"How accessible do you think guns should be?"

"How accessible do you think guns should be?"  | GUN CONTROL ADVOCATE: ME: "HOW ACCESSIBLE DO YOU THINK GUNS SHOULD BE?" | image tagged in vending machine,gun control,second amendment,liberty,triggered,memes | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
5,792 views, 129 upvotes, Made by james3v6 3 weeks ago vending machinegun controlsecond amendmentlibertytriggeredmemes
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
16 ups, 1 reply
Trading Places Looking Good | LOOKS GOOD TO ME. BUT STILL HARDER TO ACCESS THAN ON THE STREETS OF CHICAGO THE MOST MURDEROUS CITY WITH HEAVIEST GUN LAWS | image tagged in trading places looking good | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Just hope it takes credit cards!!!
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Heaviest gun laws- False.
Easier to buy on the streets than a vending machine- probably also false.. you ever done it?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Enlighten me on who has the heaviest gun laws?
Yes bought on streets. Didn't have to put money in slot, got product without getting stuck in machine.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Your statement may have been true about 10 years ago before the scotus struck down their gun ban.. but I think currently it's California. (42 more gun laws than Illinois. )
Well.. uh.. i hope the feds aren't reading this?
reply
2 ups
Fair enough. Even without research, I could see where California would have the most laws than ANY other state when it comes to controlling people's rights. It's what they do.

I was leaning more towards specific cities and high gun violence. Surely Chicago must be at the top of murder rate. Either way, I thought the original meme was funny and replied in such with satire. Doesn't affect me either way.

I have always and will always be a proud gun-owner and concealed-carry protector of myself and family. Don't give a flying F**K what the government says or dictates. The only thing that does is determine if I am a criminal or not in their eyes. In my eyes, the 2nd Amendment gives me all I need.
reply
13 ups
Bill of Rights | ...SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED | image tagged in bill of rights | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
9 ups, 3 replies
X All The Y Meme | ARM ALL THE PSYCHOPATHS | image tagged in memes,x all the y | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I'm very pro-2nd Amendment, but even I think some things should disqualify someone from legally obtaining a gun, for example a domestic violence conviction.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
I believe a conviction for something as serious as domestic violence should permanently bar someone from owning a firearm. History tells us that people who commit domestic violence don't change. They shouldn't be trusted with a gun if they've done something that egregious, IMO.

As far as voting rights, I believe (and this is just my opinion) that if someone is convicted of a felony, they've shown through their actions that they are not fit to represent the United States of America in the political process. That's just my opinion. We want moral, upstanding people deciding the direction of our nation. I might make some exceptions depending on what the crime was and how long ago it occurred, however.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
In some, if not most, states any type of domestic violence conviction automatically makes you unable to buy a gun legally. Unfortunately, there are other channels.
reply
0 ups
True
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
I don't believe illegals should be allowed to vote...or get drivers licenses
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Well...that's what I believe. I don't know what else to tell you.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Just my opinion: If someone is too dangerous to own a gun, they're too dangerous to be outside of prison
reply
1 up
I would say there's a middle ground, that someone shouldn't be trusted with a gun, but not so dangerous that they have to stay in prison the rest of their life.
reply
2 ups
3 seems like a good cutoff.
reply
8 ups
damn yeah
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups
i.imgflip.com/22edi6.gif (click to show)
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
im sorry, but... um....
reply
2 ups
reply
5 ups
reply
5 ups
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
To criminals, they are already this accessible. The rest of us are at the mercy of our "overlords".
reply
3 ups
reply
4 ups
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/2iyyl4.gif (click to show)
reply
3 ups
reply
6 ups, 4 replies
Gun vending machines?! You know how much crime would escalate if those things existed?! Christ. It's like you want the country to destroy itself from the inside.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
lol
reply
1 up
Glad we agree!
reply
2 ups
It's a joke, not a real gun vending machine.
reply
[deleted]
1 up
Not necessarily, they could require stuff like Fingerprint ID, Retina scanners ect........
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
:)
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/2e6u09.gif (click to show)

i.imgflip.com/1tna1z.gif (click to show)

That deserves an upvote or two?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
0 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
That machine accepts only 1$ bills, so the gun would still be a little difficult to obtain. :D
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
bruh i can't see the image because that gay impact font is too f**king existing
reply
1 up
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups
Got'em! i.imgflip.com/2ecdse.gif (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Always the same reasoning. More armed citizens like lead to less armed violence. wake up and stop listening to the gun lobby. The proof that this is bullshit is there everyday on your streets.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Maybe it is that way on "your" street. Is it a rainbow lined street with unicorns and gummy bears?
What about like real streets? Inner city streets Chicago? News everyday how extreme the murder rate is in Chicago (probably highest in country). Also pretty extreme gun laws in Chicago and the state of Illinois. The idea of more laws and less guns isn't doing much good there, is it?

Tell you what. Let's drop you off in Chicago and your mission is to walk from one side of town to the other. Oh, just for kicks, let's put on a little jewelry, nice clothes and really expensive Nikes. There is a huge sale going on at Food King. Doughnuts and day old Wieners are 60% off. Therefore, you are your only defense against. You can take a gun with you or a book containing all of the laws against having a gun.

Obviously you are against having even one more gun out there to reduce violence. This time though, the violence is against you. I'm sure someone out there thinks it was nice knowing you.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
Coming up with another reasoning and therefore claiming to be right. Anyway, does not matter. I hope all your children stay safe. Give everybody a gun and utopia will come for sure. It worked so far quite well for you.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
You deflected. Why not just actually respond to what cajun_thor said?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Because talking about this topic is useless with nra fanatics and other supporters. In addition, you did a troll diversion too. Sorry, look for another victim. Over and out.
reply
1 up
That's because you only have "your" agenda and are closed-minded. You cannot even take a hypothetical question and answer what would you prefer.

I am not an NRA fanatic. I am an NRA member. I am not a college football fanatic. I enjoy watching college football. Do you see any difference. I do. I agree that there are NRA "fanatics" that go to extremes. It is like that with anything. When you refuse to look at the "other view" because you are close-minded, well then that makes you the "fanatic" for the other side.

I do believe there should be limitations and restrictions for owning guns. And there are many. More laws won't help. Enforcing present laws will. Ridding the world of guns will not reduce violent crimes. Evil will happen regardless.

Another situation you'll likely not want to acknowledge. Not sure if you are male or female. Doesn't matter. An evil person just broke into your home. Doesn't matter if they have a knife, gun, rock or nothing. They inform you they are about to murder everyone in the home. Then before they murder you, they are going to stick everything they have in every hole you have. Do you think a book full of laws are going to protect you? Go ahead, call the cops if you can. They can't unrape you or bring your family back to life.

Me, I have all sorts of weapons (especially guns). This clown is dead on the floor and the police are called to do what their jobs are - investigate crimes. Not prevent crimes.

I know there is no hope for you. Maybe your luck will hold out and you never have to experience evil first hand like some of us have. I don't know you, but wish that good fortune for you.

Myself, I will always be armed and ready to protect what I love against evil. It's a shame people like you want to take that choice away from me.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/2hlbaq.jpg (click to show)
They can't do it Soldier. It's easy to blabber a social agenda from ivory tours where what you believe makes you feel good. It has no bearing on them. But put them in a different situation and see if the mindset changes.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
So you live in Chicago? in the ghetto?
reply
1 up
Thayum big ci-ities are all ghetto to trailer trash out in the boondocks.
Scroll down for more pretending and deflecting from this inbRedneck cretin.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
Was in Chicago 6 months. The whole place is a ghetto. Thank you very much. Also spent 3 months in New York. Mostly in Manhattan. Can't comment on their ghetto.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Of course you cant.... New York has tough gun laws, they work. Chicago has tough gun laws, they dont, because just 25 minutes away you can cross the border and by a gun in Ohio without ID ... so for the upteenth time give the Chicago reference a rest, its stupid. Do you like being stupid?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
0 ups
That's right. I'm stupid and you are the smartest damn person on this site. Or any site as a matter of fact!!! I stand in awe of your superiority.

You enjoy the rest of your day knowing you've done your part in trouncing those evil people who believe in guns.

In the meantime, I'll spit out my gum so I can get to walking around without falling.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Actually parts are, parts are gentrified by hipster trash and spreading fast.

You lie too much.
reply
0 ups, 5 replies
Did anyone tell you to go blow yourself yet today? If not, go ahead and get you sum!
reply
0 ups
"Cajun_Thor

Don't worry so much 'rhoid tickler. And don't let your dreams die about having enough money to move to f*g-town. Just keep sucking cock at your usual rate of $5 a pop. As much as you suck, you'll be a millionaire in no time. Just try to swallow a little more. You keep burping up cum-posts on here."

5 is what you charge back in the swamp? Dang, them meth heads hickoids are ripping you off, son.

Still stuck on sucking cock, yet still can't answer whereabouts you worked your Katrina ass off in NYC, tho you did give away the West Side docks...

Slurp away, that swamp gas soes your brain wonders...
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Aww, triggered much, hick style? Your deflections are adorable. *hugs*
0 ups
Back at ya sweet-cheeks. Good luck and don't take less than $100 down in the village!
reply
0 ups
Frequent it*
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Aww, backwater hick made a reference about Ye Olde Village.
Which part? Is that one of the unamed parts you non-lived in while living in Manhattan for 3 months? No? Oh, heard about that once on the tv, didn'tcha?
Did it ignite your severe inferiority complex too?

*kisses*
0 ups
Nope. Just heard that was a favorite place for the F*gs to hang out. It's obvious you spend a lot of time there.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
"Cajun_Thor

Nope. Just heard that was a favorite place for the F*gs to hang out. It's obvious you spend a lot of time there."

Hell, I'd live there if I could afford it. Unfortunately, I'm not a millionaire.

You're kinda obsessed with the area, seeing as you keep bringing it up.
Frequent the it much on your extended business trip here? Did the notion of sweaty glistenin ripplin manly man lovin stir your swamphick loins, something y'all family humpin cretins 'never' thought of *wink*?
1 up
Don't worry so much 'rhoid tickler. And don't let your dreams die about having enough money to move to f*g-town. Just keep sucking cock at your usual rate of $5 a pop. As much as you suck, you'll be a millionaire in no time. Just try to swallow a little more. You keep burping up cum-posts on here.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Sarcastic? Definitely. A Troll response? Not even. If you truly believe you or anyone will be safer with less guns, we know where the delusion lies.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
you are an idiot, move to Somolia and tell us how more guns make you safer
reply
0 ups
And the same for you...OK, you win. All the guns are gone and there is no more violence or killings. I feel better already.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
What about New York ? what about that?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Spent about 3 months in New York. Didn't get out of Manhattan much. Passed through Harlem. Didn't look near as bad as Chicago. But I didn't stick around either. Sure they are all bad. Been in and out of New Orleans all my life. It gets worse by the day. But no matter where you are, you hear about Chicago. That's all I'm saying...
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Harlem? This is 2018, not 1981. Need to be a millionaire to buy a brownstone there now. Chicago? Try San Francisco. Gentrification is destroying the place, another piece of NYC infected by the hipster scourge.

Another diff? Effective gun control.
Even the slums of the Bronx are safer than - get this - the OP's hometown.
Did some number crunching a few months ago on a meme of his where he told me the name, STILL waiting for him to correct me on it. I've must've screwed up on a decimal point somewhere, because his way-whiter-than-Atlanta city seems to be going through the crack epidemic still or something, IT IS THAT BAD.
B-B-BANG!!! BANG!!!
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
OK, you win. All the guns are gone and there is no more violence or killings. I feel better already.
reply
1 up, 3 replies
Win, like in a pee pee contest? That's adorable.

Yet another astounding anecdotal rebuttal from another know-it-all who lived in Manhattan (what part?) fer a whole THrEE months, no less, without paying a gazillion dollars fer it.

Bx, NY, NY, born n raised, look close honey, I'm not dead yet,,,
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Good job of disproving your point.
reply
1 up
Stop playing the ignorant swampoid hick stereotype and look something other than your fake anecdotes up.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
And now that you are so butthurt thinking I was being derogatory about NY, you should pay attention to what I said. I didn't speak down on it, mainly because I was there ONLY three months. I only mentioned it because someone asked me "what about NY". In addition, I said Harlem looked better than Chicago. So go shine some more shoes in between posting dumb shit.
reply
0 ups
Who said you was being derogatory about NYC?

You was being ignorant about NYC.

Harlem always looked better than Chigago. In fact, why are you comparing them?

Where Downtown you lived at? What was the rent?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Didn't miss a thing. Many articles on London having a higher murder rate than NY. Proving that gun control DOES NOT STOP MURDER! Just because NY has a lower murder rate than London, you think gun control is working in NY?

What a beautiful quote by commissioner O'Neill. "It is nothing short of amazing" he said when the murder rate was "ONLY" 300. Guess "all" lives don't really matter. In further comments, not once did he claim that "gun control" had anything to do with it.

O'Neill attributed the declines to some core factors: precision policing against key offenders, anti-gang initiatives and aggressive gun investigations.

Just like London or anywhere else, if a bad guy wants to murder people, they don't need a gun. You keep protecting yourself and yours with statistics and liberal views. I'll continue protecting mine with steel and lead - GUNS. And believe me, NO law will dictate otherwise.
reply
1 up, 2 replies
290 out of 8,170,000 people? Down from 344 the year before, and over 2,200 in 1990. How's your parish compare?

A tad ridiculous to dismiss it and as non proof that gun control works, only to follow it with how it was done. btw, you left out highly succesful no-tell gun buy back programs out of your copy/paste.

London's uptick was due to a reduction of police numbers, forcing them to prioritize which crimes they responded to and investigated. They've since sought to rectify that. Haven't heard the results yet, but haven't heard the March news repeated either.

This was basically done, ya done said I won your wee wee contest, ya ain't said where in Manhattan you never did actually live at nor why your Harlem & Chicago comparison.

If you ever did live here, you would know people mean it, so if they're gonna kill someone, they will, only with their own bare hands. Only wimps need guns. Here, you wanna be a man, you be a man.

Later.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
0 ups
Still can't even say what part of Manhattan you (did not) "mostly lived in" fer three months.

Keep on a'lyin, ya swamp gas snortin' hickoid, this is done.
Go polish yer lil' pecker extending gunz, thu Chicago Negruhs might come git ya in yer slee-eep.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
End of thread on your stupid ass comment below. I never said I lived in Manhattan you dumb-f**k. I was in Manhattan for 3 months for work purposes. Not that it's any of your business anyway. Good thing I didn't talk to any ass-clowns like you. I definitely wouldn't have been as impressed with the area. They definitely must keep the shit-heads in the Bronx or outer boroughs.

So see below the same comment I gave one of your socialist compadres, and don't let the dog-knot up your ass keep you too long from doing something productive today, you dumb ass, cock-juggling, Cuomo dick-sucking, perverted douchebag.

Good job Peter-Root...

That's right. I'm stupid and you are the smartest damn person on this site. Or any site as a matter of fact!!! I stand in awe of your superiority.

You enjoy the rest of your day knowing you've done your part in trouncing those evil people who believe in guns.

In the meantime, I'll spit out my gum so I can get to walking around without falling.
0 ups
HOOOOOOOOOOOOEEEEY! Let that pent up moonshine fueled swamp rat alt right pinko rage unfurl, Jebba Lee!

Worked? Thought you was gonna say you were a temp Katrina refugee, but we know the closest ya ever done did git ta tha Big City is that time yer uncle had that tv contraption and you saw the ball drop at Times Square one New Year's Eve.

Yer massive inferiority complex is a'shinin, and dare say I, deservedly so.

Sad.
0 ups
DAYYYYYUM!!! Y'all sure likes pointin' out the superiorityness o'thayum cityfolk, ain'tcha?

I aim to please.
reply
2 ups
3-D printers, curtain rods, pipes, figure it out
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Do you also advocate open season on domestic abusers? You know, the people mathematically linked to a higher rate of gun violence and murder with a firearm.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
The OP is a joke!
But anyone should be able to use deadly force to protect themselves from violence, if necessary.
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
Watching too much Minority Report, lol :)

But I do agree that if someone is committing domestic violence, that deadly force is justified to stop it, because the victim's life is in jeopardy.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
In my state the necessary requirement for judicious (legal) use of deadly force is "threat of immediate otherwise unavoidable severe bodily harm or death."

If you have a spouse or significant other who threatens you so that you are in fear of immediate, otherwise unavoidable severe bodily harm or death, at that moment you don't have to give them the opportunity to become a "physical abuser." The law would be on the side of the intended victim if the "abuse" or "threats" had taken place before. I'm not talking about "thought crime" or "pre-crime."

If people would arm themselves (I believe that knowing the law is part of arming one's self) and protect themselves, there would be a lot less "domestic abuse."
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I see. In your earlier comment I thought you meant shoot them before they ever committed abuse, which wouldn't make sense, because they wouldn't be an abuser yet.

I can see that law being problematic if a woman shoots her abusive husband at a moment when he's not an "immediate otherwise unavoidable" threat, because a lawyer could say "she wasn't in immediate danger, she could have left the house and gone somewhere safe".

Like with SpursFan, I knew there would be some issues on which you and I agree.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I wish you could read the dozen-plus stories I read each month after month about the people who use weapons to detail or neutralize their attackers.

You will NEVER hear about them on corrupt CNN. Never.

Democrats tell a woman, if she's attacked, to piss on herself and hopefully possibly dis-interest the rapist. Independents, Republicans, and Libertarians (3rd one for me) tell her to pull a 45 on him and MAKE HIM PISS *HIS* PANTS.

Does that help make clearer part of why after two decades I left the party and never looked back?

I GUARANTEE you there are women dead somewhere because of a Democrat-mandated "waiting period," when their ex decided a restraining order was just a damned piece of paper. Their blood is on the hands of the gun grabbers.

This kind of says it for me:

imgflip.com/i/24tlze
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
That goes both ways. If Democrats are responsible for people dying due to their political decisions, then Republicans are responsible for people dying due to their political decisions. And I'm more than happy to cite an example for you.

In November 2009, Maurice Clemmons murdered four police officers in Lakewood, Washington, in one of the deadliest attacks on law enforcement in American history. He had been in prison in Arkansas, serving a 108-year sentence for various violent crimes, until his sentence was commuted in 2000 by Mike Huckabee, a conservative Republican.

So by your logic, the blood of those four slain officers is on the hands of Republican Mike Huckabee.
reply
2 ups
I could agree to that, yes. If he was supposed to be behind bars and isn't because of the actions of Huckabee, that blood is partially on his hands.
reply
1 up
I don't do double standards, so in principle yes.

Ironically, however, though I am not a Republican, that's not a case to my understanding however, of moral responsibility. He'd be answerable to their families, but I suspect he believed in a sincere contrition. I'm not sure I could reverse a 108-year sentence, but on the other hand I *would* give you George Bush Junior for executing that Hispanic woman who killed her husband in self defense, went fundie in prison, etc. - she should have been spared, and GWB failed, which to me actually does come closer. So case by case.

But the main thrust of my argument was CA twits are killing women by leaving them to swing bottles and still get overpowered. There's a bumper sticker that says, "God made man. Sam Colt made them equal." Make sure we understand women are included in that, and we get real non-Californitwit, non-junk feminism out of it.
reply
1 up
You play to much CSGO
reply
2 ups
reply
1 up
Flip Settings

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
GUN CONTROL ADVOCATE:; "HOW ACCESSIBLE DO YOU THINK GUNS SHOULD BE?"; ME:
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback