100%

Your rights are given to you by God, not government. Joe Biden had no right to target free speech by having his FBI stooges censor people on Fakebook & Twatter.

But you think trump has the right to censor people by using government agencies take broadcasters off the air from making fun of him?

The demonrats hate the constitution because it is a shield we use against their abuses of power.

America would be a safer place if Democrats didnt exist

So you think the whole country would be better off if it was like Mississippi or Louisiana? Conservative states that are impoverished and full of drug addicts and violent criminals?

But you are right, Roosevelt should have left the South the way it was with dirt roads and no electricity.

They love the constitution when they are not in power, because it limits power.

Ffffffft. Yet its dumpf who's hitting it out the park with the big globalist plays. Only mentally challenged people still think its only the dems and not the globalists v the people using their government puppet shows.

Ask a judge to define the law against the constitution, the end up delaying justice or throwing a virdect in favor of the rich company being sued.

I agree that the purpose of the constitution is meant to secure the liberties of people, but to say that we already have them from a modern lens disregards the meaning of "rights" throughout time. The constitution was a product of its time; the 3/5 compromise was needed to pass in order to get southern states to ratify it, thus constitutionally allowing slavery to exist. Freed blacks were largely discriminated against during Reconstruction despite the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments had already passed, including other acts such as Grant's Enforcement Act.

Because they were not clearly defined, they were subject to loophole exploitation. At that time, who was to say that they ever had rights? Decisions in Plessy V. Ferguson and Cruikshank undermined them and failed to protect African American rights, hence the existence of Jim Crow laws. By definition they were meant to have rights, but what use is it if they are unable to exercise them? Therefore I don't wholeheartedly agree with the concept of already having rights if it contradicts historical accounts.