FJB

there is really only one bite at the cherry.

and yet you said nothing

Or if it stopped 🤣😆

Trump is tons less creepy, but not completely uncreepy.

"id f**k ivanka if she weren't my daughter". no, that's not creepier than joe biden.

where did he say that?

The top 11 times Trump was super creepy about his daughter. https://www.indy100.com/news/donald-trump-ivanka-inappropriate-daughter-9594016

Hmm. If those were true...That would be weird...However, how do I know those quotes weren't made up?

other than #2, you can literally hunt those sources down to verify it. And in many cases, the video or sound clip where he says something creepy is linked right there in the article.

You don't even have to find it on your own.

Okay. However, how does this prove that Biden is a predator?

Idiot. The only thing you are good at is making Sh*t up.

GO ON THE AVBOVE LINKS I know you won't cause you don't want to be exposed to the truth.

But ask yourself Why are all his Kids so f**ked up all the time drugs, sex, corruption arrests etc

Idiot. That's one dude who was ostracized after that came out by conservatives and Republicans.

idiot, there are so many more like him in your party.

https://time.com/3001785/todd-akin-legitimate-rape-msnbc-child-of-rape/

As usual, a liberal misses the point. But even if this did fit your pissy little narrative, you have found 2 so far- how does that constitute there being "so many more like him"?

From the article: " “Legitimate rape is a law enforcement term, it’s an abbreviation for ‘legitimate case of rape,'” he told Chuck Todd. “A woman calls a police station, the police investigate, she says ‘I’ve been raped,’ they investigate that. So before any of the facts are in, they call it a legitimate case of rape,” explained Aiken."

Now, reading comprehension is not the forte of any liberal, but much more so for a pre-teen like yourself.

While Time, a 100% liberal rag, easily found other libs to agree with them, still here is what Aiken said of his point:
"Nonetheless, Akin believes that everyone took what he said out of context. “This was intentionally misunderstood and twisted for political purposes. It doesn’t make any sense to say ‘a conservative is saying that rape is legitimate,’ that doesn’t even add up.”"

The article itself appears to be written at the level of a 6th grader, at best, which may be why it has an appeal to you, but this incessant trait of liberals to try and find some verbal misstep by an opponent, and then ignore their explanations, is infantile at best, intellectually dishonest at worst. If Aiken was the proponent of rape you are trying to make him out to be, then why doesn't he double down? His point was, not all of the rape statistics that unborn child murderers use are legitimate, especially given that pregnancies resulting from rape are exceedingly rare. This, therefore, makes 'rape and incest' a nonissue when it comes to murdering unborn babies- it is no justification whatsoever.

I suppose you do not care, but you really are embarrassing yourself on this site. Thank goodness for the anonymity of being online, right SSTTUUTTAA?

he still sees nothing wrong with saying it. no conservative does. do you?

"his words, his choice."

Let me fix this for you, my little ignorant friend:
"his words, his choice of what they actually mean."

You put words and concepts into his mouth as a form of ad hominem, which you then use to allow you to reject what he actually means, so that you can then in turn use what you say they mean in order to be an annoyance. Like all good liberals today, if there isn't a crisis to exploit, you manufacture one. In your defense, some doofus liberal beat you to this, hence you have a useless biased article to share for your defense.

I also think you want these things to be true, because deep down you know that the positions you are defending are wrong, and evil. That may mean that your conscience is not yet so corrupt that you have no hope. I hope this is true, but you first must admit you have a problem before you can leave the evil you have decided to embrace behind.

pedophilia and rape ARE evil.

but only when a liberal does it.

I am not sure you understand his point. What do you think his point is, so I know whether or not I agree with it?

if you actually read the whole article and not just cherry pick the parts that meet your confirmation bias, you would have read this:

"But the real problem isn’t that people think conservatives are pro-rape, it’s that Akin’s comment sounds like victim-blaming. By calling some rapes “legitimate,” he is (perhaps unintentionally) implying that some aren’t. And that has lead his critics to say that Aikin wants to make sure that a woman’s claim of rape is “legitimate” and that they aren’t just making it up to get a free abortion or something.

Once the topic of abortion came up, the interview took an even more controversial turn. When asked point-blank whether rape victims should be allowed to have abortions if they get pregnant, Akin turned it around. “Should the child conceived in rape have the same right to live as a child conceived in love?” he said. “I had a number of people in my campaign that were children…who were conceived in rape.” That assertion was not immediately verifiable."

Wrong again, my tempestuous childish friend!

"it’s that Akin’s comment sounds like victim-blaming."

"Sounds like" is not the same thing as actually being victim blaming. That is a good example of why this article is pure ignorant nonsense. I did read it, doofus, but you are failing to apply critical thinking skills to what is there, because you think it supports your point.

So, while you think this statement is damming: "“Should the child conceived in rape have the same right to live as a child conceived in love?” he said. “I had a number of people in my campaign that were children…who were conceived in rape.”", the reality is that it gets to the root of the issue-

Is a child conceived in rape (again, an extreme rarity) deserving of the death penalty because of the crimes its father committed?

Well, SSTTUUTTAA, should a child be murdered for the crimes of the father?

his words, his choice.

"pedophilia and rape ARE evil.
but only when a liberal does it."

Well, of course, that's nonsense, but I suppose harmless enough, given that most pedophiles and rapists are liberals in the first place. There are exceptions, of course, but those are less so Conservatives, and more apolitical psychopaths. Which basically makes them a liberal by definition anyway.

The question you have dodged remains- should an innocent child get the death penalty for the crimes of his or her father? If you think that the guilty should only be the ones punished, then you are against abortion, regardless of the situation under which the conception took place.

Which means you agree with Aiken. Tough times for a liberal like yourself.

a fetus is not a child.

Now, watch how this should work, something you can only understand when you repent of evil, and turn to Christ.

"conservatives should first mandate jail for masturbation as spilling sperm kills the ability of a conception to happen, destroying the ability of a baby to exist."
A: That is plainly ridiculous. Though it is possible that it goes against God's will, even that is questionable- there is no way for us to know this.

"next conservatives should mandate jail for any man who gets a woman pregnant that is later aborted. he should have worn a condom and gotten a vasectomy."
A: Only if the man enables and supports an abortion should he be charged with accessory. If the woman isn't forced to have an abortion, then she should be charged with manslaughter.

"then conservatives should mandate jail for any man who condones or explains away rape and incest like steve did."
A: Since he didn't do that, this is a moot point, aside from the fact that most liberals do want to criminalize thought that they do not like. This is because, in the arena of ideas. liberals lose the overall debate. That is why liberals refuse to allow issues like this appear on ballots- they know that the majority do not support their extreme views on abortion.

"then and only then can you criminalize abortion."
A: So then, until liberals make the sale of all alcohol illegal, and take steps to ensure that it cannot be made, they cannot charge a drunk driver with vehicular manslaughter?
A: Until liberals make cigarette smoking illegal, they cannot tax cigarettes at all, much less to the high extremes they do now?
A: Until liberals stop shooting people in the streets of big cities, they cannot make unconstitutional laws that infringe on the 2nd Amendment?

Your logic is really, really bad. We have our public education systems to thank for this, as well as the wickedness of your own heart.

you're wrong on all points, but the last one is easiest to expose. https://i.imgflip.com/5tkia2.jpg

"a fetus is not a child."

You're too young to have taken a basic biology class, or a sex ed class yet, but once you do, you will understand where babies come from. Or maybe you should ask your parents to explain this to you.

Unfortunately for you, you are unable to defend this statement of yours. At what point does a "fetus" (Latin for "little one", NOT "clump of cells") become a child? Anything you say will be arbitrary, and therefore unjustifiable.

A hunter is walking through the woods, having been tracking a deer for over two hours. He hears rustling in the bushes up ahead, and fearing he would lose this deer, he shoots. He ends up killing another hunter because he acted without knowing for sure what he was dealing with.

This is what you liberals are doing, and you only get away with it because the infant cannot defend itself. If God did not exist, none of this would matter. Unfortunately He does exist, and He is the Creator of every child- no child is conceived apart from His intent.

You needn't do anything further- you stand condemned already because you have sinned in many ways from the beginning.

John 3:16-21
“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life.
For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through Him.

Whoever believes in Him is not condemned-

- but whoever does not believe IS CONDEMNED ALREADY, because he has not believed in the Name of the only Son of God.

And this is the judgment:
The Light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the Light because their works were evil.
For everyone who does wicked things hates the Light and does not come to the Light, lest his works should be exposed.

But whoever does what is true comes to the Light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God.”

conservatives should first mandate jail for masturbation as spilling sperm kills the ability of a conception to happen, destroying the ability of a baby to exist.

next conservatives should mandate jail for any man who gets a woman pregnant that is later aborted. he should have worn a condom and gotten a vasectomy.

then conservatives should mandate jail for any man who condones or explains away rape and incest like steve did.

then and only then can you criminalize abortion.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/14/steve-king-iowa-republican-rape-incest-abortion