God Bless America

and if we are so brave, why are we so desperate for a hyuge wall and imprisoning nonwhite children?

Inside the job was.

that sad moment when the government sees you reading modern day treasure seekers :(

I'll look forward to watching a YouTube link to that. In the meantime:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/madonna-trump-2020/

Question. Why do you think snopes is the end all be all of fact checkers?

Better question. Why don't you fact check stuff that comes up on your Facebook feed? Now my answer: Snopes is just the first thing that pops out of my search engine. I've also used it to fact check liberal lies and propaganda. Every time I post their work here, somebody complains about the source, but not once has anyone been able to substantially refute them.

Here's a search of Fox News's website for "Madonna." I'm afraid I can't find your video: http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/search?q=madonna

I know right, Snopes isn't completely accurate, although, they do very good fact checks.

Their work on "9/11" is absolute bullshit...
https://yournewswire.com/snopes-cia-operation/

In my experience - Wayne Madsen knows his 'stuff'. I even interviewed him once, on the radio.

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/snopes-finally-exposed-as-cia-operation/

Same story cited here as the first link - but some intersting links about "9/11" as well. I can confirm the existence of at least 7 secret wargames that morning...

https://youtu.be/dWzuY1jZ9JY

My friend Cynthia McKinney opened up a can of whup-ass on the subject - on Donald Rumsfeld.

http://911truth.org/cynthia-mckinney-shakes-rumsfeld-and-myers-over-911-wargames/

Wayne Madsen and Cynthia McKinney just repeat the same lies of the 9/11 doof cults! And being McKinney's friend is not something to be proud of.

Lies??? So then you have Mr. Rumsfeld's and Mr. Meyer's Written responses, to her questions - as found in the videos in the links... Because to the best of my knowledge - the answers to those questions are STILL outstanding... And in a world where our congress wasn't entirely COMPLICT in the cover-up (where not the actual events of September 11th 2001, also)...he would have been found IN CONTEMPT. I encourage any REASONABLE human who reads your assinine comments to follow the links and decide for themselves. She strikes me as a very diligent and effective Congressional Representative.

YOU are a doofus. Wayne Madsen is a reliable investigator - on ANY NUMBER of subjects... (including the CIA source of ISIS weaponry - as the linked article dramatically demonstrated... Until the Blogspot page of "FELLLOWSHIP OF THE MINDS" was taken down - by the recent wave of Corporate-sponsored censorship. There were actual photographs - of the weapons laden "Office Equipment" containers which he reported upon, posted there - those photos still exist but now only behind a Paywall at WayneMadsen reports).

Where can I find your balanced objective and verifiable reporting - on ANY subject... From what you've shown so far - just a faceless TROLL ACCOUNT.

I'd be embarrassed to be associated with YOU... But NEVER Cynthia McKinney. She was one of the few in Congress to EVER speak-up about the use of 'Depleted' Uranium (DU) munitions by US and NATO forces. Their use is a VERIFIABLE War Crime and Crime Against Humanity.

Yes, lies. There is no cover-up. Just because Cynthia McKinney delivered her BS accusations at a rapid-fire pace without having to take a breath, doesn't mean she wasn't lying, and she was! Reasonable human beings can see right through those blatantly propagandistic links.

Wayne Madsen IS NOT a reliable investigator. He's just another delusional whack-job with a title and a following. The CIA was NOT the source of ISIS's weapons. ISIS simply STOLE whatever weapons they were able to get. And since you want to talk about crimes against humanity, I suggest you look into the countries we attack!

The weapons Madsen identified were trans-shipped through Turkey - and Mis-labeled as office equipment. He had pictures from a Customs intercept - on his side. You have - baseless denial. Advantage - Madsen. But as you do - you repeat the big lie - until it becomes accepted as truth.

McKinney made no STATEMENTS - but rather - merely asked relevant questions - which, if there were any easy answers for them - it would have been in Mr Rumfeld' and Mr Meyers' interest to provide. She asked about 4 (of the 7 known) exercises which diverted air defense resources away from the targets "attacked", and generally prevented an effective response that morning. She asked if that was a "National Security Event Day" - whatever that amounts to, and it certainly sounds ominous - and yet the promised answers were NEVER PRODUCED.

http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/groundzero/fe_burndingquestions.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/analysis/fireengineering_calltoaction.html

No cover-up? Then why was all of the steel from the Towers shipped off to China - to be destroyed? Every beam and girder in those buildings were marked and numbered, when it was built. A real investigation could have reconstructed the demolition/collapse in reverse - with a computer simulation... The "9/11 Commission" members later complained that the Pentagon failed to disclose EVEN the existence of Operation ABLE DANGER. The FBI collected the security camera footage from the Gas Station across from the Pentagon (with a view of whatever hit it)... within minutes of that event... And yet it has NEVER been produced. Instead we get 4 frames from a high speed camera - which show NOTHING LIKE an airliner of the size claimed striking the building - merely a blur and a large explosion - which created a hole too small to account for the wings on a jet of that size.

Glad that you acknowledge that WE are the attackers - in all of our "Wars of Aggression" around the world - when we use DU weaponry - which kills indescriminately - and remains a presistent, radioactive, and toxic heavy metal pollutant in the areas we victimize. In fact it even comes home with our own troops - who give it to their wives, in their semen. So at least the birthdefects it causes are distributed in a more equitable manner than our wars of aggression.

Do you still say "Remember the Maine"? Are you still selling the "Gulf of Tonkin Incident" ?

You are a liar.

No, YOU'RE the liar, and that idiotic poster was a product of that French commie-sympathizer Thierry Meyssan, which is dismissed by those of us who are sane.

"McKinney made no STATEMENTS - but rather - merely asked relevant questions - which, if there were any easy answers for them - it would have been in Mr Rumfeld' and Mr Meyers' interest to provide."
Bullshit! She made false accusations in the form of a question, which 9/11 twoof-cult sheep do all the time.

"No cover-up? Then why was all of the steel from the Towers shipped off to China - to be destroyed?"
That's ALSO a lie! It was shipped to Fresh Kills Landfill to be examined along with all the debris there!

"Glad that you acknowledge that WE are the attackers - in all of our "Wars of Aggression" around the world - "
Oh, but we're NOT the aggressors.
"Do you still say "Remember the Maine"? Are you still selling the "Gulf of Tonkin Incident" ?"
The Maine was an accident hyped up as an attack by the press and the Gulf of Tonkin incident WAS REAL!!

OH look, someone who has no idea what the f**k they're talking about. The bit about DU munitions being a warcrime is particularly rich.

The use of DU munition is universally condemned - by those who aren't ENTIRELY beholden to the US NUCLEAR WAR INDUSTRY. So yes - as indiscriminate and persistent killers - they are like landmines - except landmines tend only to kill, maim and deform the children of the "enemy" - and on a more limited basis per use - DU munitions affect OUR-own soldiers, non-combatants, and their families, upon their return home. Way to show your FAKE SUPPORT - for "Our Troops".

US troops are often exposed to the dust and toxic gases released upon impact by DU weaponry - as has been widely reported (though, perhaps not amongst the PRO-FASCIST-LIAR-friendly media). I'm shocked that you are unaware. Or are you merely FEIGNING ignorance - as -g_user_106769...- does... for DISINFORMATIONAL purposes...?

Funny that you should assume so much about what "I" know... As a good investigator and reporter - I also LISTEN to others... Something that Reich-Whingers, like you two, seem to do only on a VERY LIMITED and PREJUDICIAL basis.

THAT JACKASS - dismisses evidence created to my knowledge, by Jim Hoffman (who works{/ed?} at a Lawrence Berkeley lab - funded by the Department of Energy and NSA - two spy organizations - so FULL DISCLOSURE intended) not Thierry Meissan... But even if it were... It was but one element in a larger meme - which was MY compilation - including the statement of an Air Force investigator... And I am unconvinced as to the assertion about Meissan's alleged political affiliations - because a)I've never heard that before (nor used or relied upon his work, to my best understanding and recollection - and I did a radio show and several news programs which explored this subject matter FULLY - and in concert with others - with recognizable and respected names in the field of journalism)... and b) because it would make little difference to me, in any event. If his work was solid (and even in the "9/11Truth" community - there is some disagreement on the point) I WOULD use it, unless there was a better source... YOU TWO KNOW-NOTHING knuckleheads - are NO KIND of source - except for an example of the dangers of CIA disinformation being spread upon the internet - in the era of FAKE NEWS. Even Donald Trump spoke truthfully in some regards as to "9/11" - only ONCE - and on THAT VERY MORNING...

https://youtu.be/Px1t1-a9uxk

https://youtu.be/v1FTmuhynaw

https://youtu.be/po5UcwOY-Ks

https://youtu.be/75Ja-W5LWVk

https://youtu.be/mrtY8XKp2Ng

https://youtu.be/gp5JCrSXkJ

^^^^ Oh Well ^^^^ Your weak attempt at derision is a poor excuse for an argument...

https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-25-rules-of-disinformation/

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

Make sure you get your tin-foil hat fitted properly, you wouldn't want it falling off. Those government mind control laz0rz might get you

That’s beautiful:)

:-)

Heh Heh

Thank you

Never forget that nobody knew when or how!

I never forget that nobody declassified what was known about how. The President's Daily Brief named Bin Laden. in the Title: and I quote: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”
I know Bin Laden was not on the planes. But you do not know what what others may or may not have known. W Bush, however, was heard to say "OK, you've covered your ass."

Have you ever read the memo? Other cities were targeted, other methods of attack were expected to happen, and no specific date was determined. Also, the government was actually trying to find out when and how.

I read the memo.
I read the news.
I read the quote when George W. Bush said "OK. You've covered your ass." to the presenter.
And the revenge war - I mean the Iraq war, created more anti-American terrorism, not less.
And bodies. https://www.iraqbodycount.org/

And for some reason, you think Saddam's increasing support for Palestinian and other terrorists in the Middle East while everybody was paying attention to the hunt for Osama Bin Laden had nothing to do with the war in Iraq played no role in this body count.

Somebody should tell "Iraq Body Count," about this,.