Imgflip Logo Icon

why are you still mad at Trump?

why are you still mad at Trump? | IF YOU HATE TRUMP BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT HE WAS COLLUDING WITH RUSSIA, BUT NOW YOU KNOW THE MEDIA WAS LYING, WHY DO YOU STILL HATE HIM? SHOULDN'T YOU BE MAD AT THE MEDIA FOR LYING TO YOU? | image tagged in man thinking,trump hatred,lying media | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
7,829 views 88 upvotes Made by DanielDonohue 5 years ago in politics
man thinking memeCaption this Meme
45 Comments
19 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Because it is hard for them to admit they've been brainwashed.
17 ups, 5y
Someone once said: it's allot easier to fool someone, then to convince them they were fooled.
15 ups, 5y,
1 reply
yet many are awakening and joining #Walk Away. But the others woule prefer to believe the lie
14 ups, 5y,
1 reply
#walk Away and #Blexit
11 ups, 5y
yes, you are right
[deleted]
7 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Why Not Both Meme | HATE | image tagged in memes,why not both | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I don’t particularly hate Trump, but I’m not the biggest fan of his immaturity. He’s not the worst president.
9 ups, 5y
Trump Bill Signing Meme | Don’t hate me because I’m immature | image tagged in memes,trump bill signing | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I feel the same way. Yes, he’s arrogant (so was Obama) and acts immature, especially to criticism. But the leftist media and Democrats are far worse with their hellbent efforts to spear him.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
It's the two party trap, I hate both, but most still choose to live inside the box and can only see in black and white. The Republican party needs the democratic party to survive, that's why they only attack eachother so far and then prop eachother up.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Got a point. Without the big evil enemy on the other side, people would see right through them.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Could you imagine the Republicans or Democrats having to debate the libertarian party, they wouldn't even stand a chance
0 ups, 5y
The problem with that, is that the Libertarian party is quite weak when it comes to actually doing anything. Policy-wise, they're fine. But put them in an election, and they fall apart. No real party there, to speak of.

2016 is a prime example. You had the candidates from the two major parties that were, at the time, not particularly appealing to a large segment of the voting public. Isn't that an ideal time for a third party, that has been around for a loooooong time, to make some headway against the two party system? Yes, of course!

But what happens? The stoner candidate can't correctly respond to a question about Aleppo, or some damned place that he doesn't care about. I thought Libertarians were not particularly interested in foreign policy, but instead of saying that, he just muffed the question.

That's exactly what I expected, and would expect if a Libertarian were to get caught up in a debate against a skilled candidate from either party.
6 ups, 5y
5 ups, 5y
1 up, 5y
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y
thanks
1 up, 5y
1 up, 5y
Democrats in a nutshell
0 ups, 5y
thonk
2 ups, 5y
10 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You mean the Mueller probe that didn't even look at where the Steele dossier came from? How about the FBI altering emails to present to the FISA court in order to spy on a presidential campaign? No problem with that?
9 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Did you look into the IG report? You realize how Carter Page got screwed? Tread lightly? By sending undercover agents to spy on Trump's team? Over a bullshit dossier that was built on lies? That Brennan and Comey said wasn't critical to the FISA warrents yet turns out it was.

Far as I know Trump hasn't sicced the IRS on his political opponents. So yeah. Trump probably would have more self restraint.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The Mueller probe produced real indictments, real convictions. The Ukraine stuff is not even close to finished. If that other stuff has any substance, prosecute away!

Afraid you missed your chance to impeach Obama though.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Wow! Indictments! As a lawyer, you know that means nothing. And the vast majority was process crime that had zero to do with Trump.

Yes, for some reason democrats had no problem with Obama's actual corruption. Shocking. Or Biden's quid pro quo to Ukraine.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"Indictments mean nothing"

Indictments mean that a prosecutor swore upon his oath as an officer of the court that there is good reason to believe an individual is guilty of the offense charged. And: That the prosecutor convinced a grand jury of randomly selected citizens to see it the same way. They are not thrown around lightly, and an indictment is far more tangible than whatever hot air right-wing talk hosts are fuming about that Obama did.

"Process crime." Uh-huh. Slick headfake there. No big deal really, like Clinton's BJ perjury eh?

A few of Mueller's scalps for "process" (and actual) crimes: Cohen, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Manafort, Roger Stone, Kilimnik, a wheelbarrow full of Russians whose names you've never heard of, and a dozen other minor figures. And that was just Russia.

https://time.com/5556331/mueller-investigation-indictments-guilty-pleas/

Who knows where this Ukraine thing's gonna go!

As for any of this other nonsense to do with Obama or Biden: Republicans controlled the House from 2010 until the end of Obama's term and didn't do shit. Put up or shut up.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Neat. A real lawyer answer :)

Roger Stone lol pure politics with that, for sure. Hillary can delete 30,ooo emails under subpoena while passing classified information over a illegal private server and what did Stone do again?

Yes, Republicans are f**ked in the head, mostly. But hopefully they'll stoop to the dems level and impeach the next dem prez in a partisan way, like the dems have. Go low like the typical dem tactic.
3 ups, 5y,
3 replies
If you have a real basis for impeachment: go right ahead! If it's over nonsense like a BJ: Possibly get your party trampled by the voters!

The Ukraine stuff is real malfeasance, but the problem is it flies over people's heads and you guys are doing a great job confusing the hell out of people on this.

It's not a visceral thing like burglars getting caught red-handed breaking into the DNC in the dead of night. Election theft these days is more sophisticated than that.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I never said I thought the Clinton impeachment was a great thing. Clinton just should have admitted it. Not like JFK didn't cheat daily as prez.

The Ukraine thing, like the Russia thing is garbage. Many dems have been blathering about impeachment since nov 8 2016. Do you think we're that stupid? But feel free to disagree.

So is the NSA spying on all citizens.
3 ups, 5y
I’ve said this so many times and you’re smart enough to know this.

A couple Dems calling for impeachment on Day 1 for emoluments clause violations does not equate to a Democratic conspiracy.

Rash “impeach that MF’er” comments by a newly-elected Class of ‘18 Democrat does not equal Democratic policy.

The Mueller report pushed some more Dems toward impeachment, but Pelosi killed that talk. Rightly. The probe generated convictions but did not directly implicate Trump. Dems followed the evidence where it led, and passed.

At this point Trump was, unbelievably, out of hot water for a couple whole months and ready to cruise toward 2020 untainted — until he stuck his foot in it again in Ukraine!
2 ups, 5y
I never said every but many. Al Green filed impeachment papers on Trump a year ago. Waters is insane but sure, not every dem conspired or what not.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
"At this point Trump was, unbelievably, out of hot water for a couple whole months and ready to cruise toward 2020 untainted — until he stuck his foot in it again in Ukraine!"

I think the phone call with Zelensky was like one day after the Mueller's testimony and Pelosi officially shut down any chance of impeachment over the Mueller Report that same day. So, not even months? Unless you count the fact the full report was released on April 18th, then yeah... months.
1 up, 5y
Good point. I guess I’m being generous to Trump here, accounting for the fact that the Zelensky call didn’t become public for several weeks

Trump is simply incapable of keeping his nose out of the mud
[deleted]
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Do you even read the words you type, ky fan?
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Do you? That wasn’t much in the way of a response.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y
Do I what? Read what I type, yes. Read what you type...sometimes. Other times I can’t quit laughing at you long enough to read the whole thing.
3 ups, 5y
Hey, you inspired my new sub, thx!!

imgflip.com/i/3kpwig
2 ups, 5y
This is why liberals are right wing. You have no spine.
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
7 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Because if everyone has already made up their mind then it isn't a discussion, it is an argument. It's like trying to persuade a brick to be a dog.
8 ups, 5y,
1 reply
3 ups, 5y
Poor Ralph.
man thinking memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
IF YOU HATE TRUMP BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT HE WAS COLLUDING WITH RUSSIA, BUT NOW YOU KNOW THE MEDIA WAS LYING, WHY DO YOU STILL HATE HIM? SHOULDN'T YOU BE MAD AT THE MEDIA FOR LYING TO YOU?