Imgflip Logo Icon

founding fathers

founding fathers | "WE'D PROBABLY BETTER MAKE THAT"; "PEACEABLY ASSEMBLE" | image tagged in founding fathers | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
537 views 42 upvotes Made by sharps45 4 weeks ago in politics
founding fathers memeCaption this Meme
63 Comments
9 ups, 4w,
3 replies
The meaning of words do not matter to leftists. If the don't like the word they redefine it. "Peaceably" now means whatever leftists do when protesting is peaceful Like how they peaceably set cars on fire, or peaceably burn buildings. If you are a leftist you can do loot, burn, destroy, murder anyone who gets in your way, you want to do and then call it peaceable
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Mostly peaceful protest touring the Capital | 'Peaceably assemble' | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
5 ups, 4w,
5 replies
J6 was a peaceable assembly until Pelosi gave the sign to the the Capitol police to open fire on the peaceable assembly. Then they started running and the FBI funneled them into the Capitol Building.

But you already know all of this but still choose to go with the leftist false narrative
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Wow. How did you convince yourself of this?
3 ups, 4w
I watched security footage from inside and outside of the Capitol Building, from the Capitol police body cams and from cellphone footage of many of the protestors.

I saw the Capitol police get the order to open fire with less than lethal ammo on a crowd off protestors who weren't doing anything at all. They were just standing around, a few had signs, a few had flags. But they were fully within their rights to do what they were doing. They were actually peaceful not the kind of "peaceful" that leftist protests get labeled.

Then with the flash grenades and rubber bullets got fired into the protestors. I also saw Ray (I was never there) Epps before the police got the order to shoot, go from one FBI operative to the next who were strategically placed at the front of the crowd to give them final instructions just before the order was give to start shooting. Those same FBI operatives then guided a panicked crowd into the Capitol building.

Once inside the vast majority were just standing or walking around peacefully. There was only a very small number that did any damage but they were the ones who you saw because that fit the narrative that the left and the news media wanted you to see.

There is just so much out there if you really want to get a better picture of what actually happened and are not afraid to have your mind changed.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Donna Beneviento and Angie; Resident Evil Village | Pelosi made the J6 traitors do it
Pelosi made the J6 traitors do it
Pelosi made the J6 traitors do it
Pelosi made the J6 traitors do it
Pelo | image tagged in donna beneviento and angie resident evil village | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
It was broadcasted live on television.

Here in America, anyways.
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Did you just miss the part when the Capitol police open fired on people just standing around doing nothing but holding signs. Oh wait. They never broadcast that part. They only controlled what they wanted you to see to push the narrative.

You know what you didn't see broadcast live was Trump's speech where he called for a peaceful protest and he didn't use the word "peaceful" like Democrats use that word.
1 up, 4w
Did they now? How many of them did they kill?
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Not it f**king wasn’t people died… officers were attacked
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Wouldn't you attack someone shooting rubber bullets at you for no reason at all?

The ONLY ONES who died were protesters. 4 of them, that I know of. You were only told about Ashlii Babbitt and you were told that you have to hate her. She was murdered by a Capitol police officer who was firing randomly from around a corner. He wasn't aiming at anyone, just discharging his weapon into an unarmed crowd. That was murder.

Another woman was trampled to dead by the crowd trying to leave the Capitol Building and she was right next to a Capital police officer who didn't lift a finger. The other 2 died of heart attacks. They may have been caused by the excitement ot the day or when they were being fired on by the Capitol Police. Or it could have been unrelated.

The media tried to make something out of a Capitol Police officer who died of a heart attack at home later that day but it was unrelated.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
No not if I was trying to over throw the f**king election
1 up, 3w
Is it allowable under the constitution to peaceably assemble in protest of an election that was stolen? That is what the entire protest was about, nothing more and nothing less.

Then a sub group got lead over to the Capitol building by Ray Epps. While standing outside of the Capitol building the Capitol police open fired on a peaceful crowd of protesters with rubber bullets and flash grenades.

When I tell you the crowd was doing nothing, I mean they were doing nothing. There was absolutely nothing illegal about what they were doing and they did not plan on going into the Capitol building until the cops started firing.

Tell me. If anything remotely happened like that at a lefty protest it would be all over the news.

We hear all about Renee Good and Alex Pretti but I'll bet you never heard of Joshua Matthew Black. Black didn't die but he had his cheek punctured with a rubber bullet just for the crime of standing outside of the Capitol Building. He wasn't even holding a sign, he was just standing there. This is before anyone removed the barricades to go into the Capitol building.

Black also was arrested and served nearly 2 years in prison for the crime of being shot in the face while doing nothing.

Then there was Steve Baker, and independent journalist who had his journalist credentials and was cleared to be in the Capital building when the rioters were in the building. He told that he was cleared as a journalist until 2024 when the DOJ changed their mind.

He was then arrested and sentenced for the crime of observing what was happening and taking notes and then reporting on it. Then in 2024 that caught up with him.

He was arrested for: Knowingly entering a restricted building, Disorderly conduct and parading.

There is Capitol security camera video of everything that happened inside the building and outside that is available for anyone to watch. It shows Baker standing in one location for several minutes taking notes then sitting down in another location taking notes. It does not show him being disorderly or parading. He entered with full permission as a member of the media. His whole reason for being in Washington DC was to report on the protest.

He was sentenced and convicted because he just reported what he observed and NOT the Democrat narrative. The lies that you apparently believe.

They call Baker a "conservative", he's a Libertarian. He is neither pro or con-Trump. He now works for Blaze TV and he's still Libertarian.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
No it was not. Literally the "protesters" were just bitter that Trump lost the election. But the elections weren't rigged. Those Trumpers then decided to tear down the capital building instead of doing their research about whether the 2020 election was rigged or not.
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
That is the narrative they want you to believe. I've dug a lot deeper and have seen security footage from inside and outside of the Capitol Building, from the Capitol police body cams and from cellphone footage of many of the protestors. You haven't.

The protestors were there to protest a stolen election and, yes, they were bitter but they didn't go there to riot and it was NOT an insurrection by any stretch of the imagination. And once again I have also dug deeper into what happened in the 2020 election. I could go on and on about both J6 and the election. The election was clearly and undeniably stolen. Just the fact that about 20 million more people voted in that election than in the previous and subsequent elections should make you wonder. And the fact that an idiot like Biden could ever get more votes than anyone before or since should make you question it. Typically obviously senile candidates who only showed up to campaign at 2 or 3 places with hardly anyone in attendance do not win anything. The man had the popularity of a gnat.
1 up, 4w
The 2020 election wasn't stolen. trump's brainwashed cult members just couldn't handle that he lost

If they didn't go there to riot why did they bring body armor and weapons and shields and zip ties?

"The election was clearly and undeniably stolen"

You've had years to prove it and you never did. Even investigations by conservative groups didn't find the widespread fraud that you people said was there. They said trump was full of crap

Literally, your claim that the election was stolen was because you're upset that the person you didn't like won the election 😂😂 get real

"My guy didn't win so it was stolen!!!!" 😂😂
1 up, 4w,
2 replies
A gallows is a sign of peace? Bringing weapons is a sign of peace? Making social media posts beforehand saying you're ready for violence is a sign of peace?

We have the words of the people who showed up that day and many of them were expecting or hoping for violence, so your claim that it was the FBI or Nancy Pelosi that started the violence doesn't hold water. No matter how much violence is committed by the right you'll always try to blame someone else.
1 up, 3w
Is this that nasty gallows that the media strategically photographed to try to make it look bigger than it was?

Did you also notice the quality construction job they did with TWO BY FOURS?????? It appears there were just enough nails to keep this thing from falling apart.

Sorry about bursting your bubble. This was just a symbol. No actually congressperson's life was ever in any jeopardy.

1 up, 3w
"We have the words of the people who showed up that day and many of them were expecting or hoping for violence, so your claim that it was the FBI or Nancy Pelosi that started the violence doesn't hold water. No matter how much violence is committed by the right you'll always try to blame someone else."

BTW the word for a fraction of the protestors who went into the Capitol Building is called "Patseys", "Pawns". They were manipulated by Nancy Pelosi thugs so that Pelosi could twist this all into a 14th amendment violation.

Unfortunately she's an idiot and the whole thing fill apart and then the truth came out but no leftist would dare look at the truth. They still want to believe it was an insurrection and a violent one at that. The only violence committed was on the protestors.
6 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Do support the protesters in Minnesota?
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Yea as long as they are peaceful
4 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Do you support harassing and doxing law enforcement officers, which includes ICE agents?

Do want to keep violent criminals who are here illegally from other countries in our country free and out on our streets?

Do you think that these protests have gotten out of control? Do you think the violent rhetoric coming from Minnesotan politicians is just to try to cover up their fraud and corruption?

Do you think it only okay to use ICE to deport criminals and anyone else who is here illegally if the president is a Democrat? Or is it that you just whatever Trump is for you're automatically against and vice versa?
1 up, 4w
Well...I said I support peaceful protest i think you can figure out what I think

No i don't support harassing ice (following and recording ice that's legal and im good with that as long as they do so without interference)

I think ice should deport real criminals, although i understand people dont like the fact that they came here illegally even if they didnt commit crimes it also seems more a waste of money, think about it

They might work a job illegally but the business's hiring them pay taxes of revenue from them, also our money could go slightly less to ice, not refund it or anything but they cant be trying this breaking the 4th amendment bs, did you hear about the secret memo trying to use administrative warrants (warrants that are not the ones you use to go into a home)

That aint right, we can go against ice peacefully, doxing ice agents doesnt help anybody, look Minnesota is a bit emotional right now for them but the 2nd shooting is can understand

Bro Kashmir Patel hating on the 2nd amendment was crazy

And i know some people are going to far, ice has also but anybody on either side that goes to far is in the wrong

I think we can fix things but the way we are going about it aint right, we should go after illegal immigrants that actually pose a threat, why come to america? Because its still seen as one of the best, I think we can do things to keep it that way

We dont need ice gone completely, but we cant let them keep going unrestrained

There is a middle ground here, we just have to find it
1 up, 4w
Do you think it's okay for these untrained and unqualified illiterate goons to harass and target people just because of their skin color or the way they talk?
4 ups, 4w
I can agree with that
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
The people he's talking about weren't even liberals, they weren't political at all, they just wanted to steal stuff and destroy property. The liberals who were protesting may have gotten violent at times, but the looting and burning wasn't done by them.
5 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Why have liberals gotten violent? What was the point?
1 up, 4w
Because they are fed up with the tyranny from conservatives. The same reason the founding fathers and colonists got violent because they were tired of the tyranny from England.
9 ups, 4w,
1 reply
And then Thomas Jefferson said, "Nah! There's no need to do that. I mean you'd have to be some sort of leftist moron to think that rioting and attacking federal agents while armed with a deadly weapon is an example of Peaceful Assembly."
3 ups, 4w
Even though American independence is the result of people attacking their government
6 ups, 4w,
1 reply
The hard truth is there are no nonviolent protestors, zero. Everyone still in the streets tend to fall into one of two groups: paid agitators or true believers, both groups know ICE will continue to operate even with them in the way. Resisting law enforcement is not a protest, it never was. It is a crime and when you add the goal of forcing political change through acts of violence it is also an insurrection.
1 up, 4w
There are lots of videos of people confronting ice and the agents leave without doing anything because they know they weren't doing anything legal in the first place. If they were actually going after violent criminals they would continue until they got the job done, not back off when they get even the slightest pushback.
5 ups, 4w
4 ups, 4w,
1 reply
1 up, 3w
Incorrect
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
4 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Guess which ones didn’t put themselves into a law enforcement operation are still alive.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
yeah, cause when you're standing on the other side of the street holding the phone, you're deep in it then.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Too bad pretti didn’t stick to that. He would still be alive.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
When exactly did he insert himself into a "law enforcement operation"?

Was it when the ICE agents crossed the street to get in his face? Or was it when they pushed that woman down and pepper sprayed her? Or was it when he turned to help her?
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
When he advanced onto the perimeter he and the woman had been told repeatedly to stay back from.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
So, you've gone from....

Deranged maniac out to kill ICE agents with his gun

to

Deranged liberal waving his gun at ICE agents

to

Angry liberal throwing hands at ICE agents

to

Angry liberal interfering with ICE agents

to

Angry liberal who kicked out a tail light two weeks ago and the agents are still scared of him

to

Liberal who was standing nearby filming ICE agents...

which is why it's okay that the ICE agents pushed him to the ground, beat him, murdered him, and then one of them applauded?
2 ups, 3w
I never said anything but he was interfering with law enforcement while carrying a gun. I still say that and say you are risking this outcome when you fight with the police. He put himself in that position of risk. Your interpretive theater isn’t reality.
5 ups, 4w,
1 reply
It's almost as if they recognized the danger of riotous assemblies huh
3 ups, 3w,
2 replies
But not in our ruling force the Constitution. Besides, you lefties hate both the declaration and the constitution
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Except Lefties wrote both and are the only ones standing by them today.

Righties aren't even bothering to pretend they support either anymore. At least they're honest about that.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
You're denying reality
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
They were quite literally the first and most radical Leftists of all time. Granted, it was the French Revolution that birthed the terms Left and Right Wing, but America was the first place where people rebelled against their God-King, something completely inconceivable at the time. Then they proceeded to come up with a form of government that did not include any such ruler. You can't get any more radical left than that.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Perhaps this would be true in the classic left-right sense; but in current reality it is the left that seeks totalitarian ends and the right that seeks freedom
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
Perhaps you haven't heard. Trump and his worshipers are not Left Wing.

It's very easy, those who support the King are Right Wing, those who do not support the King are Left Wing.

That's quite literally the origin of the term, during the French Revolution in 1789, when members of the National Assembly divided up their seating arrangements in that manner. Supporters of the King sat to the right. those who wanted change sat in the left section.

Thus today, anyone who supports monarchy or anybody with monarchic aspirations such as a dictator would be on the farthest of the right end of the spectrum, whereas those in support of individual liberty free from authoritarian rule are on the left.

That's literally the origin and definition, past and present. And Future.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Taking your twisted logic, that would make it the left who supports the king; as in total control of government, the economy, even down to your lawn equipment and what you sip your drink with. They March against no kings yet do so freely knowing Trump and the right won't mow them down like wheat ( which we easily could do). Trump hasn't threatened to nuke them with f-18s as Biden did. Who wants a king- the left. No, actually they want a socialist dictator
0 ups, 3w
Something something fake news Donny is no king but here comes the usual scripted pile to skip over...

Perhaps if you simply looked up the term and its origins it might clear up some of your conclusion?
Then again, deliberate ignorance is not accidental,,,
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
2 ups, 3w
Nailed it!
4 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I venerate both
4 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Sure, Mr. Junior High social studies teacher. The Declaration was a document explaining our reasons for parting ways with England. The Constitution is a document setting forth the type and rules of our government after learning from the failures of the Articles of Confederation. The Declaration made the Constitution possible, the constitution owes nothing to the Declaration.
4 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Maybe he will read it and learn the difference since he doesn’t know.
4 ups, 3w
Don't bet on it
founding fathers memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
"WE'D PROBABLY BETTER MAKE THAT"; "PEACEABLY ASSEMBLE"