AOC Nazi

Bravo, best projection meme of the week. Number 1. ~ Congratulations!

A small group of insignificant republicans making bad jokes is not comparable to nazi dems in power.

Many maga suffer from mass psychosis driven by powerful emotional forces such as bigotry, hate, and rage, leading to the nazification of many. It's the reason why posts from maga are void of reasoned political platforms.

Mmm no. The emotional group is the left. Often devoid of facts or reason.

Mmm, such as your demonstrable false claims about the 2020 election and COVID 19 shot's? Maga evidence of collective delusion driven by powerful emotional forces rather than by a reasoned political platform?
You Fail.

Not as demonstrable as you think. Lawsuits are coming out left and right showing the horrors of covid and the 2020 election.

Lol, facts don't care about your maga feelings.
You fail.

Yes the facts are coming out bro.

That's the good news. You're just on the wrong side of them.

O'Nazio Cortez 😆

https://x.com/i/status/1982887754238501329

What is closest to nazi is not the gesture, it is their ideology.

you know, for a guy whose username involves an actual historical figure why do you refuse to learn actual history?

Is it because it will directly refute your political ideology?

There's nothing wrong with the historical information I've learned. The problem is what I have learned has been obscured, hidden, distorted or omitted from what you have been indoctrinated with. But don't feel bad, the majority of the country has been taught the same caca.

Very few have decided to dig deeper on their own and go the the original sources. There are plenty who have done a lot more research than I have, but at least I know that what is taught in schools is rubbish.

When did the Nazi party say they support social justice (in the modern progressive sense)? 😂😂

Social Justice is found in ever version of socialism. It is all based on Marx's need to create a oppressor class and and oppressed class. Without that duality Marxism cannot exist. Social justice is the idea of making the oppressors pay for their sins against the oppressed.

Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Castro, Hitler and Mussolini all preached making one group of people pay for what they allegedly did to another group of people.

Back in the later 1920's and early 1930's, the American Nazi party published a newspaper named, Social Justice. This was back when the Progressives had no problem pontificating on the greatness of Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Lenin.

The major problem with pushing the oppressed/oppressor narrative in America is we were never founded on that model. Yes, we had slaves in the early history but we rectified that. Then we had Jim Crow and that too is gone. The only group of people in today's society that are seeing the worst kind of oppression are unborn babies. They are being slaughtered in numbers greater than the holocaust and the left is leading the charge against human life that they find inconvenient. Of all of the sins that has been committed in this nation, abortion is the greatest. Far worse than slavery, the genocide of native Americans and any kind of mistreatment of any other group of people.

Because there is not an oppressor class, oppression has been redefined as opposition. If your a leftist and someone opposes your viewpoint then you win the prize of victimhood and you get to claim to be oppressed. You're not oppressed, we just disagree with your solution, not the intended outcome of your solution. We want to keep the government out of all of the solutions because they are extremely inefficient and wasteful.

Well... I'm just rambling on. I'll shut up now.

Social justice is the equal and fair treatment for all members of society, it is not the demonization of the other in order to galvanize and unite society behind an autocratic leader just as Fascism and Nazism did.Which is, in case you haven't noticed, exactly what Trump is doing, and why he took off in 2015. He demonized the Gypsies and the Jews, or in this modern retelling, the Mexicans and the Muslims.

Not that he's the only one, that's basically what every single politician, official, leader, ruler of any sort has done, as well as political entities and nations - demonization of the other. Countries are best defined not by what they are, but by what they are not. The US is not Britain. Britain is not France. France is not Germany. Germany wasn't even Germany until 1871 because little German city states were fighting each other because they demonized their own German brethren over in the next town.

▶️ "Back in the later 1920's and early 1930's, the American Nazi party published a newspaper named, Social Justice. This was back when the Progressives had no problem pontificating on the greatness of Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Lenin."

⬛ This was back when the Nazis claimed that the Jews were the source of all their woes, and ridding the West of them would rid the West of the nefarious Globalist/Communist/Socialist/Zionist plot outlined in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion intended to replace or at least subjugate 'true' Europeans/Germanics.

The world initially admired Hitler because he took a devastated despondent country and revived it, leading the greatest economic revival in history, inspiring the public, invigorating society, instilling a sense of hope.

The West also looked favorably upon Nazism and Fascim because they saw them as a bulwark against the spread of so-called socialism via the expansion of the USSR into other countries. Better them who are willing to work with the already present scaffolding of society rather than a radical movement that wanted to completely eradicate and replace government and cultural institutions.

▶️ "The major problem with pushing the oppressed/oppressor narrative in America is we were never founded on that model."

⬛ The USA was founded, nay, birthed from this narrative. Got rid of its King, expelled its British rulers. And replaced it with something radically different on top of that, the first nation history to do so. It also pushed against France, Spain, then later the Nazis and the USSR oppressors

Modda?? You just betrayed your own comment. Equal and fair treatment has always been the foundation of this nation but that's not social justice.

And if Trump is a Nazi and fascist then that makes everyone who voted for him a Nazi and fascist, therefore, that is neither equal or fair treatment to lie about someone and dehumanize them.

Trump hasn't demonized anyone except for liberal ideology and the press. Trump moved the US embassy to Jerusalem, recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. That's the most pro-Jewish thing any president has ever done for Israel. He negotiated a peace deal between Israel and Hamas over Gaza so that Gaza can finally rebuild. For as long as Hamas doesn't violate that peace deal which they will do starting right about now, because that is how evil Hamas is.

When did Trump ever say anything bad about Gypsies??? That's bizarre.

I wouldn't say "the world admired Hitler". It was just the Progressives, the leftists. The problem is that the economists who saw socialism as a failure could only describe it in paper because it was too new. It didn't take long for the Australian school of economics philosophers, like Hayek, Mises, etc to be vindicated.

1928 was when the NY Times finally published an article they had been sitting on about the horrors of the Soviet Union. Then a few years later Hitler invaded Poland and the entire Progressive world started to fall apart.

You think a country that didn't let women or black people vote for at least 100 years is based on equal and fair treatment of people?

He has demonized immigrants. He has demonized Muslims. He has demonized transgender people. He has demonized democrats. He has demonized anybody who isn't like him.

When all you can focus on is the negative you miss the much greater positive.

When this country was founded only male landowners were allowed to vote. Why was that? Did the take the right to vote away from anyone. Did the English allow women and blacks to vote before we separated from them. NO!!!!!

People do what their conditioned to do until enough people question the reasons. And there was a valid reason why only landowners (notice I didn't say slaveowners, they are not the same thing) were allowed to vote. The founders believed that if you owned a piece of America you were more likely to support America. You would defend your property from foreign invasion.

What no one did back then was to count the vote of the woman as separate from the man. They figured the husband and wife were always in agreement. Most of the time that is true, even today.

The man's vote was counted for everyone living on his property. If 10 people lived on the property the man's vote was counted as 10 votes. But there was one exception the the left purposely gets wrong. If you owned slaves you could not claim 1 vote from the slave, you could only claim 3/5ths of a vote for each slave you owned. Basically your voting power was diminished for owning slaves. This was a compromise because 11 of the 13 original states wanted to end slavery altogether. But 2 states wanted slavery so s compromise was created and that was ending the U.S. slave trade from Africa 20 years after the Constitution was ratified and counting the slave vote as less that the slave owner. Because if the slave had a right to vote, which he or she did, then they clearly would not vote to stay in slavery.

It just took a while and a civil war for enough people to get out of their "it's always been this way" mentality. It still takes is a long time because that's how human beings act. It's real easy to be a presentist and criticize the past but if you lived back you may have even supported slavery.

Certainly that is what the left is fighting for now. Only it's a different kind of slavery. It's the kind where the authoritarian government strips us of all our rights and micromanages our lives. In other words, oppression.

And not only that, treated both as actual property. Women weren't even allowed to get credit cards without permission from their husbands till 1973. 1973. Credit cards. Best thing that ever happened to the credit card industry is women. That's like inventing cars and not allowing anybody to fill the tank up with gas.

Amazon would still be a literal bookstore if it wasn't for women with credit cards.

Amazon was just ordered to stop making getting out of Amazon Prime so difficult, and two weeks later they're getting rid of 30,000 employees. Coincidence?

That's probably how much money they were making from people stuck in Prime Purgatory. Believe you me I tried once for their free introductary 30-day period, oh my gosh, you have no idea how difficult it is to get out of that thing. Good thing I checked, because it seems like you got outt, but you didn't because you have to keep confirming it over and over again.

"But are you sure you want to cancel your Amazon Prime service?"

"But are you really REALLY sure you want to cancel your Amazon prime?"

"I mean, seriously, like do you actually truly want to cancel your Amazon Prime?"

I even called customer service up (back when you can call them) just to make sure I truly finally got out of there after taking the longest to get out of it.... oh my gosh, it's a freaking maze of endless repetition.

Native Americans too. And try getting arrested for killing someone from China back in the day out West. It was mission impossible (providing the killer was Anglo). You would get in worse trouble just for trying to steal a horse. You didn't have to steal it, just try.

In Texas during the 1930s, they started driving out Mexicans by the hundreds of thousands, by harassment, deportation, and outright killing. It didn't matter that many of them actually had actual US citizenship, not to mention living there way before the US had invaded and taken over Texas.

When did the Nazi party say they support social justice (in the modern progressive sense)?

(They didn't)

There is only one sense. The only thing that changes is who the oppressed and who the oppressors are.

It's all about giving one group payback for the crime of being labeled an oppressor.

If you have some other definition, please share it.

Not everybody uses the term social justice in the same way

That's true. The term originated with the Catholic Church and it meaning was nothing close to the Marxists.

All I ever seen it used was to describe getting justice for the oppressed.

Even the definition of oppression has changed.

It used to mean having all or most of your God given rights trampled on by a dictator, and oligarchy or a monarch. The oppressor could also be an individual or group of individuals not affiliated with any government.

But with modern Marxists it now means opposition. You're rights are intact but someone(s) disagrees with you. Many times it's just the obstacles that life throws at everyone that modern Marxists call oppression. Those hardships are then assigned to a person or groups of people.

None of that is real oppression, it's just annoyances. But those gave been convinced they are oppressed seek governmental remedies. They end up taking the rights away from the person or people they hate. And taking rights away IS oppression.

Everyone has the right to free speech, but according to the left it must be speech they approve of, if not then they claim to be oppressed and label their "oppressor" with names like Nazi and fascist. It is interesting that they never call anyone a communist or a socialist, just Nazi and fascist. That's not all, there is a list of standard mis-characterizations and some of them end with "phobe" as if the subject of their hatred has an irrational fear of something.

Those of us on the receiving end of this hatred continually ask if the leftist even knows what X means. Because we do and we stand in direct opposition to everything the left accuses us of.

And we wonder what it will take to get the left to just use their brains and learn the meaning of the words they call us. Learn that the only socialists in this nation are the leftists trying to silence and dehumanize us.

It was the name of a German immigrant Nazi newspaper in New York, so therefore it's a universal term for Socialists. Something like that. Nazism is so Hippie.

You know cropping the meme does not help you if the original is right there?
All you do is make yourself look dishonest and untrustworthy.

😭😭😭

https://x.com/i/status/1982854233885159590

a wave? oh my

Context other than beginning to do a wave?

Show context

That would reveal their lies, are you crazy? 😧

Well I'm glad you asked.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/elon-musk-salute-trump-inauguration-b2683095.html

I bet they appreciate people being on edge, or they wouldn't have a job.

Wow, scrapping up this again? Are you trying to distract from the fact that Melania Trump has spent less than 14 days at the White House since the beginning of Trump's term?

And with the demolition of the East Wing her 'office' has to be permanently relocated to so that number of days spent near Trump will drop to 0.

Are you trying to distract from that?

Nobody gives a damn where Melania spends her time. Except maybe you and other people who wake up a check in with their masters to see what they can be mad about every morning.

You don't think it's weird that a wife actively chooses to not be anywhere near her husband?

Not at that age, and not as president and first lady.

Can you name another First Family where the First Lady lived in another state full time?

Can you name one that had their own businesses and did as much as this one?

He's running a country and is gone alot. No reason for her to stay and clean the house. She has a life too. I also don't think it is my business. Lot's of older couples don't have the insecurity that demands their spouse always be by their side. Seems like a stupid subject to deflect to.

Is it an "older couple" when one is only 55? 😂😂

It's not that he's working morning shift and she's working night, and they only see each other for 20 minutes a day. She actively avoids him. She doesn't live in the White House. She doesn't sleep in the same bedroom as he does when they're in the same building.

What's the point of being married if you actively avoid your spouse?

Benefits. Not every marriage is the picture portrayed in teen heart throb movies.