Lying is essential to any and every liberal.

in a way, the Democrats are right. White supremacists are the biggest problem in America.

facts

Effing nailed it

am don get

This deserves 10k upvotes and probably not that little tho. Keep up that good conservative work

Democrats are the racists because they are telling black people that they are oppressed even though they aren’t

Amen!

Fixed your meme with the correct template, you’re welcome :)

I don't get it, but much appreciated.

Party On -595vd4.jpg (click to show) - Upvote for you!

Please don't post damn sh***y fake news!

America is about to have a REPARATIONS problem from all these White Guilt libs!!

Good one!

Do I get a check? I am Irish.

Fine, fine, as a conservative I'll give you proof of white supremacy -
imgflip.com/i/57hk5n

Are you incapable of understanding that two things can be a problem?

That too overwhelming for you?

I'm guessing your a (yuck) liberal. Therefore your rebuttal is obvi a lie.

Up vote!!

i stand corrected. it may be worse ( :

Thank you. This guy knows what's going on!

FBI director Christopher Wray - Sept. 17 2020 @ a House Homeland Security committee hearing

Wray stated that the FBI has roughly 1,000 domestic terrorism investigations a year, though it is a "good bit north of a thousand this year."

"Everything from racially-motivated violent extremists to violent anarchist extremists, militia types, sovereign citizens, you name it. Of the domestic terrorism threats, we last year elevated racially-motivated violent extremism to be a national threat priority commensurate with a homegrown violent extremists," Wray testified. "That’s the jihadist-inspired people here and with ISIS."

"What I can tell you is that, within the domestic terrorism bucket category as a whole, racially-motivated violent extremism is, I think, the biggest bucket within that larger group, and within the racially-motivated violent extremists bucket, people subscribing to some kind of white supremacist-type ideology is certainly the biggest chunk of that."

Okay. After an entire year of domestic terrorism by black supremacists and antifa blm bootlickers.

Black supremacists. - Yeah, look at them talking about the superiority of the black race. With such catchphrases as "I can't breathe", "no justice, no piece", "is my son next?", "no one is free when others are oppressed", and of course "Hands Up, Don't shoot" (meaning if my hands are up, don't shoot).

I do not believe the BLM riots were ever formally called terrorism.

Wow, a bunch of slogans. What do they really think? Oh, you forgot 'pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon'.

Of course. How could months and months of burning looting and murder ever be considered domestic terrorism?!?!?

Oh look. You identified a few idiots. That doesn't change the fact that those aren't the commonly used phrases. Yursa hasn't posted anything since that so I'm guessing she got plenty of backlash.

Months of murders - how many murders?

I'll bet Hitler said the exact same words and foolish people like yourself said, "Only a few Nazis are only like that."

Hitler was all about attacking, not defending. Based on the Beer Hall Putsch which Hitler was jailed for, his approach was kidnapping politicians and seizing power. He wasn't shy about the anti Semitism either.

BLM, for the most part its a grass roots movement. You don't sign up to protest. And like any movement you look to see if these sorts of things are being encouraged. In my estimation, they aren't . The reason you will find so few examples like the ones listed is because there aren't that many. Despite what you may have been told, most people who support BLM are supporting it for the reasons that are on the surface - to protest injustice and seek equality. And riots have caused their wider support to go down, so it isn't a blind following.

Are. .are you kidding me? The founder is a grifter that bought a million dollar mansion, zero donation money went to poor black communities, and one major voice rage quit because of that. And then there's the millions, if not billion, of dollars of property and economic damage they did to poor black neighborhoods.

(3) million+ mansions? Must be some book deal. You have no idea how she paid for those.

Don't defend the indefensible. . .only makes you sound stupider than you already are.

And you trust her? All the blm donation money at hand? Just because she says? idk lady. Could be but unlikely.

Trust her? No. Believe he in this case? Yes. Because a paper trail like that would be easy enough to prove.

Oh, she told you. Pack it in, boys! Nothing to see here.

The founder is a grifter - maybe. There have definitely been complaints about the attempts made to organize and leverage the grass roots support into more centralized power. Complaints about money not coming to the local groups. I see that as backend politics, and not particularly surprising or different from any other large group.

As to whether the money went to poor black communities - I'm not sure what people expected (I mean that literally). Did they expect it to support people protesting, to go to the families of victims, to bail out protesters? If you donate to a charity or group without a clear mission on how they will spend the money, that's going to happen. I've not looked into the founders, because the only people paying any attention to them are people trying to leverage her into ad hominem attacks. They pretty much made a hashtag - that's about it. They don't have any real power.

You are equating BLM protesters with rioters. And as far as damage done to communities - that was substantial and regrettable. If every protest or even a large percentage of protests ended in riots, then you might convince me that there was something rotten at the core.

But whether the cause is just is a separate issue than the methods being utilized. Stopping animal cruelty = good. Murdering people for said cruelty - probably bad. Addressing childhood hunger = good. Doing so by taking them from their parents and moving them to farms as labor to earn their food...probably bad. A subset of people choosing a path I disagree with does not convince me that the initial complaint isn't correct.

To redirect back to the point - nothing you are mentioning is black supremacy. Money going to a grifter (your words), money not coming to the local chapters (fraud or mismanagement), and damage to local communities (as you pointed out their own communities).

So, yes, I'm more concerned about groups like the Boogaloo Bois who think a civil war is imminent and where some of the group are actively trying to accelerate. Apparently there is a split over those who think the impending 'boogaloo' will be a race war or everyone against the government...gut again, off topic.

Yet no one knows where the 70 million in donations to BLM went...

That's an implication, not an accusation. Based on a February article by the AP, they got so many donations after George Floyd they didn't know what to do - I'm paraphrasing. It doesn't sound like they did anything wrong with it, they mostly just sat on it, which isn't what people donated to do.

It sounds like they are a disorganized mess. And that's a lot of money - line any non profit they should be transparent abd be audited.

I would find a local group or charity and donate directly instead of at the national level at this point.

Perhaps if there's an investigative journalist left in the world, they could look into it. Wouldn't be the 1st time a scam like that happened.

Every year in this country, blacks murder twice as many whites as the reverse, despite being outnumbered five to one. That’s a lot of hatred.

The numbers are accurate (comparing to 2019), but the assumption of hate is suspect

Black people are responsible for 17% of white homicides (566): white people 8% of black homicides (246). As you point out there are five times as many white people, so really the scary number is the fact that there are many as many black homicides as white.

Males kill females at nearly 4x the rate that females kill males. Men must hate women?

An actual logical argument. . . . I may drop dead of shock.

"Males kill females at nearly 4x the rate that females kill males. Men must hate women?"

Fair point. But no one would dispute that men are more violent than women. Many people have disputed this about blacks and whites.

And any hint of a negative attitude from a white person is called hatred. I am simply responding to the environment in which I find myself. White people are guilty of terrible hatred against blacks? If there is hatred, there is significant evidence it is directed the other way.

I personally am generally uninterested in motive because its hard to prove. I also think most things we end up labeling racism comes from fear not hate.

But systemic racism - that thing we are most concerned with now doesn't require active hate. Just momentum and complacency. Despite the fact that the numbers are skewed, the actual percentages are low. Crime rates are far lower than they were in the 90s (for instance). So the assumption of criminality is galling.

And yet every time, when one of these stories of these poor innocent black men whom the police shot for no good reason comes up, that poor, innocent man has a rap sheet a mile long. Curious, that.

George Floyd was part of an armed home invasion. He held a woman at gunpoint in her own home while his scum friends robbed her. In a just society, he’d have been executed for that and we’d all have been spared a lot of trouble.

Unless he has an outstanding warrant, those past crimes shouldn’t mean anything to the arresting officer.

I’m pretty sure even the most conservatives state reserves the death penalty for murder and not armed robbery.

Two wrongs don’t make a right. So I assume chauvin would also be executed in your world?

And yet the black on white murder rate is ten times higher than the reverse. Looks to me like the balance of hatred is all in the other direction.

On behalf of Cannon Hinnant, go to Hell.

You misunderstand the complaint. Cannons murderer was arrested, held without bail, and we all know he's going to jail, probably forever. That trial probably already happened. Nobody protested for the killer.

All the BLM protests are about what happens after. Nobody thinks bad cops will ever go away. Chauvin nor his accomplices were arrested immediately after George Floyd was killed on video . The cop who killed philando Castile was found innocent. I'll say it again - it isn't the crime it's the subsequent injustice.

It isn't the incidents, it's the response.

“You don't give a shit about him as a murder victim, you just want to use his death as justification for hating all black people,”

Reverse the races and you have the truth about BLM.

"You misunderstand the complaint."

No, I understand the complaint. I also understand that the complaint is based upon a falsehood. When you actually examine the facts, including the fact that black people in this country have a much higher violent crime rate than white people, the idea that the police are violently persecuting black people just to be racist is laughable.

For that matter in nearly every case BLM brings up, they lie, and not just a little bit, about almost every relevant fact of the case.

And even if we get "justice," we're never going to get that little boy's life back, nor Isabella Talton's, nor Cash Gernon's, nor any of the other approximately 500 white people who were murdered by black people in this country last year.

AND I'M F--KING TIRED OF BEING TOLD HOW NICE WE HAVE TO BE TO THE PEOPLE DOING THIS.

I generally don't flat out call something out as racist...but if you see 'black people' as the 'PEOPLE DOING THIS', then that is pretty much the definition of racism. Even if most crime is committed by black people, that doesn't change the fact that the majority of black people aren't criminals.

The police cannot use race to discriminate or judge someone any more than it would be fair to blame all white people for mass shootings, even though there have been more white shooters in such events than all other races combined. So yes, when an officer assumes the criminality of a suspect based on race (even if statistics have his back) that is racist. When a black person is shot by police and are automatically given a little more benefit of the doubt, that is racist.

Is “your white DNA is an abomination” black supremacist talk?

What about “that same chemical which gives Blacks their superior physical and mental abilities”? You know, like the disgusting slime Biden nominated for the civil rights division of the DOJ said?

I don't think the white DNA guy was black - but I would think it is more racism than supremacy - it isnt raising up a specific race.

Well, her claim is that it was written in response to the bell curve which is a book that apparently has some black inferiority theories. She says it was absurd on purpose. She's right about the bell curve, and the claims are ridiculous, so.... I'm inclined to believe her.

But if she was serious then yes that would be black superiority.

It is objectively true that on every IQ test or IQ proxy ever devised, black people, on average, perform worse than white people. This is not a theory. This is a fact. There are theories to explain this fact. Given what else we know about IQ, genetic differences is the most plausible explanation.

Also, if a white person had said what she said, but reversed, he would be afforded no context, no explanation, and no mercy. That would be the end of his career. But sure, make excuses for her hateful speech.

IQ tests are weird. Either you think white people are smarter or IQ tests are flawed.

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1994/10/28/blacks-seek-an-end-to-abuse/

Here’s her actual article. In context, I think it’s clear. As to response to a white person saying similar...I can only judge each case as I see it. I would try to be equally fair on the other side.

All of those slogans are based on lies. Michael Brown never had his criminal hands up. He was shot while assaulting a police officer. Darren Wilson should get a medal for eliminating a menace to the community.

Hands up don't shoot - agreed, but at the same time, pretty good advice

Yes, if more blacks would cooperate with lawful police orders, fewer of them would end up being shot. Perhaps their parents could try teaching them this.

When the philando Castile was shot for doing nothing wrong, his girlfriend had to stay calm and keep her hands in sight. She had to assure the officer that she wasn't doing anything wrong The officer panicked and shot him - the civilian had to stay calm.

Every police shooting isn't wrong, but if officers fire without a realistic fear for their lives, they are murderers.

if BLM had stormed the capitol it would have been more than two protests dead. If none of the details other than the players had changed, they wouldn't have made it in before being fired on.

Hahaha had blm stormed the Capitol, they wouldn't even be in jail. Harris would push charities to help release them and all the dems would say it's justified cuz rayciiiiiiiiiiissssm

Nobody has defended rioters. If you think they wouldn't have opened fire before letting them into the capitol, you are disconnected.

There have been over 14000 arrests related to BLM protests.

Yeah, I heard that above the right protesting with guns. Then I saw a bunch of black people protesting on government property with guns, and AMAZINGLY they weren't killed either.

Your fantasy is laughable.

*about

Trump had tear gas fired on a crowd just to go get a photo op at a church.

If you have info showing the same treatment in a similar situation I'd welcome it. But similar isn't just in government property. We had people chanting that there were going to kill the VP while forcing entry. I don't know if anything similar.

Feel like revising your statement about Trump firing tear gas for a photo op now that we all now know that's bs?

Sure, I will always revise based on facts.

Trump did not have tear has fired on a crowd. His photo op at that time was in reaction to the police clearing the streets, not the cause.

Wasn't trying to pick on you but I was going back in my notifications and saw this and couldn't resist.

Fair is fair

Philander Castile genuinely sounds like a bad shoot to me. The officer should be held responsible. But nearly every other case BLM gets behind is wildly misrepresented. Rayshard Brooks? Not police misconduct. Darren Wilson? Not police misconduct.

“If none of the details other than the players had changed, they wouldn't have made it in before being fired on.”

So you just weren’t paying attention at all last year, were you? The BLM rioters did much worse in many cases and received no penalty whatsoever.

Did they force their way into a building chanting that they were going to hang people inside? I really objectively don’t know of a situation like this.

If it had been BLM, Trump would have had the military on site with alacrity.

Yes... Except that they didn't include ANY Black Lives Matter riots birthed from Protests. Which would have dominated the category so hard you would have thought whites were the slaves 150 years ago.

I believe the reason is one of the categories is planning. Most protestors are against riots and looting. Combine that with generalized opportunistic looting and I don't think the actual crimes meet the criteria.

Which they obviously had lol. There was so much live leak footage of Cargo Trucks unloading with signs to hand out, cans of soups for people's families, and instruction on where to go and what to do.

They had Twitter facebook and tiktok groups planning and organizing events...

It's called selective narrative driven outlets for information. FBI and CIA have been on the hook to democrat interests since Bush Jr opened the gateway for it with the darned Patriot Act.

So, they're guilty of exercising their first amendment?

Lol - nice comment

Protests were organized to a degree - where to gather for instance. Expecting that people will show and having signs and soup is organization and planning...but not what I was talking about. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but organizing doesn't make it terrorism. I believe that would take an actual goal we would consider terrorism and organization and planning to make it happen. Protesting isn't terrorism, so unless someone can show that the actual riots were planned, then I don't think it meets the criteria.

To be clear, I'm not sure that is the only reason it isn't classed as terrorism.

Compare the financial damages. Clear winner and it ain't the proud bois.

Still a bit off topic - damages don't demonstrate black supremacy and property damage alone doesn't make something terrorism.

I gotchu bae, check out the comment above with all those links, enjoy :)

You're not wrong. It's boogaloo boiz, KKK, III%ers, Patriot Prayer... and non affiliated.

"LEAKED DOCUMENTS SHOW POLICE KNEW FAR-RIGHT EXTREMISTS WERE THE REAL THREAT AT PROTESTS, NOT “ANTIFA”"(2020)
https://theintercept.com/2020/07/15/george-floyd-protests-police-far-right-antifa/

FBI warned of white supremacists in law enforcement 10 years ago. Has anything changed? (2016)
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/fbi-white-supremacists-in-law-enforcement

Far-Right Infiltrators and Agitators in George Floyd Protests: Indicators of White Supremacists (2020)
https://www.justsecurity.org/70497/far-right-infiltrators-and-agitators-in-george-floyd-protests-indicators-of-white-supremacists/

FBI chief says U.S. 'Antifa' demonstrators are targets of multiple probes (2020)
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-security-threats/fbi-chief-says-u-s-antifa-demonstrators-are-targets-of-multiple-probes-idUSKCN26F3C2

3 with ties to white extremism accused of plotting mayhem at protests (2020)
https://www.ajc.com/news/with-ties-white-extremism-accused-plotting-mayhem-protests/GdtpTjwVaapgVZihVtNWeI/

Police: Richmond riots instigated by white supremacists disguised as Black Lives Matter (2020)
https://www.wsls.com/news/virginia/2020/07/27/police-richmond-riots-instigated-by-white-supremacists-disguised-as-black-lives-matter/

DHS draft document: White supremacists are greatest terror threat
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/04/white-supremacists-terror-threat-dhs-409236

Any non left leaning sources? Didn't think so.

Amazing how these organizations point fingers at groups that aren't involved as the bad guys, while giving AntiFA and Black Losers Matter free rides to "peacefully protests"

Also check your genetic fallacy.

Genetic fallacy - someone Hates that they were born white...

lmao.

You should probably look up what a genetic fallacy is.

justsecurity.org, reuters, pbs.org, wsls.com are all centrist. Get your bias checked.

He asked for items against illegal immigration, not puff pieces describing policy. PBS is as republican as Sesame Street is. Not at all.

why would they? theyre centrist not right wing😂😊

Centrist? Cool. When’s the last time PBS published a piece against illegal immigration?

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/a-guide-to-some-major-trump-administration-immigration-policies/

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/topic/immigration//

🤣😂🤣😂

“why would they? theyre centrist not right wing”

If they were “centrist,” they would cover both sides of an issue. They are hard left. You fail, liar.

Nah, they aren't pro-immigration either and they aren't anti-immigration; they're centrist. You're proving the notion we've been saying in PoliticsTOO that the right sees anyone to the left of them (including centrists) is considered left-wing. "Hyper-partisan" is the word.

There are no white supremacists in this country. You are such an indoctrinated fool.

lol

Words have meanings, not just feelings. If “supremacist” means anything, it must include a desire to rule over others. I’m familiar with a lot of people idiots like you would call “white supremacists.” Not one of them wants to rule over other races. Mostly, they just want white people to be left alone and not constantly blamed for other people’s problems.

There are no white supremacists in this country. There are clearly many black supremacists, though.

You are funny.

Supremacist - a person who believes that a particular group, especially one determined by race, religion, or sex, is superior and should therefore dominate society.

When Trump called out the squad for "loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run" - three of the four were born here. And "telling us how our government is to be run" - what makes it ours and not theirs too? They are American citizens. Even Omar is naturalized and is representing Americans who elected her.

West is best, white genocide... Hell even pretending people asking for equality are somehow taking from us.

Most of it comes down to fear mongering and conspiracies.

😊🤣😊🤣

I would say there are an equal amount of supremacists on both sides. There are just as many black supremacists as there are white supremacists. Difference is in media leeway given to black supremacists... They get called political activists while white supremacists get called hate mongers.

"Feb. 9, 2021
A member of the Ku Klux Klan who drove his pickup truck through a crowd of Black Lives Matter protesters near Richmond, Va., last year while his girlfriend’s teenage son was in the vehicle was sentenced on Tuesday to three years and eight months in prison, officials said.

The man, Harry H. Rogers of Hanover County, Va., drove his truck through the crowd of protesters in Henrico County on June 7 and was arrested later that day while he and others were monitoring another group of protesters about two miles away in Richmond, according Lieutenant J. De Groft, a spokesman for the Henrico County Police Department."

Yeah? So what's this?

“They are American citizens. Even Omar is naturalized and is representing Americans who elected her.”

They are hyphenated Americans. They clearly hold loyalty to another identity than simply American. Teddy Roosevelt was right.

The day they honestly say “I am an American and that is all” is the day I begin to trust them. But they won’t say that because they aren’t.

Are the Japanese “supremacists” for wanting their country to remain Japanese? Are Mexicans “supremacists” for having *in their constitution* that the government must not alter the racial demographics of their country?

Wait. So the Japanese are compelled to open their borders because you say so?

Why? In most places you can leave your wallet on a bench and pick it up after 3 hours, untouched. They have very particular social habits and structure. Why shouldn't they preserve what's unique to their culture? It's a small amount of land.

But yeah, encouraged is different than compelled.

So all the African and Muslim countries are racist because not one would provide me free citizenship?

I was in negotiations with Gaddafi when that Hillary bitch took him out.

Cool. Go yell at them for a while and give us a break. After all, you should be exactly as offended at them, right? Or is the truth that you've been indoctrinated to hate white people and just look for excuses?