Once again, liberals DO NOT enforce the laws on the books. Funny how they always do that. Always.

from the labor movement to the civil rights/anti-war movements.
America has a long, and proud history of making the powered elites extremely uncomfortable.
tactics and strategies perfected by your great great grandmother.

and Yeah, those tactics were quickly made illegal in order to protect the powerful and the privileged.

all you are pointing to is the partisan hypocrisy when a political party co-opts a social movement to serve their agenda. Which is fair to a point, but don't act like it is only one party that engages in this practice.

actually, protesting a judge's residence is illegal.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507

What is your point then? I've seen this movie before, you post a comment, a conservative destroys it, and you simply claim that they either proved or missed your point.

Devious, brilliant, and underhanded strategy but like your mom's favorite nighty, totally transparent.

i acknowledge the illegality,and even expanded that many tactics were made illegal in order to protect the powerful and the privileged.

which explains comment #2.
and i have no problem with tonedef,never have as far as i can recall.
he was just pointing out something that was irrelevant to my commentary,and in fact,i had already addressed.

now,if you would like to have a conversation about america's protest movements over the past 100 years from eugene debbs and rosa luxemberg to martin luther king.
i would remind you that this is a meme site,and nuanced and in depth conversations are damn near impossible,but i would be happy to share some fantastic books on the subject.

does this address your question?
have i sufficiently explained my point?
so may i ask,respectfully,that you stop wasting my time?
we good?
good.

*walks away mumbling...
"destroyed"..
you gotta be kidding me...

Its only illegal if you step onto private property.

That law was made under the assumption that judges as well as SCOTUS would remain impartial and political unbiased in their approach to laws. There will be severe consequences to millions of people’s lives if these SCOTUS justices do not consider every potential damage that comes with overturning Roe v Wade.

well, purely from a legal standpoint, not a moral or ethic standpoint, the Supreme Court wants to get out of the business of legislating when Congress doesn't want to do its job and stick to their business of protecting the constitutionality of what's federal and what should be state law.
Based on the leaked draft, from purely a legal argument, the draft asserts that the matter of abortion is not expressed in the Constitution, so this right should be upheld by state government and not federal government. The legal arguments posed in the draft are very solid and the legal matter is not actually about making abortions illegal at all, it's about having laws set by the state rather than the federal government.

But they're ignoring the all the ramifications of overturning such a ruling. While true, rulings should be overturned in time; they should only apply when they are actually irrelevant or redundant. Roe v Wade is neither.

if you read the draft, which of course still is just a draft and not a published court opinion, but for sure there are serious ramifications politically speaking, but from purely a legal standing, this issue should've been decided by the states even back in 1973 and not shift the responsibility to the Supreme Court, because to base abortion "rights" on the Constitution is a much harder case to prove, rather the states which DO have the rights NOT enumerated in the Constitution, could easily make a law or court ruling to legally allow abortions. Most lawyers or law experts know the "Roe v. Wade" ruling has this legal technical flaw, but because it's so interwoven with moral and ethics of the public, it's hard for most people to separate themselves to analyze it purely from an objective legal matter.

It's like 2 guys wanting to fight, but the bartender says "take it outside". Then the crowd yelling at the bartender "What? You want to fight?!" and the bartender saying "I don't care if you fight, just take it outside". The crowd is like mainstream media chanting "Fight! Fight! Fight!" and the bartender just rolling his eyes and shaking his head.

I understand your position is that laws should not be written by the Supreme Court; however with the absence of Roe v Wade, the existing laws still somewhat had their hands tied. Without it, the existing laws are unlikely to remain unchanged and force the issue to become chaotic.

It should be a federal law; because of the possible discriminatory nature that will likely come with some states completely making abortion illegal and others legal. In the absence of legislation that addresses a social issue; it is absolutely in the power of the Supreme Court to uphold that law.

The precedent is not only constitutional but vital for a growing and evolving society.

Nope. Roe v wade is about when life begins because it is illegal federally to kill someone (capital crime). That determination is not listed in the constitution so according to the 9th and 10th amendments is up to the states.

It isn’t always illegal to kill someone depending on the circumstances. Federally or otherwise.

By your logic, the constitution does not permit wars or acts of self-defense. It does both; so you’re not only objectively wrong but constitutionally wrong.

It is only allowed in the case of saving your life or another and then it's still considered illegal, but the jury let's you off. You gotta read the laws.

It is legal in the case of self-defense.

Or you could just make the exception clear, and take the win that elective abortions are illegal.

You are blowing something way out of proportion. If Roe is overturned then it is up to the states to make laws regarding abortion. The legislators in each state represent the voice of the people in their districts. Which means if a state makes abortion illegal then the majority of the people have made it clear how they stand. If the majority of the people do not want abortion in their state then who is going to riot in those states.

In blue states abortion will not be outlawed at all. In fact partial and post birth abortions will be fully legal in those states.

All that said, the left, being the imbeciles that they are, will actually travel in large groups to all of the red states to cause problems. They will try to get legislators who do not represent them because they do not live in the state, to vote for abortion.

If you guys were actually interested in preserving democracy then Roe v Wade would never have become the law and the leftist traveling douche bags would all stay home. You do not want majority rule, you want tyranny. You want un-elected government officials creating laws that control every facet of our lives and kill babies.

Maybe don’t end a comment about me wanting to kill babies that starts with the claim that I am the one blowing things out of proportion.

All I’ve stated is that all the ramifications have not been considered in the overturning of Roe v Wade. That’s not a disproportionate view if all the SCOTUS care about is the legality surrounding the constitutional value of 60 year old court ruling which remains neither irrelevant or redundant to dismiss.

You're right. I apologize for that.

There is nothing that can be done with the left. They are who they are and they love to riot. But doing what is right should not be pushed aside just because of a whole lot of spoiled brats. They are already grossly overstepping their bounds by protesting in front of justices house, publishing the address of the justices and calling for armed violence.

This may be the catalyst to the next civil war. A lot of people think there will be another civil war and that the left will start it. We just never expected that it would happen because Roe v Wade might get overturned. If Roe doesn't get overturned the war will still happen. The left is just growing far too violent.

"There is nothing that can be done with the left. They are who they are and they love to riot"

And conservatives love to blow up abortion clinics

"This may be the catalyst to the next civil war"

That's not going to happen, no matter how eager you are to kill American citizens

The south has been anxious for a Civil War rematch for over a hundred years.

The shit you’re consuming is their endgame agenda. I’m not buying it.

Good luck with that!

There are about 5 or 6 people living in their parents basements who want the South to rise again. I am not one of them. I don't want any war, civil or foreign. War kills people and it is never the people who cause the war.

I am just observing the violence in the left and how divided this country has become because of the media. The right are not violent. We are the "forgotten men", the ones who have to foot the bill that you guys always create. Yeah, we're pissed at what your side is doing to the economy and our taxes. You guys are just far too expensive.

The left is always trashing places, defacing or burning buildings and causing all sorts of problems. You guys posted the addresses of all of the Supreme Court Justices and are camped outside threatening them and their families if they do anything that tamper with your baby murder fetish.

Your side is a death cult.

"I am just observing the violence in the left"

And ignoring the violence from your own side

"The right are not violent"

Plenty of people on the right are violent

"You guys posted the addresses of all of the Supreme Court Justices and are camped outside threatening them and their families if they do anything that tamper with your baby murder fetish"

There is no "baby murder fetish", except from the baby-killing god you worship

"Your side is a death cult"

Still not as bad as Christianity

5 or 6!

Your side, my side?

I'm on nobody's side.

That's your problem.

Not mine.

"the left, being the imbeciles that they are, will actually travel in large groups to all of the red states to cause problems. They will try to get legislators who do not represent them because they do not live in the state, to vote for abortion"

So people are imbeciles for trying to influence legislation? What does that say about conservatives?

"Roe v Wade would never have become the law"

It's not a law and never was. Learn what "court opinion" means.

"You want un-elected government officials creating laws that control every facet of our lives and kill babies"

Not remotely true 😂

:0)

Your Q was: Why should the government fear the people

A: They don't even people like right wingers who claim to be "patriots" and love the "constitution" have no real and geniune love of it or America

There are serious and blatant unconstitutional "laws" in America and after 54 years it's clear to me that the "right" don't give 2 FS about it.

The right is always going on about their "rights". You have no actual "rights"

Right wingers hate being told that but FACTS are FACTS and no amount of crying, and calling the messenger names will change FACTS

By definition a "right" is absolute and can not be taken.

The right of the people to keep and bear arms "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"

The text of the 2nd Amendment is CRYSTAL CLEAR and yet? There are blatantly unconstitutional gun laws

And most "right wing patriots" support the "gun laws" they like.

You can not claim to support and love something while approving of SCOTUS carving out exceptions out of thin air.

The Government has no constitutional authority to creat gun laws and SCOTUS has no such authority to rule on it.

How the f**k can a judge rule on something that is not supposed to exist in the first place

First, I asked no question.

Second, I do not support SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade.

My meme is pointing out the hypocrisy that the right always claim to be on the brink of revolution if they don't get their way while also claiming to love the country that they claim is always on the brink of destruction under Democrats. Who... they claim hate the country despite having just as much reservations about their own hang ups.

Then, they throw this quote, the one in my meme about; as if that only applies to them. Then scream bloody murder when some assholes set some structures on fire.

You are correct you asked no question. And I apparently misunderstood my apologies

And you are correct. I was raised Red White And Blue Republican

Trumplicans are NOT Republican they are just full of cultist

Agreed.

So that means conservatives as a whole are okay with blowing up abortion clinics

There is no such thing as a actual conservative these days.

1. Trumplicans LOVE spending our taxes it's only bad when they don't get to dictate HOW

2. Trumplicans are just as massive hypocrites as any left winger. Again "violence" is acceptable and supported as long as they approve of the motives and agenda