This meme was hilarious. With joking aside though, they are both innocent until one of them is proved lying or perhaps she was assaulted by somebody else but not Kavanaugh. I've been thinking about multiple things that could have happened since all this crap started. I'm not taking sides. In this country it is Innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. Forgive me if I don't hop on one of the two trains.
Unsettled you Know that Ellison was bout stealing somebody's McDonald prices and even the Meals was supposed to be cooked on the grill not a Barbecue But if you wanted know that I gived it a Yes.
And some of us are happily married women who have undergone sexual abuse, reported it promptly, survived the proper legal process for justice and are honestly fed up with those who wait until it is expedient to their established political views before making an allegation (and glean thousands of dollars via Gofundme while they're at it). It is also glaringly telling when the same outspoken people who would judge an accused conservative guilty before being proven innocent are amazingly quiet when it comes to Karen Monahan's allegations leveled at Rep. Keith Ellison. Where are the sjw's rallies, protests and elevator confrontations for Ms. Monahan?
Eloquently stated! I am now a fan! Thank you, for your courage speaking out. I have two sons and I fear, given a similar situation, some irate or jealous or angry person could try to ruin their lives. Today, an article in USA Today said that Kavanaugh should never be allowed to coach girls. MY Lord in Heaven Help us! Sincerely, Vince Vance
Where are the throngs of Republicans denying her accusations and sending her death threats? The memes challenging her honesty? You support Monaghan but not Ford? Monaghan never went to the police, either. Ellison has also called for an investigation into her claims. He should be ousted if they're true. I have no problem with that.
Bart O'Kavanaugh hasn't and wouldn't even agree to call for an investigation when asked directly if he would. I don't see Ford trying to make any money from this. Whatever your personal experience is, you have to know every situation is different and many women take years to come forward. I'm surprised a victim would be so callous of another.
It is exceptional, but sadly I find her completely unconvincing. Unlike Ellison's accuser, Ford has no proof and the witnesses she claimed to have on her side have all denied the event happened. It is a hard thing to accept, yes, but some people are capable of falsely accusing others, whether from mental instability, viciousness or other factors. Much like Ruby Bates and Victoria Price did. And society is not well served when we allow emotions, fears and prejudices sweep over our legal system as was in that shameful blot on American history.
I know there are false accusations out there. But let Kavanaugh prove his innocence. Take a polygraph. Have the FBI investigate. He shouldn't have anything to worry about if he's innocent, right?
The valid reason is that police can tell you that you didn't pass, although you did, to try to coerce a confession. Don't tell me it doesn't happen, because I've seen it.
"the White House counsel’s office has given the FBI a list of witnesses they are permitted to interview, according to several people who discussed the parameters on the condition of anonymity."
Where!? Oh, sweetheart. That's a mirror. It's ok. Everyone screws up when they speak without knowing the subject matter. Eventually, you'll be ok. Truly, you will. *kisses
Ninj is chiming in with your sentiment, not countering it, mocking those who dismiss or even ridicule those speaking on assault (as we've seen happen on this site a'plenty).
If he's innocent, then why is the White House preventing the FBI from actually investigating anything?
"Not only are Ms. Swetnick’s claims not to be included (likely because they are the most scandalous, and because of the president’s feud with Swetnick’s lawyer Michael Avenatti), also off limits are Kavanaugh’s drinking habits and Mark Judge’s employment records at Safeway. Both would be crucial in corroborating the accounts of both Dr. Ford and Ms. Ramirez."
A lot of **pe and sexual assault allegations are true. And in this event? I find Dr. Ford more credible based solely on each of theirs testimony. At this time anyway.
She clearly admits to care confusion on complete memory and there are proven factual causes for that.
Kavanaugh? Well in his own words he was a football player and people like him. His supposed witnesses?
1. They can’t be a witness if they were not in the room.
2. To my current understanding they stated they do not remember the “supposed” get together. Not that it never happened.
3. Kavanaugh has now even admitted he drank himself into black outs. So that leaves the door open to the possibility he doesn’t remember doing it.
He contradicted himself at the hearing. He stated he’s never had a blackout.
Then asked the femal democrat. “Haven’t you ever blacked out?
Regardless of what happens he’s not fit to be a judge let alone on the Supreme Court.
Facts are facts, lies are lies, and opinions are opinions.
Telling someone they need to be **ped is just downright disgusting and you probably should be ashamed of yourself. However, judging by your ignorant and self-righteous comment, I'm quite sure that you aren't. And the fact you're freaking out over a joke (a very light joke at that) is telling and you have no business telling anyone anything.
I will agree that I could have worded that bette. As such I have deleted the post. I don’t feel ashamed of telling someone to take a walk in someone else’s shoes before they make a mockery of them though. As I said, my wording could have been more appropriately focused on that message. For that I apologize, Norse.
My grandmother was a **pe victim just so you know. And the hateful slander of women was what kept her from coming forward with it all the way up to her death. It broke my heart that she never got her resolution and that women in this day and age likely never will either. I suppose my ignorant statement was out of anger for such a terrible perception of a person before they are finally believed.
You've got that right! It's difficult dealing with the clueless though. They think they can read a few memes, watch fux entertainment "news" and then have an understanding of the complexity of the human brain so that mocking victims that have survived being assaulted/raped is funny to them. My bet is all the men trying to make her look bad more than likely sexually assaulted someone at some point. No one else is arrogant enough to down play **pe.
On behalf of all women who have survived r*pe and had the courage to promptly report it, let me say you are the judgemental one, and your statement reflects the mindset of those who encourage women to be silent about their experience until such time it is politically expedient to make the allegation. It is this sort of mindset which fuels an environment of suspicion and hostility between the sexes and also has helped make a poltical weapon of sexual abuse. And as you have stooped to the lowest level of dialog by suggesting I should be r*ped also shows me a person all too comfortable with sexual assault when it suits your personal agenda.
It was funny, but humor aside? Regardless of what happened? Or happens? There’s no way what so ever a alcoholic man child who threw a evasive and deflecting tantrum on National television is more credible than Dr Ford was.
Kavanaugh displayed text book examples of lying and deceit.
And every person supporting him? Based solely on being a Republican nominee? I pity them and their blatant hypocrisy and disdain for due process when it’s the other person.
She has no proof so she’s lying? Well he has no proof but he’s telling the truth?
The supposed witnesses never stated it never happened. Only that they have no memory of that particular get together.
And? They all have motI’ve to lie. Would you willingly admit to being somewhere a potential crime occurred? When it’s possible you can be implicated?
LE is not in the profession of clearing your name. They’re primary function is to arrest and charge you.
Ford is FBI Strzok’s cousin. She has a second job as head of the CIA undergrad program at Stanford. Her brother, Ralph Blasey III worked for law firm of Baker, Hostetler. His firm created Fusion GPS, the company that created the “Russian Dossier” on Trump that they later admitted was a collection of field interviews. That law firm is in the same building where the CIA operates 3 companies: Red Coats, Inc, Admiral Security Servuces, and Datawatch. Those companies are run by Ralph Blasey Jr., Ford’s dad. Ford’s grandfather was Nicolas Dean, who was thanked for his CIA service by CUA Director Willuam Casey. Still think a 3rd generation CIA woman whose REAL job is at Stanford would have stood by for 36 yrs and not taken care of her problem, if it really existed? She’s no soft spoken wallflower but a shark that wants to take down Trump’s nominee - Deep State style. And the FBI investigation will clench it for her. The FBI is in on the deep state agenda too. They miscalculated and we’re not prepared for Brett’s calendar journals. They will find “new” witnesses and put the nominee away next week. The judge will resign, not because he did anything to a woman but because he was not Deep state sanctioned nominee. It’s not party politics, it’s government bureaucrat self preservation. Trump actually wants to end that crap. Carter tried and they jacked with the economy to Mae him lose his 2nd term election, because he did not put people in finance from a prominent Wall Street finance company that has run the federal financial decisions since at least the ‘50s
Jesus Christ you people are the most gullible idiots on the planet. I could make up a fake story about Hillary paying Ford and you'd believe it just because you want it to be true. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ford-george-soros/
Re-caption this meme
Bart O'Kavanaugh hasn't and wouldn't even agree to call for an investigation when asked directly if he would. I don't see Ford trying to make any money from this. Whatever your personal experience is, you have to know every situation is different and many women take years to come forward. I'm surprised a victim would be so callous of another.
...
"the White House counsel’s office has given the FBI a list of witnesses they are permitted to interview, according to several people who discussed the parameters on the condition of anonymity."
Gee, I wonder why she has no proof.
"Not only are Ms. Swetnick’s claims not to be included (likely because they are the most scandalous, and because of the president’s feud with Swetnick’s lawyer Michael Avenatti), also off limits are Kavanaugh’s drinking habits and Mark Judge’s employment records at Safeway. Both would be crucial in corroborating the accounts of both Dr. Ford and Ms. Ramirez."
She clearly admits to care confusion on complete memory and there are proven factual causes for that.
Kavanaugh? Well in his own words he was a football player and people like him. His supposed witnesses?
1. They can’t be a witness if they were not in the room.
2. To my current understanding they stated they do not remember the “supposed” get together. Not that it never happened.
3. Kavanaugh has now even admitted he drank himself into black outs. So that leaves the door open to the possibility he doesn’t remember doing it.
He contradicted himself at the hearing. He stated he’s never had a blackout.
Then asked the femal democrat. “Haven’t you ever blacked out?
Regardless of what happens he’s not fit to be a judge let alone on the Supreme Court.
Facts are facts, lies are lies, and opinions are opinions.
My grandmother was a **pe victim just so you know. And the hateful slander of women was what kept her from coming forward with it all the way up to her death. It broke my heart that she never got her resolution and that women in this day and age likely never will either. I suppose my ignorant statement was out of anger for such a terrible perception of a person before they are finally believed.
Kavanaugh displayed text book examples of lying and deceit.
And every person supporting him? Based solely on being a Republican nominee? I pity them and their blatant hypocrisy and disdain for due process when it’s the other person.
She has no proof so she’s lying? Well he has no proof but he’s telling the truth?
The supposed witnesses never stated it never happened. Only that they have no memory of that particular get together.
And? They all have motI’ve to lie. Would you willingly admit to being somewhere a potential crime occurred? When it’s possible you can be implicated?
LE is not in the profession of clearing your name. They’re primary function is to arrest and charge you.
infact snopes is the worst one!.
https://www.foodabletv.com/blog/2018/3/27/celebs-vs-wendys-alyssa-milano-and-others-slam-the-fast-food-chain-for-farmworker-controversy
https://www.techcellentnews.com/2017/02/10/president-trumps-android-phone-now-even-more-at-risk-of-hack/