Some really think like this. Do you?

Some really think like this. Do you?  | IF YOU OUTLAW ABORTIONS WE WILL ALL BE SAFE FROM GUN CRIME! THEY WILL JUST HAPPEN ILLEGALLY! IF WE OUTLAW GUNS | image tagged in triggered feminist,triggered liberal,abortion,gun control,leftists,memes | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
23,150 views, 274 upvotes, Made by james3v6 3 months ago triggered feministtriggered liberalabortiongun controlleftistsmemes
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
36 ups, 6 replies
Creepy Condescending Wonka Meme | WHY DON'T WE COMPROMISE AND ABORT GUN LAWS | image tagged in memes,creepy condescending wonka | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
18 ups, 1 reply
feminist chick | SUPPORTS HUMAN RIGHTS IS PRO ABORTION | image tagged in feminist chick | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
7 ups
College Liberal Meme | SUPPORTS FULL ANIMAL RIGHTS TOTALLY OK WITH SEEING HUMAN RIGHTS THAT DON'T SUPPORT HER AGENDA TAKEN AWAY | image tagged in memes,college liberal | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
18 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/1dnfap.gif (click to show)
reply
10 ups
i.imgflip.com/261gcd.gif (click to show)
reply
8 ups, 3 replies
WHY DON'T WE COMPROMISE AND LET THIS KID HAVE ALL THE GUNS HE CAN GET HIS HANDS ON | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
9 ups, 4 replies
i.imgflip.com/248ebh.gif (click to show)
You mean the guns he obtained illegally?
I think he killed his mom and used her guns!
Even if he didn't, he still obtained them illegally. What do you propose would have kept his hands off of the guns he used?
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
There was nothing illegal about Adam Lanza's guns. They were legally obtained and his mother often took him shooting.

Most guns used in mass shootings are legally purchased:
https://nyti.ms/1VtVPMa
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Isn't stealing illegal? Last count I had, it was.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Go ahead and show how me how you know that he didn't have his mother's permission to use the totally legally purchased guns. We already know they went shooting together often. Please, share your insight.
reply
5 ups, 3 replies
Isn't it common knowledge that he stole them from her? Okay, I'll even use CNN as a source. He killed her first and then took her guns and went on a shooting spree. Apparently he was trying to take them and she tried to stop him, and he killed her. There is no proof of that, just my insight because she went shooting with him but it doesn't say if she allowed him to take her guns alone. I assume that maybe she didn't.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/us/sandy-hook-adam-lanza-unsealed-docs/index.html

Any questions?
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
By the "no gun laws" rationale, he should have been able to legally purchase all he wanted, like this nice couple did.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Of course they did. I don't adhere to that rationale. I believe that Reginald are necessary, just not overly so.
reply
2 ups, 3 replies
Sounds like we're in agreement, then. I think pendulum needs to swing significantly toward new gun laws. People should be able to own them, but there's no reason not to throw up some reasonable obstacles.
4 ups
I think we mostly agree, except I think existing laws should be enforced consistently and penalties should be far stiffer for violators before more laws are made. I submit to a background check every time I buy a gun, and my health information is none of the government's business.
2 ups
Yeah, agreement right there.
2 ups
New gun laws should be Islamic immigrants can't legally own guns. If your wife wears a headscarf, no guns. If you post selfies with guns and talk about killing innocent people, no guns.

Bam I fixed it.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
No, it is not common knowledge that they were stolen because they weren't.
reply
2 ups, 3 replies
Okay, taken without permission. Is that better?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
No.

R-E-A-D the statements, for real real.
2 ups
How about you give me a link to what you are referring to, because everything I have seen says that he killed his mother and took her guns...
reply
1 up, 1 reply
"musicman88240
Your transcript says they were legally purchased, owned, and stored by his mother. The kid killed his mother and used her guns to murder people. What part of this is so hard for you to understand?"

R-E-A-D the statements, for real real, still.

I posted the T-R-A-N-S-C-R-I-P-T-S, I am aware of what they state.
If you are in agreement with what I posted, then you have no need to argue against it.
0 ups
So what is your argument? I stated that the kid stole his mom's guns and you claim (I think) that he didn't. I have read your transcript and your posts and I guess I'm missing something.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
"musicman88240
How about you give me a link to what you are referring to, because everything I have seen says that he killed his mother and took her guns..."

How about no.

I posted the T-R-A-N-S-C-R-I-P-T-S.
I have no need to supply any links for your rhetorical request so that you can dismiss them as fake news without even looking.

You are free to attempt to refute what Adam Lanza's brother and father both stated separately to law enforcement.
1 up
Your transcript says they were legally purchased, owned, and stored by his mother. The kid killed his mother and used her guns to murder people. What part of this is so hard for you to understand?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
CNN is not a reliable news source
reply
0 ups
Of course it isn't. But sometimes I cite it just because it's the liberal gospel.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Nothing illegal? OK, when did the law change about transferring to minors change? i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-connecticut/
Unless this law changed since 2012 in the wake of Sandyhook, what moms did was illegal! Transferring firearms (handgun or long gun) to underage or (depending on the law of the state) mentally incompetent people is illegal.

Lanza was 20. Training young and underage people in safe gun use is not illegal, it is encouraged, but transferring guns into their possession is very illegal in CT.
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-connecticut/
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Nothing illegal? OK, when did the law change about transferring to minors? i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
You can ignore the facts if that helps you maintain some semblance of rationality in your worldview. Liberals and Conservatives do it all the time. Sad.
reply
1 up, 2 replies
reply
1 up
reply
1 up, 2 replies
i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
Nothing illegal? OK, when did the law change about transferring to minors?
Good gun laws are the question! I love the good gun laws already in place! They need to be followed and enforced just like had the law in CT been followed that lady and those kids might not be dead.

Again: so if nothing illegal happened in the Lanza case when did the law about transferring guns to underage people change?

If you refuse to answer, I get it, you're just a troll and I will be ignoring you...
reply
1 up
My work here is done.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
He's is trying to paint you as an extremist. Most conservatives don't want to be over regulated, but still support gun laws.
1 up
He is either so NPC that he is programed to ignore direct question or see them as "gaslighting" or he is just a troll.

He is not trying to "paint" me as anything. He is programmed to believe that if a person thinks differently than the liberal-progressive-leftist narrative then they ARE and extremist. Or he is just a troll. I won't be interacting with anymore of his comments.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
No - she gave him the guns... Then he killed her. Perfectly legal up to that point.
reply
1 up
i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
See below for details!
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Those guns were purchased legally by his mother, and there is indication she bought them specifically for him as gifts for his birthday and Christmas.
He had access for the safe they were stored in, which was described by his brother Ryan as Adam's room. While they were in the adjoining desiganted computer room, evidentally it was his room alone as well.
He was also trained in gun use.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-connecticut/
Unless this law changed since 2012 in the wake of Sandyhook, what moms did was illegal! Transferring firearms (handgun or long gun) to underage or (depending on the law of the state) mentally incompetent people is illegal.

Lanza was 20. Training young and underage people in safe gun use is not illegal, it is encouraged, but transferring guns into their possession is very illegal in CT.
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-connecticut/
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Hence why his mommy bought them (going back to when he was 17, I believe).

He was trained.

He had access.

He used them for what they were designed for.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Hence his moms broke the law so there was no lawful gun owner involved in what took place. Are you still going to misrepresent it as though "everything was legal and no laws were broken"?
i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Try READING what I said instead of faking an argument.

Pretty pathetic when I have TWO individuals so attached to a bot agenda that they're arguing against what I said by agreeing with it, don'cha think?
Oh, that's right, you don't.

*enter your logical fallacy & totally unrelated scripture now*
reply
1 up, 1 reply
If I'm a bot, you know what you can do...i.imgflip.com/24ga77.gif (click to show)
reply
1 up
I made that special for you, in the name of,,,
reply
4 ups, 3 replies
reply
10 ups, 1 reply
They already exist and people want them, we can't do away with the law of supply and demand.
reply
6 ups, 3 replies
reply
4 ups
round'em up -rofl
i.imgflip.com/2ewlnd.jpg (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Civil War 2 is all that will accomplish.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
Let's see you bring your BB gun to a tank fight.
reply
3 ups
I guess you're not familiar with the difficulties our military has had in the Middle East. Multiply it by 10x and that's what the military would have to deal with in the states, assuming most generals even fight for the government and not the people.

Most citizen combatants will be decently trained snipers (thanks hunting). There would be almost no actual battles in civil war 2. Tanks would be rendered mostly useless. It's not like there's manufacturing plants or many strategic targets to demolish.

Opposing forces to the civilians militia would be totally demoralized by their fallen comrades, especially when they have nothing to fire back at. I'm going to stop, you don't have the mentality for warfare and I'm wasting my time talking to you about something you don't understand.

US citizens are the most dangerous citizens in the world. Just look at all our gun violence. If Democrats ever get the majority and try to pull that shit they'd just be taken out by extremist patriots with hunting rifles. Less scum in the government.
reply
1 up
haha
reply
1 up, 1 reply
There's going to be a lot of loss of life if that gets attempted. 100s of thousands would die if not millions. You're very naive.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
How many lives will be saved?
reply
2 ups, 3 replies
Is life in a cage really living? The right to bear arms was included in the constitution for a very important reason. It gives citizens the power to fight against our own government in the event that it oversteps its authority or begins mistreating us. If citizens lose that capability then we are completely at the mercy of our government. Maybe read up on the American Revolution again.

The government needs to know that hell yes people will die, especially politicians, if they try to take our freedoms away.

Oh it's blue ninja, you're a troll, and one of the more stupid personalities.
reply
1 up
"Grind

A well regulated militia, shall not be infringed.

The of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Famine helps, but a disrespectful government was the trigger.

You're right, most people are sheep that won't do anything. We're a country of 300million people. If even .005% of that picked up a hunting rifle with intention then the Government would be toppled in a matter of days."

The Second Amendment, as printed, requires no agenda biased paraphrasing.

Poverty is the cause of every revolution. Why do you think food is subsidized to keep it so cheap and we have benefits for the needy? Because PC SJW lib prog left yadda yadda...? It's to keep the masses nice and plump and content and lazy.
An optimal economy is stable at a minimum of 4.3% unemployment. Any less, costs go up, inflation sets in, the economy sours... That's THE main benefit of welfare - to keep a steady supply of poor ready for work for paltry wages if needed. "Give us our daily bread" was a Roman thing, not Jewish. Roman citizens were allotted one free loaf of gov't bread per day. A full tummy makes people compliant. Let them eat cake, and heads will roll.

To think the mightiest military in history can be toppled at all (let alone in days) by some folks who like using empty beer cans for target practice at family reunions on the 4th means its time to lay that xbox console down.
The military can handle civil unrest with no shots fired, simply by pulling the plug. Something as simple as no air conditioning for a few days and the bloated squirrel hunters will die in droves. No water? No food? No i-i-internet? What are they gonna fight for, the right to bust their backs plowing fields medievel style? Better stock up on candles, dried rice and beans, and dig a well.
reply
2 ups
Here we go with the coup d'etat talk again. You're insane and deluded if you think you're going to be able to fight the US military on their own turf. Seriously.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
For your reading pleasure.

Seems the ravages of time have eroded the ENTIRE Second Amendment to a mere snippet devoid of its context,,,

PS: Revolutions, like the American or any other, are fought because of hunger (Check what the weather was doing round that time, the colonies were on the brink of famine, with dwindling agricultural produce being carted away to Britain). Loftly ideals are nice, but they really didn't start that glorious shindig over tea.

Entitled lazy gelatinous assed gaming keyboard warriors are NOT going to distract themselves from Walmart posts on Facebook to shoot at anything other than the Nuge's hand fed antelope on his ranch.
1 up
A well regulated militia, shall not be infringed.

The of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Famine helps, but a disrespectful government was the trigger.

You're right, most people are sheep that won't do anything. We're a country of 300million people. If even .005% of that picked up a hunting rifle with intention then the Government would be toppled in a matter of days.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
According to my research, 11 million.
reply
2 ups
Soros Open Society Foundation pays millions of $ to comission studies like that
reply
2 ups
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
Haha no. I'm not stupid.
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
they'd*
reply
1 up, 1 reply
He had mental problems. Guns aren't the issue, mental health is.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
They're both the issue.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups
Here's a fun one:

imgflip.com/i/2gdbzf
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Are you actually serious or is this sarcasm?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I have this same problem...i.imgflip.com/2g8fh0.jpg (click to show)
reply
2 ups
LOL.
reply
1 up
Why don't we abord every laws cause there will always be someone to break them.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up
Done and done....the criminals/murderers are police and their crimes are broadcast on every form of media.
reply
17 ups, 7 replies
The left is great for passing feel-good laws. Laws that make you feel good, like at least your doing something, but they don't address the problem. Like banning AR15s or banning plastic straws. Yeah, you did something, but it will have no effect on the problem. I think we need to pass do-good laws. Laws that actually address problems.
reply
10 ups
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
Last night I was watching a past broadcast of The Atheist Experience from December 2015, and the co-host said that a Texas politician put on his Facebook page that he would slap the next person who said "happy holidays" to him. What an asshole.
reply
4 ups
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
You know what I think...i.imgflip.com/20tptk.gif (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
i never thought i would see somebody else use a gif i made. it's pretty cool
reply
1 up
i.imgflip.com/22vkx7.gif (click to show)
Thanks for the gif.
reply
5 ups
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups
exactly like this
i.imgflip.com/2ewlnd.jpg (click to show)
reply
0 ups
Gun laws do no good? So why have any?
reply
15 ups, 3 replies
Outlaw coat hangers
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
That'll be the Republicans' banning straws
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Never going to happen.
reply
1 up
I know, but if they banned coat hangers to stop abortion like California banned plastic straws prevent ocean pollution... imagine the laughs....
reply
1 up
i think i laughed a bit to hard at that. that's great
reply
0 ups
Holy Shit!
reply
13 ups, 2 replies
reply
8 ups
i.imgflip.com/22edi6.gif (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
reply
2 ups
Yeah, if you're not gonna do anything harmful with them.
reply
1 up
reply
12 ups, 1 reply
reply
10 ups
i.imgflip.com/1tna1z.gif (click to show)
reply
8 ups
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
I don't care if you think it is comparing apples to oranges.
Everybody can see how inconsistent the "thinking" is in this meme and I have heard plenty of leftist express the exact some thoughts.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Agreed, The human race itself lives in a bubble of cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias in order to justify and defend their hat, racism, and bigotry. Read the definition of Conservatism and compare it to Actual Liberalism, and Progressive. Without genuine liberalism and progressive mentalities Humans would still be wiping their asses with leaves. But? Todays Liberalism is not genuine liberalism and capitalism ? It's not true capitalism
reply
0 ups
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
reply
3 ups
reply
1 up
Best!
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 3 replies
Exactly!
Make drugs illegal...people still use drugs.
Make guns illegal...people will still get guns.
Make abortions illegal...people will still get abortions, at least our country will not be condoning the murder of preborn children.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
So make them all legal. Guns already are.
reply
4 ups
Anarchy is just as bad as tyranny. Unfortunately, too many people decide to do, or not do, something based on whether or not it’s “legal”.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Pre-born humans are still humans and they have the same inalienable human rights as we all do. Murdering another human being is not one of those inalienable rights even if that human being is growing inside your womb.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
OK- but the woman carrying it has rights too. So, if she decides to not want another human in her she should have the right to remove the unborn human. If said unborn human can live outside the woman then that now born human has all the rights bestowed upon it by the Constitution.

Why are the rights of the woman taken from her? What about her rights?
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
That pre-born human has human rights which begin at "life" not "birth." You will not find that wording anywhere in the Constitution.

Human life begins at conception and ends at death.

The pregnant woman's rights don't go anywhere, they are intact, because she never has the right to murder another human being. None of us have a right to do that. "What about her bodily autonomy?" She no longer has "bodily autonomy" once another human being's body is present and dependant upon her body.

You can bring up anecdotal cases like "rape," "iincest," or ectopic pregnancies...those don't change the fact that most of the murders of preborn humans are due to convenience because like you said, "they don't want the other human growing inside of them."
reply
5 ups, 4 replies
1. The phrase "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" doesn't appear anywhere in the Constitution either.

2. To say that a woman doesn't have bodily autonomy once she gets pregnant is appalling. So once she gets pregnant, even through **pe, she no longer has control over what happens to her body? I'm very glad the law doesn't agree with you.

Would you look a **pe victim in the eyes and tell her that she should be legally forced to carry that pregnancy to term, against her will?

3. You mention **pe, incest and ectopic pregnancies, which actually do happen, then immediately dismiss them as if they don't matter, because they make your "no exceptions" viewpoint look bad.

I also feel the need to keep reminding you people that abortion is not murder, because murder is illegal. You can say it's wrong, immoral, etc. But it's not murder.
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
It saddens me that some believe certain situations make murder OK. Tragic. Why not focus on that the baby is half-Mom and build on that? Half-Mom. No matter what, everyone... EVERYONE has ONE biological father and ONE biological mother. Half and half. It's YOUR child, no matter what the situation was. Is it YOUR fault that your Mom and Dad conceived you? Did you have any control over who your parents are? Did you have a say in convincing them to let you live and be born? Life is precious, a gift, a miracle. Take your half of the miracle and mother them into someone special, someone cherished, and someone loved. Choose life... Your Mom did.
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
Sorry if I got preachy, I didn't mean to be. My son is a special needs child, and every time... Every. Single. Time. We did the prenatal doctor visits, we were made aware that abortion was an option. It made us sick. I can't imagine not having my son, who is now 7 years old. He touches the lives of all who know him, has changed the perspective of so many, has shown us so much about ourselves that we had no idea was even there. Again, sorry if I crossed a line... The subject obviously hits a nerve, and I shouldn't let it. God bless
reply
3 ups
Well said. Upvote
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
I believe you when you say that your son is very special to you and makes your life better. I don't doubt that at all. But I believe that abortion should be a legal and safe option to any woman who wants it, especially in horrible cases like **pe or incest, where she did not choose to get pregnant.
4 ups
...and we will agree to disagree. I’m good with that. Truth is, I have no idea what that would be like. I have no idea how I would react, or respond, or deal with such a situation. I am on the outside looking in, and it is easy for me, or anyone, for that matter, to make assumptions. My heart goes out to those that do have to make such hard decisions in situations I can’t begin to fully comprehend.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Your right it's not murder, since murder is the unlawful killing of another human being, but abortion is lawful, under the law of the United Sates. Now does that make it right? No, now let me explain why, first off what is the main reason for a pregnant woman to get an abortion? Usually to escape responsibility, both financial, and free of care of another.
2: **pe, now this is a hard one to tackle , at first, but its neither the childs fault nor the mothers, what a horrific man decided to do to her. The child should not be punished for someone elses sins, the person who committed the **pe should and will. The child, if spared, could grow up to be the one who helps other **pe victims get the justice they deserve, or be anything they choose to be.
3: Abortion that is meant to save the mothers life over the childs, is a hard thing to do, but should be allowed, so as to give a choice.
Basically Abortion is a law given right, not a morally given right, killing children for comfort, or for vengence, isn't ok. I understand that if a pregnancy is going to kill you and the only choice for you to live is for you to abort, then yeah, but thats a choice of life or death.
Basically what makes us different than those in the womb? We both started from the same place, me and you both grew up and have lives that we live, whether they're good lives or not
reply
2 ups
, so what right do we have to take that away from them? And will we stop at just the womb?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Allowing a **pe victim to have an abortion is not about punishing the child. It's about not forcing the woman to carry a pregnancy for nine months that she did not consent to, carrying a child of someone that horribly violated her.

As far as what makes us different from a fetus in the womb: we've been developed all the way, for starters. We aren't "under construction" as it were.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
"Octavia_Melody0 ups
Allowing a **pe victim to have an abortion is not about punishing the child. It's about not forcing the woman to carry a pregnancy for nine months that she did not consent to, carrying a child of someone that horribly violated her." Can't think of a punishment worse than death. If anything maybe the rapist should get death? If everyone is so up in arms about this SPECIFIC, why isn't anyone mad about the low sentences on rapist?
0 ups
"why isn't anyone mad about the low sentences on rapist?"

There are many people who express outrage when rapists get unjustly short sentences.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is in the Declaration of Independence. Those are inalienable rights and there is no Amendment in the Constitution changing those or recognizing them. A human right doesn't have to be recognized to exist, only protected.

You are trying to put onto me a "no exception" viewpoint without asking me what I believe. I believe that human rights must be protected first and foremost and every anecdotal case which make up less than 3% of all abortions should be looked at on a case by case basis with the overarching principle that human life and rights should be protected if possible.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
What is in the Declaration of Independence is not legally binding as far as US law, as far as I know.

Do you believe exceptions to abortion should be allowed in cases of **pe or incest or life of the mother?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
What was laid out in the Declaration are overarching/governing principles of why we broke off from England and upon which the USA was founded. "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" are governing principles of my political philosophy. Which is why I'm not a Conservative or Liberal. You are right and it is unfortunate that laws do not have to be based on founding principles.

Exception in case of the life of the mother, yes if no other medical procedure can save both lives.

In the case of **pe and incest, an innocent person's human rights have already been violated so what justice will be brought about by violating someone else's human rights? Why should the innocent child be made to suffer death due to the father's actions? I don't think that they should.
0 ups
As far as the last part, I get where you're coming from, and I think the issue at hand hinges upon when "human rights" truly begin. Many people believe they begin at conception, other people would disagree. I would not say that an embryo has the same human rights as a baby, child or adult.
reply
2 ups, 3 replies
And to give that proto-human all those rights, you take away the basic human rights of the mother. In fact, you leave her with less rights than you afford a corpse. A corpse can't have their organs taken or their body used unless the person left specific instructions before they died that they wanted to be an organ donor. It's why consent for sex is so important. NO ONE has the right to use your body for ANY reason without your express consent. You take that away from a woman, you essentially tell her the government will mandate her body for your idiot beliefs. Your beliefs end at the tip of your nose. They do not extend to my uterus. It's NONE of your business what decisions I make about my reproductive rights. They aren't yours to take. And the fact that you would never face this **pe of a woman's rights makes it even more vile and disgusting that YOU THINK you should have any power over women. You can wax poetic all go***mn day and night about the sanctity of life, but until you actually walk the walk, then STFU. It's NONE of your business. Unless of course you're adopting these children, fighting for free contraceptives which access to contraceptives has bern proven to bring down abortions. You need to be out there fighting for gun control, for food stamps and WIC programs to feed hungry children and their moms, you need to go out there demonstrating and forcing corporations to clean up the air and water...And BTW, what outrage did you throw at Flint? Their "water crisis" has bumped fetal deaths up 58% Why are you not out there attacking the powers that be? Is it because it's so easy for you to sit in your lazy boy and attack women? Misogyny much? Pfftt... You and your kind are hypocrites. You aren't worth arguing with. Just remember, you come after MY rights and I will take great pleasure in devouring yours.
reply
1 up
Hmm so i have an opinion and say what i think and im called an idiot, just because I want a child to have a chance at life? And yes I know about flint and thats one of the things on my list to takecare of. I speak as how I would speak to you in person, but if you met me in person, I bet you, most definitely, would not. All I know is that if we keep going down this selfish road, at the end only death and destruction awaits.
reply
0 ups
reply
0 ups
I'm not sure if that message was directed at me, but I'm on your side. I agree with what you said.
reply
0 ups
Do you help or support? Of course not.
reply
0 ups
Again, the abortion is a process, it's harder to do illegally than get guns illegally, they will just put it up for adoption.
reply
0 ups
Guns don't grow on trees... Abortions can be given with a coat-hanger or a set of stairs... (though at a tragic cost in women's lives usually)... Pennyroyal Tea... Abortions caneven occur naturally (miscarriage)...

Guns take spohisticated equipment and tools to make. Bullets do, too. Aside from black-powder muskets and "zip-guns" (neither of which make particularly effective weapons in a mass-shooter event), that is. The US gun manufacturung industry is WELL within the regulable sphere of Congress (interstate commerce). Increase oenalties for Ghost-guns and parts... Pretty soon you could eliminate the flood of guns on the streets - in Chicago - for instance

And I'm not a huge anti-gun guy. I say disarm the police - first... . And I use Kung Fu and hatchets - personally - so it makes no difference to me... But I think your point in the larger meme us poorly taken...
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
8 ups
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
guns should definitely be outlawed for triggered feminist.
reply
4 ups
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
Maybe his wife is hot, you dont know...
reply
1 up, 1 reply
The Constitution says, so we can fight back at a tyrannic government, you know, the one the Liberals are trying to pass.
reply
0 ups
Which Amedment was that - exactly? See Shay's Rebellion... or John Brown at Harper's Ferry... It doesn't often work-out like you'd think it would.

No... You have a system of Courts to protect yourself from the Government - in theory... But since yhey've been packed with Scalia-type authoritarians... perhaps you'll need your guns after-all...
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
I have an idea. Since we've always had both, and always will. Why don't we STFU about it? Just a thought...
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You are all so fuccn stoopid!! It's awesome!! Don't ever change!!
reply
0 ups
Now I can pinpoint the different between libtards and conservatards.... libtards are qts
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups
reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 2 replies
reply
5 ups
If I'm a bot you know what you can do...i.imgflip.com/24ga77.gif (click to show)
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
1 up
LOL this is a trick meme, DO NOT SHARE! Unless of course, you don't live in Russia.
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
Under this logic, shouldn't we legalize abortions?
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
Do you mean under the double standard leftist logic of this triggered liberal-feminist?
No we should outlaw abortions to protect by law the most helpless amongst us.
If criminals still want to murder pre-born babies in 'back alley' procedures prosecute them for murder just like we prosecute people who violate gun laws.
reply
3 ups
Ok, neato.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Gotta love Rethugs that will NEVER, EVER, be faced with the difficulty of an unwanted, unplanned or unviable pregnancy sitting up on their sanctimonious ass and passing judgement on women facing what will probably be the most difficult decision of her life. Smug pr*cks. Every one of them should be neutered.
reply
0 ups
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
People who may want an abortion, won't if they have a right mind, because it's nought a crime they need to commit, they can just go with the next option, which is sensible, adoption, besides, it's a long process to get an abortion, when killing someone is much faster if they are fully intelligent.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Abortion is not a crime, period.

A long process? Pregnancy is a nine-month process. Abortion is less than a day.
reply
0 ups
Killing someone is less than a second.
reply
1 up
"besides, it's a long process to get an abortion, when killing someone is much faster if they are fully intelligent."

Typical not to really care for someone after they're born
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
Alright. Here's a few things;

1. SJWs are not real liberals. Real liberals believe in cival rights. SJWs believe only women and minority groups deserve rights.
2. Abortion is not murder. It can count as murder if the fetus is in a certain stage in development, though.
3. Not all liberals are anti-gun. I myself am not anti-gun. But I still think that restrictions are necessary at times.

I hope this helps.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
I agree that sjws are not "real" liberals. I refer to them as Leftists. Leftists believe everything you ascribe to sjws though they may not be into "social justice."

The meme is tagged "triggered liberal" can't change that, all we can do is call a Leftist a leftist.

Murder is the premeditated taking of another human life with malice of forethought. (legal definition)
A human being comes into existence at conception and all "medical" abortions are premeditated and well thought out before they take place. Malice comes into play when someone wants to deprive another human being of their human rights for their own means.

Gun restrictions are necessary. There are already enough of them. One would know if they ever tried to legally obtain a firearm.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
"Murder is the premeditated taking of another human life with malice of forethought. (legal definition")". Interesting take. And to expand on that, it's at the benefit of at least two other people. Collusion?
reply
0 ups
Many if not most of the avowed "pro-life" advocates say that we should never "charge the mother with murder, collusion, or breaking any law as pertaining to abortion." Their reasoning is that "most of these women have been lied to for generations or at least their entire lives that the "thing" growing in them is not a human, it's not alive, it's just a clump of cells, etc."

I used to think that was garbage and just soft peddling (playing down) to people who are guilty of collusion to commit murder or murderers themselves. I was hardcore about it: charge the mothers along with the abortionists with murder if it is done unsanctioned by the state.

Until I heard Ben Shapiro (Harvard Law School graduate) who is very anti-killing-pre-born-babies describe what it takes to convict someone of murder.

The prosecution has to prove Mens Rea (criminal intent.) I don't know that that could be done for the majority of mothers who abort their children because of the generations of social engineering to make them believe the aforementioned ideas about abortion.

I have seen videos of protests and demonstrations outside of 'abortuaries' were women said, "I know it's human, I know it's my baby, I don't care," but I doubt that is the majority of women. The doctors definitely know.

Collusion, I don't know if men rea is applicable, but the ones who state that they know better but don't care are definitely colluding to commit murder.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I'm glad you sorta understand. Just next time, don't have a meme that refers SJWs as liberals. It feels offensive. And abortion is still not really "murder". Scientifically, a fetus isn't alive until it has a heartbeat, gains consciousness, ect. And when it comes to gun restrictions, I think that people can have firearms unless if they have a criminal record or they're too mentally ill.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
The medical testimony is that human life begins at conception. "Scientists" who say a fetus is not alive until whatever are probably politically biased and/or just ignorant of what they are talking about.
http://abort73.com/abortion/medical_testimony/
reply
0 ups
Watch this until the end. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=058twWloL34
reply
1 up, 1 reply
What stage of development is a fetus not human?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I meant by when it hits a stage where it starts having heartbeat, consciousness, etc.
reply
2 ups
One could argue that life begins at conception, or when that “spark”occurs in the fertilized egg. But even with your reasoning, that’s not a big window of time. A heartbeat begins at 18 days, and most abortions are done much later than that.
reply
3 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
:)
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups
reply
3 ups
reply
[deleted]
3 ups
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
reply
2 ups
i.imgflip.com/235434.gif (click to show)
reply
2 ups
Difference is, not all guns have hair triggers. ;-)
reply
2 ups
My take on abortion:

How about we make it so it's legal, but exceptionally difficult to access except in cases of actual medical need, or in cases of **pe or incest or extremely young age?

We have all heard the stories about someone who ends up unintentionally pregnant only to go to the handy abortion clinic to fix the problem. Readily available and essentially just a form of birth control.

Also, if it can survive outside of the body, how about we don't kill it?

My thoughts, all in good faith. Let the hate begin.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
Inconsistent worldviews and the sad souls who hold to them are hilarious to some of us.
reply
1 up
I suppose you’re right
reply
0 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Guns, like gender, are just a social construct.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
^^
reply
1 up
You heard it here first.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
We should make murder legal, because otherwise It will happen illegally.
reply
1 up
i.imgflip.com/246kkr.gif (click to show)
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
DROP THE MIC! Killing it over here!
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
i.imgflip.com/22y29m.gif (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
This is some people's logic! Upvoted
reply
5 ups
i.imgflip.com/1q9cci.gif (click to show)
reply
1 up
reply
1 up
Sterilize american population, will fix the both problems in less than 100 years. I'm a genius
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Can someone link me the link of the video?
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
I don't have the link to the video. I was in a compilation video from some channel like 50 Shades or Leftist Cuck. I took a screenshot.
Here is a copy of the "happy triggered liberal" if you want it.
reply
1 up
Thanks for a copy of the picture
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Wut? I thought I see red lines below the pic on your meme
reply
1 up
i.imgflip.com/2b12br.jpg (click to show)
reply
1 up, 1 reply
the black market for drugs (and late abortions) already exists. No law will shut it down. It's about what you allow "over the counter"
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
Hi,

I think what you're saying is hypocritical because YOU KNOW that no one sane claims that banning guns will prevent all crime. They say it will improve the crime situation. Claiming something while you know otherwise is hypocritical.

Calling someone a hypocritical without asking what they believe could be called ignorance or mind-reading... :-)

otherwise, your point about aborting is pretty clear.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
[image deleted]
reply
3 ups
i.imgflip.com/23g18r.gif (click to show)
reply
1 up
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
i.imgflip.com/2ge968.gif (click to show)
reply
1 up
reply
1 up
reply
1 up, 2 replies
Why do they f**king always have such crazed eyes?
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
I like this answer.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Because the clowns that prepared the photo looked for the worst example they could find.
reply
0 ups
Well, they're competent clowns, because they never have to look far.
reply
1 up, 2 replies
No
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
That's good to hear, now if you will just call out the ones who do...
i.imgflip.com/2dfcam.gif (click to show)
i.imgflip.com/1gpco3.gif (click to show)
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
The far left, the social left, the elitist left, most of them anyway; probably a few Republicans
reply
2 ups
left for good
i.imgflip.com/2fnjkq.jpg (click to show)
respect
reply
3 ups
i.imgflip.com/1wu6ao.gif (click to show)
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Having Liberal speechless syndrome?
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Having ad hominem mouth cancer?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/2g8kt5.jpg (click to show)
reply
1 up
I know
reply
1 up
This is why we should just stick to natural law and voluntary contracts
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
It should be noted that the GOP routinely cuts back on ATF gun background check capacity - when in power... So hey... Go ahead and make the demand heard - they'll probably be more likely to listen, to their own peeps, demanding better gun-law enforcement capacity.

I can't recall which case it was... But one shooter in the news shouldn't have been able to purchase due to mental health issues - but the clock ran-out on his waiting period before the check happened (due to staffing issues at ATF)... 'So here's your gun, sir...'
reply
1 up
That already exists in my state and Georgia is about as Red as they come.
I'm not one of their "own peeps" because I don't support their entire platform.
reply
1 up
reply
1 up
reply
0 ups
reply
0 ups
Just that smuggling abortion is easier than smuggling a SN gun.
reply
0 ups
She's right you know.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
And right back atcha, braintrust! Idiot.
reply
1 up
i.imgflip.com/2gbs3j.jpg (click to show)
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups
True! XD
reply
12 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/2bto3d.gif (click to show)
reply
1 up
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
"Flagged"? Oh, my God. You're just making us liberals look bad.
reply
1 up
Flip Settings

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
IF YOU OUTLAW ABORTIONS; THEY WILL JUST HAPPEN ILLEGALLY! IF WE OUTLAW GUNS; WE WILL ALL BE SAFE FROM GUN CRIME!
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback