Imgflip Logo Icon

Somebody stole $50 from your wallet? There wasn't even 50 in there!..

Somebody stole $50 from your wallet? There wasn't even 50 in there!.. | 'NOT ENOUGH FRAUD TO OVERTURN THE ELECTION'; ..FUNNY HOW YOU KNOW HOW MUCH FRAUD DID OR DIDN'T TAKE PLACE.. | image tagged in memes,futurama fry | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,879 views 96 upvotes Made by Bangaioh 4 years ago in politics
Futurama Fry memeCaption this Meme
78 Comments
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You can’t quantify it unless you investigate that’s why they fight against any investigation.
1 up, 4y
No they don't.
6 ups, 4y
...Not enough fraud yet found! Awesome, got my like!
2 ups, 4y
Upvoted!
1 up, 4y
IKR
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Who actually, besides you, cares about quotes from some of the nastiest people alive?
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
But the incredible thing is that they only become "the nastiest people alive" because they say something unflattering about tRUMPf. That's why you people are accused of cult-like status. But I know that the vast majority of Americans feel exactly as he does.

Treachery.
Treason.
Traitors.

Considering tRUMPf and his supporters have yet to present the slightest hint of proof or evidence for fraud from the Democrats, literally anything you say is taken in appropriate context. So babble on.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Some day in the future, when you look back upon this moment and see how Fing wrong you and all your goons were, When the US is a Communist Run "Democratic" dictatorship you'll see. Until that day though, I guess you'll just be a consumer, feeding off the lies of the JackAss Party
2 ups, 4y
You are talking in hypotheticals. "Some day in the future", "see how wrong you were", When", "you'll see", "you'll just be."

Can't you see that you are fighting for things that have LITERALLY not happened yet. And you are trying to tell me that I"M the one who is brainwashed?

Do you have any idea how hypocritical your comment was?

Stop spreading hate and division. Let us come together and build the best nation we can on that which is real and currently exists.
Imagine how much better America will be if you work WITH Biden as opposed to AGAINST him.
We dealt with tRUMPf for 4 years. So now deal with Biden. Work on your 2022 mid terms and the 2024 election. THAT should be your focus.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
“We agree that right now the most serious attempt to overthrow our democracy in the history of our country is underway”

Except the one ms perpetrating it are those pushing the election of China Joe Biden based on a fraudulent vote riddled with inconsistencies and fraud on a massive scale in several states.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I agree the democrats deserve a traitors fate just like you. Supporting voter fraud by mail in ballot and ballot stuffing in key democratic controlled cities in order to achieve what they couldn’t legally achieve after four years of trying is an open coup attempt.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Except there was no fraud.

A traitor's fate.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Hell with you idiots in charge I can just declare my home the free state of mine and not pay any rent or mortgage or follow any of your bullshit laws as I am a sovereign citizen like your friends in Portland
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Before I go to bed. I've been way too angry on this site. Name calling and threats. That is not who I am. I still stand firm on everything I say about tRUMPf, but I need to be more civil.
Have a good night.
1 up, 4y
1 up, 4y
Der. Uh.....der.
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Have you forgotten the amount of tears and Bullshit we had to deal with from the Media/Hillary supporters up until inauguration day...

FFS we as a Nation learned more about the Electoral College and 'Emoluments' in December 2016 than anyone did in any Government/Civics class Ever
- Be honest did you even know 'Faithless Electors' were a thing until someone floated the idea as a way to keep Trump out of Office?

to say nothing of 3? Democrats (or was it one guy 3 times) attempting to initiate Impeachment less than a Month after the Inauguration
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y
Funny how the Democratic party is the offspring of the Confederates, isn't it.
1 up, 4y
“Have you forgotten the amount of tears and Bullshit we had to deal with from the Media/Hillary supporters up until inauguration day...”

Irrelevant.

“ FFS we as a Nation learned more about the Electoral College and 'Emoluments' in December 2016 than anyone did in any Government/Civics class Ever
- Be honest did you even know 'Faithless Electors' were a thing until someone floated the idea as a way to keep Trump out of Office?”

I have a theory that most Trump Supporters are Football fans. When Kaepernick took a knee was when all those fans started to boycott Football. However, they still needed a tribal outlet and because Trump shared their outrage, they moved on from Sports to Politics. The irony being that didn’t like “politics” in their sports. And so these people assume that despite our education system and almost 25 years of internet access that people were just as ignorant as they were. That no one knew how our government actually works. They were wrong, of course.

It is good that you’re getting educated finally but do not blame the media or whatever party you oppose for your ignorance and how hard it has been for you to learn such things. Instead be thankful for the opportunity to learn. And to use it as a way to factor into your decisions and discussions rather than remain angry about the result.

“to say nothing of 3? Democrats (or was it one guy 3 times) attempting to initiate Impeachment less than a Month after the Inauguration”

...should show you it’d be just as dumb for Republicans to do the same. Remember how Arizona spoke of seceding if Obama won a second term? And now Texas does it again. Just because the game didn’t go your way is no reason to flip the board. You’d think someone who knows more about a sports than politics would understand this. Unless your need for tribalism is so strong it fails to understand why we have games at all. To challenge ourselves and to improve ourselves. Not to mindlessly follow people and enjoy their successes vicariously. Perhaps you should find another outlet for that kind of thing.

But I invite you to remain active in politics and to take a more measured and analytical approach rather than wallowing in the self pity of others by instead comparing yourself with people who were genuinely afraid of losing their rights if Trump took office. Not because he was a Republican or not a Democrat but because he had all but campaigned to do so.

And yes, I knew about faithless electors. I read.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The SCOTUS just denied Trump's Texas lawsuit.

They REFUSED to even HEAR the case. That's how bad it was. That includes Trump's OWN Supreme court justices that he appointed. Certainly they can't be in on the fix? Because, the truth is, there was NEVER any "fix". The voter fraud stuff was a debunked conspiracy theory and they saw right through it.

It's over. Cue the fat lady...Trump's our bitch and he's fat. So cue him.
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y,
3 replies
0 ups, 4y
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
0 ups, 4y
Wrong pic, derp.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
It simply amazes me how when a Democrat wins, you all scream voter fraud but if a Republican wins, you have no problem with it.
2 ups, 4y
You had a $43,000,000 3 year investigation based on nothing.
We have video, statistical irregularities that occur ONLY in specific states, strange behaviour ONLY in those specific states, a verifiable machine vote change and over 100 people from all sides saying they have witnessed things they could very likely be fraud...and we ask for audits and that's a big problem..
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
0 ups, 4y
Almost none. Get over it.
2 ups, 4y
W
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
....in 3 days?

And 2 of those days are weekends?

You really think they're going to organize this TODAY???
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Between the Texas and other red state attorney generals opening a lawsuit for the flipped states and Trump pulling out all stops, I absolutely think it is organized and would not count on underestimating their ruthlessness and willingness to set new precedents. It’s been the Republicans number one trick for quite some time. Only in the last decade or so has it become unbearable.
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
I would counter that the Democrats have shifted so far left they are unrecognizable and pretty astute at dirty tricks themselves.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I don’t recall Democrats making up new rules at the last minute to justify their positions but hey, I just might be too tired to think of any.

Lay it on me, Blue.

What compares to Presidents not having a say at all in SOCTUS picks and that there is no need to rush it unless it was by a Republican?

What compares to Trump attempting to bribe Ukraine for political gain and the Republicans maintaining a partisan position in the House and Senate?

What compares to the Republican Senate refusing to hear nearly any bills proposed from a Democrat controlled house, let alone rule on any of them?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I think a discourse on dirty political tricks would be exhaustive but yes 4 years of investigations, retelling of falsehoods and obstruction by the Democratic Party would be considered dirty tricks justifying similar treatment. Who started it? I don’t know what came first the chicken or the egg. Doesn’t matter Civility is dead and partisanship is going to lead where it inevitably leads when people no longer agree or have the same values.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Sounds like someone should start. And it sounds like Democrats who tried and dialed, and Republicans who tried and failed, now would be a good time to amend bridges rather than continue to burn them.

The Republicans could’ve easily won some of their cases if their priority was election integrity rather than voter suppression and that was essentially what Supreme Court understood these attempts to be.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
If both sides were committed to election integrity we wouldn’t be where we are now. We wouldn’t have ok’d uncontrolled or unverified mail
In ballots. There is a reason this was pushed for and used and it ain’t because of Covid.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
But both sides were. Only Trump and his cronies claim otherwise. Nor was their intent to repair election integrity but voter suppression.

Why would the Democrats purposely target an entire method of voting when they could target the entire system? There is definitely a reason Trump jumped on the bandwagon of mail-in ballots being unreliable and it wasn’t voter integrity.
0 ups, 4y
So let’s be clear, absentee or request by mail ballots are not the issue. Mass mailed unverified residence ballots are. Their is a reason they were never allowed before and many nations specifically outlaw them because they open the system
Up for fraud. This was known before the push for it by the democrats. No one truly concerned about election integrity would mass mail
Live ballots out by the hundreds of thousands. Add that to the constant push by democrats to allow no ID voting which is ridiculous. You want to vote get an ID. You will never convince me there was no election fraud in this election. If Trump came out and announced there was none I would still say there was, because I don’t need the Cheeto to tell me what to think. I don’t need The Cheeto to tell me what I can see or hear and it ain’t kosher.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
>Democrats
>Far Left

Pick one, Bluessol.
0 ups, 4y
One supports the other so samey same
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
The lawsuit that everyone agrees will go absolutely nowhere?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Supreme Court seems to think so. And all of Trump’s appointees remained awfully silent.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
Dang, SCOTUS threw it in the trash already? That was fast.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Hahaha now THAT would be justice!

Probably won’t happen but it won’t change the fact that this was a sham election and Biden will be an illegitimate president as Trump was for the leftists.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Only illegitimate to one group of people? Sounds awfully partisan.
0 ups, 4y
Certainly, that’s the way it is now.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Just check the evidence...

https://hereistheevidence.com/
https://youtu.be/rri6flxaXww
https://youtu.be/DSDZkXxFVEU
https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw
https://youtu.be/z-44TVFRk6U
https://youtu.be/e35f4pUIYOg
https://youtu.be/pFs0Jag1Msc
3 ups, 4y
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
If none of that is good enough for a court of law, why would it be good enough for me?

If your evidence can't convince a judge - Trump appointed judges at that - then who CAN it convince? I'm no easier to fool than a court room.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Court rulings say that your evidence is garbage and I'm in full agreement. If you have evidence, take it to a court room. It's their job, not mine, to escalate it if you have anything worth a wooden nickel.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Your problem is that you think that the mainstream media is being free and honest and telling the facts.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
COURT DOCUMENTS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH NEWS SOURCES
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You said that "the court rulings say that evidence is garbage", and that is mainstream media fabrication. Justice never said that. That's impossible.

The evidence is overwhelming. The evidence is overwhelming. Remove the blindfold first.
We will speak later.

This first:

https://hereistheevidence.com/
https://youtu.be/rri6flxaXww
https://youtu.be/DSDZkXxFVEU
https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw
https://youtu.be/z-44TVFRk6U
https://youtu.be/e35f4pUIYOg
https://youtu.be/pFs0Jag1Msc

What justice has said is something else.

The Supreme Court has not entered the merits of the case. It "simply" considers that Texas does not have the legitimacy to sue the states.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
3 replies
Read the rulings. All the judges have been nothing but clear that the quality of evidence and even the charges doesn't live up to basic legal standards.

Nothing to do with the media. You're the one that keeps mentioning the media - I never brought them up, I'm strictly referring to the legal decisions which has nothing to do with news reporting.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
I can't answer to your last comment.

You talk about judges denying the evidence, like all the TVs... that's why I put you a meme of Twin Towers .

As you can see all mainstream media and the two party system judges too they maintain an official version of events, which contradicts the public evidence.

It is impossible for an airplane to produce a perfect demolition of a building, and also the tallest skyscraper. Causing 3 perfect demolitions with only 2 planes. Totally impossible. And an inexplicable explosion in the pentagon of a supposed plane that did not exist. Despite all that, the lie is maintained everywhere. The new world order.

That is why I am telling you, do not believe anything they tell you, even if they are a judge, first check the evidence.

There are thousands of volunteer witnesses to voter fraud actions throughout the United States. The world looked the other way with the dead from the twin towers. Are you going to look the other way with those people too?

This is not a joke. A machine counting votes, related to Trotsksite socialists of Venezuela, totalitarian Chinese communism and globalists. Deciding the elections in the US, and they name it "dominion". It's dominion the whole world. Dominion the people. It is no coincidence that they put these names.
1 up, 4y
Just check the evidence, that's how little I can tell.

https://hereistheevidence.com/
https://youtu.be/rri6flxaXww
https://youtu.be/DSDZkXxFVEU
https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw
https://youtu.be/z-44TVFRk6U
https://youtu.be/e35f4pUIYOg
https://youtu.be/pFs0Jag1Msc
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
I don't know what to tell you: I talk about the court rulings directly. If you're telling me that the TV agrees with me in this instance, I'll take your word for it because you apparently watch a lot more TV than I do - but the court judgements are what they SHOULD be reporting on ANYWAY. The judges ruled that your evidence proved nothing. It was garbage evidence. That's what the judges said. If you can't convince a judge, your evidence was not convincing PERIOD.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
A judge can't simply deny the evidence. What judges are you talking?
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Literally all of them. 50 cases. 50 judges. Not one vote was ruled fraudulent. Read Judge Brann's ruling. Read Judge Bibas' ruling. Read ANY of the rulings! Do your go***mn homework here - read ANY of it, the judges looked at all of this evidence and said that none of it had legal value.

50 lawsuits and ZERO votes were ruled as fraudulent.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Just check the evidence, that's how little I can tell.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Check the evidence that the courtrooms rejected?
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The plan of the new world order is more real than you think, and it is getting closer to being a reality every day.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Well, you were wrong about the election and you were wrong about Trump's lawsuits on voter fraud so can you understand why I'm less than inclined to believe any other predictions you make about the future?

People who know what they're talking about tend to have a history of being right. You have a history of being wrong.
Futurama Fry memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
'NOT ENOUGH FRAUD TO OVERTURN THE ELECTION'; ..FUNNY HOW YOU KNOW HOW MUCH FRAUD DID OR DIDN'T TAKE PLACE..