We all need him.

Da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da!
Red Hat man

No one can stop what God has coming.

Swing swong you could not be more wrong.

Keep telling yourself that.
Lol

:0)

man are we seriously waiting for annoying orange to come back? the racist tangerine?

You seem more obsessed with skin color than Trump.

They are obsessed. It's all the left sees, "Skin Color, What people do with their privates, and whats free for me!"

because that bitch is orange

Next you'll be crying about his hair, like some bitch at the hair salon...oh, wait....

Prove Trump is racist, or shut up

https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history

LOL according to you guys, math is racist. Milk is racist. Being on time is racist. Babies are racist. NASCAR door handle pulls are racist. So spare us.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/06/trump-racism-comments/588067/

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-insists-on-using-racist-language-will-that-approach-win-him-support

https://couriernewsroom.com/2020/08/12/trumps-most-racist-policies/

https://needchange.org/donald-trump-is-racist/

https://www.motherjones.com/coronavirus-updates/2020/03/need-more-evidence-that-trump-is-racist-take-a-look-at-his-coronavirus-edits/

It's easy to deny a racist is racist when you're racist as well: https://www.mcall.com/opinion/mc-opi-donald-trump-racism-dog-whistles-democrats-republicans-20190815-swpjtxdadjapbgxufrpvmixfs4-story.html

Ran all these through a bias check and guess what? ALL LEFT LEANING. You can't trust these sites

What “bias check?”

Mediabiasfactcheck.com

So overall the sources *lean* left in that they run stories (that are factual and credible) but appeal to more liberal audiences. Doesn't seem that the sources aren't true. (See below)

"Overall, we rate PBS NewsHour slightly Left-Center Biased based on story selection that slightly favors the left and High for factual reporting due to in-depth, well-sourced information and a Reasonable fact check record."

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: TV Station
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

"Overall, we rate Atlantic Media slightly Left-Center Biased based on the ownership of the left-leaning Atlantic. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record."

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

"Overall, we rate Mother Jones strongly Left-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left and High for factual reporting due to thorough sourcing and a clean fact check record."

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

eyyy get mediabiasfactcheck'd

They're all Left bias, meaning "manufactured to hate Trump." In short, you have nothing.

Your own fact check website says they are factual. You may not like what they say but it’s true.

Trump didn't call all Mexican's criminals, he said their criminals are crossing the border with the illegal immigrants. Mexico has it's share of criminals just like every other country. Not a racist comment. Also, technically, anyone who breaks the law, even IMMIGRATION laws, are considered criminals.

He banned travel to and from Islamic heavy countries to curb the amount of potential terrorists entering America. Yes, not all Islamic people are terrorists, but you can't tell by looking at them, and background checks take time and money. Not racist

Oh, he called Haiti a shithole? Have you SEEN Haiti, and not the Haiti Democraps WANT you to see? Type Haiti into Google Images and see what you get; GI links are way too long to post

Oh, he made a comment about India's awful air quality? Once again, have you SEEN the India Democrats don't want you to see? It's a known fact that out of the top 30 cities with the worst air quality on Earth, 21 are in India as of 2019: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_pollution_in_India

Not even your precious Vox could ignore it, though as usual, their numbers aren't up to date: https://www.vox.com/2018/5/8/17316978/india-pollution-levels-air-delhi-health

If it's fact, it isn't racist, and you can shut up now

Welcome to imgflip politics... home of the 10 months and running joke that trump will be reinstated.. and that America wants him reinstated...

Any day now!

Lol

There should be a rest of the world politics stream.

There is a "politics too" stream that's a bit more lefty but if you mean global, idk if they cover more global stuff or not. I don't really go there very often.

I was thinking more global as the volume of American memes swamp the swamp. Plus where's the fun sitting in a political meme stream where everyone agrees with you politically...

I see. Every now and then there is one here that isn't America-centric but it is pretty rare..

Ya that's more or less why I'm here instead of there.
:P

Makes sense, you would call for a criminal to "come save you." That is, instead of saving yourself

Trump doing active service lol

Neither of them did, but libs libs see only one side, and don’t like it when it’s pointed out the vegetable is the same coin as Trump, just the other side.

To be fair it was the senseless meat grinder of Vietnam Nam. I don't blame either of them.

True but was it a case of couldn't or wouldn't

Both fall under wouldn’t

Neither are mine and mine is shite too.. So had to look them both up for the details and still doesn't change my mind regarding the draft dodgiest.

We all see what we want to see.

So you saying what I saw was wrong? or my interpretation of what I saw was wrong?

Neither. You see what you want to see, I see what I want to see. Doesn’t mean either of us is wrong.

Checking I saw two people not being drafted. Which I felt was your point and something I didn't know. So I looked and confirmed your statement but I noticed one put a lot more effort in avoiding being drafted than the other. Was that the bit I saw and you didn't?

The part you may not have seen was both of them (4 deferrals before claiming a health reason) are exactly the same coin, just the two sides. Neither should try to claim the high road.

then the meme should have them working together

mmmm yeah right 10k points

dudes got fuking DashHopes (13658474) points

eyyy when the us needs more drone strikes to happen lol

Holy reinstatement, Trumpman!

Trump also did some bad things, both are bad.

Recover from what? Actually getting things done?

How many times did he say "next week is infrastructure week!" and not deliver a damn thing?

But who is getting an infrastructure deal done now?

Have you read the infrastructure bill? There’s more useless pork in that bill than a cargo ship full of Van Camp P&B

Conservative "Logic": when it benefits me, this is necessary spending. When it benefits you, it's useless pork-barrel spending and needs to be cut.

Being tied to the construction industry, any work done would benefit me. Still doesn’t mean it’s good for anything other than lining the pockets of politicians.

You've just provided an excellent example of that kind of thinking.

And yet I’m still against pork. Why are you all for it?

Proper governance requires compromise. It does. So, sometimes there are things in a bill that you may not think are necessary but are in order to get someone else to vote for it.

That's a fact. And why you label as pork may actually be something useful for somewhere else.

I sincerely doubt you've read any of the 2K+ pages of this bill. I bet the reason you're all "it's bad!!!" is because you've been told it's bad without specific details.

It's full of things like a fund for salmon population recovery in Washington and Alaska. That sounds like a good idea to me.

A study to see if first responders should actually use bicycles to enter disaster zones rather than traditional vehicles. I hadn't thought about that. We should look into that to see if it's better & more efficient.

And money for research into how collisions between vehicles and wildlife impact the wildlife in the area. Since we're gonna be rebuilding and building roads, that seems like a reasonable thing to do.

It's got stuff for bridges, roads, highways, and broadband internet. Stuff for electric cars. All sensible stuff.

What's not in it that I wanted to see? 28% minimum corp tax. Pay raise requirements for home healthcare workers. Job training for those displaced from employment by covid. expansion of medicade. And a bunch of other stuff.

So. What specifically do you think shouldn't be in the bill?

"So. What specifically do you think shouldn't be in the bill?"

To begin with, anything that hasn't to do with infrastructure. That doesn't belong in an "infrastructure" bill.

Next, anything that does. Government doesn't work, never did, and never will.

So, you've never heard social infrastructure?

Yes. It's a bromide politicians use as an excuse to include personal favors in laws where they have nothing to do.

So what you're saying is, if it doesn't benefit you, it must be being used for less than wholesome means?

"By what metric are you measuring this?"

56 years of observation of and experience with politicians.

Know how many I have? 57.

At your age, you should have learned not to trust politicians or their intentions.

Who said I did? That said, you think every politician is doing the same thing, guilty of the same thing?

Same question as before, and same answer: Observation and experience.

So, what can you tell me about some of your "observations" and "experience?"

My observations and experience? I have yet to see a politician who isn't in the game for money or power. They will lie to you in order to be elected, then do whatever it takes to be re-elected. They will speak to the voters once every two or four years, and serve themselves the rest of the time.

Once a dog has bitten, I don't trust it. Especially when it makes a habit of seeking out people in order to bite them. And then claiming that "They elected me; they wanted to be bitten!"

You may have different experiences. Or believe that you do, or maybe you have some reason to trust them. I don't.

Is there a politician you do trust? Any? At all? Do you even vote?

No, what I'm saying is, government doesn't work.

And what's worse, government doesn't intend to work, except for its own benefit.

By what metric are you measuring this?

Because we have brains

So do sheep. But they're small too.

Lol. Upvote for sure

No evidence to support that, but I’m sure in your mind you think you’re brilliant

I'd say the fact that he is able to post something on the internet suggests he has a brain.

But then I remembered that many liberals also post things on the internet.

I agree. Refusing to do the work is not actually conservatism tho. Their answer to shit or get off the pot is to get off the pot long enough to blame Democrats just to get back on the pot and wait for shit to happen.

No health care to replace obama care, no swamp drained, o wall built....great for the stock market though. He could mean tweet a wicked market drop, to a profit 2 weeks later like a pro. He billed the Secret service, thank goodness he "DONATED HIS SALARY", although there is no proof of that, same as there are no proof that he opened up his Washington plaza to troops protecting the capital. He wasnt banned from social at that time, amd not a single tweet about it....from a man who brags about everyrhing.......true or not.

No peaceful transitin, during an active pull draw down of forces in the middle east....

He wasn't in charge of most of that. You need to go back and read the conditional powers of a president.

You know, that’s exactly why I didn’t vote for Trump.

He made so many promises that were beyond his conditional powers as President. He still managed to keep some of those promises despite that.

But thank you for essentially pointing out how much of a shit President he was and that he was more a snake oil salesman.

If he were a snake oil salesman, he would be a professional career politician, not a most unwelcome gatecrasher at the self-appointed, self-aggrandizing party in Washington, DC.

I didn't say he was a great snake oil salesman.

Somehow, all his faults have fallen under the radar to most of you until he ran for President.

Then, when he ran for President and the media RIGHTLY shed light on a few of them, Trump called the media liars.

And you gullibly believed it.

He very nearly almost self-appointed himself President in 2020.

Better politicians who knew their place only as representatives and not rulers said no.

Republicans and Democrats alike.

Republicans now try to harness that same gullibility to elect lesser representatives to usurp foolish ones. Personally, I see no problem with voting for a Democrat President. They're only figureheads, after all. The real power is in the states. Unless, of course, someone were to try to overturn that power through the court.

The only ones capable of doing that are the Supreme Court and, as you know, that power has been safely contained behind Republican-elected officials.

"Better politicians who knew their place only as representatives and not rulers said no."

Such politicians don't exist.

Maybe in your head, but in the real world, they do.

Maybe so but I have yet to find them.

Deflect and put head back...

Nope. Just facts. Please read the constitution.

Constitution. Now we are talking about constitution? I thought the meme was about how trump was batman, and was going to save us....try to stay on topic....

And now you are in complete nonsense land. Where most leftists feel at home.

0 value, talking in circles.....