Every Store In San Francisco Needs To Adopt This Policy

He said "Assuming" - which clearly denotes skepticism.

Just saw your comment now. Not that you asked for my opinion, but what the heck... I wouldn't waste your time on that klown. He's a typical liberal BS'er. Wants things only his way, so he won't compromise. And apparently, he can't stay focused on a sentence with more than six words, so certainly understanding anything in the range of a two sentence or longer paragraph is out of the question!

isn't this exactly what pharmaceutical companies do? Over price their products by 600 -1500% then tell you to download Goodrx to get the price down?

Yes it is.

The point that you're so incapable of grasping, is that I said "if", because unlike brain dead libtards, I don't believe everything I see to be true, without checking it out myself. Even if on some level I would like it to be true.

Regarding the genius part, it's an expression. Your inability to grasp something so obvious, speaks more to you being a total riot.

AND, if you knew anything about SF (which I have the sorry experience of knowing, since I live so close and have been there perhaps hundreds of times) you would absolutely know that this is not outside the realm of possibility for that city.

Such a long rant for such a pointless meme

btw I have been there many times. It's a riot how right wingers believe they have a monoply on things lol

A "monoply on things"? (sic) Try to make some sense, then we can talk.

And you consider that a long rant? I guess it's true, the attention span of the average American has gone right into the crapper.

Sorry OAE, I'll try to keep my comments to you very brief from now on. Helping you keep up is the least that I can do for you. (and apologies if you consider this reply to be a long rant...)

When it's nothing but BS it's long and puts us to zzzzzzzzzzz so yep a long pointless rant

After Trump rode his "gold escalator" right wingers lost the ability to think critically or rationally

Try this for giggles.

We appose illegal immigration so tell us all about how to fix it WITHOUT violating The Constitution or committing crimes against Humanity

Then get both parties to put aside any all differences they have to put it into action

Lets hear it

First step is to stop rewarding illegal immigration, just because someone steps over our border doesn't mean tax payers should have to support them for the rest of their lives , 2nd create a straightforward path way to citizenship, ... if someone wants to be a citizen they should have to pay taxes like the rest of us. Can we start with these two things at least?

While I don't consider you response-worthy in general, I will knowingly take the bait. But first, sorry about your short attention span. Maybe you should see a doctor about that?

So, what I'm going to say about immigration will probably get me kicked out of the right thinking group here on the imgflip, but I feel my view is based on practicality, and common sense.

And sorry, this is complex issue, and while I'll keep it as brief as possible, yer gonna have to buckle up and pay attention.

1. We all have to agree that we have a problem with illegal immigration. People like dementia Joe don't even feel that way, so this first step is likely a lost cause. If so, none of what follows will work.

2. Assuming we can agree on point #1, we need to stop illegal immigration. That means securing the border. I don't care how it gets done, be it a wall, or some better high tech, more modern approach. But secure the damn border to stop the flow. This is even more important than #1, imo. If the flow isn't stopped, it only encourages more illegals.

3. Unless a DACA participant has committed a serious or violent crime (specific / legal definitions of those need to be agreed upon) they should be given a path to citizenship. Not a direct or easy path, like a legal immigrant should have, but still a path.

4. This is the one that will get me booted, bc not even my legal immigrant wife agrees with me on this... but for those illegals who are already here, see my point of view in #3. Don't make it a simple path, bc illegals have to understand they cut in line, and need to go to the end of the line. But if they're serious about it, give them a path to citizenship.

Like I said, #2 is the most important. Without that, nothing will ever change, and libtards like dementia Joe will just make it worse.

I doubt this will fly with libtards, bc their goal with illegals isn't humanitarian, it's based in securing political power. And that, my imgflip friend, is something they won't budge on.

1. We all have to agree that we have a problem with illegal immigration. People like dementia Joe don't even feel that way, so this first step is likely a lost cause. If so, none of what follows will work.

Your insults do not fix the issue of illegal immigration that has existed looooooong before Biden was born. We are not fans of Biden but why don't you try to act like adult and stop blaming Democrats for problems that NO party cares to fix.

2. Assuming we can agree on point #1, we need to stop illegal immigration. That means securing the border. I don't care how it gets done, be it a wall, or some better high tech, more modern approach. But secure the damn border to stop the flow. This is even more important than #1, imo. If the flow isn't stopped, it only encourages more illegals.

Secure the border? Can you admit Trumps 1,954 mile "sexy big wall" was never going to happen and Mexico was never going to pay for it. And can you admit Trump played you about it. Even the very few miles that have been constructed are nothing more than replacement for existing structure that has always been a FENCE.

American can never secure the entire Southern Border. And it's rather pathetic how right wingers are so hyper focused on it and ignore the Northern Border and ingore all the illegal immigration that occurs via visa over stays and so on.

Again we don't agree with illegal immigration but it's just sad that right wingers are villifying them as a bunch of "crimminals" it's a misdomeanor to cross the border.

BTW as crime goes? you are more likely to be harmed by your own family and friends compared to a stranger let alone a illegal immigrant.

3. Unless a DACA participant has committed a serious or violent crime (specific / legal definitions of those need to be agreed upon) they should be given a path to citizenship. Not a direct or easy path, like a legal immigrant should have, but still a path.

Interesting statement here. You are basically admitting the issue of illegal immigration is not going anywhere soon and willing to figure something out. That can not happen though while the "right" is using what are mostly decent people just trying to do better as poltical fodder and fear mongering propaganda.

Doing immigration the "right way" have you ever pondered that those who "do it" the right way can afford 2. While those who cross illegally don't have the means to sit and wait for years.

Part 1 (sorry, but you said a lot.)

1. Those weren't insults, but statements of fact. Joe has dementia, and he clearly doesn't view illegal immigration as any more of a problem than you do. Peoples' views on some issues are so far apart, that a compromise may not be realistic. So if you don't view it as something that needs to be fixed, as opposed to facilitated, then why am I wasting my time with you?

And... the irony. You scold me for being insulting, yet you insult me in the same paragraph. That's OK, I'm used to liberal hypocrisy. The only true thing you said is that neither party wants to fix this problem. And yes, it is a problem in spite of my question in the previous paragraph. It's nice to see you admit it.

2. Trump didn't play me or anyone else when it comes to the wall. And there were (are) plenty of ways to get Mexico to pay for it. But like I said, I don't care about the wall, just securing the border. Since you admit you can't come up with a better solution, then you leave the wall as the only option. Walls work. And I love the irony of the idiots on the right doing everything they can to stall Dementia Joe's agenda. They must have been paying attention to the idiots on the left with their tactics against Trump.

Bottom line (and anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows this) if we can't secure the border then by definition we can't stop illegal immigration. The other compromises I suggested about paths to citizenship would be nothing more than magnets for illegal immigration UNLESS the border is secure. How can you not comprehend that?

But, since you clearly can't, then all we would have left is to considerably beef up deterrence, apprehension, and removal. What are your plans for that?

Save your blathering about visa over-stays, the northern border, etc. All that's a smoke screen on your part. When you're bleeding, you stop it. Worry about lesser problems later.

I never vilified illegal immigrants. How could someone who believes the illegals here now should be given a path to citizenship, consider them villains? You gotta stop and think before you spew out libtard talking points.

You can cite all the unsourced statistics you want about who may harm me, but try telling that to the thousands of people who have lost loved ones to violent crimes by illegal immigrants. I doubt they care how the statistics play out. They would just like their loved ones back AND to prevent what happened to them from happening to others.

Stopped reading after like 6 words since were not interested in your unfounded crap about Sleepy Joe

"since were not interested in your unfounded crap about Sleepy Joe"

Grammar is clearly not your strong suit. I've read that some believe the way we write is representative of the way we think. In your case, there is no doubt.

Anyway, you're hilarious! Of course you don't care, but why would I ever take you seriously again?

btw, were I in power, the suggestions in my first reply to your trap question on immigration pretty much would give libtards everything they claim to want regarding immigrants (exception being leaving the flood gates open.)

Which pretty much proves you / libtards are not really interested in a solution. Or, maybe you just don't have a clue about how a compromise works. Do you?

And I bet you actually read my post (once you rested up and recharged your brain in preparation for about 45 seconds of hard work.)

Part 2:

3. I just find it amazing that it took you until point #3 to realize I think solving illegal immigration is going nowhere (at least under Dementia Joe.) Dude, please try to keep up!

I'm sure most illegals are decent people trying to better their situation (at least the many I know are, and if you think I don't know any, consider where I live, SF bay area.) That doesn't mean they should get a free pass to violate the law by cutting ahead of people who are trying to come here legally. And regarding your comment about illegals being used for political fodder and for propaganda purposes, only a willfully ignorant person could think how the left has used them is anything but that. These are people, but the solution has to come through the toilet of politics. If you don't like the arena, put your short pants back on and go home.

Regarding your sanctimonious accusation about what I do and don't consider, yes, I have considered that. And to that I say what my legal immigrant wife, who loves Trump btw, would say to you about them, and has said to others: find a way. If you really want to come to the US, you'll be able to find a way to get here legally. She did. And yes, it took her a long time.

So, if you want some kind of (relatively) easier immigration reform that would be impactful, then look into the process of LEGAL immigration. Streamline it. Make it more efficient. That would definitely have helped my legal immigrant wife, and perhaps would help convince others to come here legally. I think with that I've at least attempted to address your very weak point attempting to justify illegal immigration due to them not having "the means to sit and wait for years."

I am hesitant to even mention my wife, because usually the left loves immigrant women who have come to this country, boot-strapped a business, and become successful, heavy tax paying citizens. Well, that is until they find out she supports Trump. That's when they stop loving all kinds of people they would otherwise love and support.

*Monopoly