Imgflip Logo Icon

Laughing Leo

Laughing Leo Meme | WHEN YOU TELL A DEMOCRAT; THAT THE T IN LGBT STANDS FOR TERRORISM | image tagged in memes,laughing leo | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
584 views β€’ 43 upvotes β€’ Made by sharps45 3 weeks ago in politics
Laughing Leo memeCaption this Meme
50 Comments
9 ups, 3w,
2 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
5 ups, 3w
. . I thought they reached that point post Civil War. . .'cause yeah. . .
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Like I told you before, do your own research before you keep going on this track. You're going to find that it was never the conservatives.

Right now the left is trying to tell everyone that the guy who shot Kirk was a conservative. Nope! They're also trying to find some way to blame Trump for Kirk's murder.

People who cannot accept reality, like the murderer was a leftists and Trump had nothing to do with it, are are unstable. When all of your ideologies are based on lies but you refuse to accept that they are lies it takes a toll on your brain.

When people are conditioned for decades that all people on the right are evil haters who are worthy of death, you get people who feel like they are doing a service to the world by murdering people.

And that is part of that lie that all of the left's ideologies are based on.

The left has built entire arguments on false foundations and they argue points that have been added to that foundation without even understanding the whole thing is a house of cards. It frustrates a lot of conservatives because the don't understand how they got there. How did we all go from understanding what a woman was and feminists being upset "because a man cannot possibly understand what it means to be a woman" to the left saying "men can menstruate" almost overnight? And in true narcissistic fashion, anyone who still believes the truth, are evil, hater, transphobes. That is just one example. Because every time a conservative says anything about anything, there is a leftist right there to label him or her a fascist, nazi, hater, racist, sexist, homophobe, tranphobe, islamophobe, bigot or any of the other standard insults. They have dehumanized the right to the point where leftists now say things like "let's punch nazis" or they have a transgender guy go shoot up a church. To even trying to assassinate a presidential candidate.

They are all doing it because they are "protecting our democracy" or "trying to make a difference" or "trying to stop hate speech". Never mind that none of that is true.

To a certain extent that house of cards is beginning to fall apart. There's a lot of videos that are circulating of leftists leaving the Democrat party. Unfortunately they still believe in all the same whacko ideas, their just not voting Democrat any more. And come next election I'll bet every single one of those people who made those videos will run to the polls and vote for the next Democrat whatever.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
I have done my research. You haven't provided any data that liberals are more violent than conservatives. Where's your research?

When conservatives are conditioned for decades that all people on the left are evil haters who are worthy of death, you get people who feel like they are doing a service to the world by murdering liberals and democrats.

What lies are "left ideology" based on? The lie that people should be treated with equality and deserve basic rights and legal protections?

the left doesn't say that men can menstruate

You don't understand the issues around gender and sexuality

Conservatives have dehumanized the left to the point where they now say things like "let's kill liberals". The trump shooter last July was a Republican.

In another comment you said liberals have no morals. If that was actually true all liberals would be in prison because they wouldn't care about obeying any laws. Saying that all liberals have no morals is just ridiculous.

Anyway, please post the data and facts that prove that liberals do all mass shootings and political violence (or even most of it)
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
"I have done my research. You haven't provided any data that liberals are more violent than conservatives. Where's your research?"

Dude!!!!! I've been very open about my research. I have told you exactly how I did it. I did it for my own interest and I did not ever think about sharing that information. That was my fault.

I have nothing to point you to because I do not have a list of news stories where I got the information. I am not employed by any group to do research like that, I just did it on my own. I just wanted to see who is causing most of the violence because I was sure it was from the left. If I found it was mostly from the right I would have been very disappointed but I would then try to talk to conservatives about stopping the violence. I never found a single conservative that I was able to identify as a conservative or someone who just leaned right. None.

So I concluded that the vast majority of mass shooters are some type of leftist. If they don't lean left then they are just homicidal psychopaths and if they aren't leftists or homicidal psychopaths then they were Muslim. Muslims committing the least mass shootings of all of the mass shooters.

I think explained the reason why. The left has been nonstop brainwashed into thinking that every single one of us hates everyone. All we do is sit around thinking of new ways to hate people. The left has been told that we're either fascists or nazis. And that we hate blacks, women, anyone "who doesn't look like us".

If you tell people, for several generations, like the left has done at college campuses all over the US and on the news and in nearly every movie or TV show that the right are haters and they are dangerous, then you are going to get people who actually think they are saving the country by killing conservatives. It was just inevitable.

The right doesn't do stuff like that. We do call the left socialists but that's only because they are. They espouse ideas that come straight from Karl Marx. Why else would we call you anything different. We study history and political ideologies. We don't just make them up and call it fascism without ever having a clue what fascists believe.

And the biggest reason conservatives are out killing everyone is most of us are Christian. Murder is just not what we do if we are trying our best to follow Jesus Christ's teachings. We have always believed that seeking nonviolent solutions have been the best.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
What data, actual data from reliable sources, can you point to that says liberals commit more political violence than conservatives? Not asking for news stories, I'm asking for data and research.

You never found a single conservative who committed violence? That's hard to believe when you've got abortion clinics and gay nightclubs and democrats targeted with violence.

I'm not saying all conservatives but many do hate certain groups and support violence against them

Same goes for conservatives. Many of them have been brainwashed for decades to think liberals are a threat to society or children or democracy or religion so that justifies violence against them. Many conservatives support violence and many conservatives have committed or tried to commit violence

Liberals are not all socialists. I'm liberal and I'm not a socialist. Most conservatives from what I've seen don't study anything. They just hear that socialism is bad and liberals are socialist so liberals are bad and must be stopped. Ask a random conservative on the street what socialism actually means or what Marx stood for and they couldn't tell you. It's just another buzzword they throw around

I'm a Christian myself but sadly many Christian's are okay with violence against groups they don't like. Being a Christian doesn't mean you will be peaceful.
0 ups, 3w
"What data, actual data from reliable sources, can you point to that says liberals commit more political violence than conservatives? Not asking for news stories, I'm asking for data and research"

If you are asking me to look it up then you can just do it yourself. Stop running to liberals sources and have the intellectual honesty to look for unbiased sources. I know others have done the research but I haven't look into what they said. I know this because frequently I see people basically tell you what I have been telling you.

Your constant request for me to provide you with sources means nothing. If I gave you a source, which I would have to do research to find, you would just dismiss it. I am not going to go way out of my way only for you to dismiss it.

"You never found a single conservative who committed violence? That's hard to believe when you've got abortion clinics and gay nightclubs and democrats targeted with violence."

Just today some leftist ran through a New Hampshire Country Club shooting people while yelling "Free Palestine". You can tell he was a leftist by the fact that he was yelling "Free Palestine". You'll never hear those words come out of a conservatives mouth. He killed one man and wounded two other before someone bashed the gunman over the head with a chair. See what I mean.

In August a transgendered man shot up a Church. Now why would a transgendered man shoot up a church if he was a conservative. Oh. I know. He wouldn't. The guy was a leftist of the same ilk that killed Charlie Kirk. And the dude who shot up the church killed 2 children and injured 17. I didn't need to go to some leftist web site to find this. It is just in the news. You can find it anywhere.

I'm thinking that now that Trump has declared Antifa a domestic terrorist group we'll probably see many of these little twits causing a lot more violence than they previously have. Oh and by the way there were about 70 people murdered when Antifa and BLM where burning down cities in 2020. Again they were leftists.

How many buildings have conservatives burned down in the aftermath of Kirk's death? None! No one has even rioted. They had prayer vigils at colleges and leftists came and started fights. A few of the Kirk supporters fought back and that was the most violence from the right I've ever heard of.
0 ups, 3w
I just read that Erika Kirk (Charlie's widow) has forgiven her husbands murderer. This is how many Christian conservatives react to when left wing whackos start shooting.
0 ups, 3w
However, with the assassination of Charlie Kirk, I fear that the time for negotiation might have ended. I hope not. But I think it is just a matter of we on the right have had enough and are fed up with the violence, the mistreatment, and the insanity of the left. Perhaps that changed a bit earlier and that is why Trump won in a landslide.

I don't want to see widespread or any other kind of violence happening in this country and I definitely do not want another civil war.
8 ups, 3w,
1 reply
4 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Doesn't bi imply 2?
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Uh oh. They're going to have to drop the B from LGBT now. Perhaps they'll replace it with another T for try-sexual as in they'll try sex with anything that moves or doesn't move.

The one that they so badly want to add to this disparate group of people is P for pedophile. I imagine we'll probably see that in our life time. Lefties started adding people to this group that have nothing in common. That is exactly why the gender queer cannot be associated with people who define themselves as someone who will have sex with both genders. But then what do transexuals have in common with gays and lesbians. Most transexuals are straight and their whole raison d'etre has nothing to do with sexual attraction, where the LGB's are all about sexual attraction. Then they threw asexual people into this mix and there is no sexual attraction and they still believe they are the gender they were born. Where do they fit in this bizarre collective the left has fabricated.

And who decides what group belongs in this group? Did they ask any of them if they wanted to be in this group. I had a lesbian friend who was on a social media group that I left who posted a meme that just said "LGB" as if she didn't think any of the others in the list had anything in common with the first three of the list.

The question I have is did the left originally call this group, "freaks" or "perverts" before the decided to add letters to name their collective. And it always ends with a + for that one eventual day where they finally get to add pedophile.
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
The Left doesn't seem to consult with these groups as to their preferred names- as in latinex or bipoc. To the Left they're just groups supposedly under their umbrella but really only for power and money. Look at how they jettisoned the poor whites and non-criminal blacks.
0 ups, 3w
Exactly. My wife is half Mexican and no one in her Mexican side of the family knew where Latinx came from. That is probably why Latinx has completely disappeared. Hispanic people were never consulted on this. Not to mention that the Spanish language very gendered in nearly every word in the language. There is a male and female version of most Spanish words that have different meanings. The left in all of their stupidity could never de-gender the language.

And the other thing about LatinX. A Latino is anyone who speaks a Latin based language. That includes Romanians, Italians, French, Spanish and Portuguese. There are so many Latin based words in the English language that we almost could be included in that list. Hispanic refers to anyone who is of Spanish ancestry. In other words European or white.

But when the left sets up their oppressor/oppressed collectives they never think very deeply. They base them all on skin color because they're all racists.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
You say the one they want to add is P for pedophile. No it's not because the lgbtq community doesn't support that.

No, we won't see that in our lifetime

You ask what do trans people have in common with gays and lesbians? They are both sexual minorities that deserve equality and freedom and legal protection like anyone else

Correct, being trans is about gender identity not sexual attraction

who decides what group belongs in this group? It's just something the community as a whole generally agrees on. It's like saying what is considered a sport or not. Swimming? Golf? Frisbee?

you think the left called the group "freaks" or "perverts"? Neither

No, the plus sign is not for adding pedophile. It's for other sexual orientations and groups that fit into the community, because human sexuality is very broad and diverse
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
"You say the one they want to add is P for pedophile. No it's not because the lgbtq community doesn't support that."

The left has been chomping at the bit waiting for the right time. A year or more ago they even stopped calling them pedophiles and started calling them "minor attracted persons" or "MAPs" because they didn't want to offend pedophiles. I have no problem offending pedophiles. I think everyone should.

So maybe the left will add an M instead of a P.

Oh and by the way, the LGBT+ group was assembled by leftists who were not part of that collective. LGBT+'s don't get to decide who is part of their group.

And how did asexuals get in that group? Asexuals are mostly not sexually attracted to anyone or if they are it is usually only one person. I forgot with the left is calling hermaphrodites these days but how did they get on that list. Being born with both sets of genitalia doesn't fit with any of the others. That is a birth defect which, I'm sure adds a lot of frustration and confusion in people with that birth defect.

Overall, the only way people are allowed in that collective is if they are all leftists. If they are conservatives or libertarians they are rejected. Conservatives and libertarians who would otherwise fit in one of those categories are treated as if they do not exist.

It is part of the left's tactic of dehumanizing the right.

"No, we won't see that in our lifetime"

We'll see. I'm 67 years old, so maybe not in my lifetime but if you're younger than me then it will most likely be in your lifetime.

"You ask what do trans people have in common with gays and lesbians? They are both sexual minorities that deserve equality and freedom and legal protection like anyone else"

Which goes with what I just said. Conservatives and libertarians who fit one of those categories are persona non-grata.

"you think the left called the group "freaks" or "perverts"? Neither"

I only asked if they originally called them that when they were forming this collective. Those who created the collective care little for the collective. They created it for votes.

The only people interested in taking yours and my rights away are leftists. Conservative number one goal is to preserve all of our inalienable rights. That is what we have always been about. If you want to be LBGTQ+ all at the same time, then you have a right to do that. I may not agree with that decision but I will never stop you or stand in your way.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
No they haven't been "chomping at the bit waiting for the right time". They never do it so you can just lie and say they're about to do it

No the left didn't call them MAPs. That was a made up term used by a few people. The left as a whole never used that term

The broader lgbtq community decides whose in their group. Asexual people are a sexual minority that's why they are often added to the community as well

Very few people are born with both sets of genitals. You're thinking of intersex. And intersex is a wide spectrum as well

LGBTQ people who are conservative are still lgbtq but whether or not they support equality for the community is a different issue.

People who oppose equality are not welcome in a group that supports equality. That's all

Liberals aren't trying to take my rights away, conservatives are. I've seen them try to take away freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and other rights too

Being lgbtq isn't a decision or a choice
0 ups, 3w
Oh come on now. The left is always creating new words trying to change our language. And each new "non-offensive" word will soon be discarded when people use that new word as an insult. They've been doing it ever since I was a young man.

It certainly wasn't any conservative who came up with the euphemism, "MAP". It had to come from the left. They have a long history of trying to change the English language.

"The broader lgbtq community decides whose in their group. Asexual people are a sexual minority that's why they are often added to the community as well"

So you've sat in on these meetings, have you?

"Very few people are born with both sets of genitals. You're thinking of intersex. And intersex is a wide spectrum as well"

I had forgotten the euphemism, "intersex", I'm not sure what the problem was with hermaphrodite. I am referring to those who are born with XXY or XYY chromosomes. I think there are also XXYY chromosomes as well. Whether they have both gender's genitalia or one or none, it's still just gotta be very frustrating and confusing. And like I said, this is a birth defect that has absolutely nothing to do with homosexuality, pansexuality, gender dysphoria, transvestites, people who have invented new genders or anyone else in that collective.

"LGBTQ people who are conservative are still lgbtq but whether or not they support equality for the community is a different issue.

People who oppose equality are not welcome in a group that supports equality. That's all"

There it is. If they don't accept "equality for the community" (or Marxism) then they are persona non-grata. We are all born equal but how we choose to live our lives means that we are no longer equal. Our outcome will never be equal. Or as someone (I don't now who) once said, "free people are never equal and equal people are never free". To make everyone equal requires force.

I would be much happier being free knowing that there are people who have a lot more money and opportunities than me. We need more rich people, not less, even if I am never one of them.
0 ups, 3w
"Liberals aren't trying to take my rights away, conservatives are. I've seen them try to take away freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and other rights too"

That's leftist propaganda. The fact is the right has already had their free speech taken away just before the 2016 election. Obama tried three times to create a system where you can rat your neighbor out if they spoke out against him. Like I said before, Biden was setting up his Ministry of Truth to eliminate conservative speech.

Social media from 2016, including ImgFlip, to about the time Trump won re-election used to censor conservative speech unrelentingly. YouTube still does. Musk bought Twitter and found out that the government had embedded several FBI agents to monitor speech and shut down conservatives. Musk kicked them all out and fired all of the libs who were censoring conservatives. Now anyone can speak their mind on X without Big Brother breathing down their neck. Facebook was awful. Friends of mine were suspended for a month. The worst I got was a week. I saw so much crap coming from Facebook.

So do not even pretend to tell me that conservatives are trying to violate your free speech after such egregious violations from the left. And don't get me going on how blatantly the left has violation freedom of religion. The left doesn't even refer to that right as freedom of religion, instead they misused a statement from a letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote to a Baptist church when Jefferson was president. Separation of church and state is NOTHING like the left interprets it.

Jimmy Kimmel and Steven Colbert losing their jobs is NOT a violation of free speech. They were both losing sponsors right and left because they couldn't stop telling the same Orange man bad jokes over and over and over. People got bored with them.

Jimmy Fallon didn't speak about politics that much even though when he did it was always biased towards the left. But Fallon isn't losing viewers like Kimmel and Colbert. ABC used Kimmel's comment as an excuse. Immediately the rabid left tried to blame it all on Trump. Trump had absolutely nothing to do with Kimmel's firing, other than being one of the millions to not watch his show.
0 ups, 3w
It means someone is attracted to the two main genders. It doesn't mean only two exist
1 up, 3w
Look at his profile (If you are old enough) you will see why he is a Republican
1 up, 3w
it doesn't
3 ups, 3w,
2 replies
I expect the same drivel from the same community members
4 ups, 3w
And you deliver as good as you expect. Nicely done, pl. Lmao!!!!
5 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Yeah, bet its those big blue cities in the middle
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Do you know what else has big Blue cities? Blue States. In fact, not only do Blue States have more cities than Red States do, they also are Blue in areas that are not cities.

Just like the higher crime rates that Red States have, with this is well Blue States should far outrank Red States if that was the cause. But it's not, now is it?

All states have Blue cities. Republicans can't run cities. That's why they don't.
6 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Crime statistics aren't reported in blue states. We've been over this.
3 ups, 3w
πŸ˜‚
2 ups, 3w
Um, no,

Lay off the Fox and do some research.
5 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Shitcago turns Illinois blue, county by county Illinois is a red state, but that big blue hemmorhoid by the lake turns it blue. I find it interesting Shitcago voter fraud kept Nixon from winning and elected Kennedy in '60, a model they tweaked and perfected year after year after because Nixon didn't want a recount because of the harm it would do to voter confidence.

And so we got a Kenyan for president in '08, because no one wanted to investigate the claims of the "birthers", because of the harm it would do to voter confidence. Shitcago is a scum city, I'd be fine if it, New York, LA, and any other blue hemmorhoids were to secede from the union.
4 ups, 3w
All he'd have had to do is demand a recount, which he didn't.
2 ups, 3w
Probably in your monthly pride digest.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
0 ups, 3w
Why is everybody always picking on her looks?
0 ups, 3w
Based Transphobia Respect πŸ—ΏπŸ· ----->
2 ups, 3w,
3 replies
2 ups, 3w
Except for Lindsey Graham of south Carolina I can't think of any offhand. Seems it's the democrats led by the California idiots who want to legalize pedo stuff
2 ups, 3w
LMAO
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Yup. The left still can't meme.

The reality is pedophilia is a serious and evil problem that doesn't care about political parties. There are as many Democrats as there are Republicans who are pedophiles.

And I think the reason that no one will release the Epstein client list is because there are people in leadership roles of both parties who are on that list. The one thing I am fairly certain is Trump was never a client of Epstein. I think there are a lot of very rich people who have threatened withholding campaign donations (and the richest are on the left, not the right).

So I would imagine lives have been threatened over that list. Seeing that Democrats do not have any value of people's lives they would most likely would be the ones threatening people. It's not like that they haven't threatened lives before. For Hillary threatening (and taking) lives was just a hobby.
0 ups, 3w
Is that better?

But, honestly, you think the left can't meme because you don't speak the language we use. We are laughing at you, you just can't tell.
0 ups, 3w
0 ups, 3w
0 ups, 3w
IT DOES???
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Racist fascist
Laughing Leo memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
WHEN YOU TELL A DEMOCRAT; THAT THE T IN LGBT STANDS FOR TERRORISM