Must Testify

lmfao

Maybe because COVID-19 and the BLM riots were used as a distraction?

https://imgflip.com/i/44ll7j

my thoughts exactly

Bravo!!

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4879365/user-clip-sen-cruz-rod-rosenstein-06032020

She will have amnesia, guaranteed.

She'll roll in there in a wheelchair pulled in by crutches that her arms wield. Oxygen tanks. She'll claim she's married to Ronald Reagan.

What 'is' her current record for 'I do not recall.' under Oath...

care to lay odds she sets a new one?

Should Have made her testify on 9/11 So she could perform an act of contrition or something

Oh the libtards are gonna have a go at this one.

2hsnp9.jpg (click to show) Upvote!

Can't pass up this reacc meme either.

Trump and, more precisely, his deranged base wanted to "lock her up" 3+ years ago. Now they're finally calling her in for... something... on the eve of an election.

This will be fun!

Gotta turn out that base -- it's Trump's only hope at this point.

When you think conservatives are triggered by the Democrat who lost the 2016 election.

She always makes me laugh.

Ooh, a September surprise. Classy

When are Trump or any of his cronies going under oath?

Many of Trump's cronies already went under oath, do you live under a rock or have memory loss from all the dope you smoke? What this woman did while in office is atrocious.

None of Trump's inner circle testified, let alone Trump himself. Many others were blocked through sweeping and spurious assertions of executive privilege.

However, we still heard from enough whistleblowers and brave officials who defied Trump's orders (and as such, it doesn't make sense to labeled them "cronies") to fill 658 pages (with dissenting views included in the interests of fairness and balanced):

https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20191216/CRPT-116hrpt346.pdf

The information gathered was enough to support impeachment and removal under both Impeachment Art. I and certainly Impeachment Art. II.

Trump's totally botched handling of Covid and the unnecessary deaths it's caused would also be worthy of impeachment, if we didn't have an election right around the corner.

But sure: keep trucking with emails and Benghazi and whatever else this is about.

You have no problem with Hillary deleting 30,000 emails under subpoena while passing classified intel over an illegal private server nor Biden issuing an actual quid pro quo in Ukraine.

Carry on with the faux outrage.

And you have no problem with anything I said.

Republicans got 11 hours of Hillary under oath and walked away from that hearing with that one wonderful soundbite taken out of context that we've all seen a zillion times

How would Trump fare under oath for 11 hours?

The world may never know

Or: maybe we will!

No, cause it's nowhere near the same.

We're getting even more. Plus whoever else Barr throws in there. You realize he is investigating the Russia investigation.

Well, if Obama could claim executive privileges in the fast and furious case, where the AG got held in contempt, for the first time ever, so should Trump.

Benghazi for the 23rd time? Email server? When will the GOp- stop with her? They whine when they want anyone from Dumpfy's cabinet to testify one time....

Rawdogged

Dog-and-pony show for the base just in time for the election.

They had 3.5 years to move on her, and they didn’t.

Hauling in your defeated 2016 election opponent a couple months before the 2020 election is not how justice works.

Maybe because nobody cares?

Is Ivanka next?

Hillary is out of politics. That's why no one cares.

Ivanka is a current nepotistic political operative of the current President, using her private email for government work.

Just wondering, the day after Trump leaves politics, are you going to have the same attitude?

I could give a shit about Ivanka or Hillary's emails. Don't care.

I mentioned Ivanka because you hypocrites are so hell bent on Hillary but go silent when your masters daughter does the same damn thing!

Who did which first? Who didn't care first? Which actually sent classified intel? Who set the precedent first? Who was the secretary of state that didn't 'know' what classified intel was. But muh Ivanka!

Yet you talk of hypocrites lmao

And you're still on it. You can't let it go. On and on and on. She's an old hag who doesn't know shit about technology and it was when smartphones were a new thing. She used a Blackberry for Christ sake!

But, it's a completely different thing than Ivanka!!!!!
You couldn't be more transparent.

First? That makes it LESS of a big deal!
At this point and the lock her up chant from her daddy, Ivanka should know better!

Yes, the Hillary appointed Imgflip police has arrived.

Cares enough to force the slag to testify.

She will have no choice but to

Good