Sorry if what I'm explain is too complicated that it can't be dumbed down to a single sentence.
And if I do, you'll start asking dumb questions and posting conspiracy theories, therefore forcing me to explain things further, then you being so generous to "gladly extend some advice to leftists".
Well I hope you also get advice from leftists too (I gladly extend any kind of advice to anyone regardless of ideology, I mean, aren't you happy with politicizing enzymes? do you really have to politicize everything?)
"If you doubt me, look to Hillary Clinton's successful campaign in 2016 where she really convinced the hillbillies, deplorables, and the great unwashed in general that she was the better candidate for the office as President of the United States. "
L, M, A, and f**king O.
Those people were calling themselves "hillbillies and deplorables", already predisposed to vote against her irregardless, their noisy minority status irrelevant due to disproportionate electoral power by a whole host of Republican dirty tactics that amount to legalized voter fraud, and the Electoral College, there's nothing on Earth she could've done to earn their vote and you know it.
Like I said, here's my "leftist" advice: There's a limit to how much you can simplify something, a threshold that varies depending on the innate complexity of the topic, and once you cross it, you'll only convince those who already want to be convinced.
I don't want people to be convinced by the way I expressed stuff, I want them to convince themselves by the stuff itself, because caring more about delivery than content is one of the reasons that people are so susceptible to marketing campaigns and well spoken political promises.
The society of spectacle buddy, you can't just give everything prepackaged and rehearsed, because I trust in people's intelligence more than that.
What you're asking me to do is precisely, the thing that Jordan Peterson accused climate scientists of doing, in that cringe af video he's got with Benny Tetiño at that coffee shop, which is not including EVERY SINGLE THING EVER, in predictive models because if a model isn't 100% infallible then why even try?
Damned if I explain stuff damned if I don't explain stuff.
I'm starting to think you don't really care about stuff