I finally watched a clip of Nick Shirley exposing the fraud at the Minnesotan "Learing" Centers. This one segment of the video (found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8AulCA1aOQ) Nick and his crew (of 2 other people armed with iPhones) were going to try to go into the center to see if they could find any actual children being taught.
This white liberal woman appeared out of nowhere and called them "ICE" Nick explained that he was a YouTube content provider and not ICE but she never listened him. All she knew how to do is just keep yelling "Don't open up" to whom ever might have been inside the "Learning" Center.
What is wrong with libs. This woman was insane. I don't think she is indicative of all liberals but she represents the ICE/Trump haters. They're all irrational twits. White liberal women are the worst.
Shirley is clearly NOT ICE. He wasn't dressed like ICE and he's probably in his early 20's. I don't know but I don't think ICE agents are that young.
It’s a leftist tactic often used to silence opposition. It’s why they blow whistles and assault people filming them. They try to shout down anyone who is saying what they don’t like with bullhorns bells and shouts. Classic Saul Alinsky commie tactics.
The AWFUL's will just never get over the butthurt they felt when Trump beat Hillary in 2016,"It was her turn, DAMMIT!!".
And so they will use the Epstein issue to "get Trump", even though they never did and never will say word one about Bill Clinton, because they were and still are drip drip drip for Bill, but never forget, their opinion matters, alot more than yours.
Sorry to be a bit off-topic, but why did you ban the guy named "sand_under_table_28" from moderating the dark humor stream? It might take you some time to think and I don't trust that user completely.
Not only do y'all not fact check anything he says, but when it's pointed out to you that he's lying and evidence is provided- you hand wave it away, you make up excuses, down to "oh, those people are out to get him" level of nonsense.
This kinda reminds me of when George Bush suppressed facts and investigations of 911. Republican, but he did terrible things
Point is, you can't blindly trust anything a politician says. We should do our own research too
Yeah, "do your own research" is code for "just believe what you want to be true instead of learning what is really true."
Like I said, y'all don't deal in facts. You deal in feelings. Feeling right is more important than being right.
Trump bragged about committing sexual assault- remember Grab'em by the pussy?
20+ women came forward to say "yeah, that's exactly what he did to me."
1 of them successfully held him accountable in a civil trial.
1 ex-wife accused him of sexually assaulting her.
When he was the owner of the ms Teen America pageant, he bragged about busting into the girls changing room.
There's over a dozen witness and survivor statements in the files accusing Trump of assaulting little girls.
The DoJ has refused to meet with any of the survivors to get their statements.
The DoJ has refused to call in anyone else named in the files.
The director of the FBI said that there was no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to other men or women.
In the redacted versions, Trump's name appears more than 3,000 times.
If reporting is accurate, in the unredacted version he appears more than 1,000,000 times. (out of 3 million records, that's 1 out of every 3).
Trump has told you the files aren't real. They don't exist. They're fake. They're a hoax written by Obama. That he's not in them.
Are you going to start facing facts or are you going to 'do your own research' and stick with your feelings?
Every single time a new story comes up. I’ve read as much of the Epstein files as I can, I read news websites from the 3 main news sources, I check official (now corrupt) government sites when I need to. When have you ever watched anything except Fox News or local news?
Just like how it's worth having swimming pools even if people might drown
Just like how it's worth it to have chips even if some people might choke
See the parallel?
The solution that worked was that we have guns to protect ourselves and to ultimately protect ourselves against a tyrannical government. Now the tyrannical politicians want to take away our guns. Are you seeing this?
Take San Fran, yes they technically allow guns but its very hard to get
San Fran has a TON of theft. People are robbing cars in open daylight on every block
You can’t stop cars from crashing. Should we ban them as well? The point is Charlie Kirk was saying he believed the second amendment was important and the idiot lefty screechers screamed “he’s for murdering children”. If you support transportation you are for murdering children as well.
We should have them regulated, which is why you need a driver's license to drive. Of course there are gun licenses and you need one to own a gun legally, but If someone gets a car illegally, then what are the odds that they intend to do harm with the car. Then ask the same question with guns.
How about cars? Thousands die each year because of them. Should we get rid of them as well? If you don’t support removing all cars you are for the murder of children!
Wanting to run our country as close to the constitution as possible, use individual and community help instead of government regulation, and protect our god given rights
No, it is not.
Quite the opposite, in fact. That's why Conservatives are busy tearing up the Constitution right now.
Conservatives are monarchists. What they seek is central authority. That's why they were attracted to authoritarian figures. That's why they back dictators. That's the appeal of Trump to them.
Correct, because there is no such thing as the Trinity, and there is no proof of such, nor has any ever been offered. Did I mention there's no such thing as the Trinity?
We'll if you don't wanna reply you're just proving how liberalism thrives off of ignorance 😂 people like Charlie Kirk are an embarrassment to people like you
People such as the ones at TP USA go right out into the unknown and even stand their ground. They're quite the embarasment to people like you who make blind claims that conservatives dont use facts or reason
Theres nothing wrong with fact checking through research you discover through Charlie Kirk. He's one of the greatest people of western civilization. Like, up there with Patrick Henry
Yeah like he said, he was talking to voters as a whole, and those college students are the future of western civilization so good for him for giving them good knowledge
No, he said we OVERCOMPENSATED for it. This is what context is
Like, since we know Charlie wasnt racist you can at least wonder "I wonder what he meant by that..."
The mistake is that we think black people are still oppressed today, so we're giving them too much benefits and sympathy
He said women should submit to their husbands, a biblical principle
He never said school shooting SHOULD happen, thats a lie; he simply said they WILL happen
He said the mistake IN passing the civil rights act was that we gave black people benefits that whites dont have, aka racism, so we certantly see some anti-white ideals going around
There are documented criminal cases where black people look for white people to kill. Ever heard of a Ukranian woman on a bus?
Of COURSE he would have his daughter give birth to that child, because Charlie proved that abortion is murder and he is not a murderer
Separation of Church and State is not in the constitution or the bill of rights. The lie is that they state and church should ignore each other. What SHOULD happen is that the church INFLUENCES the state
Of COURSE you want your pilot to be qualified. If he's not, then the plane goes down. If DEI lowers the bar for black people to pass pilot school, thats a real issue
A. The person who hears what Trump says, fact checks it with evidence and morals, and then either accepts it or not. Who is more cult-minded? B. Someone who automatically hates everything Trump says, without fact checking it or having a moral compass.
