You're really trying to stretch definitions to find a way to claim looking after one's own citizens first is a bad thing, aren't you?
Let's try this on for size: Let's say you're a single parent of three young children, but you leave them home alone for days at a time because you're out spending all your time and money doing "charity work". During that charity work, you save the lives of six starving children by buying them food.
Unfortunately, the fact that you were away from home for so long, ignoring your children and spending money that could have been used to feed them, means THEY starved to death, emaciated and covered in their own filth. But hey, at least you have the moral high ground because you saved the lives of SIX strangers, which is twice the number of lives you lost in your own home!