Imgflip Logo Icon
121 Comments
11 ups, 4w
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
10 ups, 4w,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 4w
The opposite of pro is con. The opposite of progress is Congress.
9 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Ray Epps | AFTER J6, THE FBI SPENT MONTHS SEARCHING FOR THE 30 CULPRITS WHO BROKE A WINDOW, ASSAULTED OFFICERS, BUT COULD NEVER FIND THEM | image tagged in ray epps | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Despite having HD quality video of the assailants, the FBI spend over 3 months on a nation-wide search, including plastering their pictures on national news every night for these 20-30 individuals, who broke a window and assaulted police officers, but after months of searching, then FBI stopped their search, because it turns out all of those culprits were FBI operatives.
7 ups, 4w,
1 reply
They are all hiding out with the dude who brought that cocaine into the White House.
6 ups, 4w
I love how the media just entirely drops the story about cocaine after 2 weeks. Along with the long, long list of serious events that need investigation, like the bombing of the NordStream 2 pipeline, the burning of Epstein's island the week after he was arrested, the Maui fires, the Palisades fires, the victim of N. Carolina hurricane Helene, culling millions of chickens, Pfizer & Moderna vaccine proven to be ineffective, AstraZeneca forced to admit in court their shot was ineffective, Covid passports, canceling the XL pipeline, why is John Kerry negotiating with other heads of state, etc., etc.
10 ups, 4w
2 ups, 4w
They can just stop their hypocrisy over "due process"...

Obama’s Due Process

https://x.com/i/status/1915566549773189552
3 ups, 4w
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
That guy with the baton ‘tho
8 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Such a powerful weapon to overthrow a government that is with Jets
1 up, 4w
Well if we can just shoot that guy with the baton in self defense then maybe it’s ok
4 ups, 4w,
3 replies
“Citizens exercise their constitutional rights” What in the constitution gives you the right to bash a government building window with a baton?
10 ups, 4w
Did you miss what happened in Seattle in 2019 -2020. Antifa tried to burn down a federal courthouse.
Oh, and those who bashed windows were Feds.
Oops!
9 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Pelosi fedsurrection... even her daughter admitted so much...
9 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Also Rey Epps, Flynn(who wanted to take over MAGA and is currently parking cars at West Point's visitor building), Roger Stone, and a few others who also tried to take advantage of that day for nefarious reasons.
7 ups, 4w
Not to mention Biden giving pardons to the J6 committee and DC police...
7 ups, 4w,
1 reply
The part where it says in case we need to overthrow a Tyrannical Government.

That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on ...
4 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Being butthurt because you lost an election is not an excuse to storm the Capitol building
7 ups, 4w
So what was your excuse for rioting in 2017 and again in 2025? Being butthurt for losing doesn’t give a reason to riot
8 ups, 4w,
1 reply
No but rampant election fraud is. Which is what happened & Biden got away with it.
9 ups, 4w
Yawn. Had they actually went through proper recounting and ballot eligibility research, he would have "found 15,000" more.
5 ups, 4w,
1 reply
You seriously need to listen to the call and get the context. The fact you even bring this up destroys any credibility you would have had.
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
Correct. The number Trump asked for was 11,780 votes to be created on demand to swing the vote tally in his favor.
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
Yes after a long discussion about list votes and missing votes. Again context matters. Listen to the call in is entirety.
0 ups, 2w
No. Trump told him to find him 11,780 votes, stating that that's all he needed.
8 ups, 4w,
1 reply
So they were allowed to go to McDonalds or the Apple Store after they were detained? They didn't get shipped off to prison to await a trial? Oh that's right - they didn't get to walk around and build a case... They were just held in prison until their dates.

Now look at how in comparison that looks. People rioting at a government building... Locked up and key tossed out. Black dude takes a white kids life and his bail was reduced from $1Mil to 250K & he's walking around the streets.

If they needed arrested and fined for rioting ok, fine... Arrest them, set a date - let them live their lives until that date. But that's not what happened. They got rounded up like MS-13 and shuttled off. Weird how Democrats complain about that kind of rounding up but didn't complain when it happened to US Citizens
2 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Yes, some of the J6ers were held without out bail because of the violent nature of their accused crimes. It was all the ones who beat the cops, smashed windows & doors. But the people who followed them in? Most of them were released on bail. And their lawyers got to build their cases.

It's a part of that... due process.

But did Kilmar Garcia get a trial? Nope. He was, in your words "shuttled off." Shuttled off to where? A holding facility? Noooo. He was sent to a prison in another country. They are still in a prison in another country. With no trial date. And the Trump administration says they're not coming back.

So... that's a total lack of due process. They were accused of a crime then shipped off to a prison in another country. No trial. No evidence. Nothing.

And if reporting about what officials in El Salvador have claimed, we're paying El Salvador to keep them in prison. Which isn't deportation at all.
8 ups, 4w
Because of the violent nature.... The comparison model I provided literally put a knife through a dudes heart. GTFO LMAO
7 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Actually judges already determined they were non citizen MS13 in previous trials. They got their due process.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Yes he had due process, they simply said he shouldn’t have been sent to El Salvador.
2 ups, 4w,
3 replies
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
*BOOM*
1 up, 3w,
9 replies
Except he already had his due process
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Man, you'd think the 9-0 SCOTUS decision would have caught that, huh?
1 up, 3w
😂, it says future proceedings doesn’t lt.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
"He admitted guilt. His punishment is summary deportation."

No matter how many times you assert that's how it works, Blues, it's never going to be true. Abrego Garcia was unlawfully deported (as was plainly stated 9-0 by the SCOTUS) under the 5th Amendment. 🤣
0 ups, 3w
Nope no matter how you portray it the only sticking point is where he was deported to. He was lawfully deported and they ordered the administration to “facilitate” his return. El Salvador doesn’t want to send him back. Too bad, So sad.
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
"Accusations and complaints can be filed, that doesn’t mean they have merit or that they are legitimate. Killmore will win nothing and will stay in El Salvador where he belongs. Bet."

Let's see... if Abrego Garcia lodges federal court claim against U.S., Trump Administration, individual officers and gets shot down,he has the option to appeal. If he gets shot down by the appelate judge, he then has the option to appeal to the same SCOTUS that ruled his deportation was unlawful, in violation of the 5th Amendment. What do you suppose are the odds the SCOTUS is going to reverse themselves, deny his claim having previously confirmed his 5A Right was violated? 😏
1 up, 3w
Its funny how no one is talking about the real solution to all this: for congress to make enough courts to handle all the cases in a year and then run them through those courts so no one can complain.
0 ups, 3w
I got five on it.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Nope. But good job shooting yourself in the foot there, Blues. Abrego Garcia was under a Withholding of Removal order while his case was under review. His due process was not complete and until such time as that happens one has not received due process.

Not only that, because his constitutional rights were violated (repeatedly, admittedly by the government) he now has claim and standing to bring civil and criminal charges against not only the Trump Administration for civil rights violation and kidnapping as a whole, but also every officer directly involved in his arrest and deportation to the tune of $50k personal liability per rights violation per person with a federal felony: kidnapping kicker. And, depending on how many state lines were crossed during Garcia's removal, those officers are additionally now subject to state-level kidnapping charges as well.

Oh, but doesn't stop there, no... because the government has admitted Garcia's removal was illegal, Garcia has an airtight pain and suffering case. Let that marinate for a minute -on top of the potential hundreds of thousands of dollars (maybe even mil$ depending on how many federal agents got their fingerprints on Garcia's unlawful deportation) in potential civil penalties coming Garcia's way, he stands to win a wad of cash that makes Walter White's nest egg look like chump change. If memory serves, it was Dave Chappelle who described Trump's brain-children as "high people ideas"... and... well... he was right... more right than anyone could have predicted.
1 up, 3w
You’re a dreamer. Garcia will win nothing. He is in the country he belongs. He was given due process and ordered deported. He had a stay due to claims a rival gang would harm him. Now he claims he’s not in a gang. Besides, That gang no longer operates in El Salvador so the reason for his stay is no longer existent. He had plenty of due process for a foreign criminal. Not sorry. No tears for Killmore. You can cry if you want to.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
"He had a stay"

Thank you for admitting Garcia was unlawfully deported.
1 up, 3w
Thank for admitting he is guilty of breaking the law.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
"He doesn’t need to be convicted of the crime of entering the country illegally because he admitted it. The solution to this crime is summary deportation."

Nope, not how it works, Blues.
0 ups, 3w
Sure it does, happened routinely under Obama, Clinton, Bush.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
"Thank for admitting he is guilty of breaking the law."

Never said he didn't. I mean... this whole exchange has been about the Rights of the Accused and violation thereof. But fair enough... -my fault for not taking into account the imaginary scenarios flitting about in your melon.
1 up, 3w
He admitted guilt. His punishment is summary deportation.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
"You’re a dreamer. Garcia will win nothing."

Oh, btw -thank you for acknowledging Garcia has legitimate claim and standing (probably not what you intended but still) against the Trump Administration, individual federal employees.
1 up, 3w
Accusations and complaints can be filed, that doesn’t mean they have merit or that they are legitimate. Killmore will win nothing and will stay in El Salvador where he belongs. Bet.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Also, you should probably look at this:

"Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Abrego Garcia was born in the Los Nogales neighborhood of San Salvador, El Salvador, in July 1995.[2][24] In El Salvador, the Barrio 18 criminal gang tried to extort his mother's pupusa business for money and threatened that if she did not pay the money, they would force her eldest son, Cesar, to join the gang; the gang later threatened to kill him.[2][25] As a result, the family paid the money and hid Cesar, eventually sending him to the United States.[2][26] Barrio 18 then turned its attention to Kilmar, who was around 12 years old. The gang followed Kilmar and continued to threaten his family.[2] Eventually, when Kilmar was 16 years old,[26][27] his family sent him to the U.S. as well.[2] According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Abrego Garcia illegally crossed the Mexico–U.S. border near McAllen, Texas, in March 2012.[24]

From the U.S. border, Abrego Garcia traveled to Maryland in order to live with his brother Cesar, who became a U.S. citizen.[24] In 2016, Abrego Garcia met Jennifer Vasquez Sura, a U.S. citizen who would become his wife.[2] After marrying, the couple had one child, whom they raised alongside Vasquez Sura's two children from an earlier relationship.[2][28] All three children have special needs;[28][24] the son born to the couple has autism, a hearing defect, and is "unable to communicate verbally".[26] Abrego Garcia lived in Maryland with his family,[26][4] and was not formally convicted of any criminal offense, including gang membership, in the U.S. or in El Salvador.[29]"

See that last part? You know... where it says Garcia has neither been convicted on any crimes north or south nor litigatively confirmed as being part of any gangs? Bit problematic relative to the whole "convicted gang-member" talking point, don'tcha think?

Anyway, plenty of footnotes in the source material, Blues -and all you have to do is have the courage to find out whether or not what you think you know is accurate.
1 up, 3w
He doesn’t need to be convicted of the crime of entering the country illegally because he admitted it. The solution to this crime is summary deportation.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
1 up, 3w
Except he already had his due process and was twice ordered deported.
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
No you’re wrong, He was already given his due process. Ordered deported twice and found to be a member of a criminal organization twice.
2 ups, 3w,
4 replies
Sure, show me that conviction for a crime. Because I've only seen is a mad libs worksheet from the cops who arrested him siting a 'confidential unnamed source'.

So, their know a guy who has an uncle who has a cousin-in-law who has a nephew who had a guy in their 4th grade class who definitely knows something about this.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
You’re talking about his recent pick up in a gang sweep. These were prior proceedings where he was ordered deported and two judges assented that he was an associate or member of a criminal gang.
1 up, 3w
So if a little old lady happens to be asking for directions from a suspected gang-member gets picked up in a sweep, she's automatically guilty of being in a gang, then?
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Also entering the country illegally is a crime. One that he admitted to. Why would he need a deportation hearing if he didn’t have due process?
1 up, 3w
Because the hearing is a part of the... due process.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
“ Because the hearing is a part of the... due process.”

The due process you’ve been screaming he never got?
1 up, 3w
Right. I know you can't admit when you're wrong and you'll do everything you can to feel like you're right- but you're still dead ass wrong.

He wasn't given a chance to answer the charges against him. He didn't have access to his lawyer. He didn't get a chance to review the evidence against him. He never had access to an unbiased judicial review of his case.

You can do all the mental gymnastics you want to convince yourself that Garcia had access to the due process guaranteed him by the Constitution.

You're wrong. Not only are you wrong but you're wrong AND anti-American.
0 ups, 3w
“ You're wrong. Not only are you wrong but you're wrong AND anti-American.” Talk about mental gymnastics?

How does backing a foreign terrorist affiliated criminals make you pro American? Oh yeah it doesn’t.

Two federal judges said he’s an MS13 member, a police department said he’s an ms13 member, ice status shows him as an ms13 member, El Salvador says he’s an ms13 member. He has MS13 tattoos on his knuckles, But you say he’s not. Ok and your the same guy who blew smoke about so many disproven theories on Covid and The laptop and the rest of the leftist false narratives, but sure you’re right this time. 😂
1 up, 3w,
12 replies
So what you're saying is that all 9 SCOTUS judges (you know, the people whose job it is to know how Constitutional Law works) who unanimously ruled that Abrego Garcia was unlawfully deported are wrong and you're right? Does that about sum it up?
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
The judges did not adjudicate his guilt or criminality. He was mistakenly deported to the wrong country. Too bad so sad, but it’s done and he is in the country of his birth that is free of 18th street gangsters now so all safer safe.
1 up, 3w
"The judges did not adjudicate his guilt or criminality.

Nice attempted dodge but the question was not whether the judges adjudicated his guilt or criminality, it was whether the SCOTUS 9 are wrong and you're right. So I'll ask again:

In the case of the Supreme Court's ruling that Abrego Garcia was unlawfully deported, are you saying that the SCOTUS 9's finding is wrong and that your claim Garcia's deportation was lawful is right?

Feel free to attempt dodging the question again; I'm just going to keep asking.

"He was mistakenly deported to the wrong country. Too bad so sad, but it’s done and he is in the country of his birth..."

So you're saying he was sent to *not El Salvador* and then retrieved, sent to El Salvador? Interesting. Wait a minute... is this one of those "the rest of us aren't party to your imaginary sequence of events" things?

"...that is free of 18th street gangsters now so all safer safe."

Nope. If you'd do a little research, you'd know that Barrio-18 didn't shut down, no... it underwent schism, became two new gangs sooo... yeah, your claim of "safer safe" (maybe go check your pupillary dilation, make sure you're not concussed/having a stroke) doesn't stand. Welll... unless it's also your contention that gangs go all etch-a-sketch on their roster of extortion targets whenever there's a shake-up.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
“So if a little old lady happens to be asking for directions from a suspected gang-member gets picked up in a sweep, she's automatically guilty of being in a gang, then?”

If the little old lady has ms13 tattoos on her knuckles and drives the car of a convicted ms13 human trafficker, Yes. If she admits she is in the country illegally and is part of a declared terrorist organization, bye 👋.
1 up, 3w
"If the little old lady has ms13 tattoos on her knuckles..."

Oh, you mean Garcia's knuckle tattoos indicating he likes herb, likes drinking, is into Jesus/Christianity and Dia de los Muertos? Those tattoos? Seriously, what with Garcia's Salvadoran heritage, I honestly expected you to figure out the Day of the Dead thing on your own.

...and drives the car of a convicted ms13 human trafficker, Yes."

LOL!!! So whatcha tryna to say there, Blues? I mean... it seems an awful lot like you're attempting to imply that secondary operatorship of a vehicle previously owned by a convicted human trafficker makes said secondary operator a human trafficker via car cooties. You're not the kind of person who puts stock in superstitious nonsense like transitive Ka, are you?

"If she admits she is in the country illegally"

That's a big oopsie you just popped off there, Blues; a confession alone is insufficient. Law enforcement is still obligated to investigate, corroborate, charge -after which it's up to a judge or jury to convict or not. You know... due process.

"and is part of a declared terrorist organization, bye 👋."

Still no proof of that, Blues. I mean... sure you could point to the PGCPD's arrest report... except it contradicts itself and cops are notorious for falsifying reports when they make bad arrests. In fact, the only thing going for that notion is the word of an anonymous informant who alleged Garcia is part of an MS-13 branch operating out of a section of the country there's no known record of him ever calling home or even visiting.

Maybe you should try looking up the DOJ's documentation of the Garcia matter before you commit to putting your foot deeper into your mouth. 🤔
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
I specifically said I provided evidence. So obviously I know the difference. The same can’t be said for your ability to interpret the letter of the law weighed with intent. Circumstantial evidence is used to convict people all the time. Just because there is no conviction doesn’t mean it’s not true. Biden admin was letting criminals walk routinely.

The vehicle didn’t belong to a “former” human trafficker it belonged to a human trafficker. It wasn’t Killmores’ car and he was using his “bosses” car by his own admission. His boss, the guy convicted of human trafficking and transporting people from the same place Killmore was.

He’s a wife beating scum, MS 13 gang member and human trafficker. Nothing you say changes that.
0 ups, 2w
Yes, exactly -which is why I said you're demonstratedly fuzzy on the difference between evidence and proof rather than completely clueless.

I never said the vehicle belonged to a "former" human trafficker; you're letting your imagination tell you things that didn't happen again, Blues.

But since you seem convinced that circumstantial evidence is proof of criminality, let's talk about Donald Trump for a moment. Similar to Abrego Garcia, he was accused of spousal abuse -albeit of a far greater severity- by Ivana Trump in a deposition to the tune of rape. So, by your reasoning, that makes Donald Trump a rapist. Are you sure you want to continue down this path or would you rather rely on lawful conviction by a jury per the strictures of due process as the determinant of guilty/not guilty?
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
There is one major difference of course. Trump is a citizen and not subject to deportation. So your point is moot.

Killmore is illegally in the country and has been ordered deported. The evidence of his bad character absolutely weighs in decision to deport irregardless of convictions and two different judges found sufficient cause. He was given due process and he doesn’t need to be convicted to be deported.
1 up, 2w
Oh really? So you're moving the goalposts, then?
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
I’m sorry if the imaginary goalposts in your mind aren’t where you think they are. I never set any goalposts. If I were to set one it would be that illegals aliens are better deported than allowed to stay here, especially those of poor moral character.
0 ups, 2w
"I never set any goalposts."

Except you did, Blues, when you established a standard of allegation and circumstantial evidence as being proof of criminality.

**HEY EVERYONE, SCROLL UP A LITTLE!!**

And now that your established standard is blowing up in your face, not only are you moving the goalposts, you're lying that you're not. 😄

And it's probably best not to bring questions of poor moral character into it when the contrasted person obligating said same moving goalposts is a 30k+ documented liar, self-professed peeping tom, adjudicated sexual assaulter who only missed being an adjuducated rapist by a hair due to a revision in the law, convicted fraudster, known serial adulterer who has to pay porn stars for their silence --oh... and there was that whole trying to force an aging widow out of her home, off her land thing too... that's some Snidely Whiplash-level, of-poor-moral-character, straight-up evil shit. 🤣

"Trump is a citizen and not subject to deportation."

Remember saying that, Blues? **HEY, EVERYONE, SCROLL UP AGAIN!!** And how many U.S. citizens did the Trump Administration deport recently? Three, isn't it? Sauce for the goose, sauce for the philanderer.
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
No, you established goal posts. Proof of criminality is already a fact. Killmore admitted to being in the country illegally which is against the law, thus making him a criminal. He did not enter at any port of entry or make any initial asylum claim. He snuck in across the border as a “got away”. Those facts are indisputable. He doesn’t dispute them and freely admitted such. That he is an MS13 member and was involved in spousal abuse and human trafficking are quite evident based on the documents and videos of his wife’s testimony and his Tennessee traffic stop, but he doesn’t need to be convicted of those to be a criminal since he already is one.

You obviously yearn for attention as exemplified by your “scroll up” exclamations to your “fans” 😂. As if you believe the community is reading this mish mash of long winded attempts at intellectual superiority. Sorry, it’s not that spectacular as identified by the lack of upvotes. This thread is played out as is your argument.
0 ups, 2w
"No, you established goal posts."

Aaaand you're lying again. Just as an aside, you know anyone reading this can scroll in either direction and see that for themselves, right? On that note...

**HEY, EVERYONE, SCROLL WHICHEVER DIRECTION YOU LIKE TO SEE HOW BLUES HAS DEMONSTRATED THEMSELF A LIAR!!** 😄

Wow... so you've already (conveniently) forgotten that unlawful presence in the country is a civil offense rather than a criminal offense? 😏

Okay. Ever received a parking or speeding ticket or any kind of civil citation, Blues? I know; foolish to ask because you'll just lie "I've never" if you have. But, if so, this new standard you're establishing makes *you* a criminal -which would track cleanly in terms of "those of poor moral character" what with the documented instance(s) of you lying- rather than simply someone who infracted in regards to administrative requirements.

"He did not enter at any port of entry"

Oopsie-doodle, Bluesie-Blues:

"8 U.S. Code § 1158 - Asylum

(a)Authority to apply for asylum
(1)In general
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title." 😂

"You obviously yearn for attention as exemplified by your 'scroll up' exclamations to your 'fans'"

Oh, Blues... that was just lame. Someone who yearns for attention doesn't direct the spotlight away from themself. 🤣
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Regardless of the ruling he is no longer in the jurisdiction of the court and the court has no power to compel his return from El Salvador. Note the “facilitate”language. Unlawfully, misakenly whatever you want to call it. He’s gone and staying gone. Good riddance.

Too bad you aren’t as passionate about Americans murdered by foreign criminals, but then you’re not an American, are you.
1 up, 3w
"Too bad you aren’t as passionate about Americans murdered by foreign criminals, but then you’re not an American, are you."

Oooo... combination attempted deflect/re-direct and emotionalist false narrative creation with a "you ain't from around here" kicker. 🤣

But okay, I'll play your game. Do you really care about the murders or is that just a convenient talking point? (<<<Ah, the majestic question mark -glorious, punctuative, the squiggly line standing determinative between statements and interrogatives.)

I mean... given the miniscule number of murders committed by illegals relative to the number committed by natural born killers, if it's really about the body count and not just butthurts over offsides...
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
“ So you're saying he was sent to *not El Salvador* and then retrieved, sent to El Salvador?”

Who said that? You are confused…again.

“ Nope. If you'd do a little research, you'd know that Barrio-18 didn't shut down, no... it underwent schism, became two new gangs sooo... yeah, your claim of "safer safe" ”

If you did a little research you would see that El Salvador has a plummeting crime rate and little tolerance for punk gangsters. Their power is diminished and remnants may survive but they are eviscerated and live in fear of being arrested for gang activity. So yes all safey safe for Killmore the MS 13 gang member.
1 up, 3w
“'So you're saying he was sent to *not El Salvador* and then retrieved, sent to El Salvador?'

Who said that? You are confused…again."

You did: "He was mistakenly deported to the wrong country."

**HEY, EVERYBODY!!! SCROLL UP A LITTLE BIT!!!** 🤣

Aww, Blues... if you can't even remember what you've said over such a short time span, when it's right here in black and white, how can you trust your memory of what you've read about the Garcia case?

"If you did a little research you would see that El Salvador has a plummeting crime rate and little tolerance for punk gangsters."

Irrelevant; the splinter factions which once comprised Barrio-18's presence in El Salvador are still in operation. On top of that, if what you say about El Salvador's tolerance for gangs is true, where are formerly Barrio-18's busted gang members now? They're in prison, right? And where is Garcia, again? Shanking distance, isn't it?

But good effort trying to steer the discussion away from the fact you erroneously claimed Garcia is safe in El Salvador though.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
“Oh, you mean Garcia's knuckle tattoos indicating he likes herb, likes drinking, is into Jesus/Christianity and Dia de los Muertos?”

Two federal judges said he’s an MS13 member, a police department said he’s an ms13 member, ice status shows him as an ms13 member, El Salvador says he’s an ms13 member. He has MS13 tattoos on his knuckles, But you say he’s not. 😂

Ya what a coinkydink that he’s from El Salvador and has tattoos representing M and then an S and then a 1 with a cross cover up and a 3 with a skull cover up or 3rd letter of the alphabet spelling MS 13. Amazing.
1 up, 3w
Show everyone the hi-res image of his knuckle tattoos proving what you say isn't just you scrambling after whatever angle you apparently think allows you to continue believing you're on the uphill side of the issue. Sorry, that was too wordy... let's see... how to synopsize this... hmmm... ah, got it: hi-res pic or you're full of shit.

No... that's too glib... okay, let's approach this from a tattoo artist's operational perspective; it's your contention that the skull cleanly covers up a 3 (oh, btw, the third letter of the alphabet is C **not the number 3** sooo yeah... not sure how you arrived at "3rd letter of the alphabet spelling MS 13"), correct?

In order for your claim to hold true, the tattoo artist would who applied the number three would have, instead of centering it on the knuckle like all the other tattoos, for some weird reason decided to offset it toward the outside of the pinky. You got some mental gymnastics 'splainin' to do, Blues, because what you're suggesting is coming across as wildly stretchy foray into cray-cray town.

Yes, two federal judges said he’s an MS13 member, a police department said he’s an ms13 member, ice status shows him as an ms13 member **based on the word of a anonymous informant making claims**. You're aware that police departments have a long, sordid history of their own officers calling in anonymous tips to justify search warrants against, arresting people they have nothing on beyond "but muh suspicions," right?

"El Salvador says he’s an ms13 member." You mean the same El Salvador run by the self-proclaimed "world's coolest dictator" who lied that, despite being Jefe Maximo, he doesn't have the power to get Garcia out of prison and to an airport? LOL!!! That's not how dictatorships work, Blues, and we both know it.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Your desperate need to protect an MS13 gang member and human trafficker whose wife sought not one but two restraining orders against him is hilarious. Keep going you are still wrong and he will stay where he is.
0 ups, 3w
Awww... that was weak, Blues.

But okay, fair enough; I suppose in the twisted mind of someone who thinks calling out violations of the Constitution and adhering to a high standard of evidence qualifies as "defense," such would necessarily be construable as siding with enemies of the U.S... although... it seems relevant to point out I'm arguing on the side of law and order, obedience to the Constitution's dictates and maintenance of constitutionally guaranteed civil rights while you're arguing in favor lawlessness, rights only when convenient, violation of the Constitution.

Anyway, I'll play your game: where's your proof Garcia is a human trafficker? You do have proof, right?
0 ups, 3w
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
https://nypost.com/2025/04/23/us-news/deported-alleged-ms-13-gangbanger-kilmar-abrego-garcia-was-driving-convicted-smugglers-car-during-tennessee-traffic-stop/
0 ups, 2w
So what you're saying is that someone in possession of a vehicle which previously belonged to or has been lent out by a convicted criminal is automatically guilty of the same crime? Okay, I guess we're back to car cooties. Hmmm... that doesn't seem like it's going to resonate with you...

Oh, I know... let's say you, Bluessol, buy a car from your neighbor who is a convicted serial killer. Per your apparent policy of guilt by after-possession, that would make you, Bluessol, a serial killer as well, correct?

Anyway, some things you clearly haven't taken into account:

1. per federal law, it's legal for non-citizens to enter the U.S. anywhere along the border, without passing through an official point of entry.

2. after said entry, the enteree has a period of 365 days to apply for asylum or exit the country before being considered in violation of the law.

3. if the enteree leaves the country, the clock is reset to zero.

4. if a migrant's stay exceeds the 365-day grace period, it's a civil offense (so effectively on par with a parking ticket) not a criminal offense.

5. nothing in the article rises to a level exceeding circumstantial evidence; additionally

6: (possibly most important) THP released Garcia and everyone in the vehicle even after Garcia stated occupants were in transport to Maryland for work -which indicates that, regardless of the vehicle being driven, the THP officer's suspicions, either there wasn't sufficient evidence to support arrests or everyone in the car was able to produce valid documentation.

Soooo yeah... that ain't proof. What else ya got?
0 ups, 2w,
1 reply
Car cooties? There are no places left to reply to your inanity on this thread. You asked for proof he was smuggling humans. I provided evidence of indicating he was.
0 ups, 2w
You still haven't answered the question, Blues -yes or no: does the convicting an object's former owner of a crime make its next owner guilty of the same crime?

Anyway... yes, exactly; I asked for proof and what you provided is not proof but circumstantial evidence which won't stand up in court.

Proof that Abrego Garcia is a human trafficker would be THP not letting him go with a citation for driving on an expired license and instead charging, arresting and jailing him, followed by a trial and conviction for human trafficking. You know... the product of due process.

But I think I see a large part of the problem: you're demonstratedly fuzzy on the difference between proof and evidence, jumping to conclusions based on that misunderstanding.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 3
  • Democrat logo
  • Capitol Riot
  • MS13 Family Pic
  • no i don't feel ashamed of hating this media blank
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Jan 6th: Citizens exercise their Constitutional Rights. 0 cries for "Due Process" when they are locked up. Today: Democrats demand Due Process for an Illegal Migrant that is a violent Wife Beater and Member of MS-13. The Democrat Party