Imgflip Logo Icon

jfk

jfk | DO YOU REALLY THINK HE WOULD SUPPORT TODAY'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY? I DOUBT IT!! | image tagged in politics,democrats,jfk | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3,687 views 66 upvotes Made by ScottWard2 4 years ago in politics
86 Comments
[deleted]
11 ups, 4y,
2 replies
No, JFK hated Communism. So he's gonna take a hard pass.
And they wouldn't let him in, anyway... him being hetero, pro-business, white male, war hero Catholic.
[deleted]
8 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Oliver Stone directed a smash hit film that you could not possibly have missed in which a neo-Nazi conspirator in his assassination said point blank "we killed Kennedy because he was a Communist".

You don't think he'd be well familiar that Democrats get called Communist for no reason at all? You are kidding yourself. He didn't buy that shit when he was alive and there's no reason to believe that he'd buy your shit today.
[deleted]
6 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Oliver Stone"?? LMAO
So I guess that whole Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis was just foreplay with Nikita Khrushchev?
And also sending advisors to South Vietnam to fight the... wait for it... Communists?

Oliver Stone... what the f--- ? Wasn't Spike Lee available as a source?
God, you are a lightweight. Like most libtards, an utter historical illiterate. Just STFU.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
2 replies
So do you see how despite all of that AND HE WAS STILL CALLED A COMMUNIST IN HIS LIFETIME BY PEOPLE LIKE YOU how maybe, just maybe, he'd find your assertion that Democrats today are communist to be laughable?

You can keep missing the point all you want but it won't change who he was.
[deleted]
6 ups, 4y
You're an idiot, a history retard and can't connect two dots correctly. STFU
Here's the point. You don't have one, except on top of your head.

It was a movie, an Oliver Stone movie. It wasn't even 35% real, dickhead.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Huh. I was being hit on so many sides at once, I didn't even notice de facto boy.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y
Exactly. That's the problem with trying to be the most annoying person on the internet - all you do is just blend into the noise.
2 ups, 4y
Yeah, he was gone a few hours after he posted. I had a feeling it was him.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Thought it was Mr O'Learys cow that started that fire?
4 ups, 4y,
2 replies
A rightwinger. Stupid cow.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Righthoofer, actually.
1 up, 4y
I heard it only produced white milk. What a bigot.
1 up, 4y
Actually it's a fake news story about what started the fire as no investigation ever concluded that the cow kicking over a lantern was the cause as is the commonly held belief.

I am often telling people who mostly don't want to agree, admit to or otherwise that the news has always been fake news.
It turns out that the story of Mrs O'learys cow was a fabrication by a small group of newspaper reporters. Which they used to also whip up anti-Irish sentiment in the city.

I think you can begin to read about the real story from using this,

"Michael Ahern, last surviving reporter of the famous Chicago fire of 1871, and who denied the authenticity of the story of Mrs. O'Leary's famous cow which was credited with kicking over a lamp in a barn and starting the fire, died here tonight.
"In 1921, Ahern, in writing an anniversary story of the fire said that he and two other reporters, John English and Jim Haynie, concocted the explanation of the cow starting the fire, and admitted that he afterward learned that spontaneous combustion of hay in the O'Leary barn probably was the cause. At the time of the fire Ahern was a police reporter for The Chicago Republican."
0 ups, 4y
the Cow was a Scapegoat
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I think you'll find it's the Conservatives that have exclusionary attitudes.
[deleted]
8 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I think you'll find it's Leftist Libtards that have delusions like the one you just wrote.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Oh, you're taking a slur for disabled people and bastardizing it? Sounds pretty exclusionary to me.
[deleted]
8 ups, 4y,
1 reply
It would. Only because like all Leftist Libtards, you are delusional and stupid, besides.
Nevertheless, JFK would not have been welcome in the Democratic Party of 2020.
4 ups, 4y
And you are what, superior and a genius? Did your magic mirror tell you that you are the fairest in all the land? I think that might have been a euphemism.
3 ups, 4y
Upvote!
7 ups, 4y,
4 replies
5 ups, 4y
Yes. I think a vast majority of previous presidents wouldn't support the dems.
4 ups, 4y,
4 replies
Exactly what I was gonna say.

You don’t even have to go that far back. None of the old guard Republicans like Trump — from the Bushes to McCain to Romney.

It’s radically different than the GOP of even 10 years ago.

Sure the Dems have moved Left too but so has society. Which is why Biden’s gonna win.
4 ups, 4y
Republicans are eating their own now. The Trumpies are even attacking Liz Cheney.
4 ups, 4y
This is why you will lose, you've moved too far left. Your 'squad' doesn't help.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
And keep pushing violent civil unrest and the attempts of civilians to protect themselves from your approved violence. All things that will help your case and totally not move moderates to the side of safety, which overrided most concerns.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
When was that incident in that image?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
A week ago or so. Was arrested, prior warrants. SHOCKER.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Go figure. Don't hear anything about it though. Can't fix stupid.
1 up, 4y
Of course not. Had the races been reversed it'd be front page news.
2 ups, 4y
Let's try going back 100 years then, shall we?
#bigstick!
0 ups, 4y
Yep. He put the interests of this country first, just like modern day Republicans. Trump wants us to end all these wars dragging out in the middle-east, look what Eisenhower did with the Korean war within months of his inauguration. He helped to end segregation, and even used the army to do so. You think he'd stand for the riots and violence going on today? I think not.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
He absolutely would, he certainly would be a Democrat.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Nah, even old democrats now aren’t really democrats. Many probably just vote for the name with the D next to it. They are probably unaware of the evils of socialism in the Democratic Party.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I don’t think so, lots of them don’t buy into this let the mob decide bullshit and they are fully aware of the commie menace their generations fought and defeated it.
0 ups, 4y
I mostly agree with that yeah.
2 ups, 4y
1 up, 4y
[deleted]
6 ups, 4y,
4 replies
I think he'd gladly be a part of today's Democratic party.
6 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Actually not likely, and the list of obvious reasons is long.

Here's my favorite.
[deleted]
7 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Look, if JFK didn't want anything to do with the Republican party when Richard Nixon and Barry Goldwater were its face, what makes you think he'd be more amenable now? You cannot seriously expect us to believe that Republicans have made themselves more accessible since then.
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ten years ago you might have made the case. But not any more.

Look at the Dems. Infanticiders, pedo defenders, deficit busters, deep staters (that's who assassinated him in the first place), FED defenders, gun grabbers, burners/looters, and police defunders.

You'd have to be insane to think Kennedy would have stayed. He's have had no choice.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
He absolutely would have a choice. He could choose not to believe your garbage conspiracy theories.

JFK would NOT have been a QAnon supporter. No way. Absolutely no chance. If anything, you guys would have bent over backwards to include him in your theories as a perpetrator.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You should read what he himself said about secret societies. Eisenhower's warnings weren't lost on him, he knew what was going on. But time will tell.

And the rest of it is irrefutable.
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Stop saying time will tell - time HAS told! How many years has QAnon been knocking around and still nothing has happened that defies skepticism? You guys are waiting until the end of time for a sign that is never coming.

And JFK was much too smart to fall for that kind of complete bullshit.
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
I dare say I understand him a smidge better than you, as I already explained to you that he already did understand it. The better indicator of intelligence is in those who do the research and take the red pill. I expect the irony would be lost on you that the term "conspiracy theory" was invented by the CIA as they attempted, post-assassination, to erase the footprints of that very assassination of JFK. Life, said Morpheus, is not without a sense of irony.

And it would be ridiculous to hope you had done enough looking to figure out that Jerry Ford tampered with the Warren Commission evidence to twist the facts to the official story, or that LBJ boasted openly of the hit, and on and on and on.

Arguing time has told is the fatuous whimper of those who do not understand we do not yet REMOTELY have free information yet, or that time is from our reference an open-ended arrow instead of a convergence on a point that expired last year.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y
You do realize QAnon was started by Alex Jones and someone in Trumps administration and was taken over by random people on the internet right?
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y
@lokiare: That's equivalent to saying you do realize the earth is flat and NASA is using the entire Utah data center just to photoshop and CG all their rocket launches. So sorry, no.
4 ups, 4y
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No he wouldn’t, he’s a real American Democrat not a sad shell of liberal communism the party has become.
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No one questioned his commitment to his country and he was a war hero. So what they said his policy was an appeal to socialism. He would not fit right in with your current cancel culture, anti free speech, anti religion Democratic Party
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
He would have laughed at you and told the Democratic Party "don't worry about it, they've been calling me a Communist since 1957. Now let's figure out Medicare For All."
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Haha he wouldn’t even be welcome in your party because he was Catholic, White and his family was rich.
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Unlike the white Catholic currently running?

Alright, you're just being an idiot now. Go to sleep.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You do know that’s a picture of JFK not Stalin right? JFK would not support destroying Mt. Rushmore denying the 4th of July or denigrating the countries founders, you are delusional.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
"He doesn’t know he want to experiment with us"

Rule 34, eh? I'm really not interested in the details of your sordid fantasies, thanks.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Your the one proposing a better version of communism. It’s been tried and repeatedly failed.
0 ups, 4y
It hasn't truly been tried, it's been used as a persuasive branding on tins of tyrannical shit.
0 ups, 4y,
3 replies
So what makes your commie utopia different? Talk about fantasies.
0 ups, 4y
My Commie Utopia? Surely that's an oxymoron?...
0 ups, 4y
It’s only an oxymoron if you believe in communism and it’s propaganda.
0 ups, 4y
*Our* Commie utopia, Comrade. ;)
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
He HATED Communism and looking at how similar the Democrat party has become to it he would've hated that party too.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Right, again, because y'all not listening: people just like you called him a Communist when he was alive, so he'd likely not listen to you calling the Democrats Communist today.

He'd recognize that shit immediately.

If he didn't go for Republicanism when it was Nixon, he sure as f**k wouldn't go for it when it's Trump.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Did I ever call him a communist? Did I? No.
And why would he believe something just because some people told him? He was a smart guy, I'm sure he could connect the dots for himself. He'd see the similarities.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Yeah - the similarity being that you still call anyone you don't like a Communist when it suits.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Naw, there are tons of people I don't like, but I don't call them Communist. Only the ones who admit to being Marxist and those who follow said Marxists.
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Is your issue with Communism that you mistakenly believe that the tyrannical bs in the Soviet Union was representative of it?
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Oh don't give me that. I know the USSR was socialist, and it was run by the Communist party, it was founded on Marxist ideology. "The goal of socialism is communism." Ever hear that?

So how's it supposed to be done then, hm?
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
It was Socialist in name only, the the name was nothing more than propaganda, the people were sold a lie.

"The goal of Socialism is Communism", of course I've heard that, and the goal of tyrants is tyranny and if achieving that means convincing people that you are giving them something that will benefit them then of course you do.

It's no different to Nazi Germany, people were sold a story and offered hope and the promise of progress.

The claim that it was truly Socialist has been leapt on as an opportunity to argue that the ideas are harmful.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ok, HOW'S it supposed to be done?
1 up, 4y
He doesn’t know he want to experiment with us
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Haha yes it was, so was Mao’s cultural revolution and Pol Pots, North Korea and Chavez’ Venezuela, and Castro all are failed attempts at Communism. How many more representations do you need.
0 ups, 4y
That's the impression I'm getting. Didn't work out just right the first dozen or so times, mine as well try on the strongest subject yet, maybe that'll survive.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I will never understand how you guys think that contradicting yourselves within two comments is supposed to work.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Hmm, let's see. BLM founders openly admit that they are trained Marxists. Look at the violence that has stemmed from that. Look at the people who follow them and the people who keep defending their actions. The Democrats. They're supporting (and being financially supported by) the Marxist organization of BLM.
And which party has the all the people crying for socialism? Oh that's right, the Democrat party. I stand by what I said. I don't see how that's a contradiction.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Yes you do, you just think everyone was born yesterday.
2 ups, 4y
Yes I do what?
And some people act like it
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
DO YOU REALLY THINK HE WOULD SUPPORT TODAY'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY? I DOUBT IT!!