If dems used facts instead of feelings, maybe then we'd see something

😂😂😂

These are peak peak peak

Couldn't even make community college wow

Really nice, Flick! You understand politics exceptionally well for such a young person. Your contemporaries are all about the feelz and ignoring the facts.

Bububut it's all about TRUMP! Your meme? 💯%

Thanks backman :D

I thought this one was pretty funny

Can I shoot the wheel so it goes off the track and kills everyone on board? Wait what was the objective again?

to just pow pow pow

The King James version of Exodus 20:13 says “Thou shalt not kill.”

It means "murder" the original word meant an unjust killing

The democrats been really quiet since this post came out.

You and me both, AD!

I was barely getting any notifications for a few weeks now...and then I commented on this meme...

Once they start, there's no turning them off unless one doesn't care about other notifications.

Thinking about it now....we are both contributing to the continuation of it....lmao.

🤣

Note: of I don't respond to your comment, it's not because I'm not smart enough. It's because I am f**king bored

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh7BZf7D5Bw

Someone at my camp's talent show sang this 😂 I love it

Hah!

Vro

agree with the transgender part but tf teaching evolution in schools do

It's a theory with a lot of holes in it
Plus evolution goes against God's design

man not tryna argue from a place of hate. whats your side of the arguement where you see holes in the theory. I'm not religious to add context I'm not sure what else to believe in

The fossil record just doesn't show any change in kinds. Change in kinds is still speculative
When scientists couldnt find any transitional species, they decided "actually, the first bird hatched from a dinosaur egg" skipping transitioning. But... how are we suppose to find proof of that
The big bang is mathmatically/scientifically impossible, if chance wanted to make a single protein molecule it would need 10¹⁸³ tries
All our fossil layering is explainable with Noah's Flood
...and I have a lot more. I read a lot of books about debunking evolution so it's hard to remember it all

oh damn this is actually interesting asf cus nothing you're saying is incorrect. even without my belief in god one thing that's always contradicted my beliefs is the fact there's anything in the universe at all. if the universe is stuck in a cycle of exploding and compressing where did any of this matter come from. it couldn't of always been there and it didn't just appear. realistically there shouldn't be anything in the universe at all. it should be an empty void and the only explanation I can think of is either being in a simulation or some sort of creator.

Seeeeee thats exactly it 😃
A Creator is the only way
Its something I love to lay in bed and ponder about... you can only go so far back in time before God smacks you in the face
Even if this is a simulation like you said, it would STILL require a Creator

thats my problem with the simulation theory cus something else would need to create what's overviewing us.

Yeah

and something who created that

idk if its a human urge but I constantly think about what if there is a god and for no reason. Ive tried to defy it with reason but it constantly intrudes my brain and I'm not sure why

A human urge... yeah kinda
I think its a mix of being intelligent and not being prideful
Since God is a logical conclusion

No, actually, he's parroting nonsense. If you visit a decent enough science museum, they have lovely displays of the fossil record showing change over time. The books he's reading that "debunk" evolution are from the fringe of pseudo science. I strongly recommend any of the works of Stephen Jay Gould, an evolutionary biologist, humanist, and also a lovely writer.

I know exactly how evolution works I'm not doubting its existence he's point is that there a certain common ancestors that haven't been proven.

Given the nature of the fossil record, not finding all the links in the chain is a given. Where his science-denialist books are getting it wrong is asserting that the lack of some pieces disproves the whole thing.

Actually, due to the way evolution works in real time, people have observed evolutionary shifts within their lifetimes. A fascinating example: https://theconversation.com/natural-selection-in-black-and-white-how-industrial-pollution-changed-moths-43061

The information in the moth kind was merely reshuffled.
Read the article at icr.org/article/what-about-horse-series to learn the truth about the horse series.

I could as easily read the writings of A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada on this. Your "Creation Researcher" is doing the classic move of noticing that the data we have is complicated and that horse evolution is different from many other groups because there are very few surviving descendants to falsely conclude that this invalidates the whole concept of evolution, rather than being a weird, non-reprentative version of the thing.

To spell it out, the writers of textbooks took an overly simple example, and that led to the misconception that the cartoon sketch ladder of horses was how evolution worked. (Sidebar, this is what happens in math classes when the first grade teacher says, "You CAN'T subtract a bigger number from a smaller number," ignoring the existence of negative numbers. Some of the students go on to think that this simplified idea is the whole thing, and 5 years later their 6th grade teacher has to do backflips to get them to understand integers.)

Read this.
https://ncse.ngo/horse-horse-course-courseas-long-you-know-what-horse-part-1

So how do you get around 2 facts.
1. Apes and lower hominids have a different number of Chromosomes than humans. That means we can't interbreed.
2. Like most animals apes destroy mutated offspring. Any animal behaviorist can explain that to you.
In other words even IF an ape or lower hominid gave birth to a mutant that was human and even IF he survived to adulthood then what?
He can't procreate with apes or lower hominids. Different number of chromosomes remember?
Did he f**k himself and give birth?
When Darwin came up with his theories DNA and Chromosomes were unknown. Well, we know now. But some people refuse to give it up.
You have 2 viable options - creationism or Ancient Aliens tampering with hominid DNA (which would explain the junk DNA in us no different than canine DNA).
But Darwinism is no longer a viable theory.

You are assuming that we think an ape just suddenly shit out a neanderthal 6 million years ago. That is not how the theory of evolution (which has changed much since Darwin) works. The common ancestors of great apes and humans had children who had to become better in some way. The ones that ended up being the ancestors of apes were slightly stronger than their parents, and the ones that ended up being the ancestors of humans were slightly smarter. Rinse and repeat for a really long time and you get primitive apes and primitive humans. As for your other point, Google "when did we lose a pair of chromosomes in humans"

Sorry no, at some point they had to change chromosomes at which point you would need at least 3 males and 14 females to have the exact same mutation from different family lines. Evolution is filled with these massive jumps that are just not possible.

Bless you for being willing to respond to this nonsense.

Evolution is still not proven.

That goes triple-double for creation.

answersingenesis.org/blogs/patricia-engler/2020/11/11/transitional-fossil-evidence-evolution-10

Okay, reading her backwards logic as a way of reaching a scientific understanding is EXACTLY as ridiculous as praying to the atomic table of elements. Religion is about faith in things of the spirit; science is about observation and theorizing about the things of this world.

This is exactly why Matthew 22:21, Mark 12:17, Luke 20:25.

You're missing the biggest proof: the stoekle study on mitochondrial DNA that proves 90% of living things don't have common ancestors and that all creatures go back to a certain point in time and just stop, as in no ancestors before that point.

Ooh, send me a link! I love reading science, especially if it's been replicated.

Yeah, none at all.

Humans are devolving.

Human brains, as well as physiques, have been shrinking for the last 8000 years, since the advent of agriculture.

creation.com/en/articles/fossil-evidence-for-alleged-apemen-part-1-the-genus-homo
creation.com/fossil-evidence-for-alleged-apemenpart-2-non-homo-hominids
creation.com/en/articles/haldanes-dilemma-has-not-been-solved

I don't do links, and certainly for not a "creation.com" site, which, I must add, requires no looking at as the name basically gives away the orientation and level of their nonsense.

Regardless, I can't be arsed to do someone's homework for them if they can't muster up the energy to get off their butts and do it themselves.

This is a series of untrue things. You really need to get out more, visit a good science museum, read some actual non-religious science texts.

No way man.
Jesus changed my life far too much

I'm sure he wouldn't mind you learning about the world as it actually is, instead of how your pastor teaches it. Evolution and science are frankly full of marvels. Go and learn.

I read my own books too
It's based on myths and theories. No real base

The theory of evolution is based on data and observation.

It's also based on going "nyulp, I sure hope the fossil record supports evolution after I die and we get better tools" and then the fossil record... is a complete and total embarrassment to evolution.

The embarrassment is willful ignorance.

And yet it is not proof. It’s a theory.

answersingenesis.org/theory-of-evolution/evolution-not-even-theory

Because it's science, not math.

Atheists are willfully ignorant. The King James version of Romans 1:20 says “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:”

We are willfully ignorant of the single source that you always use because we don't believe a book that is thousands of years old (the one exception to this is math)

It also has no application in the real world.

You're making memes against evolution now? Oof.

Replied to the wrong comment bro

Indeed, but you read it, small Philistine.

I read everything 🧠

Theory is not the same as hypothesis. Coincidentally, religious psychosis is also not a substitute for scientific study.

Hi its you again

And theories are not proven, so there’s that.

Once again you're thinking of a hypothesis. Theories are the result of rigorous scrutiny and testing.

But here I am wasting my breath on someone who thinks dinosaurs got wiped out by Noah's flood.

Once again you presume to know without knowing. Science proves nothing it only disproves. The “theory” of evolution is not proven it is a theory. It cannot be proven because your amphibian ancestor has never been identified much less your ape or reptile ancestor.

What the hell are you talking about? Our amphibian ancestors have been so well-documented that paleontologists were able to identify a transitional species between fish and amphibians before that species was even discovered in the fossil record. Look up Tiktaalik.

Please read what this links to: creation.com/en/articles/tiktaalik-roseae-a-fishy-missing-link
It is the top result if you look up "Tiktaalik" at creation.com

Can you provide an actual peer reviewed source and not some creationist blog post from 20 years ago?

So that’s what you came from? Interesting how you extrapolate a fish to amphibian reptile somehow became a mammal.

Because that’s not how it works. A fish doesn’t just give birth to a mammal, it’s a process that takes millions of years of genetic adaptation. You would’ve learned this in school if you paid attention.

According to you that’s exactly how it works. It just takes a long time. Of course it’s not proven because it’s not provable. It’s a theory.

A theory is proven. A hypothesis is not. Did you not even read his comment?

Wrong, if it’s proven it’s not a theory.

https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+a+theory&rlz=1CAFQYM_enUS1206&oq=what+is+a+theory&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyCQgAEEUYORiABDIHCAEQABiABDIHCAIQABiABDIHCAMQABiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIGCAYQRRhAMgYIBxBFGEDSAQgzNzgzajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&safe=active&ssui=on

It’s full of holes. You can believe that reptile is your ancestor if you like, but it is not scientifically proven that that’s where you originated.

Explain homologous structures

Homologous structures are similar structures created to fill similar roles, such as wheels on a plane and car.

All land vertebrates and see mammals have the same structure of humerus, radius, ulna, carpal, metacarpal, and digits.

A similarity in anatomical structures, it still doesn’t prove anything other than whales have a similar structure to a human hand in their fins, so what.

why do whales have hip bones?

Please do explain the existence of hip bones in whales

We are all land dwelling vertebrates with legs, jaws, and lungs. If you think we are not descendants of the first land dwelling vertebrates that existed 400 million years ago then where do you think we came from? Because unfortunately “God did it” is not a scientifically supported answer.

It’s as plausible an answer as your “theory”. Your religious belief that humans formed from a single celled organism and assembled itself over millions and millions of years is preposterous.

One of the few moments where the left and right can agree on something

Problem is, it's not even a theory because it has no test that it can take that could prove it false. Like finding higher organisms in lower strata. They just alter the timeline.

we have LITERAL scientific evidence (extinct hominids, natural selection and adaptation) to back evolution

what evidence backs God's design?

It's f**king beautiful and not random 🤩
...also weak animals dying first while the strong one's pass on their traits is not evolution. It's just a thing

"it's not random"

"weak animals dying"

Well is it random or not?

Oh hey brotato salad sandwich

The Devil went down to Georgia, he was looking for a soul to steal
He was in a bind 'cause he was way behind
And was willing to make a deal.

You know that song? Listen to the Charlie Daniels Band version, it's the best version.

Amazing song 👍

My gosh, he's too young to know who even Justin Bieber and Hannah Montana are. Literally. Look at his profile. Look at the images he's posting on this meme right here.

Those are own words.

Those are your* own words.

adaptations and mutations over those hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of years DOES lead to new species

Earth has only been here for 6,000 years so theres literally no time for that

Mutations are almost always deadly when they are additive and they disrupt the DNA RNA and protein networks causing sickness and death. The best you can get is a loss Mutation or a neutral inert mutation.

Explain scientifically how the earth came to be and where the missing links can be found from your amphibian ancestors.

the links are:

Cyanobacteria > Paleozoic bug and fish creatures > Larger reptiles, fish, and flying bugs > Shrewlike creature that took its time to show up in the Triassic period over periods of some reptiles gradually developing fur instead of scales > Larger mammals > Australopithecus > Various early hominids > The small group of fairer skinned, more humanlike hominids, which some died out and some passed on > Neanderthals, homo sapiens sapiens, and a few others > Homo sapiens sapiens

No sorry, those are classes of animals. We want a direct chain of specific animals.

who the F**K is we

Because you use > symbols doesn’t mean these are proven theories. These are beliefs. They are no better nor anymore provable than anyone else’s beliefs.

The Earth formed after a particularly large piece of rock from when the solar nebula collapsed into a disk around the sun became large enough to stop accreting material and start gravitating it. Then it gained a little bit of mass from a collision with another body that was similar in size to mars. The rest of it became the moon or got ejected to who knows where. As for your second request, the missing links probably didn't even get fossilized, as it is quite difficult to have something fossilized to be dug up in the first place. If they did get fossilized, then we probably either haven't found them yet, or haven't identified them.

According to Genesis 1, the earth was created in the beginning, before the sun was created.
The links are missing because evolution never happened.
Read the book of Genesis if you want to know how the world actually came to be.

Are you capable of compreheding the fact that I won't listen to stuff that I don't believe in?

Which is physically impossible

Typically, a star mediating gravitational pull will need to be present, otherwise the building blocks that built the Earth would not have been able to

Matthew 19:26 (KJV): “But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.”

no one is going to listen to you until you bring numbers to the table

I'm going to kill myself

What is the requirements for fossilization? I'll give you a hint: flood.

stuff needs to be buried quickly in an anoxic environment so that bacteria don't eat it too quickly. I believe that 40 days of rain on healthy soil would increase the amount of bacteria. And even then, it takes between 1 and 10 millions years on average to create most sedimentary rocks, which is more than 6000

Right, they haven’t been found nor identified so we agree. Your theory is not proven.

Here is a link for you: creation.com/en/articles/ape-to-human-evolution

God's design is clearly seen in the things that have been made. The King James version of Romans 1:20 says “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:”

this was the most nothingburger article I've ever read

Natural selection is an observable fact, evolution is a theory that was disproven by the stoekle mitochondrial DNA study.

Transgender people are exponentially more depressed because people bully them and call them bad words for who they are.

first of all people get bullied and called bad words all the time does make them depressed. second not as many transgenders are harassed as you think. name one time you've seen a trangender person get publicly name called and harassed. never? I see them working in stores all the time working with people no one blinks an eye.

I see them get called names all the time when I go places, specifically outside the city. It sucks seeing my friends get called that.

my bad for assuming you've never witnessed it, I've never seen it where I live

nah its fine ur chill

what kinda stuff they say

that's valid. what state do you live in

Colorado. Mostly that stuff happens when you go east or south

I'm in Wisconsin, people really nice there

W State. I have family there

awesome state for food if you don't mind -20 degrees and cold dry desolate darkness for most of the year

man I feel bad now ur chill I went off on my rant cus I'm on adderall it makes me hyper focused on shi that angers me

its fine

and what kinda people call them that

you wanna blame their depression on other people fine. but do some research. being trans means you are technically kind of messed up in the head cud your brain should be programmed to their gender but its not. if the programs messed up there's bound to be other issues and imbalances like depression and disorder

Wait til they find out that its caused by opposite sex gene expression caused by chemicals in the food and water like atrazine.

whether its caused by chemical leakage or pestisdes it all has the same result it doesn't change anything

mixed with hormones like estrogen or testosterone which severely affect emotional processing