We know the democrats and rinos colluded...

:0)

Cept there wasn't a riot on Jan 6th. There were a few dozen trespassers that were let in by police.

correct

It's enough to call it a riot, but nowhere near levels to call it an insurrection. I mean, a large crowd of people gathered angrily and broke stuff... That's by definition a riot.

All true and sad to see, Viking. Oh, loved your meme re Putin/Biden on another thread. F U N N Y! 😂

I know... It's truly amazing when you create a timeline pic of events...

Upvoted

And there you have it... get fined for exercising your free speech rights...

Washington Commanders Fine Defensive Coach Jack Del Rio $100,000 for Calling January 6 Capitol Riot a “Dust Up” Compared to George Floyd Riots

I hope Del Rio isn't pressured to resign. I mean free speech is still guaranteed, right?!?!

That's really why the Biden regime was pushing for a Ministry of Speech Suppression...

Yeah. 2 1/2 more years of this guy and it will be a miracle if the Country can recover. There better be a red wave this November or we are in real trouble.

After the 2020 election I don't believe that we will ever be able to "vote " the ones in power out . They proved that no matter how obvious the cheating and corruption is , the media and the left wingers will defend the democrats no matter what. Also labeling anyone that disagrees with them a white supremacist.

Yeah. They even label blacks and Asians that don't agree with them as white supremacists.

Biden has been colluding with Russia, Ukraine and China for years, and he's still on their payroll. Hillary invented the Trump/Russia collusion scandal to try to get elected.

If Trump had been THIS bad, his impeachment would've been successful. But we haven't had one yet. I bet SNL can't make any skits on Biden or Harris bc they're too "brilliant". Saudi SNL knows better...

First, they'd need to find something truthful to have a successful impeachment...

Imo the fact that Biden is this far out of his mind should be enough. We have absolutely no idea who really is running the country, and the Hunter Biden incident ain't exactly making me feel comfortable about who that might be.

They fined Del Rio $100,000. What a load of SH**! Free speech is done.

femocrats are just so dumb

You lost me at "the American people are not stupid."

Stay tuned

Here's another meme the mods refuse to post:

imgflip.com/i/6jamhc

I gave u an upvote

Put it on Real_Politics, it will sail through.

Totally refused!

An example of doublethink

And they really don’t know what they did. 🙁

"i always believed that everyone was born with the same level of intelligence"

So that makes you a science denier?

sorry, bad choice of words. bottom line is: i think this is ridiculous.

His meme or the reality of the points it makes?

It's kind of amazing how wildly disconnected from reality y'all are.

It takes deliberate effort to be this disconnected.

The police being violent murderous thugs is a valid reason to riot. Not because your favorite reality game show host didn't get to be dictator for life.

Huh go figure. Lines up perfectly

Since when did they become "murderous" or "thugs"?

When they stated to commit murder and act like thugs

In order to bulk them into that category you'd need to have a majority percentage of them doing that. It's like less than 1 percent.... Sooooooo, you're gas lighting

I'm not gaslighting. I'm not saying it's a majority of them. But some of them are, and that's a problem.

Less than 1% is a problem? compared to what? criminals resisting arrest and getting killed bucase of it?

I don't know what the percentage is. How did you figure it's less than 1%?

here, because unlike you I can Google.
https://policeviolencereport.org/ 1% are charged. Yet this article does not have the guts to state how many of those cases criminal resisted arrest. So pretty safe to assume that 1% deserved it while the rest is due to confrontation, and if you are stupid enough to go against the police and even resist arrest it is your own stupid fault.

Oh but look @Octavia_Melody something you do not want to hear, number of police officers murdered are up 59%! I guess to you police officers are not human beings with families so who cares right?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61218611

"unlike you I can Google"

I can Google

"1% are charged"

That doesn't factor in all the ones who aren't charged or investigated

"number of police officers murdered are up 59%"

And that's bad

"I guess to you police officers are not human beings with families so who cares right?"

I didn't say anything like that

""That doesn't factor in all the ones who aren't charged or investigated" => You do not know that, you just assume that"

==> I do know that because I read the article and is not present, thus it is not factored. BOOM! How easy is that?

"I know for a fact that less than 100% of cases of police harassment or brutality result in an investigation or charges being filed"

==> yes, and that is the 1% we are talking about. You always look at the 1% and base your arguments on that. Like abortions because of rape, or when defending LGBTQ. The >5% should never dictate how society shoul be run, it should be the majority. Those numbers are not significant enough.

"That's your inference"

==> that is correct, and I am sure others here agree with me on that.

Taa daaa nice talking to you Octavia_Melody

"I can Google" => Then why do you ask if you can Google things yourself?
"That doesn't factor in all the ones who aren't charged or investigated" => You do not know that, you just assume that.
"And that's bad" => Yes indeed. Sad is that no one wants to talk about it cause there is no money to be made.
"I didn't say anything like that" => You do not have to say it, it is the tone and attitude of yours that speaks for you and does says it loudly.

""That doesn't factor in all the ones who aren't charged or investigated" => You do not know that, you just assume that"

I know for a fact that less than 100% of cases of police harassment or brutality result in an investigation or charges being filed

"You do not have to say it, it is the tone and attitude of yours that speaks for you and does says it loudly"

That's your inference

Rioting is in fact illegal is the states. Protesting isn't, however. In case you didn't know the definition of riot, I got it right here for you "a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd" I'd love to see you try and defend BLM and their supposed "peaceful protests" January 6th was a riot and was technically illegal, but they didn't burn and destroy buildings unlike some other riots.

You're right, they may have tried to destroy our democracy by overturning a fair election, but at least they didn't burn down an Arby's.

So you should be happy that “murderous thugs” got beat up on Jan 6th.

True, any time fascists and cops are fighting each other, it's a good thing.