But , but , but . . .

But it won't be available for the next President. The plane will be transferred to his library foundation when he leaves office.

Is the lube so you can swallow his BS?

Yeah, moving storyline, the whole thing is stupid.

What I find out laters...
TBH I'd rather have Trump in AF1 than some vanity piece for a library.
https://youtu.be/ncyj7zrNggM?si=x9QNfErpV803Vt2p

It's also gonna cost $700 million to retrofit it so it's functional for a President ( anti-missile counter measures, etc).

Democrts defend rapist, wife-beating gang members, pedifiles, and Marxist. Accusing someone of raping a sex worker should be taken with a grain of salt.

An accusation that wasn’t proven. Because the nut job that claimed it who said rape is sexy couldn’t remember when it happened. 😂

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

😂 ya that’s why it took her 30 years to report it and she couldn’t remember when it happened. Maybe because she thought it was sexy or because her story matched almost exactly an episode of SVU.

Clearly, you don't know about laws.

Clearly you don’t know about words and meaning. In order to believe it you have to change the definition of the word rape as is written in the law? 😂 bwahahaha

The judge in the case knows more than you do guaranteed.

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Hahaha, sure he’s guilty of it but they couldn’t prove it in the eyes of the law unless you twist the words around to mean something else. The judge is delusional.

Who?

Rapist? Why bring Joe Biden into this?

Of the two, Trump's the only CONVICTED rapist.

No he’s not

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Not convicted note the “failed to prove” part. 😂

You should read the transcript instead of parroting liars. Later.

Parroting? You mean the judges own words? Which you do vociferously posted? 😂

Lol. You're delusional.

Provide proof of a rape conviction or STFU

You can only be convicted in a criminal matter. And in the civil matter, he wasn’t found to have raped her. Get your facts straight before you hate.

😂 simple facts are hard for the left.

not hard for them.. impossible for them. If it challenges their veiws on anything , no amount of proof laid at their feet will matter.

We believe in facts not the tabloid trash on Fox. Alternative facts aren't facts. They're "alternative" to the facts.

Maryland dad - LMFAO

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Maybe if you copy and paste this 100 more times , it'll be more meaningful LoL

Thanks for posting the judges proof of bias and lunacy again.

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Tabloid trash doesn't count as fact.

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

You can not say you belive in facts while at the same time be on the same side of people that try and tell me that men can get pregnant..it just doesn't gel with what you are saying. Stop repeating a bias judges opinion as facts , the jury, the only people who matter found him NOT GUILTY OF RAPE.

Who?

these zombie left wingers keep saying trump is a rapist when the jury's decision can be looked up online now, it is public access.. Trump was never convicted of rape..he was conviced of battery, and that should have never happened because there was 0 proof that he ever touched her.

Given all the latest good news , zombie left wingers don't have much left to cling to

Well according to Whistlelock and memcorio..America is in a horrific economic decline and China is dancing on our graves...LMFAO

Time to go back to square one

You guys are too much. I retract my mean comment!!!!!

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

was it expunged? I thought people just didn't buy the narrative of the entire trial, it was complete his word against hers.. but it was at the height of #metoo and Trump was the perfect guy to make a monster out of because he made statements that were offensive to women in the modeling world.. that being said, as I stated, trump was never convicted of rape, lack of evidence, 0 evidence in fact..anyone with a brain can see he was railroaded in that case. Snake oil is a solution that has no positive effect when taken.. Trump is showing MASSIVE positive results.

It was sarcasm. I apologize in forgetting (*sarcasm). I almost never forget that. Let's take this at face value. You seem reasonable, although tending to get defensive; I'm sure I have my own quirks. An accusation and trial for rape is no small thing. Trials much lesser than this bring down politicians. So there is no supposition in the snake oil analogy. Trump did use snake oil as it is meant to be used. It did foil the public into ignoring the accusations. It was an effective foil because usually the public is unforgiving to the average 'screw up' of course no pun. Yet that is now not my point. You yourself said that Trump did in fact make statements that were indeed offensive to women in the modeling world. I'm no run of the mill liberal who is triggered when beautiful women are described as being slighted. I have strong conservative leanings that help me disregard beauty, sanctity, purity as ideals unto themselves. Yet on the whole, I also recall those statements by Trump. Do you? His language was crude beyond compare for anyone in the public eye. It was detailed to the extreme -forgive me for NOT googling- about his grotesque fantasies about women again for a public admission. AND it had no misgivings or remorse that anyone could be so blatantly sexists as if this was par for the course for some kinds of overtly vile if not criminally prosecuted males. What can we possibly make of this. Few rap artists well know for their blatant sexist mores actually sing lyrics this bad. Yes some do, while turning around to defend their music as a freedom of artistic expression. Trump is not expressing himself as an artist. He's hating on women. So is that OK. Is, rhetorically, #metoo a well orchestrated scam to garner liberal support for scam liberal politicians and their scamming liberal ends. Is that what it sounds like, less rhetorically, or are women being taken advantage of en mass. Especially in supreme irony since one of the main criticisms of Biden is that he is some bona fide pedo. Where there is smoke there is fire should apply. Where there is one sexist women hating creep their is another. Except it does not because that is the game of sexism culture, which is to sow doubt from every angle about the legitimacy of all female views, narratives and accusations. Smoke screens of ridiculous self or other accusatory forums on all male proclivities that are so baseless no humans, including voters who elected both candidate monsters to office, can sort them out!

Again, I see where you are coming from, but I still stand by the fact that most people realize that what trump says and what he does are weighed and what he does if far more important to average people..liberals/nevertrumpers on the other hand , think what he says is more important. Should every man be hung that described women is a derogatory manner ? What about women? Do women get a pass that talk about men like they are pieces of meat? The left used his -secretly recorded personal conversation- as a weapon ..it just happened to be far less effective than they thought. He became president due to this fact , the staus quo politicans failed ..horribly.

His secret conversation is exactly who Trump is. He says those kinds of things in public and in private because that's who he is. Women get a pass because they're not the President of the United States.

What he does, like cutting hundreds of thousands of jobs, defunding education, selling federal lands, stealing from his own charity, cutting social services that help people and then spending most of what little that saved on himself at his golf courses, is a problem for everyone.

The problems you seem to precieve are yours and the lefts only.. no one else seems to live in the same misinformed bubble you do. We see Record stocks, peace in India and Pakistan, China Caving and opening up to American trade..and prescription costs being dropping like a stone.. Sorry you hate success so much that it has affected your ability to enjoy the good things in life.

You'd think you'd know by now that Fox spreads nothing but misinformation especially since they settled out of court with Dominion for $787M over false election claims.

I can't stand fox news, or any MSM really, one side says Trump is godly and one side says Trump is the devil, both are wrong. If you are getting all your news from left wing sources you are just as misinformed as any Fox news viewer.

I see these and you present a good case. Um... except women don't view men as pieces of meat. That's how men view women. Just saying.

LMFAO come on now, if you think women do not talk about men just as sexually charged as men about women ..I mean..that position is completely based in ignorance LoL

So is generalizing when you know nothing in particular. I spoke of a specific analogy that is irrelevant to women's perception of men. Males objectify and meat is as highly an objectified visage as there is. It literally signifies dead prey. And yes women think of me sexually; they do not do so with gross dis-concern for context. Her husband may do x,y and z wrongly. She would belittle herself to think in an abstract narrative that relates their marriage to a senseless wild metaphor. Could you stay awake while reading replies. Details matter a great deal and those who ignore them may find they do not matter much towards anyone. Grow up a bit too before pontificating so baselessly.

Again, you sound like you are speaking from a very very naive place. Maybe it is because we are obviously from different generations. Btw sometimes it is hard to stay awake while reading some of the ridiculous , nonsensical , long winded replies from some users.. just saying.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Judge Kaplan wrote. “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Yea, I know what the Obama appointed Judge said, it means nothing. The jurors decided that Trump was innocent of rape, because there was no evidence of it. Also, don't blow up my notifs, with repetitive left wing B.S. thanks in advance.

It means just as much as the judges Trump appointed.

Read the transcript. You just keep parroting Fox tabloid tv. Do you bother to even watch the cases Trump's involved in or do you refuse to watch the truth because he's your new savior?

The entire Case should ahve been thrown out, there should never be a conviction without proof, Sorry but women lie just as much as men. "Believe all women" is one of the dumbest slogans the left came up with.

I just had someone be very mean in a comment after many replies back and forth. It hurt me a great deal as explained in this factual meme. That's not a nice way to treat people, stereotyping them to accomplish your own conversational ends . I defend Mrs. Deerheart against extremist accusations of leftist BS promotion, and hope you can let go and let be momentary gripes. 9tq94o.jpg (click to show)

this is the liberal BS im talking about, spamming the same garbage over and over like it is going to make it true if she posts it to me 100 times.

maybe it's demotivational. and a contrariness that cannot be helped. if you bring her deficiencies up as a topic of discussion she'll address them more. yet because her behavior will stay the same? you will not get the right result of replies you are hoping for. or if you become critical as i've said that's not right to either of you. she knows you are being unfair and deep down you do to. this cause more caution in you two's interactions which cannot help except strain the replies further. that's why I said the best tactic is to chill. humans are smarter than we think - except for myself; i'm quite dense - and have genuine feeling that lead them to the right outcome. if someone is actually being psycho like i was apparently in my commenting strategy on the Dark Humour stream that one time WHEN I ASKED FOR AN OUT TO BE SO JUST ONCE well then heck be a jerk and block them. no big deal, people also get the bad vibes too!!

agreed, I hold no grudges. Every day is a new beautiful canvas that we paint our lives on.

Actually, you refuse to accept the truth no matter how many times I post it.

all you have done is repost some liberals judge's opinion after the case was settled. I am sorry you think that is truth. In actuality, trump was never convicted of rape. Sorry that destroys your narrative about him.

You can't let comments get to you. They're just comments. Comments indicate a lack of information. People comment what they think without thinking. It's not personal online. These people are strangers that are just venting. Doesn't even count as a conversation really. Just words from strangers.

100% agree ^

A truthfulness shared to be sure; see what we did there: irony! No really one can take things seriously in order to be motivated. Like here with my reply analytically characterizing exactly what you may or may not have imparted. (I feel like the comment police are lurking to expunge my meta-off-topic emoting.)