Things are funnier when they have a bit of reality to them. You are claiming "America" wants a woman who actually got 3 million more votes than Trump to die
Admittedly, this is a funny fictional exchange. But: what crimes is Pelosi accused of?
You can't simply jail political opponents because you don't like them, and I'm tiring of the constant implications of criminality against Democrats with no backing evidence.
There are 28 U.S. Senators and Representatives who have a higher net worth than Pelosi. I'll wait while you investigate all of them first. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_members_of_the_United_States_Congress_by_wealth
The fact that you only want to investigate Pelosi when I have given you evidence of multiple wealthier congresspeople is a strong reason to suspect that you are only interested in targeting the Democratic leadership.
The meme on this page is about Trump and Pelosi. It's as simple as that. Stay on topic or GTFO.
Also, no one is going to take you seriously when you tell some random person on the internet to go and "research". Especially since this IS obviously a diversion.
Imagine investigating a murder, and the guy says, "Well there's a bunch of other serial killers out there you should investigate if you really care about stopping murders.". F**k that. You go and pound sand.
I asked above: "what crimes is Pelosi accused of?" You waved your hands around in the general of direction of Pelosi's wealth. So, it's not off-topic to point out there are over two dozen congresspeople wealthier than Pelosi and that a generalized allegation of corruption against her and her alone is therefore suspect.
As for Trump, who you've admitted is on-topic: He's estimated to be worth anywhere from $4 billion to (in his telling) TEN BILLION DOLLARS. And of note, he is the first president to have never released his tax returns, and has indeed fought tooth and nail against their release in federal court.
We can only speculate at this point, but I predict that when historians get their hands on his returns, they are going to have a field day.
Strange. If he's been audited by the FBI the whole time.. and neither the FBI nor IRS press him with charges of tax evading or whatever it is you think he's done (keep in mind he's ran many real, legitimate businesses) .. then odds are he's done nothing which can be pinned on him.
YOU on the other hand, you seem oh-so-suspicious trying to exonerate Pelosi and throwing the scent onto others! Could it be the fact that she is currently the most powerful democrat, speaker of the house, 3rd in line of the presidency? Hmm? HMMMMMM?!
This bickering and assuming ulterior motives of the other person is pointless and a nonargument.
There's simply no scent to throw; Pelosi is still clean as a whistle according to any real information that has been presented in the OP meme or this entire comments thread.
As for impeachment: I'm not primarily interested in Trump's finances except as a curiosity. Nor was I really that moved by anything that came out of the Mueller report (troubled, but not moved). For me, the case for impeaching Trump is all about this:
In a nutshell, it's the fact that a sitting president is pressuring a foreign nation to dedicate its own judicial resources to open an investigation on a political opponent's son with little or no backing evidence.
And no, I don't want Trump in jail for anything he's done as President. I have no real vengeance motive like that. Just out of office.
"Biden stopped the prosecution" sounds like investigating a crime more than anything.
And as for whatever other quid pro quo you think Trump did, it's his job to negotiate with foreign leaders, and his call if they get foreign aid or not.
Just because you are running for office, that doesn't make you exempt from criminal investigation.
That defense of this excerpt really only makes sense if you assume Trump knows what he's talking about. Which we're not required to, and there are plenty of reasons to doubt.
Consider his phrasing: "Biden's son." Really odd phrasing, that: emphasizing Hunter's familial ties to a likely presidential opponent. You'd think that if Trump were even remotely informed or genuinely interested about potential corruption, he'd have used Hunter Biden's real name.
So, far from caring about "corruption in Ukraine" (one defense I've heard), the transcript shows Trump used the time on his call with a foreign leader to initiate a prosecution of only one person: Hunter Biden.
There's vigorous debate about whether there was a "quid pro quo," so that's what everyone's focused on, but I don't think it's necessary to prove that to show he abused his office.
Biden stopped NO prosecution. The case had been tabled months before his son even worked for the company. You're only off a few months but if you're using this as your basis, you really should learn about time.
She released her taxes and we all know where her money comes from, unlike crooked don the con who runs scam schools and cheats on his taxes. - but you dont care. all you care about is what "party"... you are part of the problem
I don't really want her jailed. I think she should be replaced and retire. this is just rhetorical humor mostly brought on by her unique brand of histrionics and obfuscation.
Yea because being a criminal is ok... and he did collude right in front of Americas eyes on live tv, once before he was elected and again in helsinki... you trumpettes are total suckers... its how he was able to run a scam school.
He asked a foreign nation to interfere in an election, I heard this with millions of others. He prevented witnesses from testifying thats obstruction, he paid hush money to pay off women and bury stories to affect the election. He is a cheat and a con man and you gotta be pretty dim to not see it.
jfc, do any of you know how to google? ffs you people are like the perfect reason this nation need free higher education. Though it should not take a college degree to know how to use a few key words in a search engine.... smh
Guess you dont actually listen to him speak.... thats a plus for you if you dont fall for his bullshit and thats all he spouts... divisive, nonsense and bullshit. That and encouragement of our enemies.
WHY IS THE HOUSE SPEAKER NOW WITHHOLDING THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, DUMBASS!?!
Liberals are just starting to realize what a bunch of dumbf**ks they are, and how this impeachment farce is going to cost them dearly at the election booth. There never was a crime, but the liberals tried to manufacture one.
Incredibly stupid dumbf**ks like you went along with it.
You really need to apologize for being such an incredible dumbf**k, delete your account, and NEVER, EVER PARTICIPATE IN ANY ELECTION EVER AGAIN.
