Imgflip Logo Icon

Racism is racism & nobody wants to be on the receiving end of it...

Racism is racism & nobody wants to be on the receiving end of it... | Racist & anti-American messages—
whether on the Smithsonian’s website 
or as part of a physical exhibit at a 
museum—have no place in a U.S. 
taxpayer-funded institution. Indefensible.

The reforms Trump is instituting at the 
Smithsonian can’t come soon enough. Mike Lee | image tagged in smithsonian,racism,what is wrong with you,racism is racism,racism is bad,thanks obama | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
59 Comments
14 ups, 4w
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
11 ups, 4w
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
9 ups, 4w,
1 reply
and i telled her you can't say that it's racist one time mommy called me white | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 4w
Hehe
7 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Fact check: Yes, this is right

Racism can be directed at white people as well

While less common, some people have said 'you can't be racist to white people' which is untrue

This is a fact check directed at the " believe it or not hating white people is racism" part, i am not addressing other parts
6 ups, 4w
MLK Jr. warned of this - He said returning hate of your own toward those who hate you will make you no better than them. That anyone, regardless of skin color or background, is capable of the type of hated that the KKK did.
4 ups, 4w,
1 reply
As a black man, i agree.
Upvote
3 ups, 4w
Thanks for the upvote. You were already on my follow list so we obviously have similar political outlooks but now I know more about you. ✅
2 ups, 4w
Growing up, racism was racism.
3 ups, 4w
5 ups, 4w,
2 replies
It's funny how you think talking about slavery in the US is hating white people.
9 ups, 4w,
2 replies
1.4% of people owned slaves at the height of the slave trade in the US. It was limited to wealthy land owners for the most part. Blaming all white people is racist.
4 ups, 4w,
2 replies
1.4% out of the entire US, including the more populated North.

4.8% of the South would be a more accurate number, and that 4.8% would be the individual owners who held title to the slaves.

25% of families in the South owned slaves.

30% of family from states that joined the Confederacy owned slaves.

46 - 49% was the number of families who owned slaves in a couple of states.

But you already knew this from when you got your 1.4% figure.
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Yes but cherry picking a few areas is disingenuous. In reality almost all the slaves were owned by wealthy land owners.
1 up, 4w
Correct, cherry picking 1.4% was very disingenuous.

No, slave ownership was not exclusive to the wealthy.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
Who SOLD them into slavery? Thinking.....thinking....oh, that's right, it was other blacks in Africa. Why is THAT never talked about? Just an inconvenient truth?
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Actually it is talked about, and perhaps you should look into it just weeee bit further. The whole thing, that is, from Cristobal Colon to the Portuguese then other colonizers.

If you want an inconvenient truth, veer your researching towards London and how it turned from mud flats into the financial capital of the world at the time before New York took that crown in the 20th Century.

As for your question, it was slave traders who sold them into slavery. Slave traders... slavery... get it?
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
My point is more about how because it's never talked about the general opinion is that whites went inland and rounded them up, as if the white slave owners were running around with big nets and lassos grabbing all they could then bringing them back and putting them to work. I remember watching a PBS show a while ago and a group of people were at the point of no return in Africa and it was pointed out that blacks were sold into slavery by other blacks and this American black woman looked like she was about to cry, she had never heard that, not back here in our public education system, and couldn't believe her ears. I'm fine with the history of slavery being taught, just as long as all the facts are presented and not just the cheery picked ones. I also think it's more important to point out America was where it ended first around the world, paid for in the blood and limbs of lots of white people and is still practiced today, by blacks in Africa.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
You did not look up what I told you to look up.

And no, America is not were it first ended around the world. As if that somehow makes it okay.
Everybody's responsible except for the slave owners, right?

Is the number of slaves in the US still 40,000 or is it more?
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
I never do what I'm told, besides that looked more like an assignment than a quick read, but if it had to do with the way England colonized the world and reaped the riches of the lands they occupied thats probably how London turned from mud flats to a metropolis. I'm also sure the way China is drugging everyone with fentanyl is payback for the way they were drugged with opium by the British all those years back.
0 ups, 4w
You should just look it up anyways. Your improvising is a tad bit off.
2 ups, 4w,
2 replies
You make it sound as if there was hardly any slavery at all! 1.4%!!!!

Yet during that same time you cited, the United States produced 78% of the worlds cotton. I'm gonna repeat that for you.

The United States produced 78% of the worlds cotton using slaves.

The economy of this country since before its founding was driven by slavery. It wasn't just that 1.4% that profited from slavery. It was every merchant between the plantation and the end consumer- every whole saler, shipper, mill owner, loom owner, factory owner, shipper, whole saler, retailer, and even the consumer profited from that free labor.

Your defense of it is exactly why we need to be teaching it.
5 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Poppycock, the South was dependent on Cotton and Britain buying it. The North was not slave based production and cotton wasn’t the biggest wealth producer. If it was the North would have lost the civil war since they would have been deprived of southern cotton. If your gonna talk, talk about all of it including who made them slaves and sold them into servitude and continue the practice to this day. Most Americans did not profit from or by slavery and many white Americans families were not here during the slave years. How many slaves were imported to North America? How many “white Americans died in the civil war?
1 up, 4w,
2 replies
Ah, look at you, being an apologist for slavery. Does it really offend you to think about how white Americans were the reason driving the slave trade here in the States? Because they were.

How many of the founders were slave owners? It's not all, but it's pretty close. they go out of their way to talk about slavery and how to count the slaves for the census. Seems a bit more important than just a quaint thing happening in part of the country.

And you talk as if a full discussion wouldn't include where the slaves came from and how they were captured and sold. Why would you think this isn't the case?

And most Americans did profit from slavery- the cheap cotton. Everyone who bought anything made from it, profited from the reduced costs. All those industrial revolution looms and mills? They all bought cotton from the south. Everyone who bought from them. And so on and so on.

All those Union soldiers died to keep the country together and end slavery- why are you afraid of talking about them?
5 ups, 4w,
2 replies
You have a very skewed version of history. Africans and Muslims sold the slaves to ships heading to the US. You failed to mention that.
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
No one foisted anything except the Black tribes that enslaved their neighbors. Everyone else was engaged in commerce as it had been and still is in many parts of the world including Africa and the Middle East.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
I do believe the discussion revolved around slavery in America. Not Africa.
Commerce back then was not like it is today.

My gosh.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
Slave commerce has not ended in the POC part of the world. Yet your yap never opens to complain about the injustice. Why not?
0 ups, 4w
What does that even mean? You actually believe "slave commerce" is limited just to the Klanners of the southern United States of America today? Really?
4 ups, 4w,
1 reply
😂 I would no more apologize for slavery than I would for The bubonic plague. I wasn’t there and I didn’t participate. Black men made their brethren slaves and sold them to a buyer. They also sold them to anyone who paid. Black, White, Arab, Christian, And Muslim.
3 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Why are you trying to build it up for the purpose of vilification? Free money grab for “reparations”. It’s part of our history as is the civil war. Slavery is an even greater part of world history but you only want to use it as a cudgel to villainize modern day white Americans as if white Americans invented slavery. White people outlawed slavery and enforced its prohibition on the high seas. Africa and other regions continue the practice. Your never outraged by that so you’re not that upset by slavery just what you and Al Sharpton and the rest of the race baiters can profit off of it.
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Again, back up to the top, it's funny how you think talking about slavery in the US is hating on white people.

Yes, there were many white people who wanted to end slavery. And ...remind me... who fought FOR slavery? Who kept pushing for it to be expanded? Who demanded escaped slaves who made it to non-slave states be returned to them at the tax payer expense?

Why do you want to minimize the institution of slavery, and the objectively monstrous people who wanted to keep it going YET at the same time lionize those objectively monstrous people as historical figures that need to be remembered if you're not a racist?

Explain it. If you're not a racist, explain it. Explain why you want to shift blame away from the people who engaged in chattel slavery for generations, minimize the work the people held in slavery did to build the economy of this country, and yet at the same time lionize the very people who started a war to keep chattel slavery.

Because it makes a lot of sense if you are a racist. If you think that Black Americans aren't human, it would make sense that you want to treat them like a horse for plowing a field. Because for a racist, there's nothing wrong.

You have repeatedly said that you don't own slaves. No one has said that you do. I never have. I've never seen anyone here accuse your or anyone else of owning slaves. No one thinks you own slaves.

So...if you're not a racist, and you have declared to me many times that you're not, explain why you want to minimize the horrible institution of slavery here in the US, the impact it had on the US economy, and why you want to lionize the people who fought a war to defend & expand it?
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Again back to the top. Why do you want to exaggerate it? Speaking of slavery isn’t hating on white people. However, If you are exaggerating and skewing the facts in order to sell your DEI hate whitey narrative to prove the whites were bad because they allowed slavery it is. Without addressing that slavery existed throughout the world and blacks were some of its primary purveyors of it is cherry picking facts because you want some sort of modern day benefit from your narrative. You were never a slave, you deserve no compensation for historical conditions or events.
1 up, 4w
So, again, you refuse to answer.

but I'll answer yours- I am not exaggerating it. I am repeating historical facts. If your state hasn't banned those books, you can go and verify it all for yourself.

Stating that slavery existed in other places doesn't make it okay that we did it. People in Africa capturing other humans and selling them as slaves doesn't make it okay that we bought them.

I've never claimed I was due anything from slavery here in the US. I've never claimed to be descended from anyone who was a slave. In fact, I have repeatedly stated that I'm a middle aged white dude who lives in Frisco, Texas.

But back to the question- if you're not a racist, why would you work to minimize slavery, it's impact on the American economy, shift blame, yet at the same time raise up the people who started a war to keep slavery in place?

If you're not a racist, why do that?
1 up, 4w
“ So, again, you refuse to answer.”

I have answered twice but I refuse to answer how you want. Are facts racist? You claim I minimize slavery and I claim you maximize it. You say my facts are racist because you don’t ascribe to them. There are many facts that disprove your hyped assumptions.

“Stating that slavery existed in other places doesn't make it okay that we did it.”

It puts it in context when you want to use it as a crutch to prop up your race baiting narrative.

We ended the civil war in 1865 why are you trying to resurrect it with hate towards southerners and democrats?
2 ups, 4w,
2 replies
“love how I ask you to answer a question that I didn't even come up with and here you are, the keyboard warrior, getting rage baited by a libtard lol”

😂 love how you assume I am enraged. Are you Projecting?
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
“Well I'm not the one to judge, but people usually don't say "shut up" to someone during a constructive conversation when they aren't enraged ;)“

Well I never sensed you were looking for a constructive conversation and it’s obvious you weren’t. I was answering the question posed and the shut up was generic and applicable to all race baiting whiners. That you took it so personally and immediately jumped to insult belies the fact that you are the enraged butt hurt party looking for an excuse to be offended. Typical leftist.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
"If you're not a racist slavery apologist- why are you working to minimize the history of slavery in the United States, shift blame to others, yet at the same time celebrate and raise up the very people who engaged in slavery?" This one right here ;D”

As I said I apologize for nothing because I did nothing. Facts are facts, if those facts hinder your hype, well too bad. Slavery happened it’s part of history. It afflicted every race of people since time began. You were never a slave so shut up. It’s history it happened, note the past tense. It happened a long time ago. Opposing your race baiting narratives isn’t apologizing for history.

There you go Mr Alt.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Which one ;)
3 ups, 4w
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
His 1.4% is also a figure skewed by representing the individuals who held title to the slaves, not households, and that's 1.4% out of the entire population of the United States including the more densely populated North which did not have any slavery at the time he's referring to.

The more accurate figure would be 4.8% held title in the South, and 25% of families there owned slaves.
4 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Another fabulous reason to make sure we teach history rather than let racists re-write it.
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
In reality most of the slave were owned by wealthy land owners.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
IN other news, the sky is blue and racist continue to create an apologist narrative to cover up slavery and that the entire nation profited from it.
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
In other news race baiters and commies try to use history to promote slave reparations for things that never happened to them nor directly affected them. As to the entire nation profiting? How? A civil war? How much did that cost? Bet it’s a net loss.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
The only person promoting reparations is you, my guy. I don't bring it up.

How does an entire nation profit from slavery? Let's say you're a plantation owner. And you've got a bunch of slaves. Do you make the clothing they have to wear? Nope. So you have to buy that.

And the people who sold you that clothing profit from slavery. And the wholesaler they bought it from profited. And the mill that made the clothing profited. And all the equipment they had to buy to make those shirts/pants/whatever. All of that was paid for with... money from slavery.

It goes on and on. All the equipment for cooking. Building structures. wagons. Anyone who sold anything to a plantation owner profited from slavery. And all the people behind that final sale profited from slavery.

Anyone who buys from a plantation owner profited from slavery- the reduced price is the profit. they can pass on that free labor savings on to their buyers.

That's how entire nations profited from slavery.

Want to see this same argument in the real world? What's the response to raising the minimum wage? Oh, things will get more expensive if we raise the workers pay. Because then the businesses will have to charge more. Which means *I* will have to pay more...
1 up, 4w
The commerce of the United States was not solely based on cotton. Proof is that when deprived of it the North was able to still have clothes and an economy. Your exaggeration of its importance is the primary flaw. Certainly it was a revenue generator for the South, but it wasn’t as if without cotton America wouldn’t exist. It existed before it and after. With it or without it the USA would have prospered.
4 ups, 4w,
1 reply
What about talking about slavery in all the world, all races implicated, and which country and which races abolished it?
1 up, 4w
Sure. But the people who don't want to talk about slavery in the US will likely just be as upset about talking about slavery in Europe.

Although, they'll be very okay with talking about slavery in places where people with brown and black skin live. White people? No. that's bad. Everyone else? sure.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 4
  • WhiteBoard
  • WhiteBoard
  • paste:image.png
  • image.png
  • image.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Racist & anti-American messages— whether on the Smithsonian’s website or as part of a physical exhibit at a museum—have no place in a U.S. taxpayer-funded institution. Indefensible. The reforms Trump is instituting at the Smithsonian can’t come soon enough. Mike Lee