More like anti-reproductive rights

Imagine if they replaced "abortion" and "women's healthcare" with what it actually is: taking advantage of women while mutilating and killing tiny little human bodies

They sell the parts, so you could call them merchants of death, but that's already taken.

Fine, I'll tone it down and call them Pro-Infanticide.

:0)

Liberal = Oxymoron...

Upvoted

The same way people call themselves pro-life and then run around ready to murder everything in sight. Except for the difference that reproductive rights encompass control over ones reproductive system. As in choosing if and when to use it procreatively. You know, choice, that concept you can't seem to wrap your tiny minds around.

If I interpreted the right to keep and bear arms in the same way, it wouldn't include the right to give them away or put them down. You don't take your rifle to the shitter or sleep with it do you? If not, for shame for violating what by logical extension would be your own rules.

That headache you feel is knowledge trying to seep into your brain. Don't worry, just yell a little louder and the noise bouncing off the walls of your echo chamber will drown it out.

Because when you find out that abortion is a patenting decision, it becomes much more obvious what is right and what is wrong

Radicals call it this for the same reason they call refer to pro-life as, "anti-choice" - it's phrase spin for the sake of propaganda. They feel most people are so stupid that if they say it long enough the lie will become accepted, much like when they tried claiming Larry Elder is the black face of white supremacy.

https://youtu.be/bn6YnUt4Vuk

Beary Good Meme - 5vjzx6.jpg (click to show) - Upvote for you!

Or "Homicide Rights" if you want to be individual

Fun fact: Planned Parenthood's only medical doctor CEO Dr. Leana Wen was fired after less than a year because she didn't like the emphasis on abortion when her vision was to provide actual healthcare to women, men and families. Her goal was "providing essential primary and preventative care to millions of underserved women and families should always be the driving force of Planned Parenthood's work." She adds that this comes at odds with what she believes is the Board's new priority to "double down on abortion rights advocacy."

She was fired because she was not pro abortion enough. Also after her miscarriage, she tweeted that her family was mourning the loss of their child. She was fired because she saw the unborn as children. If that doesn't tell you something then I don't know what does.

I didn't say women's health in the meme I said reproductive rights, but that would infer there's reproducing going on which in the case of abortion and contraception it isn't.

I've been pregnant and given birth 4 times (in 3 years, lol) I'm fully aware of the short and long term effects.

I apologize for a typo in my meme. It changed the entire message of what I was trying to say. I somehow left out the word "not" in the last sentence.

I was not arguing against you, I was arguing with you. I agreed with your meme and I up voted it. I am on your side. I think that is awful what happened to Dr Wen.

Planned Parenthood was NEVER about women's health and reproductive rights means if you don't want to get pregnant then you have the right and the responsibility to not have sex. At least the right to use contraceptives to try to prevent the pregnancy from ever happening.

Planned Parenthood was started by a eugenicist, Margaret Sanger, who wanted to eliminate certain undesirables from society to make a stronger (in her opinion) society. Eugenics was and is the only reason PP exists. One of those "undesirable" groups were blacks and she created "The Negro Project" within Planned Parenthood just to breed blacks out of existence in the United States. Sanger was an evil woman and was praised several times by Hillary Clinton. Sanger would be ecstatic to know that the majority of abortions today are the murder of black babies.

My wife and I were not able to have children. All of her pregnancies ended in miscarriage. The last one the baby came out at 11 weeks. The doctor told my wife to bring in the baby so she could see if she could figure out what the problem was from the baby. I held the body of our 11 week old baby girl in my hand. She was fully formed. The doctor told us that her brain had not developed and that was the cause of her death.

So when I see these steaming piles of pig feces bragging about their abortion on TV or the internet, I think these have to be the worst people who have ever lived on this planet. They are as bad or worse Stalin and Hitler. And most of them share Stalin and Hitler's political ideology. As did Margaret Sanger.

I'm sorry about the loss of your babies. I really hope you were able to adopt or find treatment for your wife to eventually share your life with a child(ren) it's not an easy role being a parent but it is so rewarding. So many people missing out on being mothers and fathers.

You're right about the dark history of Planned Parenthood. More like Planned Eugenics. It's sickening how they were founded and how they operate today. How anyone can give money or support to that butcher shop is beyond me.

We never adopted but we did get the chance to have a niece live with us for a couple of years and then about 10 years later a nephew lived with us. So in a way we did get to sort of raise two children for a short time. We're both too old now to have children. Adoption was an something we talked about years ago but it was just too much and we weren't earning much money back then.

However, my wife and I love each other very much and have a great relationship with each other. We will have been married 32 years this November.

What really angers me is how Planned Parenthood sued the Federal Government when Trump cut off some of the money, OUR MONEY, that was going to support them. Why did they ever think they had the right to sue the government for that money. And on top of that, like you said, they were a butcher shop. They were selling baby parts for research. They are a non-profit group making a profit selling off pieces of babies that they butchered and some of those babies were still alive when they cutting them up.

I think of Thomas Jefferson's comment, "To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." He meant it in opposition to a state religion but it applies to so much more than that and it is not out of context to apply it here. It is sinful and tyrannical for the government to force us to pay for something we so strongly stand in opposition to. That will now apply to state governments who make abortion legal. But I already know that California and New York are tyrannical with or without the legalization of infanticide.

so how many of you philanthropists are making sure the babies of rape victims don't miss out on education, health or end up on death row. I'm hoping involvement goes beyond a meme.

Just speaking personally, yes it most certainly does.

Thanks for asking! Check this out: unfeatured awhile back from PoliticsToo for "Trolling and taunting- targeting liberal members in violation of the TOS" though I think it was a rather good discussion

imgflip.com/i/4iuchf

I sadly find imgflip one sided. That good debate suffers. As many that use welfare as a freebie there are those who think it's ok not to contribute as they wait until they are rich... of course that amount is more discretionary to some than others. Some do it naturally many don't. This is why I favour a welfare with better fraud detection and tax relief for those who don't need to be prompted into goodwill

Also

There's also something called "adoption", perhaps you've heard of it. Even if a rape victim carries a pregnancy to term* there's nothing that says that she has to keep it when she can give it up for adoption.

*Yes, this will make me unpopular with some of my conservative brethren, but I'm not in favor of requiring a rape victim to carry a pregnancy to term. Even with the overturning of RvW there are still alternatives. If a rape victim lives in a state that bars abortions then she can go to another state, for example.

the problem is if you give the baby killers an inch, they'll take a mile. All of a sudden, 'rape cases' would jump 7000% and innocent men would be falsely jailed.

Everyone has the right not to have sex, no one has ever been forced to do so, and there are also contraceptive methods.

The right to life of the human being is the basis of the entire system.

I am pro-life and don't believe abortion is a reproductive right, but saying, "Everyone has the right not to have sex, no one has ever been forced to do so" sounds like a deliberate false talking point from somebody trying to make the pro-life movement sound ignorant. I am sure you have heard of something called "rape".

Rape is not a right. No one is being legally forced to have sex. Whoever does so acts against the law. Rape is illegal. Abusing minors is illegal.

I think I get what you're saying. Thanks!

"Rape is illegal. Abusing minors is illegal"

But it still happens

and is responsible for less than 1% of all abortions. Over 90% of abortions are for "convenience".

Unfortunately people are forced into sex, it's called human trafficking. Still abortion doesn't solve that problem but perpetuates it.

I mean not legally forced, human trafficking, rape, etc. it's illegal, must be prosecuted

Full term didn't solve it either as mass baby graves found by archeologist near locations of ancient sex workers.

Link please, infant mortality waas very high in ancient times. How do we know it wasn't a disease that ended those lives rather than intentional killing like abortion?

It was a uk documentary about a mass child graves - I will see if I can seek it out

I did a google and seems there are lots on the subject about what I watched but couldn't find the one I watched. Grim that infanticide was common place

"Everyone has the right not to have sex, no one has ever been forced to do so"

look up the definition of the word "rape"

"and there are also contraceptive methods"

Which sometimes don't work

Both those scenarios are responsible for less than 5% of abortions. Over 90% of abortions are purely for convenience.