"The moment a Black man was elected President was the moment y'all decided you weren't patriots anymore.
Yeah, that tracks."
When you've got nothing, play the race card. It "tracks" because you expect it to. Confirmation bias much?
While anecdotal, of my varied friends, and my own observations over the years (I used to be a fairly run of the mill liberal) I've noticed almost no racism from my conservative/republican friends, but plenty of it from my liberal/democrat friends. Maybe that's a big part of why I stopped being a lied to, led around by my nose liberal. But yeah, it's anecdotal.
"Turns out the #1 reason was sexism."
It's very convenient for you to throw sexism in with your specious racist claim, isn't it? I guess when you have ZERO tangible proof of what you're trying to say, doubling down on the made up shit seems like a good idea.
I don't think we need a study about studies done regarding why people voted the way they did. Those studies would be no more reliable than polls are, and we've learned that polls aren't reliable at all. People lie when asked about these things because they don't want to be thought of as racists (so even some racists realize it's wrong.)
When the following two sentences are in the abstract, it's pretty clear that they've drawn conclusions before they do any 'journaling' to get to the actual truth:
"Why is a reality-TV star billionaire the 2016 U.S. presidential nominee of the Republican Party? What explains why so many Americans support Donald Trump and the anti-immigrant policies that he espouses? Some"
They can't even bring themselves to say anti-illegal-immigrant, which is what Trump ran on. In other words, your studies are jokes.
Well, the one at SAGE Journals was. You're right, I didn't even start to look at the second one. After the first one, what would be the point?
