Wait, they didn't just spell the word skipping and skip a P, Diddy?

Actually no, and if you actually believe that, that's pretty sad.
If you give me any problem with Christianity, I can guarantee you it's a far worse problem in Islam. I bet if you gave me a grievance I could immediately tell you how it's worse in Islam without looking anything up.

And controlled-market communism/socialism leads to economic suicide and the death of freedom.

If you think Christianity is bad, just remember that a lot of the progressivism we see today only took root in this "Christian" country because oftentimes Christians are too nice to confront dissenting ideas until they realize how detrimental an idea is (ofc there's also stuck up Christians that feel the world revolves around their rules and that pisses me off too). In a communist or Islamic society, no such kindness is shown - if you dissent, you often die or face severe persecution that will make you wish for death, and if you don't, it's a sign the government is weakening.

Which would merely serve to acknowledge that you agree that it is wrong. "Yeah, but this is wrongerer" does not negate or justify what you are trying to excuse.

And regardless, numbers don't lie, Christianity has done far worse than any other religion, nation, or ideology in history combined.

tbh I'm growing to have more and more problems with the entirety of religion altogether these days (this includes atheism however, as atheism is absolutely a religion even though it claims to not be one simply because it doesn't profess that there is a God)

I also didn't say that I would agree that something is wrong just because someone else had a problem with it. I just said that if someone had a problem with Christianity, whether I have the same problem or not, I can simply prove that Islam has the exact same problem but far worse.

Also, that is untrue, but I'd like to see you back that up with evidence. In the meantime, Christianity has singlehandedly stopped absolutely barbaric cultures from being absolute devils of human beings (the sycthians, for example).
But to say that it's done worse than any other religion, nation or ideology in history combined, means you don't know much about history, or what numbers you are grouping together. Hinduism is one of the most oppressive religions ever, and it actually had to get legally modified by world governments because of its hierarchy and how it treats people (let's just say slaves are treated better than one of their classes of human being). Islam was spread by the sword, and fear made it popular, not logic or reason. Christianity was spread the exact opposite - for 350 years, everyone who believed was persecuted. Only when it became a major religion did corrupt people start using it for their own gain. The Crusades were done by people who outlawed bibles being translated out of Latin so they could tell the church whatever the hell they wanted. Nobody knew what the Bible even said, and it was a big hassle to even get the Bible translated bc the church was manipulative and was run like a mafia (they bullied kings into submission using spirituality as a threat). Islamic governments don't need people shielding the public from the Quran to be that corrupt - they just usually kill dissenters no matter what point in history you're looking at. Saudi Arabia kills people for being homosexual right now.

Communism in the 20th century alone killed far more people the Crusades did. Mao Zedong himself killed over 10x the maximum amount the Crusades have been estimated to have killed. One dictator from the 1900s literally "Thanosed" his own people.
This claim that Christianity is the most harmful belief is not only non-factual, it's not even close to the truth.

I was pointing out the Crusades

The Crusades killed an estimate of around 1-6 million people

Mao Zedong alone killed 65 million people, and sired 1000 children
Pol Pot killed 50% of his population
Stalin killed 20M of his own people after Lenin had already purged the USSR of anyone who didn't agree with him in the Bolshevik revolution

Nazism killed more than the Crusades too, as Hitler killed 6 million Jews and 12 million other people.

The reason you don't hear of this, however, is because our education system hates Christianity specifically bc Christianity is a blockade to these ideologies. The founder of our modern education system was someone Stalin personally adored, and he had him as a special guest in the USSR numerous times and even spent money his government didn't have to make his curriculum mandatory learning for the entirety of the USSR school system. Imagine how offensive it would be if you found out the curriculum that helped shape your worldview was Hitler-approved. That's pretty much how bad this is.
Dictatorships often hate Christianity because Christianity answers to a God above any man, and authorities are held responsible in the Bible, so if you want to be an abusive authority, you have two options; 1) gaslight people into only paying attention to specific Bible verses that endorse authority and ignore anything that talks about the responsibility of authority, or 2) get rid of religion altogether

Since many dictators are far too lazy for 1, they often opt for the latter

For Christians, the surprise comes when author Naveed Sheikh concludes that “the Christian civilization emerges as the most violent and genocidal in the world history.” Compared to Islam, Christianity is a clear winner: 31.94 million deaths (by Muslims) to 177.94 million deaths (by Christians).

The Crusades alone killed many but also remember the prejudice towards Muslims and the pillaging and burning of their cities and towns. The number above is of all time.

Your Pol Pot and Stalin numbers are correct however Hitler killed around 50-60 million (counting all death from the War)

I would argue that it’s not Christianity that is blocking these ideologies it’s the opposite. Most Christian’s don’t want to accept their previous ancestors slaughtered innocent people for no reason. (Not saying other religions haven’t killed) but it’s predominantly been in the name of Christ and for the Lord.

Hitler was a Catholic btw. Who said Nazis work was because of God using Christianity to justify himself

So honestly I think as a society we need to realize just cause ones religion says they are the best or good doesn’t mean they haven’t killed and slaughtered and raped and committed genocide on groups

Do you have proof of these numbers? Naveed Sheikh is a Muslim scholar. He probably fails to mention that Islam literally started through blood and conquest, and without either, Islam doesn't take off. Or that literally every Islamic government turns to persecution of dissenters the moment they get enough power to enforce their way. Christian governments do not do this; otherwise the USA of today could never have happened bc everyone would've been killed or tortured long time ago for deviating from the religion's rules. Do you know Saudi Arabia still kills people for being homosexual? Meanwhile, Christianity was literally started with the opposite of the sword approach - everyone who followed it was killed for their belief until Emperor Constantine himself was converted 300 years later. That alone makes the two ideologies far different.

What happened afterwards, like I said before, was a result of church leaders refusing to translate the Bible into the common language, so "Christianity" was just whatever the leaders' whims were at the moment. They gaslit the public into punishing anyone who wanted to understand the Bible. Martin Luther, in the 1500s, was infuriated when he read scriptures for the first time and found hope he'd never learned of from his church. It's not about not wanting to accept that our "ancestors" (which btw some Christians are descended from slaves or middle eastern religions, so the religion has nothing to do with race) killed people. We know the church was corrupt. That's why Protestants separated from the Catholic Church.

The concept of "prejudice" toward muslims is laughable since muslims were prejudiced toward anyone with differing beliefs and usually threatened their lives unless they converted. They weren't these "poor minorities who were oppressed by the majorities". Distrust of them was literally warranted.

I don’t have proof due to the fact that I wasn’t there during the crusades.

However we do see Christian power in goverment today which is called “Christian Nationalism” trying to stop LGBTQ, Women’s health, even voting rights for women. Now that is dangerous Christian power

I feel prejudice isn’t laughable I feel it goes both ways. I feel maybe Muslims felt better but they didn’t start the Crusades and maybe if the religions of the time were more accepting they wouldn’t have done all that

Then again that’s like asking your boomer grandparents to accept Trans people

Some of the WWII death was technically on Mussolini and the Japanese dictator, not all Hitler, which is why I didn't include the total war death toll, even though technically he did start the war. Btw, another thing our modern education will conveniently omit from discussing is that Hitler and Stalin had a pact where Stalin basically cut a deal with him and told him he could invade Poland without the USSR's interference, knowing that the last time someone had invaded Poland, england entered the war and it became WWI. This was because Stalin wanted to start another world war for financial gain. The deal was that Russia would not protect anyone from hitler, and hitler wouldn't try to invade Russia. Since Hitler later would break that pact, many historians like to simply either pretend it never happened, or not tell what the deal really was. See, some people nowadays view Stalin as a hero for his contributions to stopping Hitler - even though Hitler literally could not have successfully started WW2 without Stalin.
The reason I say this, is because technically, if you're going to count deaths caused by Hitler's ideology (which technically would be a fair thing to do), then that same total would be added to Stalin's kill count as well since he egged on the war, which would then put his death count at 70-80 million.
Also, based on numerous autobiographies I've read, being a Christian under Stalin's regime might have been equal to or possibly even worse than being a Jew under Hitler's regime. And nobody can argue Stalin was Christian - he literally died raising his fist at God.

Btw, Hitler being Christian is a misconception which actually was sadly caused by the German church. The church of Germany was so afraid of Hitler that they just folded and did what he wanted and offered him their services, and Hitler then used religious wording when trying to rile them up for his cause (Hitler knew how to file a crowd's spiteful emotions). (Btw, some churches are like this today with modern agendas). Hitler wasn't a Catholic, he simply used the Catholics because they were a large population and he wanted their support. There were legitimate German pastors however - most of them fled the country. One (Deitreich Bonnhafer) famously returned to Germany, and openly spoke against Hitler and actually ended up being involved in a plan to assassinate Hitler, and he felt he had biblical reason to.

However, even if Hitler was a believer and thought that he was divinely justified in Nazi work, that doesn't mean that Christianity actually justifies what he did. The Jews were God's chosen people and God said He would bless those who blessed them, and curse those who cursed them. Hitler already pitted himself against God by trying to eradicate them. The notion that the US took from WW2 that you cannot question anything about the Jews or you're an antisemite was an erred position, but that doesn't mean the Jews weren't God's people. There are Jews who think that the Bible is antisemitic because they think Hitler was getting his ideologies from there - even though the Bible is all about Jews and they are clearly favored by God in the Bible.
The same applies to the crusades. Those were horrible things done by people who believed in the Christian God - but that doesn't mean the Christian God endorsed that.
On the other hand, there are verses in the Quran that say to kill unbelievers and strike disobedient wives. And Muhammad himself was a pedophile. The difference between the two religions' violence is that in one religion, God openly encouraged violence. (Also, according to Islam, God is a sociopathic liar because he took Jesus and made him appear to be crucified [thus starting an entire religion that would grow to be the biggest religion in history, and, according to Islam, started off a lie God caused - meaning God Himself threw off billions of people from the truth, dooming them all to hell, simply for entertainment]. That's just messed up).
(Btw I've seen muslims recently openly say that Hitler knew how to properly deal with Jews)

My point on Hitler was actually the Christians that stood by and watched him murder people and take them away. It wasn’t that fact that he was Christian but the whole “love thy neighbor” jumped out the window as the beat up Jews in the street.

I’ve seen Christian’s try and justify him or say the Holocaust wasn’t that big

I agree with that last statement. However, the solution isn't to discard religion altogether, because atheism has also caused those same problems, but even worse. You see, without a God to answer to, there's always going to be that person that comes along and asks, "Well, what's wrong with rape and murder and genocide?" If you say that it's wrong because it affects other people negatively, they can just come back with "that's your truth. Why does your truth have to apply to me?" You may think that those kinds of people would be rare - but the sad truth is that those kinds of people are the people that will close their way up to positions of power. Then, because of hierarchy, they can literally make their "truth" everyone's truth legally, and nobody can tell them they're wrong. There's no God to answer to, and any person with a different opinion is now "beneath them". It's how dictatorships start. This is why humanity needs a baseline fear of God simply for our own protection. (And not the Islamic God because he encourages persecution, and thus that religion is no better than an atheistic state in that regard)
The truth is all ideologies have caused death because people can mishandle any idea. The solution is to judge the ideology itself - not the people who claim to represent the ideology. You should take those people into account, but scrutinize them according to the ideology they claim to represent, and you may find the very thing they believe in may not endorse their actions.

However, if an idea leads to ruin or dictatorship pretty much 100% of the time, now that is an indictment against the ideology. Something is extremely wrong if an ideology leads to genocide that often. But you have to investigate it anyway.
The idea that there is no God, therefore man must be God is a horrible idea that only leads to absolute psychopathic dictatorships.

I’m not calling for a throwing away of all religion but people need to understand that killing in the name of god or raping in the name of a god is still a terrible thing.

The reason rape and murder Is wrong is due to pain and suffering. Even if there is no god killing someone would still hurt it’s not like pain wouldn’t exist. If you rape someone you can see it in their eyes they’re scared and hurt and it’s a natural emotion most of the time to see that

I get what you’re saying judge the idea not the people but we also need to highly judge the people following this idea and also watch them if they try to seize power.

Personally the best way it seems to be is that there is no god but humans are not god in any way shape or form and should not act like one or be.