bad that Clinton was just as much an economic illiterate as all Democrats are.
Until there is artificial superior intelligence, the problem we have to fight is letting all of the blow average artificial intelligence people from putting all of their misguided information into our current AI.
Like asked in my previous reply, you do know that AI is just a search engine on steroids, don't you?
So if I did the same research just using Google (and not Google's AI) would you say the same thing?
I am fully aware of AI's untrustworthiness. More so than you will ever know unless you are a software developer. I am a former software developer (I just retired a couple of months ago). I started using AI from the beginning and it was awful. It couldn't answer programming questions with any kind of reliability. I have watched it change over the years and now it is almost indispensable. It is now replacing software developer positions. Now companies are hiring people who can ask AI to write code, AI will spit out the code and the software manipulator will just double check AI's code and implement. "Software manipulator" is a title I just invented. I do not know what that position will be called in the future. Right now it is typically software developers who check and possibly manipulate the code (just to get it to work) that AI spits out.
Eventually it will just be a business manager who won't even need to know how to program, he'll just take the code that AI generates and runs a compiler to create the application. And even that might be too much. It could be that AI writes the code and compiles it and then you download it and use it or sell it to your customers.
But you just keep on distrusting it, while putting all of your faith in to ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, BSNOW and all of the other leftwing "news" agencies.
BTW in case you didn't know, when you ask AI a political question it searches the ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and BSNOW's websites. It does a weighted average. The more it finds on the internet biased in one direction the more likely it is to tell you the biased information. It used to be awful and ALWAYS skew left. Enough people complained and now it only mostly skews left.
"Chat GPT..... 🤦♂️This is why media literacy needs to be mandatory in schools"
You do know that AI right now is just a search engine on steroids, don't you? In other words I could have found that information on Google, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, Brave, etc. It just would have taken a little longer. ChatGPT did the search for me.
Was ChatGPT wrong? Probably not in this case. AI had a lot of problems when it started but now most of those are ironed out.
You do not that CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, MSNOW and sometimes even Fox News are less reliable than a use car salesman. That particular report was so way off base. In that article they referred a "document" that "indicate most have no criminal record". What "document"? Where did it come from? Is it from the White House, Homeland Security or ICE?
No. That particular "document" is a figment of CBS's imagination. Because ALL of those people sent to El Salvador were violent criminals. You basically were lied do and you believe it because of how much hatred you have for Trump.
"In a sane world, running 100% on "I am not trump" should've been PLENTY"
You don't seem to understand which side IS the sane world. In a sane world men cannot give birth; public schools cannot mutilate small children to change their gender, especially without parental knowledge; rapists and pedophiles are kept out of women's and girls public showers, locker rooms and bathrooms; loser men who cannot compete against men are not allowed to compete against women; drag queens are not given an audience of small children; there are only two genders with the rare exception of those who are born with both sets of genitals.
The left is NOT on the sane side of the equation.
In your collective of people who have nothing else in common other than some issue with sex attraction or gender issues, you know the LGBTQ+ collective, the B and T disproves the Q. Bisexuals (bi meaning two) are attracted to both genders. Transgender men only carve themselves up to achieve womanhood and vice versa. But Queer or Gender Queer claim there are an infinite number of genders. So which is it? Is it only the two genders the B's and the T's believe in or is it infinite genders that the Q's believe?
It is insanity.
"can't say I've ever heard that being part Indian negates blackness."
You guys made the rules. Would you give us a heads-up when you are changing the rules. Is it just Kamala who gets that exemption? Just checking.
