That tracks given the OP is about masculine overcompensation as a masking behavior to conceal homosexuality rather than overt indicators of homosexual interest. Speaking of which, observe the image more closely, take note of the trouser tents.

"And you got upset when I said I don’t see any homosexual intentions and the thought that is masculine overcompensation is a load of lard"

You're allowing your own emotional state to color your view of your debate opponent. I didn't get upset; I was actually quite amused by your comment and denoted said amusement with the term "LOL".

Oh, incidentally, there's a reason why I posited the question "Can you spot the rainbow?" at the time of the OP's publication. If you wish to understand the phrase "rainbow array of dudes," look closer. Observe rather than reacting.

And where is the accusation in OP? State it.

You're assuming an emotional state in your debate opponent. For the record, I'm not "pissed," I'm simply using questions to challenging your position based on available information. Also, you're dodging the questions and engaging in marginalization again.