ehh, i think the goverment control would be better in terms of those people are more under general public scrutiniy, while it could be more the rich/few people having actual influence in private
I think we just need to standerdizse across the country, because in alabama, theres stuff we aint getting taught that we need, just a county over and the schools suddenly get better, roads, everything, i think better education could help more people
private will be more expensive, children should not have to be able to learn thier abc's based on parents income, because that would detirmine the level of learning
I understand what you intended with your example, but i dont think its eqivilant
one is a crime and issue that horribly affects people and leaves them normally with trauma, the other is weather or not we fund public schools
i will redo what i said: a lot of privare schools, once the vouchers are gone, start eating away at parents wallets, and a public school is less expensive, while the state can better regulate how its run and make sure its being run right
the state would do the hiring not the school
we should allow abortions because or rape
we should allow school vouchers because of bad public schools
??????
the argument does not seem equal
and we can keep public schools and allow private ones, we dont have to fully do either
i gauss this is what it felt like, but then i realized we both want the same thing: we both want children to get good education without the parents having to lose money
but we have different ways we wanna do it, there's likely some compromise or something else we can figure out that works, right now it sorta works but i think we can do better
