Some really think like this. Do you?

Some really think like this. Do you?  | IF YOU OUTLAW ABORTIONS WE WILL ALL BE SAFE FROM GUN CRIME! THEY WILL JUST HAPPEN ILLEGALLY! IF WE OUTLAW GUNS | image tagged in triggered feminist,triggered liberal,abortion,gun control,leftists,memes | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
29,447 views, 284 upvotes, Made by james3v6 1 year ago triggered feministtriggered liberalabortiongun controlleftistsmemes
Add Meme
Post Comment
Best first
267 Comments
reply
37 ups, 1y,
6 replies
Creepy Condescending Wonka Meme | WHY DON'T WE COMPROMISE AND ABORT GUN LAWS | image tagged in memes,creepy condescending wonka | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
19 ups, 1y,
1 reply
feminist chick | SUPPORTS HUMAN RIGHTS IS PRO ABORTION | image tagged in feminist chick | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
7 ups, 1y
College Liberal Meme | SUPPORTS FULL ANIMAL RIGHTS TOTALLY OK WITH SEEING HUMAN RIGHTS THAT DON'T SUPPORT HER AGENDA TAKEN AWAY | image tagged in memes,college liberal | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
18 ups, 1y,
1 reply
i.imgflip.com/1dnfap.gif (click to show)
reply
10 ups, 1y
i.imgflip.com/261gcd.gif (click to show)
reply
8 ups, 1y,
4 replies
WHY DON'T WE COMPROMISE AND LET THIS KID HAVE ALL THE GUNS HE CAN GET HIS HANDS ON | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
9 ups, 1y,
4 replies
i.imgflip.com/248ebh.gif (click to show)
You mean the guns he obtained illegally?
I think he killed his mom and used her guns!
Even if he didn't, he still obtained them illegally. What do you propose would have kept his hands off of the guns he used?
reply
8 ups, 1y,
2 replies
There was nothing illegal about Adam Lanza's guns. They were legally obtained and his mother often took him shooting.

Most guns used in mass shootings are legally purchased:
https://nyti.ms/1VtVPMa
reply
4 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Isn't stealing illegal? Last count I had, it was.
reply
4 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Go ahead and show how me how you know that he didn't have his mother's permission to use the totally legally purchased guns. We already know they went shooting together often. Please, share your insight.
reply
5 ups, 1y,
3 replies
Isn't it common knowledge that he stole them from her? Okay, I'll even use CNN as a source. He killed her first and then took her guns and went on a shooting spree. Apparently he was trying to take them and she tried to stop him, and he killed her. There is no proof of that, just my insight because she went shooting with him but it doesn't say if she allowed him to take her guns alone. I assume that maybe she didn't.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/us/sandy-hook-adam-lanza-unsealed-docs/index.html

Any questions?
reply
7 ups, 1y,
1 reply
By the "no gun laws" rationale, he should have been able to legally purchase all he wanted, like this nice couple did.
reply
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Of course they did. I don't adhere to that rationale. I believe that Reginald are necessary, just not overly so.
reply
2 ups, 1y,
3 replies
Sounds like we're in agreement, then. I think pendulum needs to swing significantly toward new gun laws. People should be able to own them, but there's no reason not to throw up some reasonable obstacles.
4 ups, 1y
I think we mostly agree, except I think existing laws should be enforced consistently and penalties should be far stiffer for violators before more laws are made. I submit to a background check every time I buy a gun, and my health information is none of the government's business.
2 ups, 1y
Yeah, agreement right there.
[deleted]
2 ups, 1y
New gun laws should be Islamic immigrants can't legally own guns. If your wife wears a headscarf, no guns. If you post selfies with guns and talk about killing innocent people, no guns.

Bam I fixed it.
reply
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
No, it is not common knowledge that they were stolen because they weren't.
reply
2 ups, 1y,
3 replies
Okay, taken without permission. Is that better?
reply
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
No.

R-E-A-D the statements, for real real.
2 ups, 1y
How about you give me a link to what you are referring to, because everything I have seen says that he killed his mother and took her guns...
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
"musicman88240
Your transcript says they were legally purchased, owned, and stored by his mother. The kid killed his mother and used her guns to murder people. What part of this is so hard for you to understand?"

R-E-A-D the statements, for real real, still.

I posted the T-R-A-N-S-C-R-I-P-T-S, I am aware of what they state.
If you are in agreement with what I posted, then you have no need to argue against it.
0 ups, 1y
So what is your argument? I stated that the kid stole his mom's guns and you claim (I think) that he didn't. I have read your transcript and your posts and I guess I'm missing something.
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
"musicman88240
How about you give me a link to what you are referring to, because everything I have seen says that he killed his mother and took her guns..."

How about no.

I posted the T-R-A-N-S-C-R-I-P-T-S.
I have no need to supply any links for your rhetorical request so that you can dismiss them as fake news without even looking.

You are free to attempt to refute what Adam Lanza's brother and father both stated separately to law enforcement.
1 up, 1y
Your transcript says they were legally purchased, owned, and stored by his mother. The kid killed his mother and used her guns to murder people. What part of this is so hard for you to understand?
reply
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
CNN is not a reliable news source
reply
0 ups, 1y
Of course it isn't. But sometimes I cite it just because it's the liberal gospel.
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Nothing illegal? OK, when did the law change about transferring to minors change? i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-connecticut/
Unless this law changed since 2012 in the wake of Sandyhook, what moms did was illegal! Transferring firearms (handgun or long gun) to underage or (depending on the law of the state) mentally incompetent people is illegal.

Lanza was 20. Training young and underage people in safe gun use is not illegal, it is encouraged, but transferring guns into their possession is very illegal in CT.
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-connecticut/
reply
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Nothing illegal? OK, when did the law change about transferring to minors? i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
You can ignore the facts if that helps you maintain some semblance of rationality in your worldview. Liberals and Conservatives do it all the time. Sad.
reply
1 up, 1y,
2 replies
reply
1 up, 10m
reply
1 up, 1y,
2 replies
i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
Nothing illegal? OK, when did the law change about transferring to minors?
Good gun laws are the question! I love the good gun laws already in place! They need to be followed and enforced just like had the law in CT been followed that lady and those kids might not be dead.

Again: so if nothing illegal happened in the Lanza case when did the law about transferring guns to underage people change?

If you refuse to answer, I get it, you're just a troll and I will be ignoring you...
reply
1 up, 1y
My work here is done.
reply
1 up, 10m,
1 reply
He's is trying to paint you as an extremist. Most conservatives don't want to be over regulated, but still support gun laws.
1 up, 10m
He is either so NPC that he is programed to ignore direct question or see them as "gaslighting" or he is just a troll.

He is not trying to "paint" me as anything. He is programmed to believe that if a person thinks differently than the liberal-progressive-leftist narrative then they ARE and extremist. Or he is just a troll. I won't be interacting with anymore of his comments.
reply
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
No - she gave him the guns... Then he killed her. Perfectly legal up to that point.
reply
1 up, 1y
i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
See below for details!
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Those guns were purchased legally by his mother, and there is indication she bought them specifically for him as gifts for his birthday and Christmas.
He had access for the safe they were stored in, which was described by his brother Ryan as Adam's room. While they were in the adjoining desiganted computer room, evidentally it was his room alone as well.
He was also trained in gun use.
reply
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-connecticut/
Unless this law changed since 2012 in the wake of Sandyhook, what moms did was illegal! Transferring firearms (handgun or long gun) to underage or (depending on the law of the state) mentally incompetent people is illegal.

Lanza was 20. Training young and underage people in safe gun use is not illegal, it is encouraged, but transferring guns into their possession is very illegal in CT.
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-connecticut/
reply
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Hence why his mommy bought them (going back to when he was 17, I believe).

He was trained.

He had access.

He used them for what they were designed for.
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Hence his moms broke the law so there was no lawful gun owner involved in what took place. Are you still going to misrepresent it as though "everything was legal and no laws were broken"?
i.imgflip.com/2gb2wl.jpg (click to show)
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Try READING what I said instead of faking an argument.

Pretty pathetic when I have TWO individuals so attached to a bot agenda that they're arguing against what I said by agreeing with it, don'cha think?
Oh, that's right, you don't.

*enter your logical fallacy & totally unrelated scripture now*
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
If I'm a bot, you know what you can do...i.imgflip.com/24ga77.gif (click to show)
reply
1 up, 1y
I made that special for you, in the name of,,,
reply
4 ups, 1y,
3 replies
reply
10 ups, 1y,
1 reply
They already exist and people want them, we can't do away with the law of supply and demand.
reply
6 ups, 1y,
3 replies
reply
4 ups, 1y
round'em up -rofl
i.imgflip.com/2ewlnd.jpg (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Civil War 2 is all that will accomplish.
reply
3 ups, 1y,
2 replies
Let's see you bring your BB gun to a tank fight.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1y
I guess you're not familiar with the difficulties our military has had in the Middle East. Multiply it by 10x and that's what the military would have to deal with in the states, assuming most generals even fight for the government and not the people.

Most citizen combatants will be decently trained snipers (thanks hunting). There would be almost no actual battles in civil war 2. Tanks would be rendered mostly useless. It's not like there's manufacturing plants or many strategic targets to demolish.

Opposing forces to the civilians militia would be totally demoralized by their fallen comrades, especially when they have nothing to fire back at. I'm going to stop, you don't have the mentality for warfare and I'm wasting my time talking to you about something you don't understand.

US citizens are the most dangerous citizens in the world. Just look at all our gun violence. If Democrats ever get the majority and try to pull that shit they'd just be taken out by extremist patriots with hunting rifles. Less scum in the government.
reply
1 up, 1y
haha
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
There's going to be a lot of loss of life if that gets attempted. 100s of thousands would die if not millions. You're very naive.
reply
3 ups, 1y,
2 replies
How many lives will be saved?
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1y,
3 replies
Is life in a cage really living? The right to bear arms was included in the constitution for a very important reason. It gives citizens the power to fight against our own government in the event that it oversteps its authority or begins mistreating us. If citizens lose that capability then we are completely at the mercy of our government. Maybe read up on the American Revolution again.

The government needs to know that hell yes people will die, especially politicians, if they try to take our freedoms away.

Oh it's blue ninja, you're a troll, and one of the more stupid personalities.
reply
1 up, 1y
"Grind

A well regulated militia, shall not be infringed.

The of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Famine helps, but a disrespectful government was the trigger.

You're right, most people are sheep that won't do anything. We're a country of 300million people. If even .005% of that picked up a hunting rifle with intention then the Government would be toppled in a matter of days."

The Second Amendment, as printed, requires no agenda biased paraphrasing.

Poverty is the cause of every revolution. Why do you think food is subsidized to keep it so cheap and we have benefits for the needy? Because PC SJW lib prog left yadda yadda...? It's to keep the masses nice and plump and content and lazy.
An optimal economy is stable at a minimum of 4.3% unemployment. Any less, costs go up, inflation sets in, the economy sours... That's THE main benefit of welfare - to keep a steady supply of poor ready for work for paltry wages if needed. "Give us our daily bread" was a Roman thing, not Jewish. Roman citizens were allotted one free loaf of gov't bread per day. A full tummy makes people compliant. Let them eat cake, and heads will roll.

To think the mightiest military in history can be toppled at all (let alone in days) by some folks who like using empty beer cans for target practice at family reunions on the 4th means its time to lay that xbox console down.
The military can handle civil unrest with no shots fired, simply by pulling the plug. Something as simple as no air conditioning for a few days and the bloated squirrel hunters will die in droves. No water? No food? No i-i-internet? What are they gonna fight for, the right to bust their backs plowing fields medievel style? Better stock up on candles, dried rice and beans, and dig a well.
reply
2 ups, 1y
Here we go with the coup d'etat talk again. You're insane and deluded if you think you're going to be able to fight the US military on their own turf. Seriously.
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
For your reading pleasure.

Seems the ravages of time have eroded the ENTIRE Second Amendment to a mere snippet devoid of its context,,,

PS: Revolutions, like the American or any other, are fought because of hunger (Check what the weather was doing round that time, the colonies were on the brink of famine, with dwindling agricultural produce being carted away to Britain). Loftly ideals are nice, but they really didn't start that glorious shindig over tea.

Entitled lazy gelatinous assed gaming keyboard warriors are NOT going to distract themselves from Walmart posts on Facebook to shoot at anything other than the Nuge's hand fed antelope on his ranch.
[deleted]
1 up, 1y
A well regulated militia, shall not be infringed.

The of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Famine helps, but a disrespectful government was the trigger.

You're right, most people are sheep that won't do anything. We're a country of 300million people. If even .005% of that picked up a hunting rifle with intention then the Government would be toppled in a matter of days.
reply
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
According to my research, 11 million.
reply
2 ups, 1y
Soros Open Society Foundation pays millions of $ to comission studies like that
reply
2 ups, 1y
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
reply
4 ups, 1y,
1 reply
reply
1 up, 1y
Haha no. I'm not stupid.
reply
8 ups, 1y,
1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
reply
1 up, 1y
they'd*
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
He had mental problems. Guns aren't the issue, mental health is.
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
They're both the issue.
reply
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
reply
0 ups, 12m
Here's a fun one:

imgflip.com/i/2gdbzf
reply
0 ups, 1m
Nobody died at that STAGED event for gun control. Period.
reply
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Are you actually serious or is this sarcasm?
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
I have this same problem...i.imgflip.com/2g8fh0.jpg (click to show)
reply
2 ups, 1y
LOL.
reply
1 up, 1y
Why don't we abord every laws cause there will always be someone to break them.
reply
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
reply
1 up, 1y
Done and done....the criminals/murderers are police and their crimes are broadcast on every form of media.
reply
17 ups, 1y,
7 replies
The left is great for passing feel-good laws. Laws that make you feel good, like at least your doing something, but they don't address the problem. Like banning AR15s or banning plastic straws. Yeah, you did something, but it will have no effect on the problem. I think we need to pass do-good laws. Laws that actually address problems.
reply
10 ups, 1y
reply
9 ups, 1y,
1 reply
reply
4 ups, 1y,
1 reply
reply
8 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Last night I was watching a past broadcast of The Atheist Experience from December 2015, and the co-host said that a Texas politician put on his Facebook page that he would slap the next person who said "happy holidays" to him. What an asshole.
reply
4 ups, 1y
reply
7 ups, 1y,
1 reply
You know what I think...i.imgflip.com/20tptk.gif (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 1y,
1 reply
i never thought i would see somebody else use a gif i made. it's pretty cool
reply
1 up, 1y
i.imgflip.com/22vkx7.gif (click to show)
Thanks for the gif.
reply
5 ups, 1y
reply
3 ups, 1y
reply
2 ups, 1y
exactly like this
i.imgflip.com/2ewlnd.jpg (click to show)
reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 1y
Gun laws do no good? So why have any?
reply
15 ups, 1y,
3 replies
Outlaw coat hangers
reply
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
That'll be the Republicans' banning straws
reply
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Never going to happen.
reply
1 up, 1y
I know, but if they banned coat hangers to stop abortion like California banned plastic straws prevent ocean pollution... imagine the laughs....
reply
1 up, 1y
i think i laughed a bit to hard at that. that's great
reply
0 ups, 1y
Holy Shit!
Show More Comments
Flip Settings
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Triggered Liberal
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    IF YOU OUTLAW ABORTIONS; THEY WILL JUST HAPPEN ILLEGALLY! IF WE OUTLAW GUNS; WE WILL ALL BE SAFE FROM GUN CRIME!
    hotkeys: D = random, W = upvote, S = downvote, A = back
    Feedback