Imgflip Logo Icon

The Nuremberg Code

The Nuremberg Code | How Is This Misleading? Up 
For 
Discussion | image tagged in politics,covid vaccine,the nuremberg codee,civilized discussion | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,589 views 98 upvotes Made by vBackman 2 years ago in politics
33 Comments
14 ups, 2y
1,000 Lawyers And 10,000 Doctors Have Filed A Lawsuit For Violations Of The Nuremberg Code

https://lightonlight.education/1000-lawyers-and-10000-doctors-have-filed-a-lawsuit-for-violations-of-the-nuremberg-code/#:~:text=1%2C000%20Lawyers%20And%2010%2C000%20Doctors%20Have%20Filed%20A,and%20the%20Davos%20Group%20for%20crimes%20against%20humanity.
6 ups, 2y
The Most Interesting Man In The World Meme | IT IS MORE IMPRECISELY WORDED THAN "MISLEADING." | image tagged in memes,the most interesting man in the world | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
It was doctors who carried out the forced sterilizations, abortions and euthanasia.
6 ups, 2y
Memed it before and I'll meme it again-
3 ups, 2y
Seal of Approval - Upvoted!
4 ups, 2y
History as a whole is misleading in my opinion.
2 ups, 2y
It's so interesting that Biden's snowflakes seem to be actually doing things worse than Hitler.. how do people not see that they are trying to do something with the "vaccines"..(bill gates is tracking us is what I think)
1 up, 2y
It’s not, there isn’t even a reference to vaccines just to medical ethics. Attempts at speech and thought control ate pernicious by the left.
2 ups, 2y
2 ups, 2y
Anything involving doctors that does not have a check or something is probably flagged by an algorithm.
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/11/read-whistleblower-says-pfizer-vaccine-trial-included-falsified-data/
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
LoL, OK, the lab was a bit dirty and unkempt. That says NOTHING about any problem with the vaccine or it’s efficacy. And it specifically refers TO NO BAD REACTIONS TO THE VACCINE AT ALL.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Not quite...A regional director who was employed at the research organization Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial.

Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.
0 ups, 2y
I read the article. That’s not what the whistleblower said. What data was falsified? It doesn’t say anything about that. Nor does it mention any hidden bad reactions or deaths or injuries. It says needles weren’t placed properly in sharps boxes and labels that had patient info on them were not properly disposed of in a manner that would conceal the patient identities. That is a far cry from your claims. You are making things up that are not shown in your sources. And what exactly is an “inadequately trained vaccinator?” How much training do you need to give a vaccine. Vaccines are routinely administered all over the world by people with less training than the staff at McDonald’s or Dunkin’ Donuts.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
That doesn't mean it's okay for the government to force a "consensus" among scientists about it.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Not happening. I will forever keep saying, if you believe that, you have to believe that every government in the world, every news outlet in the world, every medical system in the world and every research organization in the world are all in on it. That would include in places like North Korea and governments like the Taliban. If you think it is a worldwide conspiracy, you’re a special kind of stupid.
2 ups, 2y
Did i claim that?

N O
1 up, 2y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7QZgH1eP2o&ab_channel=greenman
1 up, 2y
Losers always attack past history to make a point that supports their backasswards view of right and wrong. Meanwhile.... in 2022 Democracy is being attacked by American's with fascist ideals of Republican fundamentalism.
Y'all are weak students of history if you only take what you need and discard the rest.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Like how liberals already assumed their view on global warming and dismiss all contrary views, facts, and data that didn't fit their narratives, conservatives are now doing to the virus outbreak and the vaccine, just so they can demonstrate their hatred for Biden.

I have repeated asked you to look at the data globally and not just in your little corner of the world. To look at what the outbreak has done in Brazil, India, and other places, where they were not contained, where there are no vaccines, and there are no lockdowns. Yet conservatives continue to push their own narrative that this is a harmless flu, vaccine is fake, and nobody is dying.

You are as delusional as the liberals you accuse in Trump's 4 years. Hatred has blinded you both.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I’ve stayed with multiple people that had COVID, never got it. It seems less contagious than the common cold.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Or you are lying which is the most likely scenerio and you did not stay with covid infected people
0 ups, 2y
Why do you think I’m lying? Are they really that rare? If that’s the case, it really shouldn’t matter if I’m lying or not.
7 ups, 2y,
1 reply
So you're arguing that Twitter censored a tweet because something was historically misleading? If Twitter is now censoring tweets about history, it will have to censor 60% of the tweets on its service.

Obviously, that's not why Twitter marked it as "misleading". They marked it as such because it criticized the ongoing vaccine push by governments. Criticism of that push marks a person for censorship.

Trying to defend this kind of censorship is a losing battle for people who claim to favor free speech. For people who do not favor free speech, then defending such censorship of ideas is appropriate, I suppose.
7 ups, 2y
Yes. Exactly. They are obviously not the arbiters of truth.
7 ups, 2y
YES.

The entire point of free speech is that people have the right to present ideas that are unpopular, misleading, or even incorrect. The antidote to inaccurate or misleading ideas is not LESS speech, but MORE speech.

This is called the marketplace of ideas view of speech, and it has underpinned modern society for the past few centuries. If someone makes a statement that is inaccurate, we don't censor that person. Instead, other people offer their own, more believable information to counter the inaccuracy. People will then decide which speech is the most true speech.
3 ups, 2y
They either need to not censor ideas or not have the protection of section 230 which protects them from liability as though they allow users to freely post anything. They should not be able to have it both ways.
3 ups, 2y
"Participated"
That's an understatement.
"mostly soldiers" is patently false.
The Doctors were the first to implement Hitler's sick and demented racist policies and they used the inmates as guinea pigs in many deplorable medical "experiments".
The S.S. ran the KZ's and the Death Factories and they were NOT soldiers.
The Wehrmacht was the German Army, and they were soldiers, and the rank and file generally detested the S.S.
Klaus Von Stauffenberg was in the German Army...he and many, many German soldiers were hanged with paino wire for trying to assassinate Hitler.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
five chimneys book by olga lengyel, they also were selling ppl for pharmaceuticals studies aside from mengele. Bauers or bayers Corp. I think the point of the persons statement was more towards eugenics but still they’d would need soldiers to enforce/carry out orders
1 up, 2y
Yes
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 3
  • image.png
  • image.png
  • paste:image.png
  • image.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    How Is This Misleading? Up For Discussion