Imgflip Logo Icon

Buffalo Shooter was a pinko

Buffalo Shooter was a pinko | _________________; That sounds more like Breadline Bernie than a Republican | image tagged in black box,bernie sanders | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,799 views 76 upvotes Made by Hardraker 2 years ago in politics
183 Comments
10 ups, 2y
Bernie I Am Once Again Asking For Your Support Meme | You to ignore the truth | image tagged in memes,bernie i am once again asking for your support | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
6 ups, 2y
Alec Baldwin | NOT IF HE HAD A GUN | image tagged in alec baldwin | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
10 ups, 2y,
5 replies
From the manifesto:

“LEFTISM RESULTS IN A DEGENERATE HATEFUL SOCIETY“

“Are you a fascist? Yes”

“I support neo-nazism”

I’m leaving some parts out because I’m not here to encourage hate for anyone else. Basically he was a communist when he was younger, was turned on to white nationalism through 4chan and other online outlets. He said the political compass test puts him in the authoritarian left quadrant, but he identifies as an ethno-nationalist national socialist (Nazi). He is obviously far right and also ripped on democracy and transgender people.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Ever heard of the horse shoe theory? Well, it’s the idea that each end up the political spectrum may be disconnected, but still much closer than you’d think. (Like the ends of a horse shoe) So a leftist may say Nazism is a far right belief, but a right wing may say that Sovietism is a leftist belief. But then you need to pose the question “Are they really that different?”. I think that it’s absurd to try and blame someone’s evil deeds on either side of the political spectrum unless it’s a semi-universal belief amongst one side. (I.e Someone may believe abortion is wrong, but that would be valid to associate with the left because the majority of the left are pro-aborts) But the vast majority of people who think of themselves as right wingers aren’t nazis and I’ve never heard a right wing person say nazism is a right wing belief, I’ve literally only heard leftists claim that. Further more nazis shared arguably equal beliefs with the right as to the left. As an example they supported eugenics so that’s leftist, they didn’t support gays so that’s right wing. Now you may argue eugenics isn’t a left wing belief, but eugenics is an extended form of abortion and therefore the point of extremists is that they take a belief to an extremem therefore eugenics is the extremist version of abortion. Now a right winger may argue directly killing homosexuals is not what right wings believe, but once again it’s an extreme version of a belief. Those beliefs may not match the typical beliefs, but they are derivatives of the more typical beliefs.
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
Right wingers say Nazis aren’t right wing because they don’t want the association at all, even though Nazis are farther right than the average conservative. It’s scary however the direction that the right is going, promoting white nationalist conspiracy theories like the great replacement. A poll showed half of Republicans believe in it. And a white nationalist just shot up a supermarket in a black neighborhood because he was inspired by the theory.

Typically right wingers don’t know what they’re talking about and will literally make shit up to defend their narrative.

Every now and then, I monitor white nationalist conversations, like on Stormfront. They hate socialism and communism. They literally talk just like any other MAGA idiot, but with a greater focus on ‘protecting the white race’.
2 ups, 2y
I don’t believe that white people are superior or anything, I mean I believe they may be superior on average in one genus of work, but not overall. But I do however have full belief that the left is in fact trying to eliminate white people. Why else do you see leftist TikTokers constantly saying things that imply any white person is inherently evil just because some white people’s ancestors owned slaves? Why else is the left encouraging Mexicans to illegally immigrate, but don’t encourage Canadians to? Simple, Canadians are typically white. I believe that any racial supremacy is wrong whether it’s saying one specific race is inferior to an other, or saying one race is superior over all other races. I also don’t support any bias based around skin color including hiring someone over another just for “diversity”. But nazism clearly holds left wing beliefs for an example libs were cheering for federal government mandated vaccines. Sorta similar to nazis performing medical experiments on people in concentration camps.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Nazis were Socialists period. If you could pass an 11 panel urinalysis screen you'd see the irony in Leftists telling the same lie over and over again hoping someone besides themselves might be blotto enough to believe them- that's a Nazi tactic. Repeating lies. The word Nazi means "National Socialist". That's a FACT, not an argument. It's beyond arguing. You don't have an argument. You just keep telling the same lie over and over based on your wishful thinking.
I had to read Mein Kampf in High School. I know what I'm talking about. Facts.
2 ups, 2y
You think you're debunking me but you just keep repeating that Nazi means "National Socialist" because that's all you have. The Nazis targeted communist districts and fought them in the streets. They had their parties and newspapers banned right away and sent them to concentration camps.

As I said, Hitler opposed left-wing politics. So much so, that he had the leader of the Nazi left ASSASSINATED. He was appointed chancellor by a Centre Party chancellor, Brunig, who wanted a coalition of right-wing parties to help resolve the Great Depression. The original cabinet under Hitler consisted of Nazis and German National People's Party politicians. The Nazis became the dominant right-wing party in Germany after a wave of splinter parties. The Nazis success couldn't have happened without the Weimar republic, and reactionary and nationalist forces pushing for resistance against the prominence of unions, interest groups and causes for the left.

If you actually read Mein Kampf, you would know Hitler was vehemently opposed to Marxism, as he calls it a "pseudo-science" and equates it with "Jewry". Hitler would use the term "socialist", and call himself a "true socialist", because he equated it to social politics related to a national German identity (folk) and white supremacy. It had zilch to do with class struggle or abolishing private property, or obviously anything to do with equality and egalitarianism.
7 ups, 2y,
8 replies
That's because fascism is far left.
10 ups, 2y,
2 replies
I believe that the true definition of Fascism is when you use private companies to enforce mandates that are unconstitutional, ie, vax and mask mandates.
6 ups, 2y
F A C T
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
To quote the Rock, IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT YOU THINK. Fascism is Left wing. Nazis were national Socialists. Only facts matter not feelings or the opinions of people who can't pass a drug test.
2 ups, 2y
Rock is a proponent of forced masking, therefore he's a Fascist
0 ups, 2y
Fascism is not left wing and never has been. Do some research.
4 ups, 2y
It certainly is in this country.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Right.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Are you agreeing with me? Thanks.
6 ups, 2y,
2 replies
No problem. Hitler and Mussolini both said that they were socialists. Really the only big ideological difference between national socialism and Marxism is the racial ideas of the Nazis.
6 ups, 2y,
4 replies
Hitler was a "national socialist" and Mussolini was a socialist before being expelled from the Socialist Party and creating fascism. I don't think you understand the ideology of either.

Socialists/Marxists wish to abolish private property and the state in favor of a system of free associations of producers that produce according to ability and give according to need. They believe in equality for all and democratic management of the economy.

Fascists believe in a merger of corporations and the state, and believe in totalitarian rule, abolishing all forms of democracy, suppressing labor unions and socialists. They support private property. Nazis believed in securing a national identity for a "pure" German race.

Fascists are extreme nationalists, and while some socialist countries embrace red patriotism, it is not remotely the same thing. Socialists reject imperialism and colonization and typically nationalism.
5 ups, 2y
"abolish private property and the state"

That sounds more like full communism than socialism.
4 ups, 2y
I don't think the combination of THC in your system and the brainwashing effects of modern mass media mind manipulation (the Madcow show) let you understand much more than yelling for mom to bring you another hot pocket to the basement.
But please- prove me wrong. Explain to me how $4.50 a gallon gas is not Geritol Joe's fault despite the fact he shut down our pipeline, didn't renew leases for drilling and reversed all of Orange man's measures to make us energy independent? Remember- every Conservative WARNED yall Brandon would DOUBLE gas prices in a year- and it happened.
3 ups, 2y
Actually, I don't think YOU understand their ideology.

While Hitler didn't abolish private property, he essentially owned it. He kept himself popular (by choice or by force) and thus controlled the people, and so too their property. He "owned without owning".

While it is true Hitler banned labor unions, he replaced them with an arm of the government that did exactly the same thing (advocated for better work conditions, etc.). It was called the German Workers' Front. He also started the "Strength through Joy" program, wherein the government would provide numerous benefits to Germans, among them even free vacations, all paid for by taxes.

Correct. Hitler also believed in racial purification. Other than his racial views, he said he would do "nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground."

Really? Like how all the failed socialist experiments of the past just weren't "real socialism"? ;)
Left-wingers and socialists can be natianalist too, you know.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Both are stupid why would you want absolute equality rather than equal rights? Remember that episode of My Little Pony with the town where all of the ponies cutie marks were = signs?
Then your description of fascism sounds exactly like leftists trying to get their companies to be able to fire co-workers who don’t use their preferred pronouns. Also, why wouldn’t you want to own your own property? Oh, well I guess it’s the whole “Govern me harder daddy!” thing.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
I’m an anarchist bud
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Yeah, sometimes I think anarchy would be ideal. Vigilante justice, no such thing as illegal ownership of weapons, no laws in general, etc.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Anarchism would be restorative and transformative justice.
2 ups, 2y
It’d be interesting for sure. Old western showdowns in the middle of New York City would be awfully fun.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Did you even read those?

Most are actually RACE-focused, and he actually admits he WOULD interfere. He wanted to give the illusion of choice. But should the business owner disobey, well, goodbye!

You should read the 25 Points, you know, the National Socialist platform that HITLER wrote.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Yup.
Now read Hitler's 25 Points.
1 up, 2y
🤣
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Fascism is syncretic, economically left wing and culturally right wing.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Sorry nationalism isn't right wing. It's literally every side. When in control all sides enforce nationalism except anarchy.
2 ups, 2y
Every Communist authoritarian country is Nationalistic. Look at China and Cuba.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Flip that and change "left" to "right" and vice versa, and you'd be absolutely correct.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
1 up, 2y
And is that one of Hitler's writings?

Nope.

Anyway, Hitler didn't dislike socialists. He WAS one. He hated COMMUNISM, mostly because he didn't like it's universal, globalist nature, and thought it a creation of the Jews. The difference between Nazi Germany and the USSR was the difference between NATIONAL socialism and INTERNATIONAL socialism.
Also, before you point to the "trade unionist" line, while Hitler did abolish trade unions, he replaced them with the "German Workers' Front", or DAF. It was an extension of the government designed to do the same things as unions, like vying for better working conditions and whatnot.
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
I feel like you need to compare fascism with socialism and communism. There's not much difference.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
These nut jobs feel that if why you stole, and what you do with the stolen proceeds is what differentiates their three forms of governance through theft.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Yeah, I mean the Fascists are just more honest "we own the means of production." whereas the other two are like "You own the means of production, but we make all the decisions about it."
1 up, 2y
Well, the Fascists seem to have more of a movement that was popular at the time, due to the destruction of their economy during WWI.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I feel like you don't know the Sodium content in those hot pockets mom keeps bringing you downstairs is killing your kidneys. That's why dad buys them. He wants that basement back for a man cave. Go see a nephrologist. You'll thank me later.
7 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Look at today's left, Octavia. Which party no longer believes in free speech? Which party wants to control our minds? (as in, which party wants to have a govt board decide what's true and what's not?) Which party wants to force people to take the jab? You can run down the list and every time freedom is limited and govt has increasing control, it's the left. The left are clearly the neo-fascists.
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
True, but there are more people on the left trying to do so.
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
As usual you are wrong. Democrats want big government and are the party bent on silencing and subjugating opposition.
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
I do.
I also see reality. You should try opening your eyes and seeing for yourself.
0 ups, 2y
modda himself admits he doesn't have the attention span to look up anything.

tl;dr, right modda? that's your go to reply when you can't counter with facts... right?
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Just saying it's false doesn't make it false.

You need to look things up modda. You ought to try some fact checking of your own and not rely on the lying media. It will open your eyes to what lying weasels they are. You just have to take the first step to being self reliant. You can do it. I did. It was quite liberating and refreshing.
1 up, 2y
Simply claiming to be a United Statian isn't enough. You should learn more about our history before trying to pretend it's yours.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
When modda tells someone to look something up, he's only referring to things that pop up on the first page of a google search, since his go to reply is "tl;dr" when you respond some drivel he posted with facts.
0 ups, 2y
Yeah, ya got me.
I tell them to look things up within certain limited parameters which they dutifully follow because I am that cool.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"big gov't centralism"

That's now the domain of the democrat party, modda. Wake up! Open your eyes!

And that's why I will no longer vote for a democrat. I am also fairly unlikely to vote for a republican, but it could happen. Never again for a democrat. The party has shed its thin veneer of rationality and exposed themselves for the lunatic nut jobs that they are. And we can thank Trump. (nicely done, Donald) Because of him, they couldn't contain themselves any longer. They lost it, and they clearly cannot get it back. ("it" being their ability to lie to people and also maintain the perception of being a center left party)

"Specializing in silencing and subjugating opposition since Lincoln."

Ironic, isn't it, that you mention subjugation and Lincoln in the same sentence, when it was Lincoln who had to battle democrats to do away with their subjugation of African Americans.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
tl;dr

This fella was the first to start calling the federation of countries known as the United States a country itself. As you already know (I'm being sarcastic there), the USA is not, repeat, NOT a nation. Kind of like your Australia, only that was more of an actual thing here rather than an assemblage of settlements with heaps of barreness in between trying to pretend it can emulate us.

The Republican Party has always stood for a big centralized federal goverment superseding states' rights since - nay even BEFORE it became the party it is, as anyone can look into its Federalist Party roots stemming back to Hamilton/Washington. This has never changed.

Do look things up.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"tl;dr"

Ah yes, tl;dr, the cry of those with no attention span.

And in a nutshell, there's your modern demotard party.

You're appallingly bad at answering simple questions modda, yet I cannot resist! So let me ask you something modda; why should anyone listen to advice such as 'do look things up' from someone who replies with tl;dr?

Even you must realize the incredible irony of someone who hasn't the attention span to read a short paragraph, advising someone else to look something up when looking something up requires an attention span... right?

Who am I kidding? The obvious wasted on the left.

Why do you, someone born in France, insist on telling we Americans what is what about our country? We've more than paid you guys back for the help you so kindly gave us during the revolution by bailing your brie cheese eating butts out of two world wars.
0 ups, 2y
So don't read it then.

That fella was Lincoln. He was a Republican. A lil fyi.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Meanwhile back in reality the Republicans were formed to hold the Union together back when Demorhhoids got upset that they couldn't buy and sell slaves based on White Supremacy.
After the Civil War, the Republicans had no actual goal or purpose and became the Status Quo party. Their big goals were to get reelected and get along with their Demorhhoid buddies.
In the 60s Goldwater tried to get em to go Conservative but he wasn't the right guy with the right message.
In the 80s Reagan was, even tho he really was not Conservative- he only played one on TV. But he gave the GOP a meaning for the first time since 1965, besides going along and getting along with Demorhhoids.
He wasn't out of office long until Republicans reverted back to the Status Quo party- the party of Cucks like John McCain and Mitt Romney.
Every time someone tried SUCCESSFULLY to integrate Conservativism into the GOP the Establishment EXPLOITED IT to get reelected, then KNIFED IT IN THE BACK. They did it to the Tea Party. They did it to MAGA.
1 up, 2y
"Meanwhile back in reality the Republicans were formed to hold the Union together"

No.

I skipped through the rest, looked like it matched the first bogus sentence there in bunk-ness.
You should try sticking to facts. Lends an air of plausibility to propaganda.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Meanwhile back in reality there's no conservatives melting down because Musk discussed bringing free speech back to Twitter. There's no Conservatives into Censorship. None. In the 80's it was Al Gore's wife trying to Censor Rock music. Conservatives value TRADITION and revere the CONSTITUTION and Bill of Rights.
1 up, 2y
"There's no Conservatives into Censorship. None"

That's bullshit. You've got conservatives right now trying to shut down movies and TV shows they don't like.

"In the 80's it was Al Gore's wife trying to Censor Rock music. Conservatives value TRADITION and revere the CONSTITUTION and Bill of Rights."

Is that why there were conservative groups trying to censor rock and rap music they found offensive?
1 up, 2y
Perhaps, but I do not recall any non-Biden administrations attempting to set up a govt board to tell us what's true and what's not.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Why do we listen to someone born in France? Sorry Frenchie modda, you just will never understand the American spirit. 👍👍👍
0 ups, 2y
What an astounding rebuttal. And it only took a mere 6 whole days.

Who is we, btw?
Oh, and you forgot to say "Taxiformia"
6 ups, 2y,
3 replies
These conservatives never let facts get in the way of their emotions
8 ups, 2y,
1 reply
The facts are that anyone like this, on whichever part of the political spectrum people want to consider him to be in, is just a crazy psycho.

In reality, Octavia, the political spectrum isn't a line; think of it as a circle. From the starting point you go either left or right, and the psychos, like this guy, meet at the 180 degree mark. Because in reality, there's very little difference between the nut jobs that the media likes to put into neat little political identity boxes in order to trash the right.

Oh, and they also almost instantly stop reporting on the nut jobs that by their own definition would have to be considered on the left. Always. You know that's true.
2 ups, 2y
That's exactly what I've been saying (but I use parallel lines instead of a circle to describe the spectrum). Saying Nazism is the flip side of communism is like saying Satanism is the flip side of demonic divination.
5 ups, 2y
These liberals misinterpret their emotions for facts.
2 ups, 2y
You again? Pinkos never remember that everything that Madcow Guy on MSNPC told them for 7 years was a lie.
Jussie didn't get lynched.
Hillary was unbearable not unbeatable.
Obamacare cost people a fortune.
Rittenhouse shot a white pedophile and white spouse abuser in self defense not 2 black guys in cold blood.
Bubba had a pull cord in his garage not a noose.
Catholic Schoolboy didn't harass anybody.
Hillary colluded with Russia, not Orange Man, so she could steal uranium owned by taxpayers etc.
And yet yall still believe him.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Nazi literally means National Socialists Workers Party of Germany. He was fixated on the Ukraine like Every Demorhhoid and RINO right now. Kool Aid poisoning.
2 ups, 2y
Hitler objected to the addition of “socialist”, but still appropriated the term and always distinguished it from Marxian socialism, which he thought was Jew-influenced and detestable.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 5
  • soviet russia meme
  • Communist Logo
  • 09f5c305-8aa3-43f2-81a1-914a20182027.jpg
  • 20220516_195538.jpg
  • Black Box
  • Bernie Sanders
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    _________________; That sounds more like Breadline Bernie than a Republican