You made an assertion that should be very easily provable. I asked for a real world example. You can't produce one. Basic logic and reason suggests you are full of shit. Prove me wrong with a real world example of a high velocity bullet causing friction burns. You won't be able to because none exist.
If gunshot wounds leave burn marks from friction, there should be plenty of documented examples and research on it. Please give me an example, show me how ignorant I am.
There is an old expression that says "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt." You have assuredly removed all doubt with your verbal dysentery. Let me break it down for you and give you an education.
Your words.
"Hey MAGA, did you know if struck in the ear by ammunition from any AR15, you would more than likely lose your whole ear and possibly suffer burns and abrasions to that side of the head?"
The only burns associated with a gunshot wound are caused by the muzzle flash of the gun, never by the bullet. Anyone who has ever shot a paper target knows this. The bullets put holes in the paper, not burn marks, and paper is far more combustible than human flesh. There also would not be any abrasions other than that of the wound tract caused by the bullet. I've already demonstrated your ignorance about the "likely lose your whole ear" in previous replies, no need to repeat.
Your little "anatomy lesson" about the inner ear left out two crucial facts. The inner ear is separated from the outer ear by the ear canal, average distance in adults 1 in. and is also INSIDE THE SKULL. To even assert that it could be damaged by a bullet nicking the helix of the outer ear is ludicrous and shows how little you understand the anatomy you are discussing or how bullets actually cause damage to the body. There is no possible way for any energy from the bullet to be transferred from the outer ear to the inner ear from the angle that Trump was shot.
Here are two links you should read to educate yourself on the facts I have laid out.
You continue to display a lack of understanding of what you are saying, either through deliberate obtuseness or lack of mental acuity. When I'm off work and have more time I'll do a detailed explanation.
