XiaoJia0 ups, <1h
"The constitution is above the law, thus separate."
Wrong. The Constitution is not above the Law, it is the Law -meaning the SCOTUS can rule on Controversies arising under it. To wit:
Article VI, Clause 2
**This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;** and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Just so we're clear on the matter, in accordance, lockstep with Article III, Section 2, Controversies of Law arise **under** law regardless of superior/inferior situation. If one violates a law, whether it be civil or criminal violation, that Controversy is addressed by said law's respective Judical tier. If that tier's ruling is appealed to a higher Court, the Controversy is then transfered upward to the next highest Court, lather rinse repeat until it lands in the SCOTUS' lap.
"Courts give warrants not arrest power. Arrest power is executive branch."
Firstly, it was a metaphor -that's why the word "arrest" was in quotes, spotlighted with the "so to speak" follower.
Secondly, no, that's not correct; the power to make arrests under the law is possessed by every citizen (hence the term "citizen's arrest"). The warrant/probable cause requirement established by Amendment V, reinforced by Amendment XIV is a guardrail against arbitrary arrest at the hands of LEOs with the Executive Branch merely being the top tier of the governmental LEO hierarchy.
What's going on with you? This is all middle-school level Civics that, as someone who is, at the very least, of age to use Imgflip, you should know already.
