Matrix Morpheus

Because socialism is such a good idea

Exactly.

It's liberal logic 101.

What amazes me is that liberals are always saying how much they hate guns and violence but the moment they lose and election or court case they all too happily turn to it like a swarm or pissed off hornets. And as soon as they are done with their little tempter tantrums they go back to telling the rest of us how they're so much more "evolved, mature, civilized, and enlightened" than the rest of us "savage Neanderthals".

A strawman implies an argument lacks substance. Not applicable.

Our views don't necessarily represent all conservatives.

True. Most conservatives have a better taste in comedy than trash memes.

WOW! An example of the clearest of thinking. They are Pawns of Pelosi and her Persuasion. These Politicians Prey on Powerless People who are just Plain Puerile.

Good point

Personally, I'm not all that well-versed on what the limitations of the freedom of speech are. I've heard that calls to action are not protected, is that correct?

its only unprotected if it starts a riot

Words can't start a riot. People do. Isn't that the gun logic?

It is usually defined as "inciting violence" or "inciting riot" and, at least in some states, is against the law. There are much more lengthy definitions associated with it and clear outlines of what is considered inciting. The parts I have read seem rather reasonable.
Link to Breach of Peace and Riot according to Texas Statutes -
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/DocViewer.aspx?DocKey=PE%2fPE.42&Phrases=Inciting%7criot&HighlightType=1&ExactPhrase=False&QueryText=Inciting+riot

"Inciting violence" which includes rioting, is the one thing not protected by free speech. In other words, if I'm not mistaken, it's a federal crime which may be legalized in some states.

Pretty sure the 10th Amendment say that what is not privilege or prohibited by the Constitution falls to the responsibility of the state or the people. Pretty sure there are not federal laws that can be superceded (less restrictive) by a state law.
https://usconstitution.net/xconst_Am10.html

Then if you're right, then it's not against the law in "some states", it's against the law in ALL states, since incitement to violence is not protected under free speech, meaning it's prohibited.

Have a read of the two links I posted, one of the 10th Amendment, and one of Texas Statute that outlines freedom of speech is protected except when it's mere utterance is an immediate breach of peace. Read what I posted, find your own references, then we can discuss established fact and the interpretation of the established laws. Discussing speculative assumptions does no good for anyone.

The people who speak (or write) the words do.

Same way they pull off this stuff...

25vp8q.jpg (click to show)

Ironyyyyyyy

Freedom of speech is protected, and always will be as long as there is a 2nd to protect the first. Riots and property damage are not legal, and are prosecuted, however, with as long as the legal system takes for conclusions to come about, there is very little sensational value for the mainstream media to report of cases that have been adjudicated.

Protests are legal. When a protest becomes violent and there is damage to property and physical assaults (both of which are ILLEGAL), that becomes a Riot and is illegal.

PURE WISDOM... in addition to being a Spurs Fan.

Just so there's no confusion, it's the San Antonio Spurs, the basketball team, not the soccer team. There has been some confusion in the past with my name. Lol.

See, when you said spurs, my mind went immediately to the video to “She shook me all night long”.