Imgflip Logo Icon

Don't worry, without the Trump boogeyman, Democrats will turn on themselves.

Don't worry, without the Trump boogeyman, Democrats will turn on themselves. | TRUMP ASKS HIS TEAM TO FIND VOTES AND DEMOCRATS CALL IT A CRIME; MEANWHILE VOTING MACHINES CONTROLLED BY DEMOCRAT OFFICIALS, BEHIND LOCKED DOORS, COUNT 100,000 VOTES FOR BIDEN AND 0 FOR TRUMP AT 4AM AND DEMOCRATS SAY ITS FINE??? | image tagged in democrat congressmen,cheaters | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,170 views 86 upvotes Made by CorporateLife2k 3 years ago in politics
Democrat congressmen memeCaption this Meme
104 Comments
9 ups, 3y,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
3 replies
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
He's also wearing sunglasses..
:o
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
OOOOHHHH!!!! | image tagged in oooohhhh | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
1 up, 3y
Biden Laughing | image tagged in biden laughing | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Lol
3 ups, 3y
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
yeah so?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Tired of all this LOSING yet? got a fresh box of diapers for today?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
? who is losing... biden won bro
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Yes, it was for the Clump'tards. 60 court cases LAUGHED out of court. His SCOTUS appointments that he thought he "bought" wont hear his cases. He uses lawsuits like most people use kleenex.
1 up, 3y
yes yes yes
7 ups, 3y
5 ups, 3y
Fake news.
[deleted]
7 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Courts ruled nobody's proven it.
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Fake news again.
[deleted]
5 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Read the rulings. The judges will tell you the same thing.
4 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Tell me a ruling where the court actually looked at the evidence
7 ups, 3y,
2 replies
"This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together… This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more."
-Judge Matthew Brann

"This ‘supplemental evidence’ is inadmissible as hearsay. The assertion that Connarn was informed by an unknown individual what ‘other hired poll workers at her table’ had been told is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay, and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either level of hearsay that would warrant consideration of the evidence."
-Judge Cynthia Stephens

"Perhaps if plaintiffs’ election challenger affiants had attended the Oct. 29, 2020, walk-through of the TCF Center ballot-counting location, questions and concerns could have been answered in advance of Election Day. Regrettably, they did not and, therefore, plaintiffs’ affiants did not have a full understanding” of the absentee ballot tabulation process."
-Judge Timothy M. Kenny

"Although Wood generally claims fundamental unfairness, and the declarations and testimony submitted in support of his motion speculate as to widespread impropriety, the actual harm alleged by Wood concerns merely a “garden variety” election dispute. Wood does not allege unfairness in counting the ballots; instead, he alleges that select non-party, partisan monitors were not permitted to observe the Audit in an ideal manner. Wood presents no authority, and the Court finds none, providing for a right to unrestrained observation or monitoring of vote counting, recounting, or auditing."
-Judge Steven D. Grimberg

"Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations
and then proof. We have neither here."
-Judge Stephanos Bibas
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
Judge Matthew Brann denied an evidentiary hearing in the ruling you are referring to. Which is exactly what we've been saying. The rulings are not based on evidence. I haven't bothered to look up the rest, because I'll find that they did the same.
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
No you won't. Read them. You'll find what we've been saying.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
From the ruling "I determined that an evidentiary hearing (previously scheduled to take place on November 19, 2020) was no longer needed and cancelled that proceeding" Judge Matthew Bran
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You won't find that they're the same. Read them. You'll find what we've been saying.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I would like you to check one of my sources, now. This following link is what the Trump legal team presented to the Georgia Senate. Start watching at about 17:00, it should last about 10-15 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e35f4pUIYOg&feature=emb_logo&fbclid=IwAR0Qkx_DMaB47w8vijNhOTiT_Ol9of-Ljcg-Es9dybac2V4KHzQxbP3uj4w
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
On the off chance that I never do
1 up, 3y
Deny, deny, deny.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
From the lawyers I've heard, the decisions sound like a decision was made and then evidence denied to justify them.
0 ups, 3y
Too bad your interpretation is grounded in a fantasy land and the interpretation of every reasonable person, which is that the decisions looked at the supposed "evidence" and found it to be lacking is grounded in reality.
[deleted]
6 ups, 3y
Adding to Bobbathian's list, Nevada District Judge James Russell ruled that witnesses’ declarations constitute hearsay and the expert witness testimony was of little to no value.

I'm not going to go through all the rulings and find all the lines for this - the point here is that's what YOU should be doing.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Tell me a time where Donald Trump actually looked at facts.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
When he denied the Russia hoax, when he lowered unemployment, when he initiated operation warp speed for a vaccine, when he brought real peace to most of the middle east; should i go on?
0 ups, 3y
Yes he lowered unemployment for a risk.
0 ups, 3y
LMAO he never brought "real" peace
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
fake news
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Liar.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Courts didn't make a single ruling based on evidentiary reasons.
5 ups, 3y
Imagine being this confidently wrong
1 up, 3y
Liar again.
3 ups, 3y
"Republicans are under the illusion that anything they do tomorrow will allow tRUMPf to stay in office.

Their entire case falls apart once you ask them for even the simplest explanation of how its all supposed to work. And that's because its all a lie to conceal the truth that tRUMPf revealed on his Georgia phone call: Its not about Principle or election integrity. Its about power. These guys believe their opponants are illegitimate. They want to dismantle our democracy and replace it with an authoritarian state in which they're the only ones that get to govern."

Here is the bottom line:
tRUMPf has never been able to prove election fraud. Oh...the right comes up with new conspiracy theories every week (just like the OP's meme). But every court and judge in the land know the truth. Including tRUMPf-appointed judges.

Biden won with 81 million legal votes.

AFTER Georgia certified its results (after exhaustive audits and recounts), tRUMPf called their Sec of State to find LITERALLY just enough votes so that he could win by one vote. THAT is fact. tRUMPers can make all the excuses they want. This fact does not change.

And the stupid thing is that it wouldn't matter anyway. Georgia certified.
No one can change the election. Not even congress. Not even Pence.
And yes yes yes...we will deal with all the threats of violence, all the MAGA rallies, and all the Civil Wars. And then after a few days when that is over, We'll focus on America and its future.
Do you want to be productive. Start to rally for your 2022 and 2024 candidates.

The train is going forward. I'm afraid it's nonstop.
8 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Ugh. The lies and treachery of your average communist Democrat. Aren't you proud?
4 ups, 3y
Problem is the meme is a lie.
8 ups, 3y
5 ups, 3y,
1 reply
They are proud. "By any means necessary" is a way of life for them.
2 ups, 3y
But they’re not trying to overturn election results, using unprecedented court stunts like the one from Texas, nor asking to suspend the constitution. This whole “By any means necessary” thing people keep saying doesn’t apply to the Democrats at all.

We’ve always had mail-in voting. We’ve always had recounts. We’ve always counted votes for weeks on end. It’s usually never this close or this many votes. Errors will occur. And those errors are usually caught and not counted. Days before and after the election; well before the election is certified.
5 ups, 3y
They just call it all fake. any bad news about trump magically isn’t.
6 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Hey did that username come from the deepest depths of toddler hell or did some TDS child in a man body did
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y
Lol sorry if it sounded cringe
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Warm toast.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
U mean a roast?
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
No. Warm toast.
0 ups, 3y
Show More Comments
Democrat congressmen memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
TRUMP ASKS HIS TEAM TO FIND VOTES AND DEMOCRATS CALL IT A CRIME; MEANWHILE VOTING MACHINES CONTROLLED BY DEMOCRAT OFFICIALS, BEHIND LOCKED DOORS, COUNT 100,000 VOTES FOR BIDEN AND 0 FOR TRUMP AT 4AM AND DEMOCRATS SAY ITS FINE???